Compare NuPhy Air60 HE vs GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro

P1 NuPhy Air60 HE
P2 GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro

Comparison Takeaways

NuPhy Air60 HE

Where It Has the Edge

  • cable quality is 4.3 vs 2.0. Cable quality was mixed: the included angled cable was praised, while one reviewer found the side-port cable setup...
  • portability is 3.6 vs 2.3. Portability was mixed: reviewers liked the small, light body but repeatedly noted that wired-only operation undercuts travel appeal.
  • value for money is 4.2 vs 3.5. Value for money was usually praised, especially versus other Hall Effect boards, but one negative review argued the...
  • typing comfort is 4.0 vs 3.3. Typing comfort was praised by some reviewers as excellent, but others reported accuracy issues from the flat/light low-profile...

GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro

Where It Has the Edge

  • legend visibility is 4.8 vs 2.2. A reviewer praised the oversized themed legends as still very legible despite the bold styling.
  • stabilizer quality is 4.4 vs 2.5. One reviewer said the stabilizers sounded pretty good.
  • hot-swappable switches is 4.4 vs 2.5. One reviewer highlighted the Hall-effect switches as easy to swap.
  • key spacing is 4.4 vs 2.5. One reviewer praised the layout gaps and spacing for making arrow navigation easy by touch.
Average score
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
3.9
Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.1
acoustics
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.2

Acoustics were generally liked, especially the muted or satisfying low-profile sound, but some reviewers criticized the space bar or found the sound lackluster.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.1

Sound impressions were generally positive and clacky, though one review framed it as a louder, more direct sound.

actuation consistency
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.8

Actuation behavior was described as stable and reliable, especially with the dual-rail switches and dependable Hall Effect functions.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.4

Actuation tuning was viewed positively where tested, with reviewers describing it as accurate and working well.

backlight brightness
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.5

Backlight brightness was praised as bright and usable without being obnoxious.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.3

One reviewer said the RGB backlighting gets pretty bright.

build quality
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.5

Build quality was broadly praised, with reviewers describing the board as sturdy, solid, premium-feeling, or well put together.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.6

Build quality received strong praise across reviews, with repeated comments about premium feel, sturdy construction, and high quality.

cable quality
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.3

Cable quality was mixed: the included angled cable was praised, while one reviewer found the side-port cable setup limiting for custom cables.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
2.0

The included cable disappointed one reviewer because it was not braided.

compatibility
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.3

Compatibility was positive in the reviews that tested or valued laptop use plus Mac, PC, and Linux support.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.0

Compatibility comments were modestly positive for keycap support and Windows/Mac switching.

connectivity
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
2.4

Connectivity was the most repeated drawback because the board is wired-only and side USB or cable placement bothered several reviewers.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
2.0

Connectivity was a notable drawback for reviewers who wanted wireless, because the keyboard is wired-only.

customization options
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.5

Customization options were strongly praised for remapping, actuation tuning, lighting, layers, and Hall Effect controls.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.5

Customization was praised for Hall-effect tuning, broad feature access, and the number of available controls.

design aesthetics
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.4

Design aesthetics were usually praised as stylish, distinctive, and attractive, though a few reviewers disliked the keycap color mix in person.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.0

Design was the most polarizing trait, ranging from love and excitement to strong dislike of the Neon Graffiti look.

desk space efficiency
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.5

Desk space efficiency was praised for freeing mouse space in gaming setups.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.0

One reviewer found the 75% layout not too sparse while still keeping most needed keys outside the numpad.

durability
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
3.3

Durability was mixed, with PBT legends and solid keycaps praised, but one reviewer strongly criticized scratching during use and travel.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.7

One review expected the keyboard to withstand years of use.

ease of switch replacement
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.0

Switch replacement appeared physically easy in the one review that discussed removal directly.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.4

One reviewer said the switches can be swapped easily.

ergonomics
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.0

Ergonomics received limited but positive support around comfort adjustments and wrist positioning.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.1

The adjustable legs were viewed positively for typing angle control and satisfying physical feedback.

extra gaming features
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.0

Extra gaming features were extensive and often praised, though SOCD/Hyper Tap-style features raised usefulness or fairness concerns for some reviewers.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.5

Reviewers valued the extra Hall-effect gaming features, especially Rapid Trigger, LKP, and customizable behavior.

frame rigidity
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
5.0

Frame rigidity was strongly praised in the PC Gamer review, which reported no flex or creaking.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.6

The frame and case were praised as heavy duty, sturdy, high quality, and unusually detailed.

gaming performance
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.6

Gaming performance was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers praising speed, responsiveness, Hall Effect control, and compact competitive use.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.6

Gaming performance was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling it a clear gamer improvement and strong in fast-paced play.

hot-swappable switches
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
2.5

Hot-swap support was limited in practical value because compatible low-profile magnetic switch choices were narrow.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.4

One reviewer highlighted the Hall-effect switches as easy to swap.

keycap quality
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
3.1

Keycap quality split reviewers sharply: some praised PBT feel and solidity, while others disliked slipperiness, light bleed, scratching, or average legends.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
3.7

Keycap opinions split sharply: several reviewers liked the texture or quality, while one strongly disliked the painted feel.

key responsiveness
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.6

Responsiveness was a major strength across reviews, with reviewers praising fast keystrokes, snappy switches, and responsive in-game behavior.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.7

Responsiveness was a consistent strength, with reviewers reporting prompt command registration and instant key presses.

key spacing
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
2.5

Key spacing was criticized by reviewers who felt the flat or wide keys could cause accidental presses or strange typing.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.4

One reviewer praised the layout gaps and spacing for making arrow navigation easy by touch.

