Average score
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.6
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Auto-detection is limited to simple activities, but reviewers did note the watch can recognize basic exercise like walking without a manual start.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.0

Auto-detection is explicitly criticized in testing, with reviewers saying workouts usually need to be started manually to access the watch’s richer tracking features.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.8

The watch leans on Mi Fitness and can link with common fitness services, giving it a modest but usable app ecosystem rather than a broad one.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

The app ecosystem is solid rather than class-leading: reviewers cite Connect IQ support and a healthy app catalog, but not the broader polish or reach of Apple or Wear OS ecosystems.

band quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.4

Band feedback is mixed: the strap material is decent and soft enough, but several reviewers disliked the awkward fastening design.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Band quality is generally good, with flexible silicone straps and solid sweat performance, though silicone can stay damp and irritate skin if not dried after workouts.

battery life
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.3

Battery life is a clear strength, with most reviewers reporting about a week to roughly two weeks depending on usage, even if claims looked optimistic.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Battery life is a major strength. Reviewers report multi-day to multi-week endurance depending on usage, with always-on display and GPS workouts reducing runtime but still leaving it ahead of many rivals.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Blood oxygen tracking is widely available and repeatedly mentioned as a core health feature, with some reviewers finding readings close to comparison devices.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

The watch supports blood oxygen tracking and related wellness sensors, but reviewers discuss it more as part of the feature set than as a standout accuracy differentiator.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Bluetooth connectivity supports calls and watch-to-phone features, and one reviewer specifically reported stable connection behavior.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Bluetooth connectivity is dependable for phone pairing and headphone playback, with no major complaints in the selected reviews.

brightness
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.3

Screen brightness is usable, and one written review praised auto-brightness, but multiple video reviewers complained about missing automatic brightness control.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Brightness is repeatedly praised. Reviewers call the AMOLED screen bright, vivid, and easy to read in varied lighting.

build quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.7

Build quality is acceptable for the price, though the case is clearly plastic and premium feel is limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Build quality feels premium overall, helped by the metal or titanium bezel and polished finish, even if outright ruggedness is not the headline strength.

button controls
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

The single side button is consistently described as useful and straightforward for power, home, or app-list access.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Button controls are a clear positive. Multiple reviews praise the tactile hardware buttons and say they remain easy to use during workouts and with gloves.

call handling
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.7

Bluetooth calling is one of the standout smartwatch features, though speaker quality and assistant-related call workflows still come with compromises.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.7

Call handling is inconsistent across reviews. One source says calls can be answered via a paired phone, while others explicitly note missing call functionality compared with Garmin’s more smartwatch-focused models.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.5

Calorie tracking is present as part of the watch's daily activity stats, but reviewers treated it as a basic metric rather than a standout feature.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.1

Calorie tracking is only modestly useful. Calories are visible in daily metrics, but one review says users wanting stronger calorie and intake support should look elsewhere.

charging convenience
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Charging is simple thanks to the magnetic charger design, though it still uses a proprietary cable instead of wireless charging.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.5

Charging convenience is a weak point because Garmin still uses a proprietary connector, and reviewers call the port connection delicate while also noting the lack of wireless charging.

charging speed
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Charging speed is described as decent rather than class-leading, with one reviewer citing a full charge in about 80 minutes.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Charging speed is good, with reviewers citing roughly an hour to reach high percentages and quick top-ups that provide meaningful battery in minutes.

coaching features
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.8

Coaching-style features are light but present through items like Vitality Score and VO2 Max-related readouts rather than deep guided training.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Coaching features are strong, with suggested workouts, race prediction, and readiness-style guidance giving the watch a helpful training-assistant feel.

comfort
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Comfort is generally good because the watch is light, but strap design can make wearing it less convenient than it should be.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Comfort is a strength for most users thanks to the light, slim build and wearable design, though the large case can still be noticeable for some sleepers or smaller wrists.

companion app quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.3

Mi Fitness gets positive feedback for being user-friendly, data-rich, and modern-looking despite the budget positioning.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

Companion app quality is mixed. Garmin Connect is praised for depth and data access, but several reviewers also call it confusing or poorly organized in places.

contactless payments
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
1.0

There is no NFC payment support, so contactless payments are a clear omission.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Contactless payments are available through Garmin Pay, but real-world usefulness depends heavily on bank support, which several reviewers say is still uneven.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.5

