Compare Glorious GMMK 3 HE vs McHose GX87 Keyboard

P1 Glorious GMMK 3 HE
P2 McHose GX87 Keyboard

Comparison Takeaways

Glorious GMMK 3 HE

Where It Has the Edge

  • portability is 4.0 vs 2.0. Portability was helped by a lightweight or non-cumbersome feel despite the board's substantial construction.
  • switch options is 4.6 vs 3.0. Reviewers liked the variety of HE switch choices, including tactile/clicky options and samples, with several calling the switch...
  • cable quality is 3.5 vs 2.0. Cable quality was only lightly evaluated, with one reviewer calling the included USB-C cable basic but nice enough.
  • RGB lighting quality is 4.8 vs 3.5. RGB lighting quality was a clear strength, with reviewers calling it pretty, eye-popping, and effective through transparent keycaps.

McHose GX87 Keyboard

Where It Has the Edge

  • value for money is 4.9 vs 2.6. Value for money was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly calling the keyboard exceptional for its...
  • frame rigidity is 4.4 vs 2.5. Frame rigidity was mostly praised for its solid, flex-free construction, though the quick-release design was seen by one...
  • acoustics is 4.5 vs 3.0. Acoustics were a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the thocky, poppy, solid, and very nice sound.
  • keycap quality is 4.4 vs 2.9. Keycap quality was praised for PBT material, thickness, durability, and a profile that helped typing accuracy.
Average score
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.0
Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2
acoustics
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.0

Acoustics were mixed to weak on the stock board, with comments ranging from merely decent sound to loud clack or nothing special.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Acoustics were a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the thocky, poppy, solid, and very nice sound.

actuation consistency
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.3

Adjustable actuation was credited with reducing accidental inputs and improving typing accuracy for different typing styles.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.0

One reviewer found the switch actuation consistent, with only a slight scratchiness detectable during very slow presses.

backlight brightness
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.5

Backlighting was viewed positively, with powerful LEDs and transparent caps helping the RGB stand out.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
battery life
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
No score yet
Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.8

Battery life was strongly praised, with reviewers emphasizing the large 8,000 mAh capacity and long time between charges.

build quality
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.6

Build quality split reviewers sharply: custom or higher-spec builds felt solid and premium, but the stock plastic base drew repeated criticism.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.7

Build quality was a major point of agreement, with every review giving positive evidence around the aluminum body, dense feel, assembly, or lack of flex.

cable quality
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.5

Cable quality was only lightly evaluated, with one reviewer calling the included USB-C cable basic but nice enough.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
2.0

Cable quality was a weak point in one review, where the included cable was described as cheap and not very good.

compatibility
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.8

Compatibility was mixed: one reviewer had seamless console use, while another warned about possible north-facing LED keycap compatibility issues.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Compatibility evidence was positive where reviewers connected QMK and VIA support to deep, flexible keyboard customization.

connectivity
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
No score yet
Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.3

Connectivity was mixed: reviewers liked the wireless and tri-mode feature set, but noted mode-switch delay, visible front controls, and minor connectivity issues.

customization options
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.8

Customization was the strongest consensus attribute, with every review highlighting unusually deep physical, software, or checkout configuration options.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.9

Customization options were a major strength, especially the magnetic or ball-catch quick-disassembly case, hot-swap design, and easy access for mods.

design aesthetics
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.3

Design aesthetics varied from dull to stunning, with RGB and custom color/material choices often lifting the visual impression.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2

Design aesthetics were generally positive for clean, premium, and attractive looks, but some reviewers found the styling mundane or noticed mismatched colors.

desk space efficiency
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.5

Desk space efficiency was supported by praise for the compact yet functional 75% layout.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.0

Desk space efficiency was positive in one review, which liked that TKL saves space while leaving room for an optional macro pad.

durability
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.8

Durability was viewed positively where reviewers focused on repairability, longevity, and Hall Effect switch lifespan.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.7

