Average score
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.6
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
3.7
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
1.0

Multiple reviewers explicitly note there is no active noise cancellation.

Android compatibility
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.5

One WT review reports the same strong listening experience on an Android phone, indicating solid mobile compatibility when used that way.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.5

Android support is generally treated as straightforward Bluetooth compatibility; where mentioned, reviewers note it can pair with Android phones like any standard Bluetooth headset.

App
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.1

WT reviews consistently mention an optional PC app or SoundBase software for sound tweaks, and they generally describe it as useful rather than bloated.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.3

Fractal's Adjust Pro is commonly referenced as a browser-based configuration tool. Several reviewers like avoiding heavyweight desktop utilities, while some note Chromium-based browser requirements or prefer offline access options.

aptX
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
1.0

aptX support is not offered according to reviewers discussing Bluetooth codecs.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.5

The WT reviews that discuss lag explicitly say audio and video stay in sync, with around 30 ms latency claims and no noticeable delay in use.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
3.1

Audio-video sync is fine on 2.4GHz/USB in most accounts, but Bluetooth use can introduce noticeable lag in games or video.

Bass performance
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.8

Bass is usually presented as punchy and enjoyable for games, with several reviews calling out strong low-end impact even if it is not truly premium.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.2

Bass is described as impactful but controlled, tending toward tight rather than boomy, which helps clarity for both music and competitive gaming.

Battery
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.7

Wireless battery life is mixed: several WT reviews report roughly 30 to 36 hours or acceptable endurance, while one finds real-world life shorter than hoped.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
3.9

Battery life is generally considered solid with RGB off (often landing in the 30–50 hour range depending on use), but becomes noticeably shorter with RGB on (roughly around the low-20s hours in several accounts). Battery replacement appears possible but not user-friendly, with at least one reviewer wishing it were as easy as more serviceable designs.

Bluetooth
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
3.1

Wireless connectivity is generally stable, but a few reviewers report occasional 2.4GHz dropouts or early reliability issues; repositioning the dongle via the dock is suggested as a mitigation. Simultaneous wireless plus Bluetooth audio (or Bluetooth mixing) is commonly noted as not supported, limiting flexibility for multitasking workflows.

Build quality
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.2

Build impressions are mixed, with repeated comments about plastic or cheap-feeling materials alongside several notes that the headset still feels sturdy enough for everyday use.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.3

Build quality is frequently described as premium for the price, mixing sturdy plastics with metal parts and refined mechanisms. One reviewer reported an early unit failure, but most impressions are very positive.

Button control usability
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.1

Controls are repeatedly described as simple and easy to use, with physical wheels or buttons handling volume, mute, power, and surround without much learning curve.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.5

Controls are generally considered well-thought-out, with distinct buttons and an easy-to-use crown/dial. One recurring nit is that some buttons have low travel, making certain combos less satisfying.

Cable quality
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.9

Wired reviews generally like the thick braided cable and its durability, though one reviewer also criticizes the stock cable for being too short.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.2

Included USB cable quality is described positively in unboxings, including braided construction in at least one review.

Charging
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.8

WT charging is treated as acceptable rather than exceptional, with repeated references to roughly 2.5-hour full charges and quick-charge support in one review.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.4

The magnetic inductive charging dock is a standout convenience feature and helps keep the headset topped up; USB-C charging is also available and faster. Some reviewers wanted clearer charging indicators or noted you cannot listen while it is sitting on the dock.

Clamping force comfort
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
2.0

Clamp pressure is a consistent drawback in the wired E1000 coverage, with reviewers describing a tight fit that presses on the head or ears.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.0

Clamping force is commonly described as snug to strong: it helps seal and stability, but can be fatiguing for some head shapes or very long, uninterrupted sessions.

Codec support
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
3.0

Codec support over Bluetooth is described as basic, with reviewers noting SBC and AAC rather than higher-end options.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.6

Comfort is mixed overall. Several reviewers say the headset is wearable for hours, but just as many report pressure, digging pads, or frequent adjustments over longer sessions.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.2

Comfort feedback is mostly positive for long sessions thanks to breathable fabric and well-shaped pads, though some reviewers report headband top padding pressure after a few hours.

Connectivity versatility
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.5

WT coverage strongly favors connectivity versatility, with repeated praise for having both low-latency wireless and 3.5 mm wired use across several devices.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
No score yet
Console compatibility limitations
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.0

WT reviews note a real console caveat: wireless mode is not universal, especially on Xbox, so some console use falls back to wired connections.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
No score yet
Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.6

The styling is unmistakably gamer-focused, with RGB lighting and flashy accents drawing both praise for visual flair and criticism for looking kitschy or overly loud.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.6

Across reviews, Scape is repeatedly praised for a minimalist, premium look that reads more like a luxury headphone than a typical gaming headset, with a clean dock that fits on a desk or living-room setup.

