Compare Suunto Vertical vs Suunto Vertical 2

P1 Suunto Vertical
P2 Suunto Vertical 2

Comparison Takeaways

Suunto Vertical

Where It Has the Edge

  • menu navigation is 4.6 vs 3.3. Menu navigation was described as intuitive and easy, with key settings and data not buried too deeply.
  • reliability is 4.7 vs 3.6. Reliability was supported by long-term battery stability and a reviewer describing it as dependable.
  • comfort is 4.3 vs 3.4. Comfort was good for a large outdoor watch, with reviewers saying it was not chunky and could be...
  • customization options is 4.3 vs 3.5. Customization is strong across widgets, watch faces, activity profiles, buttons, and home-screen data.

Suunto Vertical 2

Where It Has the Edge

  • charging convenience is 4.5 vs 2.9. Charging convenience is much improved thanks to a stronger magnetic USB-C charger, with reviewers repeatedly saying it stays...
  • software smoothness is 4.4 vs 2.8. Software smoothness was widely praised, with repeated comments about faster menus, snappier performance, smoother animations, and a much...
  • heart rate accuracy is 3.7 vs 2.3. Heart-rate accuracy was improved over older Suuntos and often solid for steady running, hiking, and cycling, but several...
  • fitness tracking accuracy is 4.3 vs 3.1. Fitness tracking was generally trusted, especially when reviewers considered GPS and heart-rate data together, though the broader accuracy...
Average score
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.8
Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.8
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.5

Evidence for automatic activity handling is limited; the clearest support is commute logging for walking or cycling rather than broad automatic workout detection.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

Reviewers saw a useful SuuntoPlus and partner-app ecosystem, but one noted that only one SuuntoPlus app can run at a time.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.6

The app ecosystem is serviceable and can connect with health/training platforms, but multiple reviewers explicitly said it is not as deep or rich as Garmin's.

band quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.3

Band feedback was positive overall: reviewers liked the comfort, standard 22mm compatibility, ventilation, and secure strap design.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.0

Band quality is mostly positive, especially softness, stretch, and comfort, though one reviewer disliked the stock band and another noted initial stiffness.

battery life
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.9

Battery life was the clearest strength, with reviewers reporting week-plus daily use, strong GPS endurance, and class-leading longevity.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.7

Battery life is the headline strength, with nearly every reviewer praising long smartwatch runtime, strong GPS endurance, and unusually good AMOLED stamina.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

Blood oxygen was confirmed as an available widget/tracking view, but reviewers did not deeply validate SpO2 accuracy.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.0

Blood oxygen tracking is present and repeatedly mentioned as part of the health suite, with one reviewer noting more stable readings from the redesigned sensor.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.8

Bluetooth support covers common external sport sensors, including heart-rate straps, though sensor management is not especially advanced.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.0

Bluetooth support is useful for headphones, turn prompts, and music control, but the evidence is narrower than for core fitness features.

brightness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.3

Brightness improved versus older Suunto models, with reviewers praising the backlight and quick wrist illumination.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.7

Brightness was strongly praised, with multiple reviewers highlighting the 2,000-nit AMOLED screen and strong lighting performance, despite one complaint about dim indoor behavior.

build quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.7

Build quality was repeatedly described as premium, rugged, sturdy, and tank-like.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.4

Build quality is rugged and premium, with reviewers citing solid metal construction, sapphire protection, and little concern about normal outdoor knocks.

button controls
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

Button feedback was mostly positive for gloves, solidity, and simplicity, though one reviewer wanted a five-button layout.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.0

Button controls are a strong outdoor feature, especially with gloves, though several reviewers preferred a dial or wanted more consistent back-button behavior.

call handling
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
2.2

Call handling is limited. Reviewers mention seeing, answering, or declining calls, but not full on-watch calling.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

Calorie estimates were viewed as more realistic than another tested watch in one review.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.4

Calorie data is available in daily and workout summaries, but usefulness is moderated by one reviewer's concern that calories were overestimated.

charging convenience
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
2.9

Charging convenience was mixed: the magnetic charger attaches easily, but reviewers disliked proprietary/no-wireless charging and one reported charging trouble.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.5

Charging convenience is much improved thanks to a stronger magnetic USB-C charger, with reviewers repeatedly saying it stays attached and fixes older friction.

charging speed
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

Charging speed was presented positively in the review evidence, with a full charge cited at about 90 minutes.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.5

Charging speed is acceptable rather than exceptional, with evidence around roughly 90 minutes to 1 hour 45 minutes for a full or near-full charge.

coaching features
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

Coaching and training tools include VO2-related tests, Suunto Coach, and personalized training/recovery guidance.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.1

Coaching features are meaningful, with Suunto Coach, AI-driven suggestions, and plans appearing in multiple reviews, but one reviewer found plan duration limitations.

