Compare Apple Watch Series 10 vs Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro

Pool testing gave the only clear auto-detection judgment, with the watch correctly identifying the reviewer’s freestyle swim style.

The Apple ecosystem was a major strength, with seamless Strava syncing, Mac authentication, Apple-device continuity, and broad app support.

Reviewers generally found Zepp improving into a usable ecosystem, but several said it still feels overloaded or less clean than Garmin/Coros ecosystems.

Band quality and compatibility were praised through excellent bands, older strap compatibility, and a well-designed band mechanism.

Band reactions were split: some reviewers found it comfortable or even a favorite, while others called it cheap, not premium, or irritating.

Battery life was the most common concern: some reviewers got acceptable or improved results, but many called daily charging the biggest flaw.

Battery life was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for week-plus use and long GPS endurance, though one reviewer found it inconsistent and another compared it unfavorably to a T-Rex model.

Blood oxygen tracking drew mixed evidence: one updated review said it was available, while several others criticized or noted disabled U.S. availability.

Blood oxygen evidence was limited to one first-look concern where an unexpected SpO2 reading made the reviewer question the result.

Bluetooth-related evidence was positive, covering external sensor support and effortless AirPods connection.

Brightness was generally good, especially for glancing and always-on use, but several reviewers said the off-angle improvement was subtle.

Brightness was consistently praised, with reviewers calling the 3,000-nit display highly readable in sun and a major visibility advantage.

Build quality evidence centered on durable sapphire glass as a recommended premium durability upgrade.

Build quality was widely praised thanks to the titanium and sapphire construction, with reviewers repeatedly describing the hardware as premium or impressive for the price.

Physical control evidence was critical: runners wanted better button workflows for splits, starting workouts, and precision start.

The physical buttons were a clear strength for running use, wet hands, gloves and avoiding accidental presses, though one reviewer still missed a fifth button/crown-style setup.

Call handling was a highlight, especially voice isolation; reviewers found calls clearer and useful in noisy settings.

Call handling had limited but positive evidence, with the watch speaker and microphone judged loud and good enough for calls.

One reviewer criticized the low exercise threshold, making calorie/exercise credit feel too easy rather than especially meaningful.

Nutrition and calorie logging in Zepp received unusually strong praise because reviewers found automatic calorie and macro calculations easier than other apps.

Charging convenience was strong because short charging sessions could cover sleep tracking or daily use and fit into routines.

Charging convenience was mixed: the magnetic puck was liked, but reviewers disliked the proprietary charger and need to carry another accessory.

Charging speed was a major strength, repeatedly verified or praised as very fast and helpful.

Coaching features were useful but uneven: pep talks and Training Load helped, while reviewers wanted more depth, feedback, or Garmin-level detail.

Coaching features were broadly useful, especially Zepp Coach and structured plans, though some reviewers wanted deeper or more polished training analysis.

Comfort was the strongest consensus point, with reviewers praising the thinner, lighter design for all-day wear, workouts, and sleep.

Comfort was polarized: some found the watch light and wearable on long runs, while others criticized its bulk, weight, thickness or tempo-run nuisance.

The companion Health/Fitness app was rich and useful, but one reviewer found the volume of data overwhelming.

The companion app was useful and often clear for training data, nutrition, routes and analysis, but reviewers also described it as overwhelming or initially hard to learn.

Contactless payments were strongly praised for speed and convenience, especially in daily routines and transit-like scenarios.

Contactless payments were positively described as practical for errands, coffee or post-workout stops without carrying a phone.

Cross-platform compatibility was a weak spot in the available evidence because iPhone users lose direct SMS replies and some smartwatch integration.

Customization was praised through adjustable goals, personalization options, and enough watch-face/app choices for most users.

Customization was praised across brightness, data pages and watch setup, with reviewers noting the watch can be tailored heavily to training needs.

Display quality was one of the clearest strengths, with repeated praise for the bigger, readable, premium-feeling screen.

Display quality was strong overall because it is sharp and bright, but several reviewers disliked the smaller usable display or large bezel relative to the case.

