Average score
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Reliable auto-workout detection was praised in multiple reviews, especially for catching walks automatically without much manual input.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
No score yet
app ecosystem
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Reviews consistently praised Wear OS app breadth and the watch’s tight integration with Google services and apps.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.7

The app ecosystem is useful but not expansive. Reviewers mention ConnectIQ apps and data fields, while also noting that Garmin’s ecosystem feels more limited than watchOS or Wear OS.

band quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.7

The included band was comfortable and secure, but some reviewers found the default/first-party strap options plain or pricey.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Band quality is good, with soft silicone straps and positive comments about long-term wear and durability.

battery life
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Battery life was a meaningful improvement, with the 45mm often reaching about two days, while the 41mm remained good rather than class-leading.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.2

Battery life is the biggest tradeoff. Some reviewers still found it good in normal use, but many say the brighter screen makes it noticeably weaker than the 265, especially with always-on display.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

SpO2 tracking is present, and one reviewer said the sleep-related oxygen data matched expected baseline patterns.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

The watch includes blood-oxygen-related health sensing, with reviewers mentioning a pulse oximeter and overnight blood-oxygen or saturation tracking as part of the health stack.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Bluetooth behavior was stable in use, and Google’s Bluetooth 5.3/connectivity refinements were called out positively.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Bluetooth support is functional for phone-linked features and external sensor pairing, including Bluetooth and ANT+ accessory support.

brightness
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

The jump to a brighter 2,000-nit screen was one of the most consistently praised upgrades.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.9

Brightness is a standout strength, with multiple reviews describing the screen as one of Garmin’s brightest and easiest to read outdoors.

build quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Reviewers said the watch feels more refined and better built than earlier Pixel Watches, even if it is not meant for rough abuse.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Build quality feels premium for the line, with one review explicitly describing it as a high-quality watch.

button controls
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

The crown/button setup was generally praised for smooth scrolling, good feel, and useful shortcuts.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

Button controls are one of the watch’s practical strengths. Reviewers like the five-button layout and say it works reliably when touch is less convenient.

call handling
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

Call-handling extras such as hold/screening features add convenience, though this is more about ecosystem utility than speakerphone quality.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Call support is a useful upgrade rather than a must-have killer feature. Reviewers generally found wrist calls workable and clear enough when paired to a phone.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.2

Calorie data was considered useful enough for general training context, but at least one reviewer questioned how accurate the burn estimates felt.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
No score yet
charging convenience
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.1

Charging works securely, but the proprietary pin puck and lack of wireless charging reduce convenience.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.8

Charging convenience is less impressive. Reviewers specifically wanted wireless charging and also called out the proprietary cable setup.

charging speed
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Charging speed was widely seen as improved, making quick top-offs easy.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Charging speed is fine in practice, with one long-term reviewer saying it can top up from empty to full during a shower.

coaching features
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.6

Guided runs, workout builder tools, AI suggestions, and live cues were among the strongest new fitness additions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Coaching features are well developed, especially for runners and triathletes. Garmin Coach plans, daily suggestions, and structured guidance were consistently praised.

comfort
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

The watch and stock band were regularly described as comfortable for all-day wear and overnight tracking.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Comfort is a major plus. Across sizes and use cases, reviewers repeatedly say the watch is easy to wear for workouts, daily use, and even overnight.

companion app quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Fitbit app presentation and dashboards were repeatedly praised as clean, useful, and rich in data.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Garmin Connect is usually viewed positively for depth and data richness, though the new subscription layer is a recurring annoyance in the reviews.

contactless payments
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Google Wallet/contactless payment support was widely treated as a standard, useful smartwatch feature.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

NFC payments are available, giving the watch a useful everyday smartwatch feature beyond training tools.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.4

It works broadly with Android phones, but reviewers repeatedly noted the lack of iPhone support and some Pixel-only extras.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Cross-platform support looks good overall, with smooth iPhone use noted in one review and phone-assistant access highlighted in another.

