Average score
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.8
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.8

One review notes that commutes are logged when the user is walking or cycling, indicating some lightweight automatic activity recognition rather than deep auto-detection coverage.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.0

Auto-detection is explicitly criticized in testing, with reviewers saying workouts usually need to be started manually to access the watch’s richer tracking features.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
2.5

The app environment is described as weaker than Garmin’s, with one review explicitly calling out a less rich app ecosystem.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

The app ecosystem is solid rather than class-leading: reviewers cite Connect IQ support and a healthy app catalog, but not the broader polish or reach of Apple or Wear OS ecosystems.

band quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.8

Band feedback is mixed but generally positive: reviewers like the silicone strap’s comfort, softness, and flexibility, though a few note fiddly hardware or stiff fastening at first.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Band quality is generally good, with flexible silicone straps and solid sweat performance, though silicone can stay damp and irritate skin if not dried after workouts.

battery life
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.7

Battery life is one of the watch’s clearest strengths, with repeated praise for strong real-world endurance in both smartwatch use and GPS-heavy outings.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Battery life is a major strength. Reviewers report multi-day to multi-week endurance depending on usage, with always-on display and GPS workouts reducing runtime but still leaving it ahead of many rivals.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.0

Blood oxygen tracking is supported and appears improved, with reviews pointing to onboard blood oxygen sensing and steadier readings from the updated sensor layout.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

The watch supports blood oxygen tracking and related wellness sensors, but reviewers discuss it more as part of the feature set than as a standout accuracy differentiator.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.8

Bluetooth support is mainly framed around audio accessories, with reviewers noting headphone pairing and turn prompts over paired Bluetooth devices.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Bluetooth connectivity is dependable for phone pairing and headphone playback, with no major complaints in the selected reviews.

brightness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.8

Brightness is a clear strength, with one reviewer saying the display is easy to see across all lighting conditions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Brightness is repeatedly praised. Reviewers call the AMOLED screen bright, vivid, and easy to read in varied lighting.

build quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.7

Reviewers consistently describe the chassis as solid and confidence-inspiring, with no meaningful complaints about the overall build.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Build quality feels premium overall, helped by the metal or titanium bezel and polished finish, even if outright ruggedness is not the headline strength.

button controls
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.2

Physical buttons are well liked overall, especially for glove use and tactile control, even if some reviewers still prefer a crown in certain situations.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Button controls are a clear positive. Multiple reviews praise the tactile hardware buttons and say they remain easy to use during workouts and with gloves.

call handling
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
2.2

Call handling is limited: one review says calls can be answered or declined from the watch, while another notes you cannot actually answer a call on the watch itself.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.7

Call handling is inconsistent across reviews. One source says calls can be answered via a paired phone, while others explicitly note missing call functionality compared with Garmin’s more smartwatch-focused models.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
2.6

Calorie data is treated cautiously, with one review saying the watch can overestimate calories burned.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.1

Calorie tracking is only modestly useful. Calories are visible in daily metrics, but one review says users wanting stronger calorie and intake support should look elsewhere.

charging convenience
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.8

Charging convenience is much improved thanks to the stronger magnetic attachment, which reviewers say now stays put and feels far less fussy.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.5

Charging convenience is a weak point because Garmin still uses a proprietary connector, and reviewers call the port connection delicate while also noting the lack of wireless charging.

charging speed
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.0

Charging speed is adequate rather than standout, with one review calling the roughly 90-minute charge time unimpressive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Charging speed is good, with reviewers citing roughly an hour to reach high percentages and quick top-ups that provide meaningful battery in minutes.

coaching features
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.0

Coaching tools are meaningful but not perfect, with reviewers highlighting Suunto Coach, training plans, AI-driven insights, and race predictions that are useful if not always exact.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Coaching features are strong, with suggested workouts, race prediction, and readiness-style guidance giving the watch a helpful training-assistant feel.

comfort
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.9

Comfort is good for a large adventure watch, but not effortless; several reviews say it wears well once on, while others still call it bulky or heavy.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Comfort is a strength for most users thanks to the light, slim build and wearable design, though the large case can still be noticeable for some sleepers or smaller wrists.

companion app quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.6

The companion app gets mixed feedback: several reviewers praise its clean dashboard and digestible presentation, while others still find parts of the experience dated or restrictive.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Companion app quality is mixed. Garmin Connect is praised for depth and data access, but several reviewers also call it confusing or poorly organized in places.

contactless payments
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
1.1

Contactless payments are a clear miss, with multiple reviews explicitly noting that tap-to-pay or direct payments are not available.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Contactless payments are available through Garmin Pay, but real-world usefulness depends heavily on bank support, which several reviewers say is still uneven.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.3