Durability evidence was mixed: some reviewers saw no blemishes or scratches, while others warned about scratch risk and newer-model improvements.

Durability evidence was positive, with one fall leaving the watch unmarked and another review saying the case stayed immaculate after hard training.

ECG was treated as a mature health function that continued to work seamlessly rather than a major new upgrade.

ECG functionality was a weakness because reviewers noted the feature is absent and that Garmin offers superior ECG-related capability.

Fit mattered for sensor performance; the Sport Band was praised as adjustable and effective for running accuracy.

Fit depended heavily on wrist size: one reviewer found it too large on a smaller wrist, while others found it lightweight or nicely fitting.

Workout and fitness tracking accuracy was praised in cardio, structured workout, and general fitness/sleep contexts.

Fitness tracking accuracy was generally good for recreational training and racing, though reviewers noted GPS distance quirks and not-class-leading precision.

The flashlight was repeatedly praised as useful, with reviewers liking the real LED torch, red mode and practical running or nighttime use.

GPS accuracy was consistently praised as quite good to spot-on, with one caveat that dual-band sports watches can still outperform it.

GPS accuracy was one of the strongest consensus areas, with many reviewers finding it solid, fast, close to Garmin, or excellent, though a few noted corner-cutting or distance errors.

One review characterized the broader health and fitness tracking as strong, with the Series 10 continuing to perform well as a health-focused watch.

Health tracking accuracy was positive but not flawless; heart-rate-based health metrics were useful, while scientific testing rated broader heart tracking as only okay.

Heart-rate evidence was strongly positive across running, cycling, and chest-strap comparisons, though one reviewer noted occasional errors and dropouts.

Heart rate accuracy was good for steady efforts and often close to straps or Garmin, but several reviewers still recommended a chest strap for intervals, cycling or precision work.

LTE evidence was mixed: standalone calling worked well, but Series 10 lacked the newer 5G coverage advantage discussed for Series 11.

Mapping and navigation were promising but unfinished, with reviewers calling routes OK, half-baked, or not cleanly integrated with workouts.

Mapping and navigation were useful and feature-rich, but map smoothness, readability, rerouting and polish were repeated limitations.

Materials were praised for the lighter titanium, polished finishes, premium look, and improved perceived luxury.

Materials quality was a major strength, with reviewers praising titanium, sapphire glass and premium exterior hardware, though one first-look review flagged a polymer bezel.

Menu navigation benefited from the revised workout layout and larger screen, making navigation, typing, and selections easier.

Menu navigation was serviceable but not effortless; reviewers liked straightforward navigation yet noted a learning curve and some complexity.

Speaker-based music and media playback was convenient in quiet or headphone-free moments, but volume and audio quality were common limitations.

Onboard music storage was useful because there is room for music, but reviewers criticized the MP3-only approach and lack of streaming integration.

The operating-system experience was mostly strong, but one reviewer felt Apple’s once-simple interface is becoming more muddled.

The operating system experience was mixed: Zepp OS and Zepp app features worked, but reviewers called parts of the interface overloaded or bloated.

Outdoor and angled visibility was praised for making quick glances easier during runs, rides, and everyday use.

Outdoor visibility was excellent across reviews, with the display repeatedly judged easy to read in bright sunlight.

Recovery and Training Load insights were useful and easy to digest, but reviewers repeatedly wanted more numbers, guidance, or actionability.

Recovery insights were useful and practical, especially BioCharge, fatigue and sleep-related suggestions, though one reviewer found recovery time less conservative than Garmin.

Reliability evidence was excellent, with reviewers describing the watch as something that simply works without crashes or weirdness.

Reliability evidence was limited and mixed, mainly around inconsistent heart-rate/GPS moments and one wrong first GPS run.

Pause/resume-style ring controls were appreciated for breaks, sickness, and preserving streaks.

Running power support was useful for one reviewer, but others questioned related metric reliability or found the calculation too different to evaluate.

