Compare Huawei Watch Fit 4 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)

P1 Huawei Watch Fit 4
P2 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)

Comparison Takeaways

Huawei Watch Fit 4

Where It Has the Edge

  • cross-platform compatibility is 3.9 vs 2.4. Cross-platform compatibility is acceptable across Android and iOS, but reviewers flag missing iOS features such as Petal Maps...
  • value for money is 4.6 vs 3.3. Value for money is one of the strongest consensus points, with reviewers repeatedly calling the watch affordable, good...
  • size options is 4.4 vs 3.4. Style and design are widely praised, with reviewers describing the watch as elegant, premium, stylish, and Apple Watch-like.
  • recovery insights is 4.3 vs 3.5. Recovery insights are present through recovery time, training load, and training index metrics.

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)

Where It Has the Edge

  • ECG functionality is 4.1 vs 1.8. ECG functionality is widely listed as part of the health feature set, though one review notes Samsung-phone pairing...
  • voice assistant quality is 4.4 vs 2.4. Voice assistant quality is a strength with Gemini, which reviewers describe as convenient, useful, and directly available on...
  • contactless payments is 4.5 vs 2.5. Contactless payments are supported through Samsung Wallet or Samsung Pay shortcuts.
  • Wi-Fi connectivity is 4.0 vs 2.0. Wi-Fi support is present across connectivity mentions, including LTE/Wi-Fi model references.
Average score
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.1
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.0

Workout auto-detection is directly mentioned as handy, though only one review discusses it and notes battery tradeoffs around keeping it enabled.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Workout auto-detection is broadly useful, with reviewers citing automatic workout detection and reliable walk detection, though manual starts remain better for some activities.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
3.0

Reviewers describe the core Huawei feature set as useful, but the app ecosystem is limited compared with fuller smartwatch platforms.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

The app ecosystem is a strength: reviewers mention many available apps, Google Play access, and expanded usefulness from the extra storage.

band quality
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.2

Bands and strap hardware draw mostly positive comments, with easy removal, secure fit, and good strap quality across several reviews.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

Band feedback is mostly positive for comfort, stability, and easy removal, though one reviewer noted dirt collecting in the strap holes.

battery life
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.5

Battery life is one of the strongest recurring positives, with reviewers reporting roughly a week or more depending on always-on display and usage.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, often described as the best in Samsung’s lineup, though heavy GPS or always-on use can reduce it.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.1

SpO2 tracking is present and repeatedly included among the watch's health metrics, with reviewers treating it as part of a solid wellness set.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Blood oxygen tracking is present across the health sensor set, but one long-term reviewer found SpO2 readings routinely low.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.2

Bluetooth support is generally positive for calls, external sensors, and earbuds, with Bluetooth 5.2 and pairing use cases called out.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

Bluetooth support is present, including Bluetooth 5.3 mentions, but external sensor connections were criticized or described as unavailable.

brightness
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.7

Brightness is a clear strength, with multiple reviewers highlighting the 2,000-nit peak and comfortable visibility.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Brightness earns strong praise, with reviewers citing high nits, bright AMOLED output, and easy readability.

build quality
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.5

Build quality is praised as premium for the price, with aluminum construction and lightweight feel repeatedly mentioned.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Build quality is consistently praised through the rugged titanium case, durable chassis, and robust construction.

button controls
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.3

The crown and button setup is positively described, with reviewers finding the controls more integrated and handy for scrolling.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.7

Button controls are mixed: reviewers like the Quick/action button and programmable shortcuts, but one long-term reviewer disliked accidental presses and limited workout button behavior.

call handling
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.3

Call handling is good for a budget smartwatch, especially speaker loudness and Bluetooth calling, though one review notes clarity is not the crispest.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Call handling is supported through Bluetooth calling, speaker/mic use, and smartwatch features for calls and texts.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
3.8

Calorie tracking is only lightly supported, but one review values seeing calories alongside steps and heart rate on the watch face.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Calorie tracking is included as part of the activity metrics, but the evidence is limited to feature availability rather than deep accuracy testing.

charging convenience
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.2

Charging convenience is mostly positive thanks to fast top-ups, secure magnetic charging, and wireless charging mentions, but proprietary charging is a caveat.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.8

Charging is wireless and reasonably convenient, but one reviewer criticized the missing wall charging block.

charging speed
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.4

Charging speed is consistently strong, with several reviews citing a full charge around 75 minutes or a meaningful 30-minute top-up.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Charging speed gets limited but positive evidence, with one review reporting a full charge in about 95 minutes.

coaching features
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.2

Coaching features are useful, from movement prompts to warmups, cooldowns, training plans, and non-generic feedback.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Coaching features are a real addition, especially Running Coach, with reviewers describing personalized plans and guidance.

