Average score
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.0

Auto-detection is explicitly criticized in testing, with reviewers saying workouts usually need to be started manually to access the watch’s richer tracking features.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Reviews describe auto-detection as reliable for walks and runs and able to recognize many workout types, though one reviewer treats it more as a convenience backup than a substitute for manually choosing the exact workout.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

The app ecosystem is solid rather than class-leading: reviewers cite Connect IQ support and a healthy app catalog, but not the broader polish or reach of Apple or Wear OS ecosystems.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Reviews highlight lots of available apps, including media and fitness options, and portray the Wear OS app catalog as broad enough to add meaningful utility to the watch.

band quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Band quality is generally good, with flexible silicone straps and solid sweat performance, though silicone can stay damp and irritate skin if not dried after workouts.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

The band system is easy to swap, stays secure in daily wear, and is described as robust, though one review notes that genuine replacement bands are expensive.

battery life
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Battery life is a major strength. Reviewers report multi-day to multi-week endurance depending on usage, with always-on display and GPS workouts reducing runtime but still leaving it ahead of many rivals.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Battery life is consistently one of the watch’s strongest traits, with reviewers reporting anything from roughly 35–36 hours under heavier use to multiple days in lighter real-world use.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

The watch supports blood oxygen tracking and related wellness sensors, but reviewers discuss it more as part of the feature set than as a standout accuracy differentiator.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.7

Blood oxygen tracking is widely available as part of the sensor package, but one long-term review says the SpO2 readings tend to run low, so confidence in the metric is mixed.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Bluetooth connectivity is dependable for phone pairing and headphone playback, with no major complaints in the selected reviews.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
brightness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Brightness is repeatedly praised. Reviewers call the AMOLED screen bright, vivid, and easy to read in varied lighting.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

The display’s brightness is a standout strength in the review that directly measures it, with the screen described as exceptionally bright.

build quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Build quality feels premium overall, helped by the metal or titanium bezel and polished finish, even if outright ruggedness is not the headline strength.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Reviews describe the chassis as rugged and premium, with a solid case that fits the Ultra’s outdoor positioning.

button controls
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Button controls are a clear positive. Multiple reviews praise the tactile hardware buttons and say they remain easy to use during workouts and with gloves.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.8

The Quick button gets positive marks for usefulness and shortcut flexibility, but other reviews dislike the overall button layout or want better workout-time control behavior.

call handling
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.7

Call handling is inconsistent across reviews. One source says calls can be answered via a paired phone, while others explicitly note missing call functionality compared with Garmin’s more smartwatch-focused models.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Reviews confirm that the watch supports speaker-and-mic calling, but they focus more on availability and setup than on deep call-quality analysis.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.1

Calorie tracking is only modestly useful. Calories are visible in daily metrics, but one review says users wanting stronger calorie and intake support should look elsewhere.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
charging convenience
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.5

Charging convenience is a weak point because Garmin still uses a proprietary connector, and reviewers call the port connection delicate while also noting the lack of wireless charging.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

Wireless charging is a plus, but convenience is undercut by Samsung’s decision to omit the wall charging block in the box.

charging speed
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Charging speed is good, with reviewers citing roughly an hour to reach high percentages and quick top-ups that provide meaningful battery in minutes.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Charging looks decent rather than class-leading, with one review citing about 95 minutes for a full charge and another showing a meaningful top-up during a short morning routine.

coaching features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Coaching features are strong, with suggested workouts, race prediction, and readiness-style guidance giving the watch a helpful training-assistant feel.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Running Coach is the standout coaching feature, with reviews describing personalized plans, helpful guidance, and useful support for improving pace or distance.

comfort
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Comfort is a strength for most users thanks to the light, slim build and wearable design, though the large case can still be noticeable for some sleepers or smaller wrists.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Comfort is generally good for a large watch thanks to the straps and wrist feel, but reviewers who prefer smaller watches still notice the size and weight.

companion app quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Companion app quality is mixed. Garmin Connect is praised for depth and data access, but several reviewers also call it confusing or poorly organized in places.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.6

Setup and app integration are smooth, but Samsung’s split between Galaxy Wearable and Samsung Health remains a mild annoyance.

contactless payments
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Contactless payments are available through Garmin Pay, but real-world usefulness depends heavily on bank support, which several reviewers say is still uneven.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Samsung Wallet or Pay access is readily available from the watch and is framed as convenient for payments on the go.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility is strong, with consistent support for both Android and iPhone across reviews.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.8

