Compare Lemokey P1 HE vs Epomaker G84 HE

P1 Lemokey P1 HE
P2 Epomaker G84 HE

Comparison Takeaways

Lemokey P1 HE

Where It Has the Edge

  • frame rigidity is 5.0 vs 3.9. Frame rigidity was supported by the sturdy full-metal construction and reviewer confidence in long-term use.
  • durability is 4.8 vs 4.0. Durability received strong support from comments about the lasting full-metal build and longer-lived Hall-effect components.
  • actuation consistency is 4.5 vs 3.8. Actuation consistency was praised through reliable repeated recognition, especially when rapid trigger was enabled.
  • build quality is 4.8 vs 4.1. Build quality was one of the strongest points, with repeated praise for the high-quality full-metal aluminum body.

Epomaker G84 HE

Where It Has the Edge

  • layout options is 4.9 vs 3.0. Layout options were praised for functional 75% or compact layouts that avoided missing important keys.
  • switch options is 4.5 vs 2.7. Switch choice was praised in the budget-focused review, especially the Creamy Jade option for users who prefer a...
  • RGB customization is 4.3 vs 2.5. RGB customization was praised for matching setups, turning off cleanly, and fitting the rest of a desk setup.
  • portability is 4.3 vs 2.5. Portability was mostly praised because of the compact/light design and easy relocation, though one reviewer found the board...
Average score
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.2
Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.4
acoustics
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.4

Reviewers generally liked the P1 HE’s sound, calling it soft, satisfying, and inoffensive, with one note of minor spring-ping resonance.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.0

Acoustics were split: many reviewers liked the creamy, subdued, or satisfying sound, while one found heavy presses hollow and resonant.

actuation consistency
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.5

Actuation consistency was praised through reliable repeated recognition, especially when rapid trigger was enabled.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
3.8

Actuation consistency drew mixed evidence: some reviewers praised dialed-in settings and precise actuation, while others hit accidental presses with very sensitive setups.

analog input support
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.8

Analog input support was treated as a major gaming advantage, with reviewers calling the Hall-effect behavior game-changing and price-distinguishing.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.4

Analog-like input support was praised for racing-game control, where the reviewer valued linear control behavior for precise key actions.

backlight brightness
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.5

Backlight brightness was praised because the shine-through keycaps and north-facing lighting made legends clearly illuminated.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.7

Backlight brightness was praised in most evidence as bright and usable in the dark, though the overall RGB quality had one unevenness complaint elsewhere.

battery life
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
3.7

Battery life was considered good enough or standard, though one reviewer called it decent rather than standout.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.8

Battery life was praised strongly, including nearly impossible-to-drain testing, a two-month claim, and expected long gaming sessions.

build quality
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.8

Build quality was one of the strongest points, with repeated praise for the high-quality full-metal aluminum body.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.1

Build quality was generally positive for a plastic board, with reviewers calling it solid or not cheap, though one noted flex.

compatibility
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
3.0

Compatibility was mixed: reviewers said it works across platforms, but Mac setup and missing Mac-specific conveniences drew criticism.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
3.2

Compatibility was mixed: reviewers liked broad compatibility in general, but Mac-specific keycap omissions were a recurring caveat.

connectivity
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.7

Connectivity was consistently positive, with wired, 2.4GHz, and Bluetooth options described as versatile and reliable.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Connectivity was consistently positive, with reviewers praising flexible wired, Bluetooth, 2.4GHz, and fast mode-switching options.

customization options
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.8

Customization options were a major strength, spanning actuation, remapping, lighting, macros, profiles, and physical modification.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Customization options were a strength, with reviewers praising extensive software controls, rapid-trigger settings, and broad configurability.

design aesthetics
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
3.7

Design aesthetics split reviewers: some liked the minimalist or improved look, while one felt the P1 HE lost the P1 Pro’s visual flair.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Design aesthetics were generally praised for the gradient, minimal branding, RGB-friendly look, and color-scheme fit, despite one colorway complaint elsewhere.

desk space efficiency
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
5.0

Desk space efficiency was praised because the 75% layout leaves more mouse room while keeping practical keys.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.9

Desk space efficiency was a clear strength, with reviewers valuing the compact footprint for laptop overlay use and mouse-space comfort.

