Compare Garmin Forerunner 255S vs OnePlus Watch 3

P1 Garmin Forerunner 255S
P2 OnePlus Watch 3

Comparison Takeaways

Garmin Forerunner 255S

Where It Has the Edge

  • fit is 4.7 vs 2.5. Fit is excellent for smaller wrists, with the 41mm case repeatedly described as comfortable and well-sized.
  • cross-platform compatibility is 4.5 vs 2.5. The watch works across Android and iOS, with a consistent Garmin Connect experience, though Android gets better message...
  • size options is 4.7 vs 2.8. Size options are a standout benefit because the 255S gives smaller wrists a serious multisport watch without losing...
  • reliability is 4.8 vs 3.3. Reliability is supported by long-term updates and GPS stability, with Garmin’s longevity praised in follow-up use.

OnePlus Watch 3

Where It Has the Edge

  • touchscreen responsiveness is 4.5 vs 1.0. Touch responsiveness is praised where cited, with the display described as sharp, vibrant, and responsive.
  • third-party app support is 4.6 vs 2.5. Third-party app support is strong because Wear OS provides Play Store access and popular apps like Strava, Spotify,...
  • menu navigation is 4.6 vs 2.9. Menu navigation benefits greatly from the functional crown and easier scrolling, especially compared with touchscreen-only use.
  • charging convenience is 4.4 vs 3.2. Charging convenience is strong thanks to a compact magnetic dock, USB-C-friendly cradle design, and easy top-ups.
Average score
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0
Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.0
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.3

Auto workout detection is explicitly supported for common activities, though reviewers focused more on workout depth than detection behavior.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.5

Connect IQ adds watch faces, data fields and apps, but reviewers describe the ecosystem as useful rather than Apple-level and sometimes limited.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.5

Reviewers consistently credit Wear OS and Google services with giving the watch a strong Android app ecosystem.

band quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.4

Reviewers consistently liked the silicone strap, calling it comfortable, adjustable, exercise-ready and tough enough for regular training use.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.9

Band feedback is mixed: quick-release and strap compatibility are positives, but smaller 43mm strap sizing and basic rubber bands drew criticism.

battery life
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.4

Battery life is a major strength, commonly landing around a week or more, though music, GPS and oxygen monitoring can reduce it.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.7

Battery life is the clearest strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting multi-day endurance that beats most Wear OS rivals.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0

Blood oxygen tracking is present for sleep or daytime monitoring, but reviews treat it as one metric among many rather than a standout feature.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.0

Blood oxygen tracking is present for sleep and health checks, with reviewers noting SpO2 monitoring as part of the health stack.

Bluetooth connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.9

Bluetooth headphone pairing is generally workable and music-friendly, though one long-term user found headphone pairing slow and frustrating.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.9

Bluetooth is treated as reliable enough for core use and calls, though reviewers mainly mention it as the watch’s non-LTE connection path.

brightness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0

Brightness control is handled through physical buttons and fits the watch’s practical, low-key outdoor design.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.6

Brightness is a major display strength, with multiple reviewers citing 2,200-nit peak brightness and strong readability.

build quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.1

Build quality is generally solid for a lightweight polymer watch, with durable long-term impressions but some concern about scratch-prone Gorilla Glass.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.6

Build quality is widely praised for feeling solid, premium, and improved over earlier OnePlus watches.

button controls
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.2

The five-button layout is repeatedly praised for workouts, water use and avoiding accidental touches, even if it requires adjustment.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.7

The functional rotating crown is one of the most praised upgrades, improving scrolling, zooming, shortcuts, and tactile control.

call handling
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.5

Call handling is basic: Android users can respond or reject calls through the watch, but it still relies heavily on the paired phone.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.9

Call handling works and voice quality is generally acceptable, though one reviewer found the speakerphone too quiet.

calorie tracking usefulness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.1

Calorie tracking is mixed: one review lists calorie data as useful, while another found the calorie goal too easy to trigger.

charging convenience
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.2

Charging is functional but not premium; Garmin’s common cable is convenient for Garmin owners, while the proprietary setup feels dated to one reviewer.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.4

Charging convenience is strong thanks to a compact magnetic dock, USB-C-friendly cradle design, and easy top-ups.

charging speed
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.6

Charging speed is repeatedly praised, with many reviews reporting quick top-ups and full charges in roughly an hour or less.

coaching features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.4

Coaching features are a clear strength, with Garmin Coach, suggested workouts, race tools and personal-trainer-like prompts repeatedly highlighted.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.6

Coaching is mixed: auto-pause and workout guidance can help, but some reviewers wanted more actionable improvement tips.

comfort
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.6

Comfort is one of the strongest points, especially for sleep and long workouts, because the smaller case feels light and unobtrusive.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.9