Cross-platform support is straightforward, with explicit mention of compatibility on both iOS and Android.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility is strong, with consistent support for both Android and iPhone across reviews.

customization options
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.5

Customization is a strength, with reviewers highlighting customizable watch faces, widgets, and complication-style tweaks.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Customization options are extensive, including watch faces, widgets, data pages, and other configurable on-watch and in-app elements.

display quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.8

Display quality is a standout, with repeated praise for the AMOLED panel’s clarity, sharpness, and overall visual appeal.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Display quality is one of the headline wins. The AMOLED panel is widely described as sharp, vibrant, and transformative compared with older MIP models.

durability
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.7

Durability is a strong point, with reviewers noting protective materials and minimal wear after extended testing.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Durability is mixed. Some reviewers appreciate the materials and scratch resistance expectations, but several also report real scratches and visible wear sooner than expected.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

ECG functionality is absent. Multiple reviews explicitly state that the Forerunner 965 does not include ECG hardware or support.

fit
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.4

Fit is better than the size might suggest, with reviewers describing the watch as secure, stable, and not prone to shifting once properly adjusted.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Fit is acceptable for many wrists but not ideal for everyone. Several reviews warn that the 47mm case can feel large on smaller wrists.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.2

General fitness tracking is viewed positively, with reviewers calling the overall tracking accurate and stable for core training use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

Fitness tracking accuracy is a standout strength, with reviewers praising the consistency of workout metrics and the overall trustworthiness of exercise data.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.8

GPS performance is one of the best-supported strengths in the reviews, with repeated claims of spot-on, rock-solid, and near neck-and-neck accuracy against top rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

GPS accuracy is one of the watch’s clearest strengths, repeatedly described as spot-on, industry-leading, or nearly dead accurate in testing.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.7

Broader health tracking is decent but not flawless, with reviewers saying the metrics are generally useful while still noting some inconsistency.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Health tracking accuracy is good overall but not flawless. Reviewers praise the depth and usefulness of health data, while some flag sleep-related inconsistency that affects broader health confidence.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.1

Heart rate performance is much improved and usually dependable for steady efforts, though several reviews still mention occasional quirks, fit sensitivity, or slight drift in harder sessions.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Heart rate accuracy is strong for a wrist-based sensor, with several reviewers calling it excellent or near chest-strap performance, though interval lag can still appear.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

LTE connectivity is absent. Reviews explicitly note that the watch lacks LTE or mobile internet support.

materials quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.7

Materials quality is a strong point, with repeated emphasis on sapphire glass and stainless steel or titanium components.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Materials quality is solid, with repeated mentions of titanium, Gorilla Glass, and generally premium-feeling hardware choices.

menu navigation
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.2

Menu navigation is workable but sometimes clunky, with reviewers calling out extra steps, slow scrolling, and a few awkward flows in maps or flashlight controls.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Menu navigation is generally good once learned, with reviewers highlighting customizable widgets and easy menu flow, though Garmin’s depth can still feel dense at first.

music controls
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.4

Music controls are present and useful for phone-based playback, but they remain basic transport controls rather than a deeper music experience.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Music controls are well covered for a sports watch, with reviewers noting onboard player controls and convenient workout use.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
1.2

Onboard music storage is not here, and reviewers repeatedly flag the lack of offline music as a missing premium feature.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Onboard music storage is a strength thanks to offline music support and ample storage for playlists, maps, and media.

operating system experience
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.4

The operating system gets positive marks for feeling fast and efficient, with one reviewer explicitly describing the Linux-based experience that way.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

The operating system experience is capable but not always elegant. Reviewers appreciate the depth and button-first control options, yet some still describe Garmin’s interface conventions as archaic or complex.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.8

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with reviewers saying the screen stays highly legible in sun, low light, and bad weather.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Outdoor visibility is a clear positive. Reviewers say the AMOLED screen remains readable outdoors and in direct sun, even if some still prefer MIP’s look.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.2

Pairing reliability appears solid in the available evidence, with one review reporting no issues connecting and syncing the watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Pairing reliability is strong, with quick phone pairing and dependable syncing or headphone use in the selected reviews.

recovery insights
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.9

Recovery insights are useful and present meaningful guidance, with reviews highlighting Coach recommendations and recovery advice that generally lines up with how the user feels.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Recovery insights are a major strength, especially through Training Readiness, recovery time, and related load metrics that help guide training decisions.

reliability
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.5

Reliability is a selling point, with reviewers describing the watch as dependable and praising its stable tracking and battery behavior.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Reliability is broadly strong. Reviewers describe stable tracking, dependable uploads, and few serious failures in day-to-day use.

safety features
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.3

Safety features are a meaningful part of the package, thanks to the built-in LED flashlight, SOS-style modes, and strong off-route alerts.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Safety features are meaningful, with reviewers highlighting LiveTrack and fall detection as useful extras for training and outdoor use.