comfort
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.3

Comfort was good for a large outdoor watch, with reviewers saying it was not chunky and could be worn or slept in comfortably.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.4

Comfort is the main physical tradeoff: several reviewers found it wearable or surprisingly comfortable, but many also called it heavy, bulky, or chunky for sleep and daily wear.

companion app quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.6

The Suunto app was strongly praised for route planning, visual data, and a simpler organization than some competitors.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.0

The companion app is generally clean, useful, and increasingly complete, but it is not universally praised because some reviewers found it less engaging or less reliable in the background.

contactless payments
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
1.0

Contactless payments are a clear miss, with reviewers explicitly noting no NFC or tap-to-pay functionality.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
1.2

Contactless payment support is effectively absent; reviewers directly noted no tap-to-pay or wallet-style functionality.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

The route-planning experience extends beyond the phone, with one reviewer noting tablet and macOS desktop use.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
5.0

Cross-platform compatibility is directly supported by iOS and Android compatibility, though platform-specific smart features remain limited.

customization options
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.3

Customization is strong across widgets, watch faces, activity profiles, buttons, and home-screen data.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.5

Customization is solid for data fields, shortcuts, sports modes, widgets, and watch faces, though some changes require the app or SuuntoPlus.

display quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.4

Display quality improved markedly, with a larger, readable MIP screen, though it is less flashy than AMOLED rivals.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.6

Display quality was one of the most consistent strengths: reviewers praised the AMOLED screen as bright, sharp, colorful, clear, and a major upgrade.

durability
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.9

Durability evidence was strong, citing sapphire glass, MIL-level testing, and long-term rough-use confidence.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.4

Durability is a strong point, with reviewers reporting scratch resistance, tough outdoor confidence, and only minor wear in some cases.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
1.0

ECG is not included, and one reviewer grouped it with other missing smartwatch-style features.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
No score yet
fit
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

Fit was praised by one reviewer who found the watch lighter and less noticeable than a larger previous GPS watch.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.0

Fit is generally secure once dialed in, with reviewers praising wrist stability while also noting that fit matters for heart-rate accuracy on a larger watch.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.1

General fitness tracking was strong on land, but open-water swim tracking was a serious weak spot in one in-depth review.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.3

Fitness tracking was generally trusted, especially when reviewers considered GPS and heart-rate data together, though the broader accuracy picture still depends on activity and fit.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.7

GPS accuracy received broad agreement as a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling the tracks accurate or best-in-class.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.6

Land-based GPS accuracy was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling it spot-on, near-perfect, or flawless; the main caveat was poorer open-water swim behavior in one test.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.8

Health tracking evidence was limited but generally positive for training data realism, while other health metrics were mixed.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.8

General health metrics were treated as useful and mostly credible, but reviewers tied accuracy to specific metrics and noted edge cases around sleep, steps, calories, and heart-rate behavior.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
2.3

Heart-rate accuracy was the most consistent weakness, especially for sports, with several reviewers recommending or implying a chest strap.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.7

Heart-rate accuracy was improved over older Suuntos and often solid for steady running, hiking, and cycling, but several reviewers saw startup, interval, cadence-lock, or large-watch fit issues.

materials quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.9

Materials quality was a strength thanks to sapphire glass plus titanium or steel construction.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.3

Materials quality is high, with stainless steel or titanium, sapphire glass, and metal construction repeatedly highlighted.

menu navigation
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.6

Menu navigation was described as intuitive and easy, with key settings and data not buried too deeply.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.3

Menu navigation is improved but not perfect: reviewers liked the button flow and app structure but cited clunky flashlight access, route limits, and some unintuitive activity organization.

music controls
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.5

Music controls are available for controlling phone audio, but the feature does not extend to onboard playback.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.5

Music controls work for phone-based playback and Bluetooth-headphone control, but reviewers consistently position them as basic controls rather than full music features.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
1.3

Onboard music storage is absent, and multiple reviewers called that a downside or missed opportunity.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
1.1

Onboard music storage is a consistent weakness, with reviewers repeatedly stating that the watch cannot store music or run offline music services.

operating system experience
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.5

The operating system was considered usable and intuitive enough, but not especially polished.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.0

The operating system feels smoother and more intuitive than older Vertical software, but reviewers still see Garmin as more complete.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.3

Outdoor visibility was mostly strong in bright sun, though one long-term reviewer reported glare in some cloudy situations.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.9

Outdoor visibility was excellent across the evidence, with reviewers repeatedly saying the screen stayed readable in sun, low light, bad weather, and direct sunlight.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

Pairing and syncing evidence was positive for fast satellite acquisition and quick app syncing.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.5

Pairing and syncing reliability is mixed: one reviewer had no connection issues, another praised fast syncing, while another reported background refresh friction.

recovery insights
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.4

Recovery insights were viewed positively through Suunto app metrics, training load, fitness change, and recovery guidance.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.1

