Compare Suunto Race S vs Garmin Approach S70

P1 Suunto Race S
P2 Garmin Approach S70

Comparison Takeaways

Suunto Race S

Where It Has the Edge

  • software smoothness is 4.2 vs 2.4. Software smoothness is improved over earlier Suunto experiences, though one review still noted minor lag.
  • operating system experience is 4.2 vs 3.2. The operating system feels simpler and more focused than Garmin, with reviewers noting improved organization and responsiveness.
  • user interface is 3.4 vs 2.5. The user interface is functional but divisive, with comments ranging from easy to find features to less intuitive...
  • value for money is 4.7 vs 3.9. Value for money is one of the strongest agreements, with reviewers repeatedly calling the feature set unusually strong...

Garmin Approach S70

Where It Has the Edge

  • activity auto-detection is 4.6 vs 1.0. Auto-detection is supported mainly through automatic shot tracking and measured-shot behavior, with positive convenience but some manual confirmation...
  • onboard music storage is 4.5 vs 1.1. Onboard music storage is a clear plus, with multiple reviewers noting downloaded songs or playlists from services such...
  • contactless payments is 3.7 vs 1.0. Contactless payments are available through Garmin Pay, but evidence is mixed because bank support and setup can be...
  • health tracking accuracy is 4.5 vs 2.7. Reviewers describe broad health tracking as useful and Garmin-level accurate, especially when combining sleep, stress, heart rate, pulse...
Average score
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.7
Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.3
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Suunto Race S
1.0

Activity auto-detection is weak in the available evidence, with one review saying not to expect auto exercise detection.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Auto-detection is supported mainly through automatic shot tracking and measured-shot behavior, with positive convenience but some manual confirmation or sensor caveats.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.3

The app ecosystem is strong for routes, TrainingPeaks-style workflows and SuuntoPlus-style extensions.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

The Garmin ecosystem is praised for tying golf, fitness, watch faces, and Connect IQ-style additions together.

band quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.0

Band quality is mostly positive for comfort and fastening, with some concerns about stickiness or discoloration.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Band quality is mixed: reviewers like comfort and integrated looks, but several dislike the molded strap not laying flat or prefer older straps.

battery life
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.2

Battery life is strong for an AMOLED sports watch, though real-world daily use can fall below the largest headline claims.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.9

Battery life is one of the strongest positives, with reviewers reporting long smartwatch use, multiple rounds, and much better endurance than Apple Watch comparisons.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Suunto Race S
2.8

Blood oxygen is present, but evidence is thin and one reviewer called overnight SpO2 readings unreliable.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Pulse ox and blood oxygen tracking are present in several reviews and treated as part of the S70’s higher-end health sensor package.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.1

Bluetooth works for sensors and notifications, but reviewers noted sensor-management limits and pairing compromises.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Bluetooth connectivity is supported through Bluetooth music and headphone pairing, though the evidence is functional rather than deeply evaluated.

brightness
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.6

Brightness is consistently praised, especially for the AMOLED screen and route-following visibility.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
5.0

Brightness is repeatedly praised, with reviewers describing the screen as bright, crisp, colorful, and clear.

build quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.8

Build quality is praised as premium for the price, including strong comments on watch and strap construction.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Build quality is viewed positively, with reviewers describing a lightweight, well-designed build and confidence-inspiring construction.

button controls
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.0

Button controls are mixed: the physical layout helps, but the crown is repeatedly described as tricky or awkward.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Button controls are generally praised, with reviewers liking the three-button setup and easy navigation support.

call handling
Product 1: Suunto Race S
2.8

Call handling is limited to alerts rather than true calling, matching the watch’s training-first focus.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
2.7

Call handling is limited because reviewers say the watch can show or manage calls but cannot be used to actually speak through the watch.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.3

Calorie tracking is mentioned as part of basic workout feedback, but reviewer evidence is limited.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
No score yet
charging convenience
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.6

Charging convenience is mixed: speed helps, but the proprietary cradle and alignment requirements can be inconvenient.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.1

Charging convenience is mixed to negative, with reviewers repeatedly mentioning proprietary charging, USB-C adapter issues, and awkward face-down charging.

charging speed
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.6

Charging speed is a strength, with several reviewers reporting roughly 40 minutes to an hour or rapid top-ups.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Charging speed has limited but positive support from one reviewer who says it does not take long to fully charge.

coaching features
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.4

Coaching is mixed: structured workouts and climb guidance help, but reviewers missed richer training plans or daily suggested workouts.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Coaching features are one of the S70’s strongest themes, with virtual caddie, PlaysLike, club suggestions, shot dispersion, and scoring advice appearing across many reviews.