The watch was explicitly reported to work with both Android phones and iPhones.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Cross-platform compatibility is strong, with consistent support for both Android and iPhone across reviews.

customization options
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Customization is respectable for a budget watch, with configurable tiles, widgets, and some watch-face tweaking.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Customization options are extensive, including watch faces, widgets, data pages, and other configurable on-watch and in-app elements.

display quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.6

Display impressions are mixed: the big screen is easy to read and sometimes crisp, but the LCD panel lacks the contrast and premium look of AMOLED rivals.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Display quality is one of the headline wins. The AMOLED panel is widely described as sharp, vibrant, and transformative compared with older MIP models.

durability
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
2.8

Durability is mixed because the TPU strap material is durable, but reviewers also raised concerns about plastic lugs and long-term wear.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Durability is mixed. Some reviewers appreciate the materials and scratch resistance expectations, but several also report real scratches and visible wear sooner than expected.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

ECG functionality is absent. Multiple reviews explicitly state that the Forerunner 965 does not include ECG hardware or support.

fit
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.7

Fit is generally comfortable, though the large case can look or feel tall on smaller wrists.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.5

Fit is acceptable for many wrists but not ideal for everyone. Several reviews warn that the 47mm case can feel large on smaller wrists.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

One written review directly credited the accelerometer and workout setup with helping the user track activity accurately.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

Fitness tracking accuracy is a standout strength, with reviewers praising the consistency of workout metrics and the overall trustworthiness of exercise data.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
1.5

GPS is a major compromise because the watch lacks built-in GPS and instead depends on the phone for route-based workout data.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.9

GPS accuracy is one of the watch’s clearest strengths, repeatedly described as spot-on, industry-leading, or nearly dead accurate in testing.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Health tracking as a whole is better than expected for the price, with reviewers calling the sensor package solid for general monitoring.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Health tracking accuracy is good overall but not flawless. Reviewers praise the depth and usefulness of health data, while some flag sleep-related inconsistency that affects broader health confidence.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.3

Heart rate tracking is one of the stronger sensor areas, with reviewers calling it better than expected and broadly in line with reference devices.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Heart rate accuracy is strong for a wrist-based sensor, with several reviewers calling it excellent or near chest-strap performance, though interval lag can still appear.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

LTE connectivity is absent. Reviews explicitly note that the watch lacks LTE or mobile internet support.

materials quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.2

Materials are functional rather than premium, centered on plastic construction and TPU strap components.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Materials quality is solid, with repeated mentions of titanium, Gorilla Glass, and generally premium-feeling hardware choices.

menu navigation
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.3

Menus and on-watch navigation are easy enough to use, with reviewers calling the structure simple and straightforward.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Menu navigation is generally good once learned, with reviewers highlighting customizable widgets and easy menu flow, though Garmin’s depth can still feel dense at first.

music controls
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Music controls are available for phone playback from the watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Music controls are well covered for a sports watch, with reviewers noting onboard player controls and convenient workout use.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
1.0

The watch does not provide onboard storage for audio files.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Onboard music storage is a strength thanks to offline music support and ample storage for playlists, maps, and media.

operating system experience
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.5

The software experience is basic but usable, with a lightweight feel rather than a premium one.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.9

The operating system experience is capable but not always elegant. Reviewers appreciate the depth and button-first control options, yet some still describe Garmin’s interface conventions as archaic or complex.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.3

Outdoor visibility is good enough at high brightness, with reviewers saying the display stayed readable outside.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Outdoor visibility is a clear positive. Reviewers say the AMOLED screen remains readable outdoors and in direct sun, even if some still prefer MIP’s look.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.3

Pairing and day-to-day connection behavior were mostly positive once Mi Fitness was set up.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Pairing reliability is strong, with quick phone pairing and dependable syncing or headphone use in the selected reviews.

recovery insights
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.8

Recovery-style metrics exist in a limited form through features like Vitality Score, giving some post-activity insight without advanced coaching depth.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.8

Recovery insights are a major strength, especially through Training Readiness, recovery time, and related load metrics that help guide training decisions.

reliability
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.5

One reviewer explicitly reported stable connection behavior with no obvious syncing problems in day-to-day use.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Reliability is broadly strong. Reviewers describe stable tracking, dependable uploads, and few serious failures in day-to-day use.

safety features
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Safety features are meaningful, with reviewers highlighting LiveTrack and fall detection as useful extras for training and outdoor use.

