Compare Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)

P1 Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
P2 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)

Comparison Takeaways

Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5

Where It Has the Edge

  • cross-platform compatibility is 3.9 vs 2.4. Cross-platform compatibility is strong for basic use, with reviewers confirming Android and iOS support, though some features vary...
  • value for money is 4.4 vs 3.3. Value for money is strongly positive overall because reviewers praise the display, battery, and basic features for the...
  • reliability is 4.3 vs 3.5. Reliability is generally good in day-to-day use where cited, with raise-to-wake, smoothness, and connection stability praised.
  • comfort is 4.4 vs 3.9. Comfort is a major positive because the watch is light, wearable overnight, and easy to forget on the...

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)

Where It Has the Edge

  • contactless payments is 4.5 vs 1.0. Contactless payments are supported through Samsung Wallet or Samsung Pay shortcuts.
  • LTE connectivity is 4.5 vs 1.0. LTE is a consistent advantage because it is standard or broadly available, though one reviewer notes carrier setup...
  • voice assistant quality is 4.4 vs 1.0. Voice assistant quality is a strength with Gemini, which reviewers describe as convenient, useful, and directly available on...
  • ECG functionality is 4.1 vs 1.0. ECG functionality is widely listed as part of the health feature set, though one review notes Samsung-phone pairing...
Average score
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.4
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.5

Auto-detection is present and useful for walking-style activity prompts, but the evidence also notes limited customization around how it detects workouts.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Workout auto-detection is broadly useful, with reviewers citing automatic workout detection and reliable walk detection, though manual starts remain better for some activities.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
2.2

The app ecosystem is limited: reviewers describe basic smarts, some data sharing, but no broad third-party app store or richer platform-level features.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

The app ecosystem is a strength: reviewers mention many available apps, Google Play access, and expanded usefulness from the extra storage.

band quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.8

Band feedback is mostly positive for comfort, quick-release swapping, and optional straps, though one reviewer found the stock strap unremarkable and another disliked the proprietary system.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

Band feedback is mostly positive for comfort, stability, and easy removal, though one reviewer noted dirt collecting in the strap holes.

battery life
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.5

Battery life is one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly reporting multi-day to multi-week endurance, although heavy tracking and always-on use shorten it significantly.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, often described as the best in Samsung’s lineup, though heavy GPS or always-on use can reduce it.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.8

Blood oxygen tracking is widely present, including continuous or overnight options in several reviews, but it is treated as a wellness metric rather than medical-grade data.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Blood oxygen tracking is present across the health sensor set, but one long-term reviewer found SpO2 readings routinely low.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.4

Bluetooth connectivity supports calls, phone-linked GPS assistance, notifications, and music-related functions, but one reviewer notes the watch cannot connect extra Bluetooth peripherals.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

Bluetooth support is present, including Bluetooth 5.3 mentions, but external sensor connections were criticized or described as unavailable.

brightness
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.5

Brightness is a clear strength, with many reviewers highlighting the 1,500-nit AMOLED screen and strong automatic brightness behavior.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Brightness earns strong praise, with reviewers citing high nits, bright AMOLED output, and easy readability.

build quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.9

Build quality is generally praised for feeling better than a cheap smartwatch, with aluminum construction mentioned often, though some plastic elements remain.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Build quality is consistently praised through the rugged titanium case, durable chassis, and robust construction.

button controls
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.8

The rotating crown is generally useful, tactile, and easy for navigation, but reviewers note the lack of extra buttons or more advanced shortcut controls.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.7

Button controls are mixed: reviewers like the Quick/action button and programmable shortcuts, but one long-term reviewer disliked accidental presses and limited workout button behavior.

call handling
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.8

Call handling is consistently usable over Bluetooth, with several reviewers praising clear enough microphones and speakers while a few describe limited loudness or clarity.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Call handling is supported through Bluetooth calling, speaker/mic use, and smartwatch features for calls and texts.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.7

Calorie tracking appears as part of the broader activity and rings system, useful for basic motivation rather than advanced nutrition or training analysis.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Calorie tracking is included as part of the activity metrics, but the evidence is limited to feature availability rather than deep accuracy testing.

charging convenience
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.0

Charging convenience is mixed: the magnetic/pogo-pin charger attaches securely and can be shared with some Xiaomi devices, but reviewers dislike the proprietary cable and slow Bluetooth file-transfer context.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.8

Charging is wireless and reasonably convenient, but one reviewer criticized the missing wall charging block.

charging speed
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.0

Charging speed ranges from good to merely reasonable, with reports of around 60 to 80 minutes in some reviews and roughly two hours in another.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Charging speed gets limited but positive evidence, with one review reporting a full charge in about 95 minutes.

coaching features
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.6

Coaching features are better than expected for a budget watch, including running courses, AI pacer-style workout tools, breathing guidance, and some sleep suggestions, but not personalized advanced coaching.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Coaching features are a real addition, especially Running Coach, with reviewers describing personalized plans and guidance.