comfort
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.3

Comfort is generally positive, especially for daily wear, though some found sleep wear or bulk less ideal.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Comfort is a major strength, with reviewers saying the watch disappears, sits comfortably, and does not bother them during golf or sleep.

companion app quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.3

The companion app is a standout for routes, maps and clean design, though a few reviewers wanted a more intuitive experience.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Companion app quality is generally positive, especially Garmin Golf for round data, stats, and ecosystem value, with setup requirements noted.

contactless payments
Product 1: Suunto Race S
1.0

Contactless payments are absent, making this a clear weakness for users who rely on wrist payments.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.7

Contactless payments are available through Garmin Pay, but evidence is mixed because bank support and setup can be limiting in some regions.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.4

Cross-platform phone support is solid, with explicit evidence for both Android and Apple compatibility.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.2

Cross-platform compatibility is positive overall because the watch pairs with iPhone and Android, though notification controls differ by platform.

customization options
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.3

Customization is strong across watch faces, widgets, map layers and personalized sport modes.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Customization is strong, with reviewers noting data fields, colors, golf settings, watch faces, and movable pin or flag controls.

display quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.6

Display quality is a major strength, with AMOLED sharpness, color and resolution praised across reviews.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

Display quality is the strongest consensus attribute: reviewers repeatedly praise the AMOLED screen’s sharpness, clarity, color, and impact on maps.

durability
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.9

Durability is generally solid, but the switch from sapphire to Gorilla Glass and 50m rating creates some caveats.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Durability has limited direct support but is positive where mentioned, with the scratch-proof lens cited.

fit
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.6

Fit is a strength for smaller wrists and active use, with secure strap fit and reduced case size praised.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Fit is positive, helped by wrist comfort, swing clearance, and the smaller 42mm option for users who found larger cases too big.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.2

Fitness tracking is generally competent for workouts, but wrist-HR weaknesses affect confidence in some activities.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Fitness and shot-tracking accuracy is mostly positive, with reviewers praising Garmin-level sensor accuracy and convenient data, though some note shot-tracking limitations.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.8

GPS accuracy is one of the strongest consensus positives, with reviewers praising precise tracks across runs, rides, trails and mapping use.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

GPS and yardage accuracy are consistently praised, including quick GPS lock, accurate yardages, and close agreement with rangefinder-style measurements.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Race S
2.7

Health tracking is usable for HRV-style context, but reviewers flagged weak sleep-stage reliability and inconsistent body-resource style metrics.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Reviewers describe broad health tracking as useful and Garmin-level accurate, especially when combining sleep, stress, heart rate, pulse ox, and fitness metrics.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.3

Heart rate accuracy is the clearest split: some reviewers saw improved or precise running/swim data, while many still recommended a chest strap.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Heart rate appears as part of the S70’s fitness and wellness tracking, with reviewers treating it as a useful everyday metric rather than a golf-only add-on.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Suunto Race S
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

Mapping and navigation are a major strength, with detailed hole maps, hazard views, pin movement, blind-shot tools, and full-color course layouts repeatedly praised.

materials quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.2

Materials quality is good for the price, with steel, titanium and Gorilla Glass mentioned, though the plastic body and non-sapphire lens are tradeoffs.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Materials quality is positive in the available evidence, especially the ceramic bezel and premium-feeling build.

menu navigation
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.2

Menu navigation takes practice; reviewers described the logic as initially confusing despite short navigation paths once learned.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.9

Menu navigation is mixed: several reviews praise simple starts and quick menus, while touch-heavy hole navigation frustrates one reviewer.

music controls
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.9

Music control from a phone works across reviews, but it is not the same as phone-free playback.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.6

Music controls are present, but reviewers split between liking access and finding Garmin’s menu path less convenient than Apple Watch behavior.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Suunto Race S
1.1

Onboard music storage is a repeated limitation, with several reviewers saying there is no real music storage or streaming support.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Onboard music storage is a clear plus, with multiple reviewers noting downloaded songs or playlists from services such as Spotify or Amazon Music.

operating system experience
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.2

The operating system feels simpler and more focused than Garmin, with reviewers noting improved organization and responsiveness.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.2

Operating system experience is mixed: one reviewer finds Garmin software mostly intuitive, while another says the OS hurts enjoyment on the course.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.6

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers reporting easy readability in sun, shade and outdoor workouts.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.9

Outdoor visibility is excellent across reviews, with several reviewers saying bright sunlight or sun glare did not prevent easy reading.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.6

Pairing is easy for the phone and external HR monitors, but multi-sensor management is a notable limitation.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
5.0

Pairing reliability has limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer calling phone pairing straightforward through Garmin’s apps.