size options
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
No score yet
Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
2.8

Size options are limited because the Forerunner 965 is effectively a one-size model, which can be restrictive for smaller-wrist users.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Sleep tracking is feature-complete for the class, with REM and nap detection mentioned, and at least one reviewer called the accuracy pretty good.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Sleep tracking accuracy is one of the most mixed areas. Some reviewers call it excellent or improved versus older Garmins, while others say the results can feel off or inconsistent.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.3

Notifications are dependable and customizable, but reply support is limited or absent depending on the reviewer and use case.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.7

Smartphone notifications work well enough for viewing alerts, but several reviews point out limitations around interaction and reply behavior, especially on iPhone.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.2

For a budget model, the watch offers a surprisingly broad feature set including calls, Alexa support, and extras like remote camera control.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.2

Smartwatch features are good for a training watch, including notifications, music, and payments, but they still trail more full-fledged smartwatches in polish and breadth.

software smoothness
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.3

Software smoothness is a plus, with repeated mentions of smooth transitions, animations, and low lag.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Software smoothness is a strong point, with reviewers describing the interface as fluid and largely free of lag or stutter.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Step counting got a positive single-review mention, with no obvious pedometer issues reported.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.5

Step counting accuracy is strong in the selected evidence, including one low-error test result and praise for the visible real-time counter.

stress tracking
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Stress tracking is included as part of the standard health suite and is presented as a built-in wellness feature.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.3

Stress tracking is well integrated into Garmin’s broader readiness and wellness stack, with reviewers frequently citing it as one of the useful day-to-day metrics.

style and design
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.5

Styling is decent for the price, but several reviewers still thought the plastic-heavy design looked obviously budget-oriented.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Style and design are widely praised, with the AMOLED display, slimmer body, and premium bezel helping the 965 look more modern and upscale than earlier Forerunners.

third-party app support
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
2.0

Third-party app support is limited to links with external fitness services rather than true installable app support on the watch.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Third-party app support is good, with Connect IQ apps plus integrations like Strava and TrainingPeaks adding flexibility for training and data workflows.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.5

Touch responsiveness was directly praised in the written review.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.4

Touchscreen responsiveness is generally praised, with reviewers saying touch makes navigation easy and smooth when they choose to use it.

user interface
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.3

The interface is easy to understand and offers useful widget organization, even if it remains fairly basic.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

The user interface is improved and easier on the eyes than earlier Forerunners, with smoother visuals and a more modern presentation.

value for money
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.1

Value is one of the watch's strongest arguments thanks to the very low price, though at least one comparison reviewer felt spending a little more buys a noticeably better upgrade.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
3.8

Value for money is mixed. Several reviewers think the feature set can justify the price, but others say many buyers would be better served by cheaper Garmin alternatives.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
1.9

Voice assistant support is inconsistent: some reviews mention Alexa, but availability, reliability, and spoken responses are limited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
1.5

Voice assistant functionality is absent. Reviews explicitly note there is no voice assistant, microphone-based response system, or similar wrist voice feature.

watch face quality
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
3.8

Watch-face selection is a plus overall, though storage and customization limits keep it from feeling unlimited.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.1

Watch face quality is good overall, especially visually on the AMOLED display, but some reviewers also note fewer face options than previous Garmin experiences.

water resistance
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.5

Water resistance is strong on paper at 5 ATM or equivalent pressure ratings, even if workout support for water activities is inconsistent.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Water resistance is strong, with repeated confirmation of 5ATM or 50-meter suitability for swimming and everyday water exposure.

wellness insights
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.0

Wellness features go beyond raw stats with sleep charts, recommendations, body-battery-style readouts, and similar overview tools.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.6

Wellness insights are a major selling point, with Body Battery, sleep scores, readiness-style guidance, and rest cues making daily health data more actionable.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
1.0

There is no built-in Wi-Fi support.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.0

Wi-Fi connectivity is useful for tasks like map or music downloads, though it is not framed as especially fast or notable compared with other core features.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Xiaomi Redmi 5 Active
4.5

Workout variety is a real strength, with reviewers repeatedly mentioning large sport-mode counts and broad activity coverage.

Product 2: Garmin Forerunner 965
4.7

Workout tracking variety is excellent, with broad multisport coverage, triathlon support, and many workout modes ranging from yoga to golf and hiking.