Durability evidence centered on the solid aluminum build and PBT keycaps, which reviewers linked to lasting use.

ease of switch replacement
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.8

Switch replacement was described as easy or convenient across reviews, helped by included tools and simplified access.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Switch replacement was mostly easy thanks to tool-free access and hot-swap sockets, though one reviewer found reinstalling switches harder because the PCB flexes.

ergonomics
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
No score yet
Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.0

Ergonomics received limited but positive evidence because the fixed typing angle was expected to be comfortable for most people.

extra gaming features
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.0

Extra gaming features were appreciated, but some reviewers thought the base board lacked certain competitive features for the price.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Extra gaming features received positive evidence from one reviewer who highlighted the ultra-low-latency mode as a surprise at this price.

frame rigidity
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
2.5

Frame rigidity was mixed, with one reviewer noting chassis flex while another said the case was generally rigid aside from top-case movement.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.4

Frame rigidity was mostly praised for its solid, flex-free construction, though the quick-release design was seen by one reviewer as less sturdy than screws.

gaming performance
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.6

Gaming performance was generally strong thanks to precise HE inputs, rapid-trigger controls, and advanced actuation, though one review saw the feature set as merely decent.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2

Gaming performance was viewed as more than adequate for casual or hybrid use, with reviewers reporting competent play across first-person and general gaming sessions.

hot-swappable switches
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.7

Hot-swappability was a standout, especially the unusual ability to use both magnetic HE and mechanical MX-style switches.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.6

Hot-swappable switches were consistently treated as a benefit because users can replace switches without soldering and personalize the board.

keycap quality
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
2.9

Keycap quality was inconsistent: PC Gamer liked the crisp GPBT caps, while several others found stock caps cheap-feeling, tacky, or prone to fingerprints.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.4

Keycap quality was praised for PBT material, thickness, durability, and a profile that helped typing accuracy.

key responsiveness
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.7

Responsiveness was widely praised, with reviewers citing crisp action, precise game movement, and highly responsive inputs.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.3

Key response was consistently praised, with reviewers describing the keys or switches as responsive and accurate enough for both typing and gaming.

key stability
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.0

One reviewer noticed slight switch/key wobble, making key stability only average in that review.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.9

Key stability evidence was mixed: one reviewer disliked the plate-mounted stabilizer tradeoff, while another found the installed stabilizers secure and free of ticking.

latency
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.0

Latency impressions were mixed: one review downplayed the perceptible benefit of low lag, while another found it slower than some HE competitors.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2

Latency impressions were positive overall, helped by 1,000 Hz operation and an ultra-low-latency mode, though this is still framed as strong budget performance rather than elite Hall Effect speed.

layout options
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.8

Layout options were viewed as a strength because reviewers noted 65%, 75%, and 100% choices serving different preferences.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
legend visibility
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.5

Legend visibility drew a qualified note because one reviewer observed imperfections in the key fonts.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
macro customization
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.2

Macro customization was useful in principle, but evidence was mixed because one reviewer said macros were forgotten during testing.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Macro customization was positively supported by reviewers who noted easy macro setup through VIA or QMK-style customization.

materials quality
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.3

Materials quality depended heavily on configuration: metal/custom builds felt premium, while the stock plastic and keycaps were often criticized for the price.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Materials quality was praised for the aluminum case, smooth finish, premium feel, and solid components.

noise level
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.9

Noise level varied by configuration, from muted and late-night-friendly to a louder clack on some switch/keycap combinations.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Noise level received limited but positive evidence from a reviewer who described the sound as muted and thocky rather than harsh.

onboard memory
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.5

Onboard memory was positively tied to saving and switching up to three keyboard profiles from the board.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Onboard memory was positively supported by stored keyboard customizations that persist when moving between devices.

per-key lighting control
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.7

Per-key lighting control was supported by multiple reviews that liked individual-key or per-key RGB adjustment.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
polling rate
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.1

The 8K polling rate impressed some reviewers, but others called its real-world value limited or had trouble accessing it in software.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2