comfort
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.4

Comfort is a major positive because the watch is light, wearable overnight, and easy to forget on the wrist despite the large display.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Comfort depends on wrist and expectations: some reviewers found it comfortable, while others felt the weight or bulk.

companion app quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.9

The Mi Fitness companion app is generally clean, visual, and easy to use, but some reviewers call it basic and not as advanced as higher-end ecosystems.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

The companion app setup is useful but split, with health and smartwatch settings divided between Samsung Health and Galaxy Wearable.

contactless payments
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
1.0

Contactless payment support is absent in the global model according to multiple reviews, making this a clear limitation.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Contactless payments are supported through Samsung Wallet or Samsung Pay shortcuts.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.9

Cross-platform compatibility is strong for basic use, with reviewers confirming Android and iOS support, though some features vary by phone platform.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.4

Cross-platform compatibility is limited: reviews say it works with Android but not iPhone, with the best experience tied to Samsung phones.

customization options
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.8

Customization is good for budget use, especially watch faces, widgets, launcher layout, and some personal photos, but deeper watch-face customization is limited.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Customization is strong across programmable buttons, widgets, tiles, colors, and watch-face data.

display quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.4

Display quality is one of the watch's strongest attributes, with reviewers praising the large AMOLED panel, sharpness, color, responsiveness, and premium feel for the price.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Display quality is a major strength, with repeated praise for the large, vibrant AMOLED display.

durability
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.8

Durability looks decent for the price, with reviewers citing scratch-free use and rugged-enough construction, though dust protection and premium glass are not emphasized.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Durability is a standout, backed by titanium construction, MIL-STD claims, scratch protection, and reviewer reports of little damage.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
1.0

ECG functionality is not available, with reviewers explicitly saying there is no ECG option.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

ECG functionality is widely listed as part of the health feature set, though one review notes Samsung-phone pairing requirements for ECG and blood pressure.

fit
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.0

Fit is mixed: the watch is light and straps cover a broad wrist range, but the single large size can feel overwhelming on smaller wrists.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.8

Fit is polarizing: it can fit some larger wrists well, but reviewers also note the single 47mm size and large wrist footprint.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.6

Fitness tracking accuracy is mixed: some reviewers found it effective or strong for casual tracking, while others called it less precise than dedicated sports watches.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

Fitness tracking accuracy is generally good for everyday and running use, though scientific testing places it below the top alternatives.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.7

GPS accuracy is split across reviews, ranging from accurate and reliable for casual runs to overreported distances and slight running inaccuracies.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

GPS accuracy is good in several reviewer tests and supports dual-frequency GPS, but scientific testing found some route deviation.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.0

Health tracking accuracy is adequate for basic wellness but not advanced or medical-grade, with reviewers noting decent data alongside sensor limitations.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.7

Health tracking is feature-rich but mixed in accuracy, with strong sensor coverage offset by questionable antioxidant, HRV, and some sleep-stage findings.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.3

Heart rate accuracy is inconsistent: some tests found close results against chest straps, while others saw high readings, lag, or occasional anomalies.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Heart-rate accuracy is strongest in running evidence, with one reviewer matching a Polar strap closely, while scientific testing calls it good rather than elite.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
1.0

LTE connectivity is absent on the global model, with several reviewers specifically noting no LTE or eSIM support.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

LTE is a consistent advantage because it is standard or broadly available, though one reviewer notes carrier setup can cost extra.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Navigation support is useful through offline maps, Google Maps routing, and GPS widgets, but one reviewer notes no built-in maps on-watch.

materials quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.7

Materials quality is better than many budget watches thanks to aluminum alloy, but reviewers still mention plastic or plasticky elements.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

Materials quality is strong, centered on titanium, sapphire/robust design references, and corrosion-resistant claims.

menu navigation
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.1

Menu navigation is easy overall, helped by the rotating crown, app grid/list options, and stacked widget layout.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Menu navigation is mostly straightforward through swipes, app drawers, digital bezel haptics, and simple operation.

music controls
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.7

Music controls are useful for controlling phone playback, and several reviews note accessible media controls from the watch.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Music features are useful for downloaded Spotify, streaming, media tiles, and larger storage for music.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.5

Onboard music storage exists and is useful for phone-free workouts on supported setups, but storage and transfer behavior are limited.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

Onboard storage is a clear 2025 upgrade, repeatedly described as 64GB and useful for music, apps, and offline maps.

operating system experience
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
2.9

The operating system experience is lightweight and mostly pleasant, but reviewers repeatedly cite proprietary HyperOS limitations versus Wear OS or watchOS.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

The operating system experience benefits from One UI 8/Wear OS updates, Gemini, Now Bar, and refreshed interface features.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.5

Outdoor visibility is excellent across reviews thanks to the bright AMOLED display and readable screen in direct sunlight.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with multiple reviewers saying the bright display remains readable in sunlight.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.7

Pairing reliability is strong where discussed, with reviewers reporting no pairing or syncing issues and quick satellite/connection readiness.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

Pairing and setup reliability are positive where tested, with instant recognition and quick setup noted.

