Average score
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.9
Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.2
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
5.0

One review says the watch can identify logged strength movements on its own and surface the specific exercise afterward.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
No score yet
app ecosystem
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.2

Reviewers say the app store exists and offers some utilities, but the overall ecosystem is smaller and less polished than Apple or Google storefronts.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

Garmin’s broader golf ecosystem was praised for keeping practice, round, and device data inside one connected setup.

band quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Included silicone straps are described as comfortable, easy to clean, and soft with good adjustability.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.6

The integrated strap feels comfortable on the wrist, but several reviewers disliked that it does not lay flat when removed.

battery life
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.6

Battery life is a standout, with many reviewers getting about a week to 10 days under heavier use and up to the advertised multi-week runtime under lighter use.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Battery life was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers consistently reporting multi-round endurance and far longer runtime than an Apple Watch.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

Reviewers confirm SpO2 tracking is part of the health suite, though detailed accuracy validation is limited.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.2

Pulse ox and blood-oxygen tracking are included and were cited as part of the S70’s broader health monitoring suite.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Bluetooth support worked for calls and external sensor pairing in the review that directly tested it.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Bluetooth audio support is present for music listening, with reviewers noting headphone pairing and Bluetooth music use.

brightness
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

The display’s 2,000-nit peak brightness is highlighted as a clear strength.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

The screen was consistently described as bright enough for sunny rounds and easy to read in strong light.

build quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.3

Reviewers describe the watch as solid and premium-feeling for the price.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.3

Reviewers described the watch as well built, with a premium feel that matches its flagship positioning.

button controls
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.3

The crown and buttons generally work well, but some reviewers wanted better default logic or more customization.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.3

The three-button layout was generally seen as easy to learn and helpful for navigating golf functions.

call handling
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.9

Bluetooth calling is available and generally clear, though it remains phone-tethered.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
2.9

Call support is limited: reviewers noted caller alerts and some answer or reject options, but not full on-watch calling.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.8

Calories are surfaced in workout summaries and daily reports, making them useful as part of broader activity tracking.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
No score yet
charging convenience
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.2

Charging uses a small proprietary USB-C-compatible cradle or puck; functional, but not especially elegant.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.1

Charging drew frequent criticism because of the proprietary cable, face-down setup, and lack of an included adapter in some boxes.

charging speed
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.9

Charging is reasonably quick, usually landing around 1 to 2 hours for a full refill.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

At least one reviewer said the watch tops up quickly enough that short charging windows are practical.

coaching features
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.0

Zepp Coach and AI plans are present, but usefulness is mixed, with some reviewers finding them generic or not especially insightful.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Virtual Caddie, PlaysLike tools, and tempo coaching were major selling points, though the tempo feature was not equally useful for every reviewer.

comfort
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Multiple reviewers say the Balance 2 wears comfortably for daily use and training despite its size.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Comfort was a consistent strength, with reviewers saying the watch wears lightly and remains comfortable for all-day and overnight use.

companion app quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.8

The Zepp app is feature-rich and improving, though some reviewers still find parts of it busy or less polished than top rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Garmin Golf was described as one of the better golf apps for stats, post-round review, and tying watch data together.

contactless payments
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
2.3

Zepp Pay exists, but support is region- and bank-dependent and not as seamless as Apple Pay.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.7

Garmin Pay is built in, but support can be uneven depending on bank compatibility and region.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Reviewers explicitly note support for both Android and iOS.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

The watch works with both iPhone and Android, though some reviewers noted better notification control on Android.

customization options
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Watch faces, widgets and button behavior offer meaningful customization.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Reviewers liked the ability to change watch faces, colors, data fields, and golf display settings.

display quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

The AMOLED panel is widely praised for sharpness and clarity.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.8

The AMOLED display was one of the product’s standout strengths, praised for crisp detail, color, clarity, and a premium look.

durability
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Sapphire protection and rugged construction give reviewers confidence for workouts and rougher use.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Evidence pointed to solid durability, including a scratch-proof lens and confidence for regular golf use.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
1.0

Reviewers explicitly note that ECG is missing.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
No score yet
fit
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.3

The watch fits comfortably for tested reviewers, but its larger case may suit some wrists better than others.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Fit was widely praised, and the added 42mm option helped make the watch more comfortable for smaller wrists.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.3

Reviewers generally describe fitness tracking as accurate, especially for running and everyday workout stats.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

At least one reviewer explicitly said the S70’s fitness and sensor data are as accurate as expected from Garmin.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.2

GPS is widely praised, though a few reviews note occasional underreporting or less consistency than the best Garmins.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Reviewers repeatedly praised fast GPS lock and very accurate on-course yardages, with some comparisons landing within about a yard.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.1

Across heart rate, sleep and general wellness metrics, reviewers usually found the data credible, with some algorithm generosity noted.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Health tracking was generally viewed as trustworthy, with reviewers calling the readings accurate in typical Garmin fashion.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.4

Heart rate tracking is one of the stronger areas, performing well in multiple comparisons, though not perfect in every scenario.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Heart-rate tracking was included in the praised sensor package, with one reviewer explicitly describing Garmin-level accuracy.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
1.0