comfort
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.5

Comfort is a major positive, with reviewers repeatedly describing the watch as light, slim, and wearable all day.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Comfort depends on wrist and expectations: some reviewers found it comfortable, while others felt the weight or bulk.

companion app quality
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
3.6

The Huawei Health app is feature-rich and can be easy to use, but several reviewers criticize clutter or bloat.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

The companion app setup is useful but split, with health and smartwatch settings divided between Samsung Health and Galaxy Wearable.

contactless payments
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
2.5

Contactless payment support is weak because NFC or payment support is limited by region and availability.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Contactless payments are supported through Samsung Wallet or Samsung Pay shortcuts.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
3.9

Cross-platform compatibility is acceptable across Android and iOS, but reviewers flag missing iOS features such as Petal Maps or music support.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.4

Cross-platform compatibility is limited: reviews say it works with Android but not iPhone, with the best experience tied to Samsung phones.

customization options
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.3

Customization is a strength, including watch-face changes, widgets, button mapping, and quick band swaps.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Customization is strong across programmable buttons, widgets, tiles, colors, and watch-face data.

display quality
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.6

Display quality is strongly praised, with reviewers repeatedly calling out the AMOLED screen, clarity, resolution, and visual punch.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Display quality is a major strength, with repeated praise for the large, vibrant AMOLED display.

durability
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.2

Durability appears good for everyday use, with Gorilla Glass, water exposure, and daily wear references supporting a positive score.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Durability is a standout, backed by titanium construction, MIL-STD claims, scratch protection, and reviewer reports of little damage.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
1.8

ECG functionality is a clear omission from the regular Fit 4, appearing as a Pro-model advantage rather than a base-model feature.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

ECG functionality is widely listed as part of the health feature set, though one review notes Samsung-phone pairing requirements for ECG and blood pressure.

fit
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.2

Fit is positive, with strap security, wrist-size accommodation, and a balanced dial size appearing across reviews.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.8

Fit is polarizing: it can fit some larger wrists well, but reviewers also note the single 47mm size and large wrist footprint.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.3

Fitness tracking accuracy is generally strong, especially treadmill, GPS, route, and workout-map evidence, with only minor caveats in some contexts.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

Fitness tracking accuracy is generally good for everyday and running use, though scientific testing places it below the top alternatives.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.5

GPS accuracy is one of the best-supported strengths, with dual-band GPS, fast lock, offline maps, and accurate outdoor tracking discussed repeatedly.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

GPS accuracy is good in several reviewer tests and supports dual-frequency GPS, but scientific testing found some route deviation.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.2

Health tracking accuracy is broadly positive for everyday use, especially heart rate and health insights, while reviewers still avoid medical-grade claims.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.7

Health tracking is feature-rich but mixed in accuracy, with strong sensor coverage offset by questionable antioxidant, HRV, and some sleep-stage findings.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.4

Heart rate accuracy receives strong support, including comparisons to other watches and a Polar H10 chest strap, with one review noting slower mid-exercise updates.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Heart-rate accuracy is strongest in running evidence, with one reviewer matching a Polar strap closely, while scientific testing calls it good rather than elite.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

LTE is a consistent advantage because it is standard or broadly available, though one reviewer notes carrier setup can cost extra.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Navigation support is useful through offline maps, Google Maps routing, and GPS widgets, but one reviewer notes no built-in maps on-watch.

materials quality
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.5

Materials quality is consistently praised, especially the aluminum or metal body and premium construction for the price.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

Materials quality is strong, centered on titanium, sapphire/robust design references, and corrosion-resistant claims.

menu navigation
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.3

Menu navigation is well supported by list/grid views, crown scrolling, quick workout access, and smooth app layout options.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Menu navigation is mostly straightforward through swipes, app drawers, digital bezel haptics, and simple operation.

music controls
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.0

Music controls are useful for phone playback and on-watch playback, though platform support can vary.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Music features are useful for downloaded Spotify, streaming, media tiles, and larger storage for music.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.7

Onboard music storage is a positive where supported, with reviewers noting MP3 copying and internal music storage.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

Onboard storage is a clear 2025 upgrade, repeatedly described as 64GB and useful for music, apps, and offline maps.

operating system experience
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.2

The operating system experience feels polished and Apple-Watch-like in several reviews, though permissions and platform gaps remain tradeoffs.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

The operating system experience benefits from One UI 8/Wear OS updates, Gemini, Now Bar, and refreshed interface features.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.6

Outdoor visibility is a major strength, with multiple reviewers saying the screen remains visible or clear in sunlight.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with multiple reviewers saying the bright display remains readable in sunlight.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
3.4

Pairing reliability is only lightly supported and somewhat mixed, with one review mentioning rare disconnects over three weeks.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

Pairing and setup reliability are positive where tested, with instant recognition and quick setup noted.