Detachable cable convenience
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.0

The wired E1000 is marked down for its fixed cable, while the WT gets positive feedback because the detachable 3.5 mm cable adds flexibility.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
No score yet
Detachable microphone convenience
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.5

Detachable boom mic convenience is praised: it is removable for a cleaner look, and flip-to-mute style behavior is noted as quick to use.

Dongle
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.2

WT reviewers consistently describe the USB dongle as an easy, useful part of the wireless setup and a core reason the headset feels plug-and-play.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.3

The 2.4GHz dongle integration is well-liked, with the dock doubling as storage and, for some, a way to position the dongle away from USB noise/interference.

Ear cup padding quality
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.8

Padding quality is generally decent for the money, with soft or thick cushions called out positively, though at least one review says the foam is not especially premium.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.4

Ear cup padding is often described as thick, soft, and spacious, helping comfort and seal. A minority dislike the fabric texture or mention rustle when moving.

Ear cup swivel/rotation range
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
1.5

The wired E1000 is specifically criticized for not letting the cups move or rotate, which limits fit flexibility.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
2.8

Several reviews note limited cup articulation, including that the headset does not lay flat, which affects portability and how it rests around the neck.

Earpad noise
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
2.9

A recurring complaint in a couple reviews is earpad rustle or fabric noise when putting the headset on or moving around.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.5

One WT review explicitly says the software allows custom sound profiles, giving users real EQ control instead of fixed presets only.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.5

EQ customization is a major strength: multiple reviews describe a robust, often parametric EQ that updates quickly and can be stored on the headset for use across devices.

Fit/seal reliability
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.0

Fit and seal are mixed. Some reviewers say the cups sit snugly with few gaps, while others say the angle can sit awkwardly or needs repositioning for the best seal.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
No score yet
Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
2.3

Tonality is one of the shakier areas: several reviews describe the headset as muffled, indistinct, or not especially balanced, even when overall gaming use remains acceptable.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
No score yet
Game/Chat balance control
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
2.0

Native game/chat balance control is frequently listed as missing; some reviewers rely on external software as a workaround.

Headband adjustability
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.0

Headband adjustment is generally handled well, with reviews noting firm clicks or usable extension hardware that helps dial in fit.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.2

The stepless adjustment mechanism is praised for feeling smooth and solid, though a few note it can be stiff initially and some want more top-of-head padding.

Hinge durability
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.2

Hinges and adjustment hardware are generally described as sturdy and premium-feeling, contributing to a tank-like impression.

Included accessories
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.8

Accessory bundles are decent for the price, with repeated mentions of items like a pouch, manuals, dongle, cables, or a velcro wrap.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.2

Most reviews call out a premium bundle for the price: charging dock, dongle, detachable mic, and a quality USB cable are typically included.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.0

Reviews that mention the mic design treat the attached boom as straightforward and practical for gaming use.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
No score yet
LDAC
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
1.0

LDAC support is not offered, and at least one review contrasts this with competitors that include LDAC.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.5

One detailed review says the headset sounds fuller and performs better when pushed louder, suggesting acceptable clarity once volume is raised.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
No score yet
Microphone
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.5

Mic quality is highly mixed across the file. Several reviewers call it clear or good for the price, but others describe it as scratchy, tinny, or only okay.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
No score yet
Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.2

Noise handling is one of the stronger recurring points, with multiple reviews saying background noise is filtered well or that ENC meaningfully cleans up chat.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
3.8

Mic noise reduction can reduce background clutter, but multiple reviewers note the tradeoff is additional processing/compression and sometimes a less natural sound.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.6

Call and voice-chat quality ranges from very good for the money to disappointing, but the balance of direct call-style tests leans positive overall.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
3.9

Microphone quality is mixed depending on reviewer and mode: several praise the boom mic for clarity, while others call it merely average or compressed; the built-in backup mic is convenient but typically worse.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
2.8

Midrange clarity is only lightly covered, and the reviews that do mention it point to muddiness or an emphasis that is more serviceable than clean.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.5

Midrange is commonly reported as clear and well-balanced, helping dialogue and positional cues stand out.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.0

Across wired and WT reviews, the headset family is repeatedly described as working with multiple platforms, though exact features vary by connection type.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.5

Tri-mode connectivity (2.4GHz, Bluetooth, and USB) makes the headset broadly usable across PC, PlayStation, Switch, and mobile devices according to multiple sources.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
1.0

Bluetooth multipoint is repeatedly called out as missing, meaning you cannot stay connected to two devices at once.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.5

Passive isolation is mixed. Some reviewers say the headset shuts out outside noise well enough for immersive play, while others say isolation is only average or seal-dependent.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
3.8

Passive isolation is usually described as good enough for home gaming and office use, but it varies with fit and the fabric pads; several reviewers point out it will not replace ANC in louder environments.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
1.5

One WT review explicitly says the headset does not fold or rotate, so portability is limited despite wired and wireless flexibility.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
2.8

Portability is limited by the non-folding, non-lay-flat design, though multiple reviewers still describe it as office-friendly in appearance.

