Compare Glorious GMMK 3 HE vs McHose GX87 Keyboard

Acoustics were mixed to weak on the stock board, with comments ranging from merely decent sound to loud clack or nothing special.

Acoustics were a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the thocky, poppy, solid, and very nice sound.

Adjustable actuation was credited with reducing accidental inputs and improving typing accuracy for different typing styles.

One reviewer found the switch actuation consistent, with only a slight scratchiness detectable during very slow presses.

Backlighting was viewed positively, with powerful LEDs and transparent caps helping the RGB stand out.

Battery life was strongly praised, with reviewers emphasizing the large 8,000 mAh capacity and long time between charges.

Build quality split reviewers sharply: custom or higher-spec builds felt solid and premium, but the stock plastic base drew repeated criticism.

Build quality was a major point of agreement, with every review giving positive evidence around the aluminum body, dense feel, assembly, or lack of flex.

Cable quality was only lightly evaluated, with one reviewer calling the included USB-C cable basic but nice enough.

Cable quality was a weak point in one review, where the included cable was described as cheap and not very good.

Compatibility was mixed: one reviewer had seamless console use, while another warned about possible north-facing LED keycap compatibility issues.

Compatibility evidence was positive where reviewers connected QMK and VIA support to deep, flexible keyboard customization.

Connectivity was mixed: reviewers liked the wireless and tri-mode feature set, but noted mode-switch delay, visible front controls, and minor connectivity issues.

Customization was the strongest consensus attribute, with every review highlighting unusually deep physical, software, or checkout configuration options.

Customization options were a major strength, especially the magnetic or ball-catch quick-disassembly case, hot-swap design, and easy access for mods.

Design aesthetics varied from dull to stunning, with RGB and custom color/material choices often lifting the visual impression.

Design aesthetics were generally positive for clean, premium, and attractive looks, but some reviewers found the styling mundane or noticed mismatched colors.

Desk space efficiency was supported by praise for the compact yet functional 75% layout.

Desk space efficiency was positive in one review, which liked that TKL saves space while leaving room for an optional macro pad.

Durability was viewed positively where reviewers focused on repairability, longevity, and Hall Effect switch lifespan.

Durability evidence centered on the solid aluminum build and PBT keycaps, which reviewers linked to lasting use.

Switch replacement was described as easy or convenient across reviews, helped by included tools and simplified access.

Switch replacement was mostly easy thanks to tool-free access and hot-swap sockets, though one reviewer found reinstalling switches harder because the PCB flexes.

Ergonomics received limited but positive evidence because the fixed typing angle was expected to be comfortable for most people.

Extra gaming features were appreciated, but some reviewers thought the base board lacked certain competitive features for the price.

Extra gaming features received positive evidence from one reviewer who highlighted the ultra-low-latency mode as a surprise at this price.

Frame rigidity was mixed, with one reviewer noting chassis flex while another said the case was generally rigid aside from top-case movement.

Frame rigidity was mostly praised for its solid, flex-free construction, though the quick-release design was seen by one reviewer as less sturdy than screws.

Gaming performance was generally strong thanks to precise HE inputs, rapid-trigger controls, and advanced actuation, though one review saw the feature set as merely decent.

Gaming performance was viewed as more than adequate for casual or hybrid use, with reviewers reporting competent play across first-person and general gaming sessions.

Hot-swappability was a standout, especially the unusual ability to use both magnetic HE and mechanical MX-style switches.

Hot-swappable switches were consistently treated as a benefit because users can replace switches without soldering and personalize the board.

Keycap quality was inconsistent: PC Gamer liked the crisp GPBT caps, while several others found stock caps cheap-feeling, tacky, or prone to fingerprints.

Keycap quality was praised for PBT material, thickness, durability, and a profile that helped typing accuracy.

Responsiveness was widely praised, with reviewers citing crisp action, precise game movement, and highly responsive inputs.

Key response was consistently praised, with reviewers describing the keys or switches as responsive and accurate enough for both typing and gaming.

One reviewer noticed slight switch/key wobble, making key stability only average in that review.

Key stability evidence was mixed: one reviewer disliked the plate-mounted stabilizer tradeoff, while another found the installed stabilizers secure and free of ticking.

Latency impressions were mixed: one review downplayed the perceptible benefit of low lag, while another found it slower than some HE competitors.

Latency impressions were positive overall, helped by 1,000 Hz operation and an ultra-low-latency mode, though this is still framed as strong budget performance rather than elite Hall Effect speed.