customization options
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Watch faces, complications, and tiles offer substantial customization, especially on the larger screen.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Customization is a strength. Reviews mention editable glance folders, assignable shortcuts, and flexible watch-face or data layout changes.

display quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Display quality was one of the watch’s clearest strengths, with sharp OLED visuals and more usable screen space.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.8

Display quality is excellent. Reviewers repeatedly call the AMOLED screen brighter, sharper, clearer, and more vivid than the previous generation.

durability
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.3

Durability remains a tradeoff: some owners avoided scratches, but others reported scratching and noted the lack of rugged protection.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Durability impressions are positive. Reviewers mention scratch resistance, pristine condition after use, and very little visible wear over time.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

ECG support is present and treated as a meaningful health feature, though it was not a major focus of deep testing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
1.5

ECG is a clear miss. Reviewers repeatedly call out that the Forerunner 570 lacks ECG despite using Garmin’s newer sensor hardware.

fit
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Both sizes were said to sit well on the wrist, with the 45mm adding space without becoming unwieldy.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.8

Fit is excellent when sized correctly, with reviewers describing the watch as secure, flush on the wrist, and almost second-skin-like.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

General fitness tracking accuracy was viewed positively overall across multiple reviewers.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

Fitness tracking is broadly praised, with one review calling the core tracking accuracy second to none for the watch’s main sports focus.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.0

GPS was the weakest fitness metric, with repeated notes about wobble, drift, or distance errors versus stronger rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.8

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest areas. Across city runs, trails, and side-by-side tests, reviews consistently describe tracking as excellent, flawless, or near flawless.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Reviewers generally trusted the broader health stack for exercise and sleep tracking.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Health stats are generally described as good, with one data-driven review calling overall stat accuracy solid and another saying heart-rate and sleep-stage tracking are pretty good.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Heart-rate tracking was one of the product’s standout strengths, often matching chest straps or top rivals closely.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Heart-rate tracking is a major strength. Multiple reviewers say it stays close to chest straps, performs well in intervals, and is one of Garmin’s better recent sensors.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

LTE support is available across the lineup, though few reviews deeply evaluated LTE performance itself.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
No score yet
materials quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Gorilla Glass and aluminum materials give the watch a polished, premium-feeling finish.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Material choices are a step up from older mid-range Forerunners, especially the aluminum bezel and sturdier-feeling case construction.

menu navigation
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

The grid app launcher and simple navigation flow made moving around the watch easier than before.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Menu navigation is easy to learn and generally straightforward, helped by the refreshed layout and button-plus-touch design.

music controls
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Music and playback controls were easy to access during workouts and from the general UI.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Music controls are present and usable, including the ability to check what is playing from services like Spotify.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

The watch supports offline music/maps and some standalone streaming, making onboard storage meaningfully useful.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Onboard music storage is useful but not generous. Reviews note 8GB of storage and MP3 support, with some calling the capacity a bit stingy.

operating system experience
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Wear OS on the Pixel Watch 3 was widely described as polished and mature.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

The overall software experience is modern and capable. Reviewers describe it as faster, more polished, and close in feel to Garmin’s higher-end models.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Sunlight readability was repeatedly singled out as a big improvement over earlier models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.9

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers saying the display remains easy to read in bright sunlight and other tough conditions.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Pairing/connection behavior was stable, including better persistent Bluetooth pairing and smooth phone transfers.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.4

Pairing reliability is mixed. One reviewer found syncing smooth and seamless, while another reported repeated disconnect-and-reconnect behavior.

recovery insights
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Readiness and load guidance were generally seen as useful and fairly true to how reviewers actually felt.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Recovery guidance is strong. Reviews highlight training readiness, recovery time, and daily summaries that help frame when to push and when to back off.

reliability
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.4

Day-to-day reliability looked solid overall, but software update bumps prevented a spotless verdict.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.7

General reliability is strong, with reviewers saying the watch can be relied on for training and that key controls remain responsive even after submersion.

safety features
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Fall/crash detection and Loss of Pulse were viewed as genuinely valuable safety additions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Safety coverage includes Garmin’s Incident Detection and LiveTrack features for activity sharing and emergency notifications.