Positional audio accuracy
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.1

Positional performance is usually a strength, with many reviewers saying footsteps, enemy positions, or directional cues are easy to place, though one review wanted better depth.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
No score yet
Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.0

WT software coverage says the built-in game and music presets are useful and meaningfully change the presentation.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.1

Preset EQ profiles are considered useful out of the box, and the ability to cycle through (and overwrite) a small set of saved profiles on-device is widely appreciated, even if limited to a few slots.

Replaceable earpads
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.0

One video review explicitly identifies the pads as replaceable, which is a plus for long-term maintenance.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.5

Replaceable earpads are explicitly mentioned as easy to remove, with some sources noting replacements are obtainable.

RGB lighting customization
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
2.0

RGB is more decorative than customizable. Multiple reviews say the lighting is fixed, limited, or only switchable on and off rather than truly programmable.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.2

RGB is described as subtle and tasteful, hidden around the earcup edge. Customization is strong, but multiple reviewers note it meaningfully reduces battery life, so many keep it off.

Sidetone adjustment quality
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
3.1

Sidetone adjustment exists, but several reviewers describe it as too quiet or even broken/robotic on certain setups, while others find it usable.

Smudge resistance
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.4

One review highlights the matte finish as resisting oily fingerprints and keeping the headset looking clean.

Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.3

Setup is usually framed as easy or plug-and-play, but one WT review says the pairing instructions are incomplete enough to cause initial confusion.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.5

Setup is widely described as refreshingly simple versus typical gaming-headset software. The flip side is a lean feature set and browser compatibility constraints mentioned by a few reviewers.

Sound quality
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.6

Overall sound quality is mixed but generally decent for budget gaming. Reviewers often like the immersion, impact, or game performance, while more critical takes call it muddy, boxy, or merely average for music.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.3

Sound quality is consistently praised as balanced, detailed, and competitive at the price. A few note it benefits from EQ for personal taste, and one reported a defective unit that prevented proper audio evaluation. Wired USB audio is supported and described as straightforward for PC use; some reviewers rarely need it because the dock is so convenient.

Soundstage width
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.2

When reviewers discuss space, they usually describe the E1000 as wider-sounding than expected for the class, especially with surround processing engaged.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.4

Soundstage is frequently described as wide for a closed-back headset, supporting strong imaging and separation.

Spatial audio
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.4

Virtual surround and spatial presentation are widely praised in the reviews that test them, with repeated comments that they add dimension and immersion for games.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.2

Spatial rendering and positional accuracy are praised in multiple gaming-focused reviews, with several noting easier footstep and direction tracking in shooters.

Stability
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.0

Fit stability is inconsistent: one review says the headset can slip on the head, while another says the clamp keeps it planted well.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
No score yet
Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
No score yet
Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.3

The dial/crown style controls are typically described as responsive and easy to find by feel, reducing the need to fumble for tiny buttons.

Treble clarity
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
2.5

One detailed music-oriented review says higher frequencies are limited, so treble detail is not a strong point.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.3

Treble is often described as detailed, but some reviews mention occasional sharpness or sibilance that can be improved with EQ.

USB-C
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.3

WT reviews clearly mention USB-C charging, which modernizes the wireless model's charging setup.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
4.3

USB-C is used for charging and for wired USB audio in many reviews, with several noting it is convenient for desktop use and can improve mic fidelity versus wireless in some situations.

Value for money
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.1

Value comes across as solid but not unanimous. Several reviews like the price-to-performance balance, while others say better options exist in the same budget range.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
No score yet
Volume output
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.0

Volume output is usually strong, with several reviews saying the headset gets plenty loud, though one PS5 test felt it was not as loud as expected.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
3.5

Volume output is generally adequate, but several reviewers wish it could get louder, especially over Bluetooth or for louder content.

Weight comfort
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.3

WT reviewers who discuss weight generally find it light enough to wear comfortably.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
3.8

Weight is generally seen as reasonable for a wireless gaming headset, but at least a couple reviewers call it heavy or note it feels heavier in long sessions.

Wireless latency
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
4.5

WT wireless latency is consistently praised, with repeated comments that lag is unnoticeable or fast enough for gaming.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
No score yet
Xbox compatibility
Product 1: EKSA E1000 Gaming Headset
3.8

WT coverage says Xbox use is supported via 3.5 mm cable, but wireless support is not presented as equally straightforward.

Product 2: Fractal Design Scape Headset
1.0

Xbox compatibility is consistently described as not supported, due to protocol limitations and the lack of a 3.5mm analog option in some discussions.