key stability
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.7

Key stability was praised when reviewers focused on dual-rail or low-wobble behavior, with only limited criticism elsewhere.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.6

One reviewer praised the switches as stable with minimal wiggle or wobble.

latency
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.6

Latency was consistently praised as very low or imperceptible, with reviewers tying the board’s wired design and 8K capability to fast response.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.7

Latency impressions were very positive, with reviewers reporting no lag and one latency test calling the measured result crazy fast.

layout options
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
2.7

Layout options were a common limitation because the 60% layout omits arrows, function keys, and navigation keys that several reviewers missed.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.4

Layout-related feedback was positive for alternative layout presets and a liked layout with function layers.

legend visibility
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
2.2

Legend visibility drew criticism because several reviewers found the legends, translucent keys, or light bleed distracting or unclear.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.8

A reviewer praised the oversized themed legends as still very legible despite the bold styling.

macro customization
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
3.3

Macro customization was mixed because one review praised available macros and custom delays while another said macro creation was missing.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
No score yet
materials quality
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
3.8

Materials quality was mixed: aluminum and PBT elements earned praise, while one reviewer criticized scratch-prone plastic and coatings.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.6

Materials were praised for metal feel, premium heft, and high-quality aluminum construction.

media controls
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
No score yet
Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.2

Media controls were received positively as tactile and useful, especially for editing and day-to-day use.

noise level
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.3

Noise level was considered office-friendly or pleasantly controlled rather than truly silent.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
3.9

Noise feedback was mixed-positive: one reviewer found it louder and clacky, while another noted it did not sound scratchy.

polling rate
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
3.9

Polling rate was viewed as a strong spec, though reviewers also cautioned that 8K may be imperceptible or cause jitter for some setups.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.1

Most reviewers treated the 8,000Hz polling as effective or accurate, though one called the practical benefit a marketing gimmick.

portability
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
3.6

Portability was mixed: reviewers liked the small, light body but repeatedly noted that wired-only operation undercuts travel appeal.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
2.3

Portability was a weakness because reviewers pointed to the board's weight, legs, and lack of Bluetooth for travel use.

profile management
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
3.3

Profile management was mixed: the physical switch was appreciated, but the three-profile limit was a possible deal-breaker.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.6

One reviewer found profile switching easy.

rapid trigger support
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.8

Rapid Trigger support was repeatedly praised as responsive and useful, with reviewers noting near-instant reset and practical gaming benefits.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.5

Rapid trigger was repeatedly praised as useful for gaming, competitive advantage, and quick key deactivation.

reliability
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
2.3

Reliability drew concerns from firmware-update problems and feet that did not lock securely in one critical review.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
3.6

Reliability was mostly fine in one review, but rare spacebar double clicking kept the score from being high.

RGB customization
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.5

RGB customization was viewed positively, with reviewers liking the available effects, side lighting, and web-based lighting controls.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.4

RGB customization was viewed favorably through dual-system personalization, many effects, and customizable modes.

RGB lighting quality
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
3.8

RGB lighting quality was usually praised for brightness and visual effect, but keycap light bleed made it look odd to some reviewers.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.6

Lighting quality drew broad praise for underglow, dual RGB systems, glow, side lights, and leg lights.

size and form factor
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.0

Size and form factor were usually praised for compactness and novelty, though one reviewer questioned the low-profile value because travel distance felt full-size.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.2

The 75% form factor was considered usable and not overly crowded, with enough keys for most needs outside a numpad.

software quality
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.7

Software quality was one of the most consistently praised attributes, with reviewers liking the web app, stability, clean UI, and broad controls.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.2

Software feedback leaned positive for web-based customization and ease of use, though one reviewer experienced an early stuck state.

sound dampening
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.7

Sound dampening was praised when reviewers mentioned the foam and silicone layers, which helped make the thin board sound more refined.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.2

Reviewers connected the board's dampened build with a clean, clacky sound and visible effort to improve acoustics.

stabilizer quality
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
2.5

Stabilizer quality was a recurring weak spot, mostly because multiple reviewers singled out the space bar for wobble, rattle, or clanky sound.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.4

One reviewer said the stabilizers sounded pretty good.

switch feel
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.5

Reviewers generally liked the low-profile magnetic Jade switches for smoothness, snappiness, and comfort, though one reviewer found the light force required adjustment.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.6

Reviewers liked the Gateron Jade feel, describing the switches as nice to type on and hard to beat among linears.

switch options
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
2.0

Switch choice was criticized as narrow, with reviewers noting the current low-profile magnetic ecosystem leaves only the two Gateron LP Jade variants.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
2.7

Switch choice was a limitation: reviewers noted Hall-effect switches are restricted to linears and wished for more stock options.

typing comfort
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.0

Typing comfort was praised by some reviewers as excellent, but others reported accuracy issues from the flat/light low-profile feel.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
3.3

Typing comfort was acceptable but not excellent in one review, mainly because the keycap feel limited the experience.

typing feel
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
3.6

Typing feel was the most divided core attribute: several reviewers loved it, while others found the keycaps, low-profile shape, or light actuation less satisfying.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
3.8

Typing feel was mixed: one review praised the out-of-box experience, while another said the keycap surface took away from it.

value for money
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.2

Value for money was usually praised, especially versus other Hall Effect boards, but one negative review argued the price made little sense.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
3.5

Value was highly split: some reviewers felt the price was justified, while others called it expensive or not worth the money.

volume control
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
No score yet
Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
4.2

The volume lever/flipper was generally liked for tactile feel and practical usefulness.

wrist rest quality
Product 1: NuPhy Air60 HE
4.5

The optional wrist rest was liked in the one review that evaluated it, where it was described as comfortable and stable.

Product 2: GravaStar Mercury V75 Pro
No score yet