Compare Google Pixel Watch 3 vs Garmin Forerunner 570

P1 Google Pixel Watch 3
P2 Garmin Forerunner 570

Comparison Takeaways

Google Pixel Watch 3

Where It Has the Edge

  • ECG functionality is 4.4 vs 1.0. ECG is present as part of the health suite, but reviewers tended to mention it alongside other sensors...
  • LTE connectivity is 4.0 vs 1.1. LTE is available but typically framed as an optional paid upgrade rather than a transformative feature.
  • reliability is 4.5 vs 2.3. Reliability was strongest around battery consistency and stable software, though GPS and durability kept it from being flawless.
  • mapping and navigation is 3.9 vs 2.2. Offline Google Maps improved navigation utility, but workout-integrated navigation still lagged specialized sports watches.

Garmin Forerunner 570

Where It Has the Edge

  • cross-platform compatibility is 4.1 vs 2.5. Cross-platform use is solid for notifications on Android and iPhone, but iPhone reply limitations keep it short of...
  • durability is 4.5 vs 2.9. Durability evidence is mostly positive, with bezels, bands, water use, and glass holding up well, though one review...
  • GPS accuracy is 4.7 vs 3.2. GPS accuracy is one of the strongest attributes, with reviewers repeatedly calling tracks excellent, flawless, near-perfect, or among...
  • band quality is 4.4 vs 3.2. The silicone/translucent bands are generally praised for softness, fit, sweat comfort, and durability, with one reviewer noting a...
Average score
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Auto-detection was usually praised for reliable workout or bedtime recognition, though one reviewer said it missed training sessions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Reviewers noted helpful race/activity automation, especially AutoLap timing gates and finish-line cleanup, but evidence is narrow rather than a broad auto-detection theme.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.6

Reviewers liked Wear OS app availability and found the platform close enough to mature smartwatch ecosystems for most users.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Garmin's app ecosystem is useful through Connect IQ and watchface downloads, though reviewers repeatedly describe it as more limited than Apple or Wear OS.

band quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.2

The default band could be comfortable, but reviewers disliked the proprietary connector, strap mechanism, and 45mm band reset.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

The silicone/translucent bands are generally praised for softness, fit, sweat comfort, and durability, with one reviewer noting a strap tail/bump annoyance.

battery life
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.3

Battery life was a consistent improvement, especially on 45mm models, generally landing between a full day and close to two days.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.3

Battery life is divisive: still far better than mainstream smartwatches for some users, but several reviewers saw a drop from the 265 and short always-on endurance.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

Blood oxygen data appears as part of the health metrics stack, but reviewers discussed it as one metric rather than a headline strength.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Blood oxygen tracking is present and used in overnight health tracking, but reviewers mention it as part of the health suite rather than a standout accuracy feature.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Bluetooth was viewed positively for upgraded specs and stable phone pairing, with some ecosystem unlocking benefits tied to connectivity.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.6

Bluetooth supports calls and pairing with phones/sensors, but one reviewer reported frequent phone disconnect notices, making connectivity evidence mixed.

brightness
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Brightness drew strong praise after the jump to 2,000 nits and better sunlight readability.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

Brightness is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers calling the AMOLED screen brighter, vivid, and among Garmin's brightest.

build quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Build quality felt refined and premium, though ruggedness concerns remain separate from the basic construction impression.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Build quality is viewed positively thanks to a robust-feeling case and upgraded aluminum bezel, with no major build concerns outside price-tier omissions.

button controls
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

The crown and side buttons were generally responsive, with reviewers appreciating the haptic crown and physical controls.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

The five-button setup is repeatedly praised for sweaty, rainy, gloved, and swimming use, while also complementing the touchscreen well.

call handling
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Call features were useful, especially Ask to Hold and watch-based call handling, with Pixel phone integration adding value.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Call handling is a solid new smartwatch feature via microphone, speaker, and Bluetooth, though reviewers usually treat it as handy rather than essential.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

Calorie tracking was treated as useful for general fitness context, not as a dedicated precision tool.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Calorie tracking is available and tied into activity details, including pack-weight calculations, but reviewers do not deeply validate calorie accuracy.

charging convenience
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.3

Charging convenience was mixed: the puck could be secure and useful for quick top-ups, but some found accessory options or cable behavior limiting.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.7

Charging convenience is acceptable but not premium: Garmin's connector is functional and fast enough, yet the lack of wireless charging is a recurring caveat.

charging speed
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Charging speed improved meaningfully, with multiple reviewers noting fast partial top-ups and shorter full-charge times.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Charging speed receives positive user evidence, with one long-term reviewer saying it can recharge during a morning shower.

coaching features
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Coaching improved substantially through custom runs, voice cues, Cardio Load, and AI-style suggestions, though it still leans runner-first.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Coaching features are a major strength, including Garmin Coach, triathlon plans, daily workout suggestions, and adaptive training guidance.