recovery insights
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.3

Recovery insights are present through recovery time, training load, and training index metrics.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

Recovery-style insights are mixed: vascular load interests some reviewers, while HRV and related metrics draw skepticism.

reliability
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
3.9

Reliability is mixed but more positive overall, with one review flagging occasional disconnects and another recommending it as reliable.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

Reliability is mostly acceptable but not flawless, with one review noting brief display interruptions and another calling performance not horrible rather than perfect.

safety features
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.0

Safety-adjacent navigation features are supported through route-back and back-to-start functions rather than emergency features.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Safety features include fall detection, emergency siren references, sleep apnea alerts, and related health/safety setup options.

size options
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.4

Style and design are widely praised, with reviewers describing the watch as elegant, premium, stylish, and Apple Watch-like.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.4

Size options are limited by the single large 47mm format, though the band can fit a range of wrists and the screen size appeals to some users.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.2

Sleep tracking accuracy is positive overall, with reviews comparing sleep duration, scores, stages, and detection to other wearables.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

Sleep tracking is useful and improving, but reviewers disagree on sleep stages and awake-time accuracy.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.0

Notifications are useful, including app selection, quick replies, and message replies, but iOS reply limitations reduce the score.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Smartphone notifications are well supported, with reviewers noting detailed notification views and suggested replies.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.3

Smartwatch features are broad for the price, but the watch is still strongest as a fitness tracker rather than a complete smartwatch.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Smartwatch features are broad, including LTE, calls, texts, Gemini, Now Bar, storage, and Samsung’s full watch software stack.

software smoothness
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.4

Software smoothness is a strong point in several reviews, with fluid interfaces, 60 Hz refresh, and smooth animations repeatedly praised.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Software smoothness is generally good, with smooth app launches and more functional One UI behavior, despite occasional reliability caveats.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.7

Step counting accuracy is directly praised in one review as matching the prior Fit line's strong performance.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Step counting is positive in basic walking tests, but one reviewer notes accuracy drops when arms are not swinging.

stress tracking
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.1

Stress tracking is well represented through HRV, all-day stress analysis, emotional well-being, and mood-pattern tracking.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

Stress tracking is included in Samsung’s health sensor set, though the reviews provide feature evidence more than accuracy testing.

style and design
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.6

Design is one of the clearest strengths, with repeated praise for premium looks, slimness, and everyday wearability.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Style is divisive: some reviewers like the rugged, colorful, stylish look, while others find it bulky or not pretty.

third-party app support
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
2.8

Third-party app support is limited, with AppGallery described as scaled back and one of the main disappointments.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Third-party app support is solid through Google Play, fitness apps such as Strava and Map My Run, and a growing Wear OS app selection.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.1

Touchscreen responsiveness is generally good, especially on the AMOLED touchscreen, though one swimming test found touch use impractical under water.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Touchscreen responsiveness and gesture operation are described as intentional and straightforward in the long-term review evidence.

user interface
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.3

The user interface is mostly praised as fluid, intuitive, and smooth, with some permission and organization caveats elsewhere.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

The user interface is improved and functional, though some reviewers dislike parts of the visual layout.

value for money
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.6

Value for money is one of the strongest consensus points, with reviewers repeatedly calling the watch affordable, good value, or hard to beat.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.3

Value for money is the main weak point because reviewers repeatedly question the high price and minimal 2025 hardware changes.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
2.4

Voice assistant quality is weakly supported and negative, because one review says the assistant needs a Huawei phone.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Voice assistant quality is a strength with Gemini, which reviewers describe as convenient, useful, and directly available on the wrist.

watch face quality
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.1

Watch face quality is good, with many attractive faces, but paid faces and regional app-store differences create some caveats.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Watch faces are a strength, with reviewers praising quantity, customization, and Samsung’s polished face designs.

water resistance
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.1

Water resistance is generally positive for swimming and daily wet use, though hot water and Pro diving differences remain caveats.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Water resistance is a strong feature, with reviews citing 5ATM/10ATM ratings, IP68 claims, and pool/rain/snow use.

wellness insights
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.2

Wellness insights are a strength, especially health insights, emotional well-being, breathing prompts, and mental-wellness trends.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.8

Wellness insights are useful but uneven: sleep coaching and vascular load get interest, while energy score and antioxidant index receive skepticism.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
2.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is a limitation because one review says Wi-Fi is added by the Pro model, not the regular Fit 4.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Wi-Fi support is present across connectivity mentions, including LTE/Wi-Fi model references.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Huawei Watch Fit 4
4.4

Workout variety is very broad, with 100-plus workout modes and many sport profiles, though one review still wanted a fuller list.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

Workout variety is strong, with reviewers citing many tracked activities, multisport/triathlon capability, and broad exercise lists.