Layout options were viewed as a strength because reviewers noted 65%, 75%, and 100% choices serving different preferences.

Legend visibility drew a qualified note because one reviewer observed imperfections in the key fonts.

Macro customization was useful in principle, but evidence was mixed because one reviewer said macros were forgotten during testing.

Macro customization was positively supported by reviewers who noted easy macro setup through VIA or QMK-style customization.

Materials quality depended heavily on configuration: metal/custom builds felt premium, while the stock plastic and keycaps were often criticized for the price.

Materials quality was praised for the aluminum case, smooth finish, premium feel, and solid components.

Noise level varied by configuration, from muted and late-night-friendly to a louder clack on some switch/keycap combinations.

Noise level received limited but positive evidence from a reviewer who described the sound as muted and thocky rather than harsh.

Onboard memory was positively tied to saving and switching up to three keyboard profiles from the board.

Onboard memory was positively supported by stored keyboard customizations that persist when moving between devices.

Per-key lighting control was supported by multiple reviews that liked individual-key or per-key RGB adjustment.

The 8K polling rate impressed some reviewers, but others called its real-world value limited or had trouble accessing it in software.

Reviewers treated the 1,000 Hz polling behavior as a strength, linking it to responsive inputs and low-latency use.

Portability was helped by a lightweight or non-cumbersome feel despite the board's substantial construction.

Portability was a weakness because one reviewer said the heavy aluminum build makes it undesirable to carry to and from an office.

Profile management was praised for handy physical switching and game-specific profile support.

Profile management was supported by the ability to store customizations on the keyboard so settings persist across devices.

Rapid Trigger earned positive comments for quick successive inputs and snappy response, especially for fast gaming movement.

Reliability was mostly positive from reviewers discussing long-term use and repairability, but one software-related macro issue reduced confidence.

Reliability evidence was mixed to negative in one review due to occasional held-input recognition and rare multiple key registrations.

RGB customization was praised for Core-based control, individual-key color options, and layered per-key lighting effects.

RGB customization was broadly useful, especially through VIA, QMK, or the MCHOSE software, though one reviewer found the RGB controls clunky.

RGB lighting quality was a clear strength, with reviewers calling it pretty, eye-popping, and effective through transparent keycaps.

RGB lighting quality was acceptable but not class-leading, with one reviewer saying the lighting options do not match bigger keyboard brands.

Size and form factor split by preference: compact layouts pleased small-form-factor users, but one 75% reviewer missed a numpad and mistyped initially.

Size and form factor earned positive evidence from one reviewer who found TKL a comfortable step down from full-size keyboards.

Software quality was highly mixed: some found Core easy or lightweight, while others reported unintuitive controls, bugs, or polling/profile issues.

Software quality was mostly praised for VIA, QMK, and the dedicated MCHOSE software, with caveats around VIA being basic and RGB customization sometimes clunky.

Sound dampening received polarized feedback: one reviewer disliked the thin foam, while others praised internal damping and quiet typing setups.

Sound dampening was praised for reducing ping, refining the sound, and isolating vibration through the case design and internal layers.

Stabilizer impressions were mixed: some reviewers found them tuned and issue-free, while others noted plate-mount tradeoffs or a need for more lube.

Switch feel ranged from smooth and satisfying to transformative with upgraded Panda switches, though one reviewer was less convinced by the stock Fox HE feel.

Reviewers generally liked the switch feel, calling the Vintage White or stock linear switches smooth, responsive, crisp, and satisfying, with only mild scratchiness or preference-based caveats.

Reviewers liked the variety of HE switch choices, including tactile/clicky options and samples, with several calling the switch ecosystem unusually flexible.

Switch choice was the clearest limitation: one reviewer wanted tactile options at checkout, while another wanted to try tactiles despite liking the included switches.

Typing comfort was generally favorable, helped by accurate typing, cushioning, and satisfying feedback, especially with preferred switches.

Typing comfort was praised across reviews for its bouncy gasket feel, smooth typing, and balanced flex, though one reviewer found it slightly firm.

Typing feel was one of the most split areas: several reviewers loved the smooth or upgraded experience, while one called the stock setup mixed.

Typing feel was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling it joyful, great, smooth, and close to ideal.

Value for money was the most common concern: reviewers praised the platform but repeatedly criticized the base price and costly upgrades.

Value for money was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly calling the keyboard exceptional for its price and feature set.

Wireless performance received positive evidence from a reviewer who found the wireless functionality impressive and quick to reconnect.