durability
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.8

Durability received strong support from comments about the lasting full-metal build and longer-lived Hall-effect components.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.0

Durability had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer expecting it could serve as a long-haul keyboard.

ease of switch replacement
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.5

Ease of switch or component replacement was positive where reviewers discussed disassembly and rebuilding, though switch compatibility remained limited elsewhere.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.6

Ease of switch replacement was praised in one overview because the reviewer said switches could simply be popped out and replaced.

ergonomics
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.5

Ergonomics were supported by the lighter switches reducing hand fatigue during use.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.0

Ergonomics were mixed-to-positive: typing comfort and range were praised, but one reviewer disliked how the slanted front affected wrist-rest placement.

extra gaming features
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.8

Extra gaming features were broadly praised, including rapid trigger, quad/dynamic actuation, analog behavior, and other Hall-effect tools.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Extra gaming features were seen as worthwhile, especially for users who value HE-specific capabilities even when not fully using them.

frame rigidity
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
5.0

Frame rigidity was supported by the sturdy full-metal construction and reviewer confidence in long-term use.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
3.9

Frame rigidity was mixed: feet and desk grip were praised, but several reviewers noted plastic-case flex or lower rigidity than aluminum.

gaming performance
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.8

Gaming performance was a standout, with reviewers repeatedly calling the board powerful, responsive, and effective for FPS play.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.6

Gaming performance was widely praised, especially for responsive inputs, casual-to-competitive usefulness, and Hall Effect precision.

hot-swappable switches
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
2.8

Hot-swappable switch support was mixed to negative: some valued magnetic hot-swap support, but others emphasized the narrow compatible-switch range.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.3

Hot-swappable switches were seen as useful, though one reviewer cautioned they swap only with magnetic alternatives rather than traditional mechanical switches.

keycap quality
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.3

Keycap quality was mostly praised for double-shot PBT feel and shine-through usefulness, with one reviewer noting off-center legends.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
3.7

Keycap quality was mixed: one reviewer disliked the colorway, while others found the texture acceptable and said the caps did not feel cheap.

key responsiveness
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.7

Key responsiveness was highly rated, especially for snappy movement, Hall-effect behavior, and smoother analog response.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.6

Responsiveness was consistently positive, with reviewers citing swift input, instant response, snappy gaming, and precise movement per key press.

key spacing
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.0

Key spacing was supported by the spacious tenkeyless/75% case, which reviewers found practical rather than cramped.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.3

Key spacing was mixed but mostly positive, with some adjustment required on compact layouts while another reviewer praised proper key positioning.

key stability
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
No score yet
Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.4

Key stability was positive overall, with one reviewer noting limited wobble and another praising how the board stayed put while typing.

latency
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.3

Latency was considered good enough for most users, with no input-lag problems reported, though not at the fastest esports tier.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Latency evidence was positive where discussed, with the wired Type-C connection praised for consistency and less lag.

layout options
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
3.0

Layout options were treated as serviceable but not expansive, with one reviewer noting the layout was not packed with extra keys.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.9

Layout options were praised for functional 75% or compact layouts that avoided missing important keys.

legend visibility
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.3

Legend visibility was praised because the shine-through labels and backlighting made the legends easy to see.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.3

Legend visibility was mostly positive because legends were clear or bright in the dark, though one reviewer found the bottom-row typeface hard to see.

macro customization
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.5

Macro customization received positive attention because firmware macros were available and could be assigned through the launcher.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.8

Macro customization was praised where discussed, especially the ability to fully customize layout functions through VIA.

materials quality
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.6

Materials quality was repeatedly praised, especially the CNC aluminum body and premium-feeling construction.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.0

Materials quality was acceptable-to-good for plastic construction, with praise for a quality feel offset by lower rigidity than aluminum.

media controls
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.3

Media controls were viewed positively thanks to the customizable knob and reprogrammable dial.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
No score yet
noise level
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
3.8

Noise level was mostly favorable, ranging from coworker-friendly and quiet to a minor spring-ping caveat.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.2

Noise level was mostly praised as quiet or pleasing, but one review complained that heavy presses were noisy.

per-key lighting control
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
2.0