Comfort varies sharply by size and wrist: the 43mm model and some straps are comfortable, while the large model can feel bulky.

companion app quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.7

Garmin Connect is useful and reliable for setup, syncing, visualization and customization, though music setup and app separation can confuse newcomers.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.9

The OHealth app is often described as useful and readable, but setup, pairing flexibility, and customization limitations remain concerns.

contactless payments
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.8

Garmin Pay and NFC are supported and useful, but reviewers note Garmin’s payment system lacks the polish or bank support of rivals.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.4

Contactless payments are well supported through Google Wallet or Google Pay and reviewers did not report major payment issues.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.5

The watch works across Android and iOS, with a consistent Garmin Connect experience, though Android gets better message response support.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
2.5

Compatibility is limited to Android; reviewers repeatedly note that iPhone users cannot use the watch.

customization options
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.4

Customization is strong, covering workout data screens, watch faces, colors, app settings and per-activity tracking options.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.0

Customization is good for buttons, faces, tiles, and controls, though the companion app and some watch faces could be more flexible.

display quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.9

The MIP display is practical and readable rather than flashy, with reviewers trading away AMOLED vibrancy for battery life and outdoor usability.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.5

Display quality is consistently strong, with reviewers praising the AMOLED panel, sharpness, responsiveness, and overall look.

durability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.4

Durability looks good in longer-term use, with reviewers reporting little wear, though the bezel and glass can still be scratch concerns.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.4

Durability is a strength on the larger model, with sapphire, water ratings, and MIL-STD references, though the 43mm model makes some cuts.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
2.8

ECG support is a major caveat: hardware or global support exists, but US and North American availability is repeatedly criticized.

fit
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.7

Fit is excellent for smaller wrists, with the 41mm case repeatedly described as comfortable and well-sized.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
2.5

Fit is the most divisive physical issue, with larger models often feeling oversized while the smaller version helps but makes tradeoffs.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.5

Fitness tracking is broadly accurate and analysis-rich, especially for endurance training, with some caveats around live heart-rate smoothing.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.3

Fitness tracking accuracy is generally good for casual and running use, though reviewers did not treat it as a Garmin-level sports watch.

GPS accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.2

GPS accuracy is a major strength thanks to multiband GNSS, though a few reviewers saw small variations or altitude inaccuracies in specific scenarios.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.0

GPS is mostly solid and improved, especially outdoors, but several reviews still note limitations in dense cities or downgraded 43mm hardware.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.8

Health tracking is useful but training-oriented; reviewers appreciated HRV and recovery metrics while noting it is not a full health wearable.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.0

Health tracking is much improved and often accurate enough for casual use, but some reviews still place it behind Samsung or Google.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.3

Heart-rate accuracy is generally strong for a wrist watch, often close to straps, but reviewers still recommend straps for the sharpest live accuracy.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.8

Heart rate accuracy is generally good for steady activity, but multiple reviewers noticed lag or underreporting during intensity spikes.

LTE connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
1.5

LTE is the most consistent missing smart feature; reviewers repeatedly state there is no cellular model or LTE option.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.5

Mapping and navigation are useful, especially Google Maps and animated route summaries after outdoor workouts.

materials quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0

Materials are typical Garmin Forerunner fare: lightweight polymer, Gorilla Glass and silicone, chosen more for sport practicality than luxury.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.4

Materials are praised on the larger model for stainless steel, titanium bezel, and sapphire crystal, with weaker materials on the 43mm model.

menu navigation
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
2.9

Menu navigation is the clearest weakness, with several reviewers calling it complex or confusing despite button-control advantages.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.6

Menu navigation benefits greatly from the functional crown and easier scrolling, especially compared with touchscreen-only use.

music controls
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0

Music controls are present for phone audio, and the watch exposes quick music controls from the button interface.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.3

Music support is strong through Wear OS apps such as Spotify, though reviewers mostly mention app access rather than detailed playback testing.

onboard music storage
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.7

Onboard music is a useful feature with storage for offline audio, but setup and loading can be slow or confusing for some users.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.3

Onboard storage is ample for apps and music, with multiple reviews citing 32GB storage or room for playlists.

operating system experience
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.9

The operating system is familiar and capable, with one reviewer praising its ease while others note Garmin’s learning curve.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.5

Wear OS experience is praised as smooth and full-featured, with RTOS helping battery life without feeling disruptive in normal use.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.7

Outdoor visibility is excellent because the MIP display remains readable in sunlight with very little glare.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.7

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with repeated praise for sunlight readability and high-brightness AMOLED performance.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.8

Pairing and acquisition are mostly reliable, especially GPS and Bluetooth headphones, but headphone pairing frustrated one user.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
2.6

Pairing reliability is mixed, with setup and device-transfer friction appearing in multiple reviews.

