- Compared: display size The reviewer compares it side by side with Apple watch and highlights the Redmi Watch 5’s larger screen.
- Worse: battery life The reviewer says the Redmi Watch 5 lasts far longer than the Apple watch.
- Compared: design imitation The reviewer says the Redmi Watch 5 copies the Apple Watch look, helping usability but hurting originality.
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5 Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Redmi Watch 5 if you want a low-cost, bright, lightweight watch with long battery life and basic fitness features. Skip it if you need rich apps, actionable replies, NFC/LTE, or precision training and sleep metrics.
Best for
Best for budget-focused users who want a comfortable, bright, long-lasting smartwatch for notifications, calls, casual workouts, GPS runs, and basic health trends.
Not for
Not for users who need a full app ecosystem, reliable actionable messaging, contactless payments, LTE, Wi-Fi transfers, or advanced training and sleep analytics.
Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Watch 5 is presented by reviewers as a polished budget wearable built around a standout display, light comfort, and unusually long battery life. It handles the essentials well: notifications, calls, broad workout modes, GPS for casual running, watch faces, and simple health dashboards. The tradeoff is that its smartwatch side remains closer to an advanced fitness band than a full platform. Actionable notifications, NFC payments, LTE, Wi-Fi, richer third-party apps, and advanced coaching are missing or limited, and tracking accuracy varies by workout type and sleep metric. For everyday users, the evidence points to impressive value and a pleasant experience; for serious athletes or app-heavy smartwatch buyers, the limits are hard to ignore.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Worse: weight and exercise comfort The reviewer found Apple Watch Ultra 2 too heavy and presents the Redmi Watch 5 as the opposite for workouts.
- Better: display brightness The screen is less bright than the Apple Watch Ultra 2, but the reviewer still praises it at the price.
- Cheaper: value The reviewer points to CMF Watch Pro 2 as a cheaper alternative with similar features.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
59 reviewed features- Very positive 4.5-5.0 20% 12 features
- Positive 3.5-4.4 47% 28 features
- Neutral 2.5-3.4 14% 8 features
- Negative 1.5-2.4 19% 11 features
- Very negative below 1.5 0% 0 features
Pros
-
Step counting accuracy received limited but very positive evidence, with one reviewer finding exercise-mode counts nearly exact.
-
Display quality is one of the most praised areas, with reviewers consistently highlighting the large, vibrant, sharp AMOLED screen.
-
Brightness is widely praised, with reviewers repeatedly calling the AMOLED panel bright enough for outdoor use and high peak brightness.
-
Outdoor visibility is strongly praised thanks to the bright AMOLED panel and readable screen in direct sunlight.
-
Battery life is the strongest consensus point, with most reviewers reporting unusually long endurance for a budget smartwatch despite one heavier-use outlier.
-
Watch face quality is strong, with reviewers praising the large, stylish, free, and varied watch-face library.
-
Touchscreen responsiveness is positive, with reviewers praising swipes, taps, and even wet-screen responsiveness.
-
Blood oxygen tracking received limited but positive accuracy evidence, with one reviewer saying readings were close in testing.
-
The flashlight received a brief positive usefulness mention as a handy quick setting.
-
Pairing reliability has limited but positive evidence, with no issues reported for pairing and syncing.
-
Recovery insights received limited positive evidence through beneficial breathing and running features tied to training and recovery.
-
Reliability evidence is limited but positive, with one reviewer reporting no stutters or hiccups in use.
-
The user interface is generally easy and smooth, with straightforward layouts and good navigation for a budget watch.
-
Coaching features are useful for budget fitness guidance, including running courses, guided workouts, breathing exercises, and export options.
-
Durability evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers reporting no scratches or scuffs after use.
-
Water resistance is reassuring for swimming and showers, with reviewers noting 5ATM support and successful pool/shower use.
-
Value for money is a major strength, but not universal: most reviewers call it excellent value, while one felt it was overpriced against cheaper alternatives.
-
Charging speed is generally acceptable to strong, with reviewers noting quick top-ups, one-hour charging, or reasonable full-charge times.
-
Menu navigation is generally easy, with praise for app finding, crown scrolling, and text-labeled icon layouts.