size options
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
1.8

Size choice is a weakness: one review explicitly says there is only one size to choose from.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.8

Size options are limited because the Forerunner 965 is effectively a one-size model, which can be restrictive for smaller-wrist users.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.7

Sleep tracking is serviceable but imperfect, with reviewers calling it generally good or aligned with other devices while still noting quirks and hit-or-miss nights.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Sleep tracking accuracy is one of the most mixed areas. Some reviewers call it excellent or improved versus older Garmins, while others say the results can feel off or inconsistent.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.1

Smartphone notifications work reliably but remain basic, with repeated notes that messages are mostly read-only and previews can be limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Smartphone notifications work well enough for viewing alerts, but several reviews point out limitations around interaction and reply behavior, especially on iPhone.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.0

Smartwatch features are intentionally lean, focusing on essentials rather than deep lifestyle extras, which some reviewers like and others see as a limitation.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Smartwatch features are good for a training watch, including notifications, music, and payments, but they still trail more full-fledged smartwatches in polish and breadth.

software smoothness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.3

Software smoothness is improved, with reviewers saying the interface is quicker and runs much smoother than older Suunto models.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Software smoothness is a strong point, with reviewers describing the interface as fluid and largely free of lag or stutter.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
2.6

Step counting is one of the weaker metrics in the evidence, with one review saying the watch can overcount steps.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Step counting accuracy is strong in the selected evidence, including one low-error test result and praise for the visible real-time counter.

stress tracking
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.8

Stress tracking exists through Heart Stress and related training tools, but the evidence suggests it is more performance-focused than frictionless day-to-day wellness tracking.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Stress tracking is well integrated into Garmin’s broader readiness and wellness stack, with reviewers frequently citing it as one of the useful day-to-day metrics.

style and design
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.7

Style and design are widely praised, with one reviewer calling it one of the better-looking watches they have tested.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Style and design are widely praised, with the AMOLED display, slimmer body, and premium bezel helping the 965 look more modern and upscale than earlier Forerunners.

third-party app support
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.2

Third-party support is good for endurance use, with reviews citing clean syncing to services like Strava and TrainingPeaks plus route imports that work well.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Third-party app support is good, with Connect IQ apps plus integrations like Strava and TrainingPeaks adding flexibility for training and data workflows.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.8

Touch response is generally good, though not flawless; reviewers praise responsiveness but also mention occasional wrist-wake delay or wet-screen confusion.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Touchscreen responsiveness is generally praised, with reviewers saying touch makes navigation easy and smooth when they choose to use it.

user interface
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.1

The overall user interface is mixed: it makes sense after some use, but multiple reviewers still describe parts of it as stripped down, awkward, or in need of polish.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

The user interface is improved and easier on the eyes than earlier Forerunners, with smoother visuals and a more modern presentation.

value for money
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.2

Value is strong relative to premium rivals, with multiple reviews framing the watch as a capable, less expensive alternative to pricier Garmin options.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.8

Value for money is mixed. Several reviewers think the feature set can justify the price, but others say many buyers would be better served by cheaper Garmin alternatives.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
1.0

Voice-assistant-style functionality is effectively absent, with one review explicitly noting the lack of a built-in microphone and voice recognition.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

Voice assistant functionality is absent. Reviews explicitly note there is no voice assistant, microphone-based response system, or similar wrist voice feature.

watch face quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.4

Watch face quality is positive in the available evidence, with one reviewer specifically praising the default face and its complication options.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Watch face quality is good overall, especially visually on the AMOLED display, but some reviewers also note fewer face options than previous Garmin experiences.

water resistance
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.4

Water resistance looks strong, with reviewers referencing 100-meter capability, worry-free strap drainage, and general waterproof confidence for swimming and outdoor use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Water resistance is strong, with repeated confirmation of 5ATM or 50-meter suitability for swimming and everyday water exposure.

wellness insights
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.1

Wellness insights are useful rather than flashy, with reviewers highlighting Resources and app-based summaries that turn sleep and activity data into practical guidance.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Wellness insights are a major selling point, with Body Battery, sleep scores, readiness-style guidance, and rest cues making daily health data more actionable.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
3.3

Wi-Fi is functional but not seamless, with map downloads working over Wi-Fi yet still requiring extra setup and occasionally added friction.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is useful for tasks like map or music downloads, though it is not framed as especially fast or notable compared with other core features.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Suunto Vertical 2
4.7

Workout variety is a clear strength, with repeated mentions of 110-plus or 115-plus sport modes spanning everything from mainstream training to niche activities.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Workout tracking variety is excellent, with broad multisport coverage, triathlon support, and many workout modes ranging from yoga to golf and hiking.