recovery insights
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.0

Recovery insights are a real part of the platform, using HRV, sleep and training load, though presentation varies by reviewer.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Recovery insight evidence is limited but supported by HRV readiness language, tying recovery-style feedback to sleep and heart-rate variability.

reliability
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.7

Reliability is strong where tested long-term, with no GPS drops, data loss or signal dropouts reported by key reviewers.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Reliability is mixed: GPS/course lock and battery endurance are praised, but one reviewer reports missed shot detections.

safety features
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.1

Safety features center on Find Back, offline maps, route guidance and battery reminders, all useful for outdoor use.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Safety features have limited support, with one guide noting an assistance/fall-detection-style safety feature.

size options
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.2

Size options improve wearability versus the larger Race, with reviewers praising the smaller 45mm format.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Size options are widely praised because the S70 offers both smaller and larger versions, though color choices are limited in some reviews.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Race S
2.8

Sleep tracking drew repeated caveats, from underreported sleep and night comfort issues to poor sleep-stage confidence.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.3

Sleep tracking gets frequent attention, with reviewers noting sleep scores, deep sleep or REM data, and morning feedback, though one reviewer questions how helpful the messaging feels.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.5

Smartphone notifications work for basic mirroring, though some reviewers found presentation limited.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.6

Notifications are useful but mixed: reviewers like seeing messages and alerts, yet some call them distracting or limited for replies and conversation flow.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.1

Smartwatch features are intentionally basic: notifications, music control and widgets are present, but advanced smartwatch tools are limited.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Smartwatch features are strong for a golf watch, but reviewers still flag limitations compared with dedicated Apple or Android smartwatches.

software smoothness
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.2

Software smoothness is improved over earlier Suunto experiences, though one review still noted minor lag.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
2.4

Software smoothness is a noted weakness in limited evidence, especially around pan-and-zoom behavior on the course.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.0

Step counting is mixed: one reviewer found totals similar to Garmin, while another saw substantial undercounting.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.2

Step counting is mentioned positively in limited evidence, mainly as an advanced counter one reviewer found useful.

stress tracking
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.1

Stress tracking appears mainly through training-stress metrics, with reviewers noting Training Stress Score and Training Stress Balance displays.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Stress tracking is widely mentioned; some reviewers found it surprisingly accurate or habit-changing, while one reviewer considered it less valuable.

style and design
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.6

Style and design are standout positives, with reviewers repeatedly calling the watch sleek, premium or great-looking.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

Style and design are positive, with reviewers calling the S70 stylish, modern, and suitable beyond the course.

third-party app support
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.9

Third-party support is useful through SuuntoPlus and connected services, but on-watch app limits hold it back.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Third-party app support is useful but not always seamless, with Connect IQ and downloadable apps/features appearing as the main support path.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.0

Touchscreen responsiveness is mostly good or improved, with some caveats around ultimate slickness and moisture sensitivity.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Touchscreen responsiveness is mixed: some reviewers find it good or responsive, while others find on-course panning and zooming fiddly.

user interface
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.4

The user interface is functional but divisive, with comments ranging from easy to find features to less intuitive than rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
2.5

User interface evidence is limited but negative where cited, focused on the touchscreen interface feeling fiddly during golf use.

value for money
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.7

Value for money is one of the strongest agreements, with reviewers repeatedly calling the feature set unusually strong for the price.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.9

Value for money is mixed but generally favorable for advanced golfers: reviewers praise value if using the full feature set, while warning basic-yardage users can spend less.

watch face quality
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.0

Watch faces are customizable and improved, though at least one reviewer still wanted third-party watch faces.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Watch face quality is well supported, with reviewers praising built-in faces, Connect IQ options, and the AMOLED screen making faces look better.

water resistance
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.9

Water resistance is adequate for swimming and normal use, but it is lower than the larger Race.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Water resistance is positive, with reviewers citing 5 ATM or 50-meter ratings and shower/swim use.

wellness insights
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.7

Wellness insights exist and can be helpful, but they stay relatively low-key and are not always as persuasive as Garmin-style metrics.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Wellness insights are a major differentiator, especially Body Battery, sleep, stress, energy, and Garmin’s explanations of what the metrics mean.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Race S
3.8

Wi-Fi is mainly useful for map downloads and syncing map regions, with the process often tied to the app and charger.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is lightly supported by setup/menu evidence showing the watch can connect to Wi-Fi for updates.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Suunto Race S
4.7

Workout variety is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly citing broad sport modes, triathlon support and multisport coverage.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Workout variety is a clear strength, with reviewers citing running, cycling, swimming, yoga, skiing, pickleball, and other activity modes.