Per-key lighting control was a weak point because reviewers complained that true per-key RGB customization was missing.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
No score yet
polling rate
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
3.8

The 1,000Hz polling rate was considered sufficient for most users, though reviewers noted faster 8,000Hz competitors exist.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

The polling rate was treated as part of the keyboard's precision-and-speed appeal for users who care about Hall Effect performance.

portability
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
2.5

Portability was a weakness because the heavy aluminum body makes the keyboard better suited to a desk than a backpack.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.3

Portability was mostly praised because of the compact/light design and easy relocation, though one reviewer found the board somewhat hefty.

rapid trigger support
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.5

Rapid trigger support was praised as useful for faster repeated inputs and reliable recognition.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.4

Rapid trigger support was viewed as useful for quick gaming reactions, with one reviewer praising the available rapid-trigger settings and another noting a VAC-related caveat.

reliability
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.5

Reliability was supported by reviewer confidence that the keyboard avoided missed inputs.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.3

Reliability had limited positive evidence, with one reviewer saying they expected to keep using it for a long time.

RGB customization
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
2.5

RGB customization was limited compared with some gaming keyboards, despite useful presets and brighter shine-through lighting.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.3

RGB customization was praised for matching setups, turning off cleanly, and fitting the rest of a desk setup.

RGB lighting quality
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.0

RGB lighting quality was mixed: reviewers liked the brighter, fun shine-through look but criticized gaps and lack of cohesion.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.2

RGB lighting quality was mostly strong thanks to bright, diffused, and ambient lighting, but one review criticized uneven backlighting on larger keys.

size and form factor
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.5

Size and form factor were praised as a practical 75% layout that balances gaming minimalism and productivity.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.4

Size and form factor were broadly praised for compact functionality, though some users needed adjustment and one FPS-focused reviewer preferred smaller boards.

software quality
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.5

Software quality was mostly positive because the web launcher was easy and streamlined, though setup could take time for some users.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.0

Software quality was mixed: reviewers liked the depth and serviceability, but several mentioned awkwardness or a learning curve.

sound dampening
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.8

Sound dampening was praised for gasket mounting and sound-absorbing materials that made the keyboard sound softer.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Sound dampening was praised through subdued keys, spacebar foam, and internal foams shaping the board's sound profile.

stabilizer quality
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
5.0

Stabilizer quality received strong praise, especially for the space bar feel.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.7

Stabilizer quality was praised for lubrication and lack of rattle, with another reviewer calling the stabilizers nicely lubed.

switch feel
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.8

Switch feel was a major strength, with reviewers describing the magnetic linear switches as smooth, responsive, and among the best around.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Reviewers generally liked the switch feel, describing it as smooth, satisfying, familiar, and easy to use, though one reviewer noted some scratchiness.

switch options
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
2.7

Switch options were mixed to negative: some magnetic variants are supported, but reviewers repeatedly criticized the limited compatible-switch ecosystem.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.5

Switch choice was praised in the budget-focused review, especially the Creamy Jade option for users who prefer a softer aesthetic.

typing comfort
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.3

Typing comfort was praised due to light switch force, lower fatigue, and a more cushioned productivity feel.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.7

Typing comfort was consistently strong, with reviewers reporting comfort during long typing sessions and little to no discomfort.

typing feel
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.5

Typing feel was strongly positive, with reviewers calling it superb, smooth, and close to ideal despite minor sound caveats.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.8

Typing feel was a major strength across reviews, with reviewers calling it premium, smooth, satisfying, and difficult to abandon.

value for money
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.8

Value for money was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers praising its price against the feature set and competing boards.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.6

Value for money was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly calling it well equipped, reasonably priced, fair, or a strong deal.

volume control
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.3

Volume control was positive because the knob could handle volume and be remapped to other functions.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.1

Volume control was mixed-to-positive: one reviewer missed a knob only mildly, while another found VIA remapping straightforward.

wireless performance
Product 1: Lemokey P1 HE
4.8

Wireless performance was praised for issue-free Bluetooth and 2.4GHz use.

Product 2: Epomaker G84 HE
4.8

Wireless performance was praised in the work and gaming context, especially rock-solid Bluetooth and snappy 2.4GHz gaming.