comfort
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.6

Comfort was a recurring strength, with reviewers finding both the strap and larger model wearable day and night.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Comfort is broadly strong, with reviewers calling it light and wearable all day; only larger-size sleep comfort and strap buckle issues temper the praise.

companion app quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

The Fitbit app and data presentation were repeatedly praised for clarity and explanation, though Premium still complicates the value.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Garmin Connect is powerful and data-rich, though one reviewer notes its learning curve and depth can feel overwhelming.

contactless payments
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Contactless payments are well supported through Google Wallet or Google Pay and treated as a normal smartwatch strength.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Contactless payment support is confirmed through NFC payments, but reviewers mention it briefly rather than as a major buying reason.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
2.5

Compatibility is good across Android phones but limited by no iPhone support and a few Pixel-exclusive features.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Cross-platform use is solid for notifications on Android and iPhone, but iPhone reply limitations keep it short of Apple Watch-level integration.

customization options
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.7

Customization is decent for watch faces, tiles, and runs, but sport data screens and non-running workouts remain constrained.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Customization is strong across watchfaces, widgets, data fields, layouts, colors, and report options, with several reviewers highlighting personalization.

display quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Display quality was one of the strongest upgrades thanks to bigger screens, slimmer bezels, sharper visuals, and more usable space.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

Display quality is a standout: the AMOLED panel is sharp, vivid, responsive, and frequently cited as a major upgrade.

durability
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
2.9

Durability was a repeated caveat because Gorilla Glass and the domed design lack the rugged protections of some rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Durability evidence is mostly positive, with bezels, bands, water use, and glass holding up well, though one review noted small scratches or heat-related unresponsiveness.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

ECG is present as part of the health suite, but reviewers tended to mention it alongside other sensors rather than testing it deeply.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
1.0

ECG functionality is the clearest omission: many reviewers criticize the lack of ECG despite the newer heart-rate sensor and the price.

fit
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Fit was praised through the flush case, comfortable underside, and wearable larger size.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Fit is praised for secure, no-bounce wear and useful size options, particularly for smaller wrists.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Fitness tracking accuracy was generally strong for workouts and heart-rate-based exercise logging, especially for casual and mainstream use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Fitness tracking accuracy is strong overall, anchored by consistently praised GPS and heart-rate performance across running, cycling, and multisport use.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.2

GPS opinions were mixed to negative: lock-on and casual tracking could be fine, but precision lagged behind stronger sports watches.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest attributes, with reviewers repeatedly calling tracks excellent, flawless, near-perfect, or among the best tested.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Health tracking accuracy was praised when compared with Apple Watch, Fitbit expectations, and reviewer lived experience.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Health tracking is broad and useful, covering heart rate, sleep, stress, skin temperature, respiration, and wellness metrics, but some illness/sleep limitations appear.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.6

Heart rate accuracy was a standout, with several reviewers finding it close to chest straps or leading wearables.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Heart-rate accuracy is highly rated across most reviews, especially for running and intervals, though lab-style testing found some delays and dips.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

LTE is available but typically framed as an optional paid upgrade rather than a transformative feature.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
1.1

LTE connectivity is not offered; reviewers explicitly note the lack of cellular connection or cellular smartwatch capability.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.9

Offline Google Maps improved navigation utility, but workout-integrated navigation still lagged specialized sports watches.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.2

Navigation is the biggest tradeoff: breadcrumb routing works, but the absence of offline/topographic maps is repeatedly criticized at this price.

materials quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Materials felt premium with aluminum cases and curved Gorilla Glass, though the absence of sapphire limited rugged confidence.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Materials quality improves over the 265 with an aluminum bezel and Gorilla Glass, giving the watch a more premium feel.

menu navigation
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Menu navigation improved with the grid launcher and intuitive controls, but some Wear OS screens still required extra scrolling.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Menu navigation is mostly intuitive and easy, supported by buttons, touchscreen, Glances, and refreshed menus, though phantom clicks hurt one review.

music controls
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Music controls and media access were useful, including workout-screen controls and phone or streaming-player control.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Music controls are available alongside notifications and calendar previews, but reviewer evidence is brief.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Onboard storage helps with offline maps and music, making phone-free runs more practical.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Onboard music storage is supported through 8GB storage, MP3s, and streaming-service syncing, giving it better music capability than many sports watches.

operating system experience
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Wear OS was usually described as smooth, polished, and increasingly mature, especially in Google’s own ecosystem.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

The updated operating-system experience is cleaner and more modern, with Garmin aligning the 570 with newer Fenix/Forerunner UI styling.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
5.0

Outdoor visibility was very strong thanks to the 2,000-nit display and better sunlight readability.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.9