-
Comfort is broadly praised because the watch is light and wearable day and night, though its size can still matter for smaller wrists.
-
The rotating crown and button controls are generally liked for tactile feedback and navigation, though one reviewer wished for more button functionality.
-
Workout tracking variety is strong, with reviewers praising broad activity coverage, many sports, and useful running/workout modes.
-
The Mi Fitness companion app is generally viewed as clean, visual, and easy to use, but some reviewers found it basic or behind stronger rivals.
-
Style and design are mostly praised for looking modern, smart, and not cheap, although several reviewers criticized the Apple-like originality.
-
GPS accuracy is mixed-positive: many reviewers found it accurate or reliable for casual runs, but some saw overreporting or slight inaccuracies.
-
Call handling is mostly good for quick wrist calls, but reviewers noted limits such as modest loudness, occasional lag, or uneven clarity.
-
Bluetooth connectivity was praised in limited evidence for stable, lower-latency calling and audio support.
-
Music controls are basic but useful for quickly pausing, resuming, skipping tracks, and changing volume.
-
Safety features received limited positive evidence from the SOS function, which the reviewer considered useful for emergencies.
-
Customization is mixed: photo faces, watch faces, and UI options are praised, but some reviewers wanted deeper watch-face customization.
-
Auto-detection is useful but basic: one reviewer saw workout prompts work well, while another liked the feature but wanted more control.
-
Build quality is mixed-positive: several reviewers praised the aluminum feel, while one felt the casing was plasticky.
-
Smartwatch features cover the basics well for the price, but reviewers repeatedly frame them as limited compared with richer smartwatch platforms.
-
Onboard music storage is useful for phone-free workouts but inconsistent across phones and hurt by slow Bluetooth transfers.
-
Materials quality is budget-appropriate: reviewers noted aluminum alloy and better materials, but not a fancy feel.
-
Band feedback is mostly positive for comfort, swapping, and optional materials, though some reviewers disliked proprietary straps or unremarkable fit.
-
Software smoothness is mostly good, with smooth navigation in several reviews, but some reported stutters, lag, or touch delays.
-
Fitness tracking accuracy is mixed: some casual and heart-rate workout results impressed reviewers, while others found it basic or not ideal for serious tracking.
-
Voice notes are useful but mixed: reviewers liked recording and audio notes, while others noted loudness, access, or sharing limitations.
-
Heart rate accuracy is mixed: some tests were close to chest straps, while other reviewers found lag, high readings, or odd spikes.
Cons
-
The operating system is smooth and functional for basics, but reviewers criticized HyperOS limitations and missing richer smartwatch integrations.
-
Health tracking accuracy is adequate for general use but not advanced, with reviewers warning against medical-grade expectations while noting some improvements.
-
Fit is split: one reviewer found alternative straps did not fit well, while another found the watch balanced on the wrist.
-
Sleep tracking accuracy is mixed: some reviewers found it close for sleep duration, while others saw inconsistent sleep stages and overestimated deep sleep.
-
Wellness insights are mixed: Vitality and sleep routine suggestions are appreciated, but deeper personalized advice is scarce.
-
Cross-platform compatibility is useful but compromised, with reviewers noting broader phone support alongside reduced functionality on some platforms.
-
Charging convenience is mixed: the magnetic connection can be secure and cable-sharing helps, but several reviewers disliked the proprietary pogo-pin cable.
-
Size options are a weakness because the large one-size design can feel overwhelming or bulky on smaller wrists.
-
Reviewers found the app ecosystem limited, citing missing major apps and only a small number of add-on apps.
-
Mapping and navigation are weak because reviewers noted no native map apps, offline maps, or GPX-style navigation.
-
Smartphone notifications are a common weakness because messages can be viewed but usually cannot be acted on or replied to.
-
Third-party app support is weak because reviewers noted no native major music/map apps, no third-party apps, and limited accessory support.
-
Body temperature tracking is effectively absent; the reviewer grouped the missing temperature sensor with features that would have been nice to have.
-
ECG functionality is missing, and one reviewer treated the absent advanced sensors as nice-to-have but not expected at the price.
-
Stress tracking was criticized in one review as slow and sensitive to movement, making continuous tracking less reliable.