Recovery insights are a clear strength, with reviewers citing recovery time, resources, training stress, chronic load, and performance trends across the watch and app.

reliability
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.7

Reliability was supported by long-term battery stability and a reviewer describing it as dependable.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.6

Reliability is mostly positive for navigation and outdoor use, but there are caveats around map rendering, background sync, and setup friction.

safety features
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

Safety-related tools include storm alerts, weather alerts, and sunset information, with storm accuracy described as useful but imperfect.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.1

Safety features center on the LED flashlight, red mode, alerts, SOS-style patterns, offline maps, and find-back navigation, though true satellite SOS is missing.

size options
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
2.0

Size options are limited, with one-size hardware and variation mainly by materials or straps.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
2.8

Size options are limited. Reviewers repeatedly frame it as a large 49mm watch, with steel and titanium trims but little real case-size choice.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.9

Sleep tracking was mixed: several reviewers liked sleep/wake timing, while another distrusted motion-based sleep data.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.7

Sleep tracking drew mixed-positive comments: some reviewers found it accurate or improved, while others reported quirky stage or wake detection and noted the watch can feel large overnight.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.4

Smartphone notifications work, but one reviewer noted weak emoji support.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
2.8

Notifications are functional but basic: several reviewers called them read-only or limited, though another found them reliable for calls, messages, and app alerts.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
2.6

Smartwatch features are limited compared with broader smartwatches, especially for music, payments, and richer smart functions.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
2.3

Smartwatch functionality is intentionally stripped back, with reviewers emphasizing the absence of richer lifestyle features and framing it as an outdoor tool.

software smoothness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
2.8

Software smoothness was a recurring complaint, though later software was described as noticeably improved.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.4

Software smoothness was widely praised, with repeated comments about faster menus, snappier performance, smoother animations, and a much improved interface.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
No score yet
Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.4

Step tracking is supported and visible in daily stats, but evidence is mixed because one reviewer specifically reported frequent step overcounting.

stress tracking
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

Stress tracking appears through Suunto's resources metric, tying stress and recovery into energy-level feedback.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.0

Stress-related tracking appears through ZoneSense, HRV, TSB, and Training Stress Score rather than a simple lifestyle stress widget, making it more training-focused.

style and design
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.5

Style and design were widely liked, with reviewers praising the clean, rugged, premium Suunto look.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.4

Style and design were praised more than typical rugged watches, with reviewers calling it sleek, refined, futuristic, and good-looking despite its size.

third-party app support
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.4

Third-party app support is useful through SuuntoPlus, partner apps, and an app store reviewers felt had caught up.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.4

Third-party support is a bright spot for a performance watch, with repeated mentions of Strava, TrainingPeaks, Komoot, SuuntoPlus, and partner integrations.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
2.8

Touchscreen behavior was mixed: usable in rain and sweat, but repeatedly criticized for lag.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.8

Touchscreen responsiveness is mostly good, but reviewers noted occasional lag, wet-screen confusion, or preference for physical controls in hard conditions.

user interface
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.1

The interface was generally understandable and organized, though hardware/software lag held it back.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.8

The interface is readable and visually organized, with good use of color and fonts, but the touch-first logic and dense training terminology can require adjustment.

value for money
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.4

Value was mixed: the watch is expensive, but some reviewers found it competitive versus Garmin and COROS alternatives.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.0

Value is favorable versus Garmin and other premium rivals, but reviewers still questioned the high titanium price and overlap with the cheaper Race 2.

watch face quality
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
3.5

Watch-face options exist and can be customized, but one reviewer still wanted better watch faces.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.3

Watch face feedback is mixed: reviewers liked customization and data, but the dimmed AMOLED state drew criticism for readability.

water resistance
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.3

Water resistance was treated as suitable for swimming/snorkeling, with reviewers citing 100m specs and shallow-water use.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.5

Water resistance is well supported, with reviewers citing 100-meter resistance, pool use, swimming, snorkeling, and comfort taking it into water.

wellness insights
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.2

Wellness insights include HRV and broader training/recovery context rather than deep medical-style health features.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.1

Wellness insights are useful and easy to digest, especially resources, body-energy-style feedback, sleep, HRV, and training trends, though the ecosystem stays leaner than Garmin.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.0

Wi-Fi enables map downloads, but reviewers noted constraints such as needing normal Wi-Fi, a charger, and time.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
3.5

Wi-Fi is mainly relevant to maps and sync features; reviewers found it necessary and useful, though map downloads or setup could be fiddly.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Suunto Vertical
4.8

Workout variety is broad, with reviewers citing more than 90 modes, up to 95 sport modes, and many sport profiles.

Product 2: Suunto Vertical 2
4.7

Workout coverage was a major point of agreement: reviewers repeatedly cited 100-plus, 115-plus, or even 150-plus activity modes.