Reviewers explicitly state there is no LTE or cellular option.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
No score yet
materials quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.3

Aluminum, polymer and sapphire materials feel premium for the price.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Ceramic bezels and quality strap materials gave the watch a more premium feel than cheaper golf models.

menu navigation
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.7

Core controls are accessible, but some reviewers found deeper menus busy or slightly overwhelming at first.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.8

Navigation was mostly described as intuitive once learned, though one reviewer felt the interface had a steeper learning curve.

music controls
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.8

Basic music playback controls are available and work as expected.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.0

Music controls are available, but some reviewers found them less immediate than on an Apple Watch.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.8

Local music storage is available with 32GB onboard, but it relies on manual file syncing rather than streaming.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.2

Reviewers confirmed on-watch music storage and offline playlist support from services like Spotify and Amazon Music.

operating system experience
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Zepp OS is described as fluid and responsive in day-to-day use.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.7

The software experience is capable and feature rich, but several reviewers still preferred mainstream smartwatches for daily smartwatch polish.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

Most reviewers had no issue reading the screen outdoors, though one scientific review reported glare or visibility concerns in bright sun.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Outdoor readability was a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly saying the screen stays visible in bright sunshine.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Setup and syncing are described as quick and easy in the review that covered pairing.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Initial phone pairing was described as simple and straightforward in setup.

recovery insights
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.1

Readiness, recovery time and BioCharge-style insights are useful to several reviewers, though not all training metrics feel fully mature.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

Body Battery, HRV, and readiness-style insights added useful recovery context, though not every reviewer found them equally valuable.

reliability
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

Reviewers generally describe tracking performance as dependable across regular use.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.0

Core performance was strong, but one reviewer did flag missed shot detections as a reliability blemish.

size options
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.5

The new two-size lineup was seen as a meaningful improvement, especially for golfers who found earlier Garmin golf watches too large.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
3.8

Sleep duration and broad sleep data are often viewed as reasonable, but some reviewers say sleep scoring or stage detail can be generous or weaker than the best trackers.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.1

Sleep tracking was viewed positively overall, with reviewers calling it strong and engaging enough to check regularly.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

Notifications come through reliably and can sometimes be interacted with, but the experience still trails top smartwatch platforms.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.3

Notifications are available and customizable to a degree, but multiple reviewers said they can feel distracting or limited versus Apple Watch behavior.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

The Balance 2 covers a solid mid-tier smartwatch feature set, but it is not as full-featured as Apple Watch or Wear OS devices.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Beyond golf, reviewers consistently saw the S70 as a full-featured smartwatch with strong everyday usefulness.

software smoothness
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.4

General scrolling and animation smoothness are frequently praised, though occasional stutters are noted.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.5

Software smoothness was mixed: some reviewers said the watch is enjoyable to use, while others found parts of the interface annoyingly clunky.

stress tracking
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

Stress tracking is present and described as responsive or useful in daily monitoring.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.3

Stress tracking was repeatedly called useful, and at least two reviewers said the readings felt surprisingly accurate.

style and design
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.5

Reviewers like the sporty yet polished circular design.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

The S70’s styling was widely praised as modern, premium, and suitable away from the course.

third-party app support
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
2.0

Third-party support remains limited, with repeated complaints about missing major services like Spotify and a smaller store.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.4

Support for services like Spotify and Apple Music added useful flexibility beyond Garmin’s own apps.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

The touchscreen is usually responsive, though one reviewer found it a little too sensitive.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.9

Touch response was generally good, but several reviewers said on-course map interaction can feel fiddly compared with the best smartwatches.

user interface
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

The on-watch UI is intuitive once learned, but feature density can make it feel busy.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.6

The interface is functional and often intuitive, but some reviewers still found it less elegant than Apple Watch-style software.

value for money
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.6

Value is one of the watch’s biggest strengths, with many reviewers saying it packs a lot in for the price.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
3.9

Value was judged through the lens of needs: reviewers often felt the S70 earns its price for serious golfers, but agreed it is overkill for basic yardage users.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.0

Zepp Flow is seen as capable and convenient for basic queries and watch control.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
No score yet
watch face quality
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
2.5

Watch face selection exists, but preloaded faces and the overall catalog draw lukewarm reactions.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Watch faces were praised for looking better on the AMOLED screen and offering better everyday appeal than older golf watches.

water resistance
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.7

Water resistance is a major strength, with 10 ATM support and repeated praise for swim and dive readiness.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.6

Reviewers cited shower and swim use plus a 5 ATM rating as evidence that the S70 handles water exposure confidently.

wellness insights
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
4.3

Reviewers like the app’s wellness insights, especially when they tie sleep, training, food logging or daily readiness together.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.7

Wellness insights were a major positive, especially when the watch explained what sleep, workout, and energy metrics actually meant.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Amazfit Balance 2
5.0

Workout variety is excellent, with more than 170 modes and support for niche activities like golf and Hyrox.

Product 2: Garmin Approach S70
4.2

The S70 supports a wide range of non-golf workouts, including running, swimming, cycling, yoga, and other activity profiles.