The watch works with Android phones beyond Samsung, but the best experience is still framed as being inside Samsung’s own ecosystem, and iPhone compatibility is off the table.

customization options
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Customization options are extensive, including watch faces, widgets, data pages, and other configurable on-watch and in-app elements.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

Customization is a major strength, with repeated praise for editable widgets, watch faces, colors, fonts, and shortcut layouts.

display quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Display quality is one of the headline wins. The AMOLED panel is widely described as sharp, vibrant, and transformative compared with older MIP models.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

The display is repeatedly described as large, vibrant, detailed, and excellent to look at, making it one of the clearest strengths in the review set.

durability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Durability is mixed. Some reviewers appreciate the materials and scratch resistance expectations, but several also report real scratches and visible wear sooner than expected.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

The Ultra’s rugged build and durability are repeated positives, with both spec-focused and long-term reviews reinforcing its tough-watch positioning.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

ECG functionality is absent. Multiple reviews explicitly state that the Forerunner 965 does not include ECG hardware or support.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

ECG is supported and easy to access, but Samsung-specific limitations still apply for some advanced health functions.

fit
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Fit is acceptable for many wrists but not ideal for everyone. Several reviews warn that the 47mm case can feel large on smaller wrists.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.3

Fit is polarizing: larger-wrist users like the substantial case, while others call it bulky or simply too big.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

Fitness tracking accuracy is a standout strength, with reviewers praising the consistency of workout metrics and the overall trustworthiness of exercise data.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

General fitness tracking is reviewed positively overall, with one reviewer saying it matched a Garmin closely, but the scientific review still frames it as good enough rather than class-leading.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

GPS accuracy is one of the watch’s clearest strengths, repeatedly described as spot-on, industry-leading, or nearly dead accurate in testing.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

GPS performance is usually described as accurate or very good for normal use, but the scientific review says it is not perfect and trails stronger sports-watch options.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Health tracking accuracy is good overall but not flawless. Reviewers praise the depth and usefulness of health data, while some flag sleep-related inconsistency that affects broader health confidence.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.2

The dedicated scientific review judges the overall health-and-sports tracking package as acceptable rather than elite, with clear room for improvement versus stronger competitors.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Heart rate accuracy is strong for a wrist-based sensor, with several reviewers calling it excellent or near chest-strap performance, though interval lag can still appear.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Heart-rate tracking is solid for running in several reviews, but the scientific review stops short of calling it best-in-class.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

LTE connectivity is absent. Reviews explicitly note that the watch lacks LTE or mobile internet support.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

LTE availability is a clear Ultra advantage, with reviewers appreciating phone-free use and noting that LTE is standard on this model.

materials quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Materials quality is solid, with repeated mentions of titanium, Gorilla Glass, and generally premium-feeling hardware choices.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Titanium construction and premium materials are central to the Ultra’s identity and are repeatedly cited as meaningful differentiators.

menu navigation
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Menu navigation is generally good once learned, with reviewers highlighting customizable widgets and easy menu flow, though Garmin’s depth can still feel dense at first.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.6

Navigation is serviceable and helped by touch and haptics, but several reviews still miss a true rotating control or want better workout-time interactions.

music controls
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Music controls are well covered for a sports watch, with reviewers noting onboard player controls and convenient workout use.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Music access is integrated into the interface, with reviewers noting Spotify-aware controls and quick access from the watch.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Onboard music storage is a strength thanks to offline music support and ample storage for playlists, maps, and media.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

The move to 64GB is one of the clearest 2025 upgrades and is repeatedly framed as useful for storing music, podcasts, or other offline content directly on the watch.

operating system experience
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

The operating system experience is capable but not always elegant. Reviewers appreciate the depth and button-first control options, yet some still describe Garmin’s interface conventions as archaic or complex.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

One UI Watch and One UI 8 are portrayed as feature-rich and modern, with newer software bringing visible interface changes and new capabilities.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Outdoor visibility is a clear positive. Reviewers say the AMOLED screen remains readable outdoors and in direct sun, even if some still prefer MIP’s look.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Outdoor readability is a clear strength, with multiple reviews saying the screen stays readable in bright sun.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Pairing reliability is strong, with quick phone pairing and dependable syncing or headphone use in the selected reviews.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

Setup is described as immediate and hassle-free in the review that directly covers pairing.

recovery insights
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Recovery insights are a major strength, especially through Training Readiness, recovery time, and related load metrics that help guide training decisions.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.8

The recovery-style insight layer exists, but the long-term review says the recommendations often feel off or unhelpful.