recovery insights
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.0

Recovery insights are present through training status, recovery time, breathing, and workout-load style metrics, though they remain basic.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

Recovery-style insights are mixed: vascular load interests some reviewers, while HRV and related metrics draw skepticism.

reliability
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.3

Reliability is generally good in day-to-day use where cited, with raise-to-wake, smoothness, and connection stability praised.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

Reliability is mostly acceptable but not flawless, with one review noting brief display interruptions and another calling performance not horrible rather than perfect.

safety features
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.0

Safety features are limited but include an SOS option that can call an emergency contact through the connected phone.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Safety features include fall detection, emergency siren references, sleep apnea alerts, and related health/safety setup options.

size options
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
2.0

Size options are weak because the watch comes in one large size, which one reviewer said will not suit every wrist.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.4

Size options are limited by the single large 47mm format, though the band can fit a range of wrists and the screen size appeals to some users.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.3

Sleep tracking accuracy is mixed: some reviewers found duration and broad stages close, while others saw inconsistent results or deep-sleep overestimation.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

Sleep tracking is useful and improving, but reviewers disagree on sleep stages and awake-time accuracy.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
1.9

Smartphone notifications are one of the clearest compromises: mirroring works, but replies, emojis, pictures, and actionable notifications are limited or missing.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Smartphone notifications are well supported, with reviewers noting detailed notification views and suggested replies.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.1

Smartwatch features cover the basics well, including notifications, calls, alarms, timers, and basic apps, but remain limited versus premium smartwatches.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Smartwatch features are broad, including LTE, calls, texts, Gemini, Now Bar, storage, and Samsung’s full watch software stack.

software smoothness
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.8

Software smoothness is mostly good, with some reviews calling it smooth and others noticing stutters, touch lag, or less-than-60Hz-feeling animations.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Software smoothness is generally good, with smooth app launches and more functional One UI behavior, despite occasional reliability caveats.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.5

Step counting accuracy has limited direct evidence, but the detailed review found exercise-mode step counting nearly dead-on and daily counts generally close.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Step counting is positive in basic walking tests, but one reviewer notes accuracy drops when arms are not swinging.

stress tracking
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.4

Stress tracking is widely included, but reviews treat it as a basic wellness feature and one reviewer found it slow and sensitive to movement.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.1

Stress tracking is included in Samsung’s health sensor set, though the reviews provide feature evidence more than accuracy testing.

style and design
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.8

Style and design are broadly attractive and modern, but several reviewers point out obvious Apple Watch influence or lack of originality.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Style is divisive: some reviewers like the rugged, colorful, stylish look, while others find it bulky or not pretty.

third-party app support
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
1.5

Third-party app support is poor, with no native Spotify or YouTube Music support, few extra apps, and one reviewer saying no third-party apps are available.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Third-party app support is solid through Google Play, fitness apps such as Strava and Map My Run, and a growing Wear OS app selection.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.7

Touchscreen responsiveness is mostly good, including wet-use and swipe/tap responsiveness, though one reviewer found touch lag in parts of the software.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Touchscreen responsiveness and gesture operation are described as intentional and straightforward in the long-term review evidence.

user interface
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.1

The user interface is generally approachable, smooth, and pleasant, with reviewer praise for simplicity and navigation despite some platform limitations.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

The user interface is improved and functional, though some reviewers dislike parts of the visual layout.

value for money
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.4

Value for money is strongly positive overall because reviewers praise the display, battery, and basic features for the price, though one reviewer considered it overpriced against cheaper alternatives.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.3

Value for money is the main weak point because reviewers repeatedly question the high price and minimal 2025 hardware changes.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
1.0

Voice assistant quality scores poorly because reviewers state that Alexa or other voice assistant support is absent.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.4

Voice assistant quality is a strength with Gemini, which reviewers describe as convenient, useful, and directly available on the wrist.

watch face quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.1

Watch face quality is a strength, with many free, attractive, and varied faces, although customization depth differs by face.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Watch faces are a strength, with reviewers praising quantity, customization, and Samsung’s polished face designs.

water resistance
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.0

Water resistance is consistently supported, with 5ATM ratings and swimming or shower use reported, though hot-water and diving caveats remain.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Water resistance is a strong feature, with reviews citing 5ATM/10ATM ratings, IP68 claims, and pool/rain/snow use.

wellness insights
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
3.5

Wellness insights include sleep suggestions, Vitality Score, and basic health summaries, but reviewers note limited personalization or AI-style guidance.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.8

Wellness insights are useful but uneven: sleep coaching and vascular load get interest, while energy score and antioxidant index receive skepticism.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
1.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is absent, specifically called out as a limitation for faster file transfers or standalone connectivity.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Wi-Fi support is present across connectivity mentions, including LTE/Wi-Fi model references.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5
4.1

Workout variety is excellent for the category, with reviewers repeatedly citing more than 150 sports modes and broad activity coverage.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.6

Workout variety is strong, with reviewers citing many tracked activities, multisport/triathlon capability, and broad exercise lists.