-
Contactless payments are a clear limitation because global reviewers repeatedly noted the lack of NFC payment support.
-
LTE connectivity is a drawback on the global model, with reviewers noting the lack of global LTE/eSIM support.
-
Wi-Fi connectivity is absent and criticized because file transfers depend on slower Bluetooth methods.
-
Voice assistant quality is poor because the reviewer noted effectively no voice assistant support.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is below average in smartphone notifications, voice assistant quality, stress tracking.
Summary
8 compared features- Above average 0.4+ pts higher 0% 0 features
- Same as average within 0.3 pts 0% 0 features
- Below average 0.4+ pts lower 100% 8 features
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| smartphone notifications | 2.1 | 3.5 | -1.4 |
| voice assistant quality | 1.5 | 3.0 | -1.5 |
| stress tracking | 2.0 | 3.5 | -1.5 |
| app ecosystem | 2.3 | 3.6 | -1.3 |
| Wi-Fi connectivity | 1.5 | 2.8 | -1.3 |
| contactless payments | 1.5 | 2.7 | -1.2 |
| mapping and navigation | 2.3 | 3.4 | -1.2 |
| third-party app support | 2.0 | 3.2 | -1.2 |
FAQ
Is the Redmi Watch 5 good value?
Most reviewers say yes, praising the bright display, light build, long battery life, and broad basic feature set at a budget price. One reviewer felt it was overpriced compared with cheaper alternatives.
How good is the battery life?
Battery life is one of the strongest review themes. Many reviewers reported multi-week or near-multi-week endurance, though heavy tracking, GPS, and always-on display use shorten it.
Can it replace a full smartwatch?
Only for basic smartwatch needs. Reviewers liked calls, notifications, watch faces, timers, music features, and utilities, but criticized missing actionable replies, limited apps, no NFC payments, and no global LTE.
Is the display easy to see outdoors?
Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised the large AMOLED display, high brightness, vibrant colors, and outdoor readability, often calling the screen one of the watch’s best features.
How accurate is fitness and health tracking?
It is best treated as casual tracking. Some reviewers found GPS, steps, and certain heart-rate workouts accurate, while others reported overreported distance, heart-rate spikes, and inconsistent sleep stages.
Does it work well for smaller wrists?
Not always. Reviewers liked the low weight, but the single large size felt overwhelming or bulky to some smaller-wrist users.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Tech, Gadgets and Other Great Ideas
- Review score
- 3.6/5
YouTube - The Product Reviewer
- Review score
- 4.1/5
YouTube - Nikolay Tanev
- Review score
- 4.2/5
YouTube - Wise Tech Buys
- Review score
- 3.6/5
Article Reviews
markellisreviews.com
- Review score
- 4.3/5
Consider This Instead
If you want better contactless payments
Choose Garmin Enduro 3. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for contactless payments, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better LTE connectivity
Choose Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025). It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for LTE connectivity, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better voice assistant quality
Choose Samsung Galaxy Watch 6. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for voice assistant quality, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better smartphone notifications
Choose Garmin Forerunner 165. It scores 5.0 vs 2.1 for smartphone notifications, with a 4.2 overall score.
Overall Top Smartwatches Alternatives
Best for rugged outdoor training, long battery life, accurate GPS, maps, calls, and a genuinely useful flashlight. Skip it if the high price, tactical extras, proprietary charging cable, or mixed...
Pros: wellness insights, build quality
Cons: LTE connectivity, band quality
Good if you want the best balanced Apple Watch for an older upgrade, stronger battery, comfort, and health tools. Skip it if you own Series 10, need week-long battery, or...
Pros: ECG functionality, app ecosystem
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, recovery insights
Choose it if you want a rugged Garmin hybrid with real hands, a sharp AMOLED display, strong tracking, and a genuinely useful flashlight. Skip it if price, full maps, onboard...
Pros: heart rate accuracy, GPS accuracy
Cons: onboard music storage, mapping and navigation
Best for bright AMOLED visuals, strong battery life, accurate GPS, maps, and standout value. Skip it if you need rich apps, reliable payments, LTE, ECG, or the cleanest companion app.
Pros: step counting accuracy, menu navigation
Cons: voice assistant quality, contactless payments