reliability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Reliability is broadly strong. Reviewers describe stable tracking, dependable uploads, and few serious failures in day-to-day use.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.2

One review notes occasional display interruptions, suggesting that everyday reliability is good but not flawless.

safety features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Safety features are meaningful, with reviewers highlighting LiveTrack and fall detection as useful extras for training and outdoor use.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Safety-minded setup options and the built-in siren add real appeal for outdoor-focused users.

size options
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.8

Size options are limited because the Forerunner 965 is effectively a one-size model, which can be restrictive for smaller-wrist users.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.0

Multiple reviews call out the lack of size choice, noting that the watch comes only in a single 47mm configuration.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Sleep tracking accuracy is one of the most mixed areas. Some reviewers call it excellent or improved versus older Garmins, while others say the results can feel off or inconsistent.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.6

Sleep tracking is useful but mixed: some reviews call the stages relatively accurate, while others say certain sleep metrics still miss obvious awake time.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Smartphone notifications work well enough for viewing alerts, but several reviews point out limitations around interaction and reply behavior, especially on iPhone.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Notifications are easy to access from the main interface and behave like a normal smartwatch strength.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Smartwatch features are good for a training watch, including notifications, music, and payments, but they still trail more full-fledged smartwatches in polish and breadth.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

The Ultra is consistently described as feature-packed, combining fitness tools with everyday smart features like calls, texts, and assistant access.

software smoothness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Software smoothness is a strong point, with reviewers describing the interface as fluid and largely free of lag or stutter.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Day-to-day performance is smooth in the review that directly comments on software behavior, with fast app launches and fluid operation.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Step counting accuracy is strong in the selected evidence, including one low-error test result and praise for the visible real-time counter.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

One detailed long-term review found step counts spot-on in normal walking, while also noting that locked-arm situations can reduce accuracy.

stress tracking
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Stress tracking is well integrated into Garmin’s broader readiness and wellness stack, with reviewers frequently citing it as one of the useful day-to-day metrics.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
style and design
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Style and design are widely praised, with the AMOLED display, slimmer body, and premium bezel helping the 965 look more modern and upscale than earlier Forerunners.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Design reactions are mixed: some reviewers like the rugged adventure look and color options, while others find the watch too big or not especially attractive.

third-party app support
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Third-party app support is good, with Connect IQ apps plus integrations like Strava and TrainingPeaks adding flexibility for training and data workflows.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Third-party fitness and media apps are part of the appeal, with examples like Spotify, Strava, Map My Run, and Hole19 explicitly mentioned.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Touchscreen responsiveness is generally praised, with reviewers saying touch makes navigation easy and smooth when they choose to use it.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
user interface
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

The user interface is improved and easier on the eyes than earlier Forerunners, with smoother visuals and a more modern presentation.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

The updated UI is generally viewed as more functional and easier to organize, though some reviewers still think Samsung’s visual design language looks odd or over-layered.

value for money
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.8

Value for money is mixed. Several reviewers think the feature set can justify the price, but others say many buyers would be better served by cheaper Garmin alternatives.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.4

Value is the biggest caveat. Reviews repeatedly say the watch is hard to justify at launch price unless you specifically want the Ultra’s rugged build, LTE, or extra storage.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

Voice assistant functionality is absent. Reviews explicitly note there is no voice assistant, microphone-based response system, or similar wrist voice feature.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Gemini and voice-assistant access are treated as genuinely useful additions, especially for quick hands-free interactions from the wrist.

watch face quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Watch face quality is good overall, especially visually on the AMOLED display, but some reviewers also note fewer face options than previous Garmin experiences.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Watch faces are a standout strength, with repeated praise for variety, aesthetics, and customization depth.

water resistance
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Water resistance is strong, with repeated confirmation of 5ATM or 50-meter suitability for swimming and everyday water exposure.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Reviews consistently frame the watch as well-suited to water exposure, with strong resistance credentials and real-world confidence for wet conditions.

wellness insights
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Wellness insights are a major selling point, with Body Battery, sleep scores, readiness-style guidance, and rest cues making daily health data more actionable.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.6

Wellness features like Energy Score, guidance, and metric explanations add context, but some reviewers feel parts of the insight layer are generic or gimmicky.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is useful for tasks like map or music downloads, though it is not framed as especially fast or notable compared with other core features.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
workout tracking variety
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Workout tracking variety is excellent, with broad multisport coverage, triathlon support, and many workout modes ranging from yoga to golf and hiking.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Workout support is broad, with reviewers describing lots of trackable activities and something for nearly everyone.