Reviewers treated the 1,000 Hz polling behavior as a strength, linking it to responsive inputs and low-latency use.

portability
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.0

Portability was helped by a lightweight or non-cumbersome feel despite the board's substantial construction.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
2.0

Portability was a weakness because one reviewer said the heavy aluminum build makes it undesirable to carry to and from an office.

profile management
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.5

Profile management was praised for handy physical switching and game-specific profile support.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Profile management was supported by the ability to store customizations on the keyboard so settings persist across devices.

rapid trigger support
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.6

Rapid Trigger earned positive comments for quick successive inputs and snappy response, especially for fast gaming movement.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
reliability
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.0

Reliability was mostly positive from reviewers discussing long-term use and repairability, but one software-related macro issue reduced confidence.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.0

Reliability evidence was mixed to negative in one review due to occasional held-input recognition and rare multiple key registrations.

RGB customization
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.8

RGB customization was praised for Core-based control, individual-key color options, and layered per-key lighting effects.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.0

RGB customization was broadly useful, especially through VIA, QMK, or the MCHOSE software, though one reviewer found the RGB controls clunky.

RGB lighting quality
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.8

RGB lighting quality was a clear strength, with reviewers calling it pretty, eye-popping, and effective through transparent keycaps.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.5

RGB lighting quality was acceptable but not class-leading, with one reviewer saying the lighting options do not match bigger keyboard brands.

size and form factor
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.0

Size and form factor split by preference: compact layouts pleased small-form-factor users, but one 75% reviewer missed a numpad and mistyped initially.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2

Size and form factor earned positive evidence from one reviewer who found TKL a comfortable step down from full-size keyboards.

software quality
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.8

Software quality was highly mixed: some found Core easy or lightweight, while others reported unintuitive controls, bugs, or polling/profile issues.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.3

Software quality was mostly praised for VIA, QMK, and the dedicated MCHOSE software, with caveats around VIA being basic and RGB customization sometimes clunky.

sound dampening
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
3.3

Sound dampening received polarized feedback: one reviewer disliked the thin foam, while others praised internal damping and quiet typing setups.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.6

Sound dampening was praised for reducing ping, refining the sound, and isolating vibration through the case design and internal layers.

stabilizer quality
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
No score yet
Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.7

Stabilizer impressions were mixed: some reviewers found them tuned and issue-free, while others noted plate-mount tradeoffs or a need for more lube.

switch feel
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.5

Switch feel ranged from smooth and satisfying to transformative with upgraded Panda switches, though one reviewer was less convinced by the stock Fox HE feel.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Reviewers generally liked the switch feel, calling the Vintage White or stock linear switches smooth, responsive, crisp, and satisfying, with only mild scratchiness or preference-based caveats.

switch options
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.6

Reviewers liked the variety of HE switch choices, including tactile/clicky options and samples, with several calling the switch ecosystem unusually flexible.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.0

Switch choice was the clearest limitation: one reviewer wanted tactile options at checkout, while another wanted to try tactiles despite liking the included switches.

typing comfort
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.5

Typing comfort was generally favorable, helped by accurate typing, cushioning, and satisfying feedback, especially with preferred switches.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Typing comfort was praised across reviews for its bouncy gasket feel, smooth typing, and balanced flex, though one reviewer found it slightly firm.

typing feel
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
4.3

Typing feel was one of the most split areas: several reviewers loved the smooth or upgraded experience, while one called the stock setup mixed.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.6

Typing feel was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling it joyful, great, smooth, and close to ideal.

value for money
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
2.6

Value for money was the most common concern: reviewers praised the platform but repeatedly criticized the base price and costly upgrades.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.9

Value for money was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly calling the keyboard exceptional for its price and feature set.

wireless performance
Product 1: Glorious GMMK 3 HE
No score yet
Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.0

Wireless performance received positive evidence from a reviewer who found the wireless functionality impressive and quick to reconnect.