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers praising sunlight readability and the bright AMOLED display in harsh outdoor conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Pairing and setup were reliable in the scored reviews, including easy setup and stable use across Android phones.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.6

Pairing and syncing are mixed: some reviewers found smooth iPhone/Strava syncing, while another saw repeated phone disconnects.

recovery insights
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Recovery guidance improved through Readiness, Target Load, and Cardio Load, giving more actionable daily training context.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Recovery insights are a major reason reviewers liked the watch, especially Training Readiness, Body Battery, HRV, and sleep-informed rest guidance.

reliability
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Reliability was strongest around battery consistency and stable software, though GPS and durability kept it from being flawless.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.3

Reliability is mixed: core tracking is reliable, but reviewers cite occasional crashes, overheating unresponsiveness, software bugs, and phantom clicks.

safety features
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Safety features were robust, including fall detection, emergency calls, check-in tools, and loss-of-pulse detection.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Safety features are solid, with LiveTrack, Incident Detection, and safety/tracking features mentioned as part of the package.

size options
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.7

The new 45mm option was one of the most agreed-upon wins, broadening appeal and improving screen and battery life.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Size options are a strength because the 570 comes in 42mm and 47mm, making it more accessible than single-size Garmin alternatives.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Sleep tracking was generally viewed as accurate or useful for timing and sleep context, though not always deeply insightful.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.3

Sleep tracking is useful but not class-leading; some found it reasonably accurate while others called it less robust or less complete than competitors.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.6

Notifications were a core strength, with prompt delivery and enough wrist interaction to reduce phone use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.1

Smartphone notifications work, but evidence is mixed because one reviewer found notification handling intrusive during workouts.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.6

Smartwatch features were broad, including Google app integrations, smart home control, Recorder, TV remote, Wallet, and safety tools.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Smartwatch features improved meaningfully with mic, speaker, calls, voice commands, music, NFC, reports, and notifications, though it is not a full smartwatch.

software smoothness
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.7

Software smoothness was highly rated, with reviewers noting snappy app loading, no perceptible lag, or no stutters.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Software smoothness is generally positive, with reviewers describing the interface as polished, faster, and modern, but not bug-free.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Step counting tested very accurately in one review and reasonably close in another.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Step counting appears accurate in direct step tests and is part of the daily tracking suite.

stress tracking
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.6

Stress tracking was useful for some, especially cEDA responsiveness, but other reviewers found the explanations less actionable.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Stress tracking feeds into readiness and wellness guidance, giving it practical value for recovery decisions.

style and design
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.7

Style and design were a major strength, with repeated praise for the pebble-like, elegant, distinctive look.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Style and design are a standout upgrade, with reviewers praising the colorful, expressive, more premium look.

third-party app support
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.2

Third-party support was good for apps, but external sensor pairing and some data export workflows were limiting.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.5

Third-party app support exists through Connect IQ, but reviewers view Garmin's store as useful yet limited versus full smartwatch platforms.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.6

Touch input was responsive in normal use, though sweat or water could make it less dependable.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Touchscreen responsiveness is widely praised as responsive, fast, and useful, especially alongside the physical buttons.

user interface
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.7

The interface was clean and straightforward overall, despite some round-screen inefficiencies and sparse layouts.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

The user interface is cleaner and easier to navigate than before, though Garmin's learning curve and rare menu quirks remain.

value for money
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.3

Value was mixed: reviewers liked the watch but cited high pricing, cheaper alternatives, or weak upgrade need.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.6

Value for money is the most common concern: reviewers like the watch but repeatedly say the price is high versus the 265, 965, 970, and rivals.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.8

Google Assistant worked well for some tasks, but the lack of Gemini and awkward voice experiences limited enthusiasm.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Voice assistant and command quality is good for watch tasks and commands, while phone-assistant workflows can be clunky or dependent on the phone.

watch face quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.6

Watch faces were mixed, with some reviewers liking Active but others wanting more variety and better defaults.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Watch face quality is strong thanks to customization and readable data layouts, with reviewers highlighting clean default faces and useful widgets.

water resistance
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.3

Water resistance was consistently supported through IP68 and 5ATM claims, suitable for showers and swimming contexts.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Water resistance is well supported for swimming and real-world water exposure, including pools, lakes, ocean use, and a 5ATM rating.

wellness insights
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Wellness insights improved through Morning Brief, Readiness, Cardio Load, and Fitbit health summaries.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Wellness insights are deep and actionable, especially Body Battery, readiness, stress, sleep, and recovery metrics that shape daily decisions.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.3

Wi-Fi connectivity improved through faster 5GHz support and was referenced as part of stable daily connectivity.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
No score yet
workout tracking variety
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

Workout variety is broad enough for casual users, but reviewers repeatedly noted the strongest new tools favor runners.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Workout tracking variety is excellent, with triathlon/multisport support, many sport modes, open-water swimming, gym profiles, and new activity types.