Average score
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.9
Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Reliable auto-workout detection was praised in multiple reviews, especially for catching walks automatically without much manual input.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.4

Reviews describe a broad Suunto ecosystem, with an app store that had already caught up and roughly 200 partner apps extending features and data flows.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Reviews consistently praised Wear OS app breadth and the watch’s tight integration with Google services and apps.

band quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

The band is described as comfortable on skin, suggesting solid everyday strap quality.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.7

The included band was comfortable and secure, but some reviewers found the default/first-party strap options plain or pricey.

battery life
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.9

Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling it fantastic, exceptional, or unusually long-lasting.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Battery life was a meaningful improvement, with the 45mm often reaching about two days, while the 41mm remained good rather than class-leading.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.7

Blood oxygen is present as a watch/app feature, but reviewers give only limited evaluation beyond its inclusion in the broader toolset.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

SpO2 tracking is present, and one reviewer said the sleep-related oxygen data matched expected baseline patterns.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

Bluetooth support covers common sport sensors and phone-linked functions like music control.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Bluetooth behavior was stable in use, and Google’s Bluetooth 5.3/connectivity refinements were called out positively.

brightness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

The improved backlight gets very bright, helping the display in darker conditions.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

The jump to a brighter 2,000-nit screen was one of the most consistently praised upgrades.

build quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.8

Reviewers describe the watch as luxurious yet rugged and even tank-like, pointing to strong build quality.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Reviewers said the watch feels more refined and better built than earlier Pixel Watches, even if it is not meant for rough abuse.

button controls
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.4

The physical controls are easy to use, including with gloves, and the buttons are generally well-regarded.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

The crown/button setup was generally praised for smooth scrolling, good feel, and useful shortcuts.

call handling
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

Call-handling extras such as hold/screening features add convenience, though this is more about ecosystem utility than speakerphone quality.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

One reviewer found the watch’s calorie-related training data more realistic than competing devices, making the readouts reasonably useful.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.2

Calorie data was considered useful enough for general training context, but at least one reviewer questioned how accurate the burn estimates felt.

charging convenience
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

The magnetic charger is easy to align or attach, though it remains a dedicated charging solution.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.1

Charging works securely, but the proprietary pin puck and lack of wireless charging reduce convenience.

charging speed
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.7

Charging speed feedback is mixed: one review saw a very fast recharge, while another reported fast-charging issues.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Charging speed was widely seen as improved, making quick top-offs easy.

coaching features
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

Coaching tools are present through VO2 max estimation and Suunto Coach guidance, but they are framed as helpful rather than especially advanced.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.6

Guided runs, workout builder tools, AI suggestions, and live cues were among the strongest new fitness additions.

comfort
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

Comfort is a plus, with the band feeling good on skin and the watch avoiding an overly clunky feel.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

The watch and stock band were regularly described as comfortable for all-day wear and overnight tracking.

companion app quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

The companion app is consistently praised for usability, organization, route planning, and depth of information.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Fitbit app presentation and dashboards were repeatedly praised as clean, useful, and rich in data.

contactless payments
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
1.0

One review explicitly notes that NFC payments are not included.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Google Wallet/contactless payment support was widely treated as a standard, useful smartwatch feature.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

Reviewers used it with iPhone/Komoot and also noted access to the app on tablet or macOS desktop.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.4

It works broadly with Android phones, but reviewers repeatedly noted the lack of iPhone support and some Pixel-only extras.

customization options
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

Users can customize pages, widgets, watch-face elements, and colors, giving the watch strong personalization options.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Watch faces, complications, and tiles offer substantial customization, especially on the larger screen.

display quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.4

Reviewers describe the larger screen as easy to read and notably improved over older Suunto displays, especially for map use.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Display quality was one of the watch’s clearest strengths, with sharp OLED visuals and more usable screen space.

durability
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.8

Reviews point to strong durability through real-world wear and formal ruggedness claims.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.3

Durability remains a tradeoff: some owners avoided scratches, but others reported scratching and noted the lack of rugged protection.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
1.0

One review explicitly states that ECG functionality is missing.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

ECG support is present and treated as a meaningful health feature, though it was not a major focus of deep testing.

fit
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.9

Fit is mixed-positive: the large case may take getting used to, but it does not feel especially chunky on wrist.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Both sizes were said to sit well on the wrist, with the 45mm adding space without becoming unwieldy.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

One reviewer says the overall training data looked more accurate than on competing watches.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

General fitness tracking accuracy was viewed positively overall across multiple reviewers.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.8

GPS accuracy is a standout strength, with repeated praise for precise tracks and strong performance against major rivals.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.0

GPS was the weakest fitness metric, with repeated notes about wobble, drift, or distance errors versus stronger rivals.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Reviewers generally trusted the broader health stack for exercise and sleep tracking.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
2.4

