Polar Grit X
Where It Has the Edge
- touchscreen responsiveness is 2.5 vs 1.0. Touchscreen responsiveness was a repeated weakness, with reviewers calling it laggy, imprecise, or unreliable with wet hands.
- value for money is 4.2 vs 2.8. Value was frequently praised because the watch delivered deep training and outdoor features for less than several major...
- button controls is 4.3 vs 3.4. Button controls were a consistent strength, with better texture, responsiveness, click feel, and glove usability than the touchscreen.
- user interface is 4.2 vs 3.5. The core user interface was praised as logical and easy to navigate, especially with the physical buttons.