size options
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
5.0

The new 45mm option was one of the generation’s biggest upgrades and broadened the watch’s appeal.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.1

Two case sizes broaden the fit range, and multiple reviewers specifically call out the benefit of having both 42mm and 47mm options.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Sleep timing and stage estimates were generally reported as closely matching real-world experience.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.7

Sleep tracking is useful but not flawless. Reviews say it is reasonably accurate and helpful for readiness, though some found it less robust than the best sleep-focused competitors.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Notifications were prompt and remain a core strength of the smartwatch experience.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
3.5

Notifications work, but the experience is mixed. Some reviewers had smooth delivery, while others found text truncated or alerts too persistent on screen.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Smart-home controls, Google TV remote, Recorder, camera controls, and other wrist utilities make the watch feel feature-rich.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.3

Smartwatch features are improved meaningfully with the added speaker, microphone, voice tools, and day-to-day conveniences, even if the watch still prioritizes sport over general smartwatch depth.

software smoothness
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

App loading and general UI movement were frequently described as smooth and lag-free.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.9

Software smoothness is generally strong, but not perfect. Some reviews call the experience polished, while others report crashes or temporary unresponsiveness in edge cases.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Step counting tested very well in at least one direct comparison.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Step counting looked solid in direct testing, with one reviewer finding the watch was off by only around 40 steps in repeated checks.

stress tracking
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.7

Stress sensing/cEDA showed promise, but opinions were mixed on how actionable it feels versus rival platforms.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.2

Stress is part of the recovery picture rather than a headline feature, with one reviewer specifically noting that stress levels feed into the watch’s overall readiness guidance.

style and design
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

The pebble-like design was frequently called stylish, elegant, and distinctive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

The design is widely liked. Reviewers highlight the brighter colors, more expressive styling, and a look that feels more refined than past Forerunners.

third-party app support
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.9

Third-party app support is good by Wear OS standards, though not entirely flawless.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Third-party service support is solid for a sports watch, with repeated mentions of Spotify, Deezer, Amazon Music, and YouTube Music support.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.7

Touch response is strong in normal use, but sweaty or wet interactions can suffer.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.5

Touch response is consistently described as responsive and easy to use, especially alongside the physical-button setup.

user interface
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

The interface was commonly described as intuitive and easy to learn.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

The interface is widely praised for feeling slicker, cleaner, more intuitive, and more modern than older Garmin implementations.

value for money
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.4

Reviewers liked the overall experience, but price came up often as a drawback versus Samsung and some other rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
2.7

Value for money is the main weakness. Most reviews say the watch is too expensive for what it adds over the 265, though a small number of owners still felt very happy with the purchase.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.7

Assistant performance was fine and responsive, but the absence of Gemini kept it from feeling cutting-edge.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.0

Voice features are mostly good for simple commands, timers, and phone-assistant access, though one reviewer reported crashes and awkward behavior with the phone assistant.

watch face quality
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.7

Watch faces are flexible and usable, but several reviewers wanted more variety or deeper customization.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Watch-face customization is strong, with reviewers calling the default face clean and noting that layouts and displayed data can be tailored easily.

water resistance
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

IP68/5ATM protection makes it suitable for swimming and everyday water exposure.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.4

Water resistance is solid for swimming use. Reviews mention pool use, open-water suitability, and repeated use in lakes or the ocean without issue.

wellness insights
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Morning Brief, Readiness, and load metrics were widely seen as genuinely useful wellness additions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.6

Wellness insights are a standout. Body Battery, Sleep Score, energy level, and broader readiness-style insights were repeatedly cited as genuinely useful.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

Wi‑Fi support is standard and Google also highlighted faster 5GHz connectivity on this model.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
No score yet
workout tracking variety
Product 1: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.6

The watch supports many workout types, but reviewers noted that Google still prioritizes runners over some other athletes.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 570
4.8

Workout coverage is excellent. Reviewers repeatedly mention broad activity support, triathlon and multisport tools, and dozens of sport modes.