recovery insights
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.3

Recovery insights are a strong training feature, including HRV, Body Battery, Training Load and Morning Report-style readiness context.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
2.9

Recovery guidance is limited; one reviewer specifically wanted stronger cardio-load style recovery balancing.

reliability
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.8

Reliability is supported by long-term updates and GPS stability, with Garmin’s longevity praised in follow-up use.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.3

Reliability is generally good in long-term software use, but comfort problems and occasional responsiveness delays keep it from being flawless.

safety features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.5

Safety features exist through optional Garmin tools such as LiveTrack, though the reviews provide limited evaluation beyond availability.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.6

Safety features are mixed: fall detection and SOS appear in some reviews, while another reviewer wished for crash and fall detection.

size options
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.7

Size options are a standout benefit because the 255S gives smaller wrists a serious multisport watch without losing core training tools.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
2.8

Size options are mixed: the smaller 43mm addition helps, but many reviews criticize the large model or limited choices.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.8

Sleep tracking is viewed as useful and reasonably aligned with other devices, though not as deep as dedicated sleep-focused wearables.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.2

Sleep tracking is broadly positive, with several reviewers finding detection and stage tracking useful, though some comparisons disagreed.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.1

Smartphone notifications work well for basic alerts and quick replies, especially on Android, but remain constrained by the small non-touch screen.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.4

Notifications work as expected, with reviewers using the watch for alerts, calendar items, Slack replies, and similar smart functions.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0

Smartwatch features are useful but intentionally basic, prioritizing training over app-rich Apple, Google or Samsung-style smartwatch polish.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.7

Smartwatch feature depth is strong overall, anchored by full Wear OS, apps, health tools, calls, notifications, maps, and payments.

software smoothness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.5

Software smoothness is one of the stronger points, with most reviewers describing fluid, lag-free, or buttery performance.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.3

Step counting appears accurate in the reviewer evidence, including a near-spot-on manual step check.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.8

Step counting looks strong in the cited manual-count comparison, where the Watch 3 stayed close to the reviewer’s count.

stress tracking
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.0

Stress tracking is available as part of the broader health suite, with reviewers presenting it as a daily wellness metric.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.4

Stress tracking and wellness scores are mixed: some find them useful, while others call the insights vague or not very actionable.

style and design
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.5

Style is utilitarian rather than flashy, but reviewers consider it acceptable for everyday wear if you choose muted colors.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.7

Style is subjective: some reviewers love the traditional circular look, while others dislike the 43mm glossy design.

third-party app support
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
2.5

Third-party app support exists through Connect IQ, Strava, Komoot and music apps, but reviewers describe it as limited versus mainstream smartwatches.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.6

Third-party app support is strong because Wear OS provides Play Store access and popular apps like Strava, Spotify, Audible, and AllTrails.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
1.0

Touchscreen responsiveness scores poorly because the watch has no touchscreen; reviewers mostly frame that as a deliberate sport-watch tradeoff.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.5

Touch responsiveness is praised where cited, with the display described as sharp, vibrant, and responsive.

user interface
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
3.6

The interface is powerful but polarizing: some find it easy once learned, while newcomers can find it dense or confusing.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
2.9

The user interface is the weakest software-area citation, with one reviewer calling it sluggish and unintuitive in places.

value for money
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.4

Value is strong for runners and multisport users, especially given multiband GPS, battery life and training depth at a midrange price.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.3

Value is mostly strong, especially for battery and features, but some reviewers question smaller-model tradeoffs or price changes.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.2

Voice assistant support is present through Google Assistant, though reviews do not deeply test assistant quality.

watch face quality
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.3

Watch face support is good through built-in faces and Connect IQ, with reviewers noting customization and many free options.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.8

Watch faces are mostly useful and customizable, but several reviewers wanted more originality, more choices, or better integration.

water resistance
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.5

Water resistance is strong for swimming, rain and shower use, and physical buttons are an advantage around water.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.4

Water resistance is strong on paper and in use, with multiple reviews citing 5ATM, IP ratings, and swim use.

wellness insights
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.2

Wellness insights such as Morning Report, Body Battery and general wellbeing metrics are useful companions to the training focus.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.5

Wellness insights are present and sometimes useful, but reviewers disagree on whether they are meaningful or too vague.

Wi-Fi connectivity
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
No score yet
Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
3.9

Wi-Fi connectivity is supported, including 5GHz Wi-Fi on one cited review, but reviewers rarely evaluate it independently.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Garmin Forerunner 255S
4.6

Workout variety is extensive, spanning running, cycling, swimming, hiking, yoga, triathlon and dozens of app-manageable workout types.

Product 2: OnePlus Watch 3
4.4

Workout variety is strong, with over 100 sports modes and several professional modes appearing across reviews.