Safety features were valued, with reviewers noting emergency access, detection features, and solo-workout check-in usefulness.

Safety features were praised mainly through the blinking flashlight/red light, which reviewers saw as useful for visibility in the dark.

Effort and score tracking were mixed: reviewers generally understood the ratings, but manual splits or score context could frustrate athletes.

Score tracking was useful when it summarized readiness, fatigue or race predictions into easy-to-read numbers, with one review praising accurate race-time prediction.

Size options were mixed: bigger displays helped usability, but reviewers worried about small wrists and the loss of very small options.

Size options were a concern because reviewers repeatedly said smaller-wristed users could benefit from a smaller or more compact model.

Sleep duration tracking was generally trusted, with reviewers finding timing or duration usable; caveats centered on limited sleep-stage confidence and weak actionability.

Sleep tracking opinions were mixed: some liked the depth and comparable sleep duration, while others found missed awake time and only okay sleep-stage accuracy.

Notifications remained useful when limited to important communication, keeping glanceable alerts on the wrist.

Smartphone notifications were usable for reading texts, but iPhone reply limits and texting restrictions reduced the score.

Reviewers repeatedly described it as a highly capable iPhone smartwatch with broad lifestyle, health, fitness, and convenience features.

Smartwatch features were useful but not full flagship-smartwatch quality, with reviewers praising everyday utility while noting slimmed-down features and unclear positioning.

Software smoothness was a strength, with reviewers describing fluid performance, fast app handling, and only rare bugs.

Software smoothness was mixed, with map lag and polish concerns offset by one review’s praise for firmware improvements and updates.

Stress tracking was useful where it offered practical suggestions and fed into readiness-style guidance, but evidence was limited.

Style and design were broadly praised as sleek, refined, and jewelry-like, though a few reviewers disliked the square form.

Style and design were generally liked, with reviewers calling it premium, sleek or good-looking, though not everyone found it amazing or loved its size.

Third-party app support was valuable for sports and customization, though reviewers wanted better APIs for route syncing and deeper integration.

Third-party support was strong for fitness platforms like TrainingPeaks, Runna, Intervals.icu and Strava, but weaker for streaming services and app breadth.

Touchscreen/display responsiveness had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer describing the OLED as very responsive.

Touchscreen responsiveness was split: several reviewers called it responsive, while others said sensitivity caused accidental inputs during running or wet use.

The interface was often described as useful and contextual, especially Smart Stack, while one reviewer complained menus are becoming cluttered.

The user interface was approachable for basics and liked by some reviewers, but others found it cluttered, unintuitive in places or frustrating.

Value was strongest for first-time buyers and older Apple Watch owners, while recent Series owners were often told not to rush.

Value for money was mostly favorable versus premium Garmin pricing, but reviewers disagreed on whether the upgrade over cheaper Amazfit models justified the launch price.

Siri on the watch was praised for reliable, fast everyday tasks like timers, music, and calendar events.

Voice assistant quality was mixed to weak: short commands could work, but reviewers often found Zepp Flow less useful, less smooth or unnecessary during runs.

Voice notes were positively received as a fun and useful way to capture run context, especially when geotagged to an activity.

Watch faces were mixed: reviewers liked the second-hand realism and customization, but criticized some new faces for lacking complications.

Watch face quality had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer noting decent watch faces as part of the strong specification.

Water features were polarizing: depth and temperature tools impressed some reviewers, while snorkeling session handling frustrated others.

Wellness insights such as Vitals, sleep apnea context, and health-conscious features were appreciated, but some reviewers wanted more practical guidance.

Wellness insights were useful because they tied sleep, stress, fatigue and activity into practical training feedback or recovery suggestions.

Wi-Fi connectivity had limited mixed evidence: map downloads over Wi-Fi worked but were described as mildly annoying.

Workout variety was broad and versatile, covering many mainstream uses, though reviewers still framed Garmin-style depth as stronger for dedicated athletes.

Workout variety was a consistent strength, with reviewers praising deep workout handling, extensive sport modes and broad activity coverage.