Optical heart-rate accuracy is a recurring weakness, especially for sports use, with under-reading and inconsistency noted.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Heart-rate tracking was one of the product’s standout strengths, often matching chest straps or top rivals closely.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

LTE support is available across the lineup, though few reviews deeply evaluated LTE performance itself.

materials quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.7

Titanium or steel construction and sapphire materials are repeatedly highlighted as premium touches.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Gorilla Glass and aluminum materials give the watch a polished, premium-feeling finish.

menu navigation
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

Menus are easy to navigate, with key items accessible rather than buried.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

The grid app launcher and simple navigation flow made moving around the watch easier than before.

music controls
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

The watch can control music playing from a connected phone.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

Music and playback controls were easy to access during workouts and from the general UI.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
1.0

Reviews clearly state that there is no onboard music storage or playback.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

The watch supports offline music/maps and some standalone streaming, making onboard storage meaningfully useful.

operating system experience
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.8

The operating system is seen as usable and reasonably intuitive, though not especially impressive.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Wear OS on the Pixel Watch 3 was widely described as polished and mature.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.8

Outdoor readability is strong, with reviewers calling the screen or maps easy to read in bright sunlight.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Sunlight readability was repeatedly singled out as a big improvement over earlier models.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Pairing/connection behavior was stable, including better persistent Bluetooth pairing and smooth phone transfers.

recovery insights
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

Recovery insights are present through recovery/energy features, and reviewers generally found that guidance useful.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Readiness and load guidance were generally seen as useful and fairly true to how reviewers actually felt.

reliability
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.4

Day-to-day reliability looked solid overall, but software update bumps prevented a spotless verdict.

safety features
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

Safety-relevant tools such as storm alerts, sunset or weather alerts, and ETA are positively mentioned.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Fall/crash detection and Loss of Pulse were viewed as genuinely valuable safety additions.

size options
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
1.8

Size choice is limited; reviewers note the lineup is essentially one-size.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
5.0

The new 45mm option was one of the generation’s biggest upgrades and broadened the watch’s appeal.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

Sleep tracking is usually described as accurate or close to real sleep and wake timing.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Sleep timing and stage estimates were generally reported as closely matching real-world experience.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

Smartphone notifications are present and generally work well, though one review notes limited emoji handling.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Notifications were prompt and remain a core strength of the smartwatch experience.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.2

Smartwatch features are present, but reviewers do not see them as especially complete versus more smartwatch-oriented rivals.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

Smart-home controls, Google TV remote, Recorder, camera controls, and other wrist utilities make the watch feel feature-rich.

software smoothness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.0

Software smoothness has improved, but lag remains a recurring complaint.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

App loading and general UI movement were frequently described as smooth and lag-free.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.5

Step counting tested very well in at least one direct comparison.

stress tracking
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

Stress is tracked through the resources system, which estimates energy levels using stress and recovery inputs.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.7

Stress sensing/cEDA showed promise, but opinions were mixed on how actionable it feels versus rival platforms.

style and design
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.7

Reviewers consistently like the styling, describing it as minimal, rugged, or well-designed.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.8

The pebble-like design was frequently called stylish, elegant, and distinctive.

third-party app support
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

Third-party syncing and integration support is strong, especially with Strava, TrainingPeaks, and broader partner apps.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.9

Third-party app support is good by Wear OS standards, though not entirely flawless.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.2

Touch interaction is usable but commonly described as laggy or slightly delayed.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.7

Touch response is strong in normal use, but sweaty or wet interactions can suffer.

user interface
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.4

The user interface is generally intuitive and easy to learn, even if performance is not always snappy.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

The interface was commonly described as intuitive and easy to learn.

value for money
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.7

Value is mixed: some reviewers call it a sound investment or relatively cheaper than rivals, while others question the price.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.4

Reviewers liked the overall experience, but price came up often as a drawback versus Samsung and some other rivals.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.7

Assistant performance was fine and responsive, but the absence of Gemini kept it from feeling cutting-edge.

watch face quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.4

Watch-face options exist, but at least one reviewer still wanted better designs.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.7

Watch faces are flexible and usable, but several reviewers wanted more variety or deeper customization.

water resistance
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

Water resistance is solid for swimming and snorkelling use, though not pitched as a full diving watch.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.2

IP68/5ATM protection makes it suitable for swimming and everyday water exposure.

wellness insights
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

The watch offers wellness-oriented feedback such as VO2 max, fitness age, and training or recovery guidance.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.4

Morning Brief, Readiness, and load metrics were widely seen as genuinely useful wellness additions.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

Wi‑Fi enables map downloads, but it depends on network availability and can be slow or situational.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
4.0

Wi‑Fi support is standard and Google also highlighted faster 5GHz connectivity on this model.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
5.0

Workout variety is excellent, with 90-plus to 95 sport modes and specialty options mentioned.

Product 2: Google Pixel Watch 3
3.6

The watch supports many workout types, but reviewers noted that Google still prioritizes runners over some other athletes.