McHose GX87 Keyboard

McHose GX87 Keyboard Review

Brand: McHose
Updated: 3 days ago
4.2
Consolidated expert score
116
Review insights
40
Scored features
6
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the McHose GX87 if you want a budget aluminum TKL with thocky sound, strong customization, and huge battery life. Skip it if you need a light portable board, tactile/clicky stock switches, or advanced gaming features.

Best for

Best for mechanical-keyboard enthusiasts who want a budget-friendly aluminum TKL with thocky stock sound, hot-swap modding, and QMK/VIA-style customization. It also suits users who split time between typing and casual or mainstream gaming.

Not for

Not for buyers who need a lightweight portable keyboard, tactile or clicky switch choices at checkout, or advanced Hall Effect gaming features. It may also frustrate users who want perfectly polished RGB, cable quality, or wireless behavior.

Verdict

The McHose GX87 lands as a rare budget TKL that reviewers describe as genuinely premium: a dense aluminum build, strong stock acoustics, hot-swap support, and QMK/VIA-style customization give it enthusiast appeal without a high price. Its typing feel earns broad praise, from smooth linear switches to foam-assisted pop and thock, and gaming performance is solid thanks to responsive inputs and high polling. The tradeoff is that it is not a lightweight or specialized gaming board; reviewers note the heavy chassis, limited stock switch choices, fixed angle, occasional wireless/input quirks, and less refined RGB or stabilizer implementation. It works best as a value-focused custom mechanical keyboard rather than a Hall Effect esports deck.

Reviewer Consensus

Strong agreement: Reviewers most consistently agree that the GX87 delivers premium-feeling aluminum build quality, strong stock sound, easy customization, and standout value.

Mixed opinions: Gaming, wireless, and software performance are generally positive but context-dependent, with praise for polling and programmability alongside minor input, wireless, and RGB caveats.

Common concern: The most repeated caveats are refinement tradeoffs: limited stock switch choices, stabilizer/RGB quirks, and a heavy TKL body that is not very portable.

Evidence coverage
  • 6 expert reviews
  • 32 of 40 scored features show reviewer agreement
  • 8 scored features have limited or less conclusive evidence
  • no scored features show reviewer disagreement or mixed evidence
  1. Limited review data
  2. Mixed evidence
  3. Moderate consensus
  4. Strong consensus

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Alternative: smaller size and desk mobility The reviewer suggests the Keychron K2 HE as a smaller alternative if the GX87 is too bulky.
  • Alternative: smaller size and desk mobility The NuPhy Air60 HE is suggested as another smaller alternative to the chunky GX87.

Chilkey NDTKL

  • Similar: build resemblance and customization features The reviewer says the GX87 strongly resembles the Chilkey NDTKL and shares customization features.

Feature Scorecards

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 4 reviews
    hot-swappable switches: 5.0, based on 4 reviews
    Hot-swap support is consistently confirmed, with reviewers saying switches can be changed without soldering.
  • 4.9
    based on 4 reviews
    value for money: 4.9, based on 4 reviews
    Value for money is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly emphasizing the low price for the feature set and build.
  • 4.9
    based on 2 reviews
    frame rigidity: 4.9, based on 2 reviews
    Frame rigidity is excellent in the strongest evidence, with no flex or rattles and a ball-catch system that feels like one solid piece.
  • 4.8
    based on 6 reviews
    customization options: 4.8, based on 6 reviews
    Customization is one of the strongest themes, with easy disassembly, hot-swap support, software customization, and budget room for user mods.
  • 4.7
    based on 5 reviews
    battery life: 4.7, based on 5 reviews
    Battery life is a major strength, with the 8,000mAh capacity repeatedly highlighted and one reviewer saying it goes forever.
  • 4.7
    based on 4 reviews
    typing feel: 4.7, based on 4 reviews
    Typing feel is a major strength, with reviews praising a soft or satisfying feel, strong flex balance, and a generally enjoyable typing experience.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    sound dampening: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    Sound dampening is strongly supported by multiple foam and PET layers that reduce harsh frequencies and ping.
  • 4.7
    based on 2 reviews
    durability: 4.7, based on 2 reviews
    Durability evidence centers on the aluminum case and durable PBT keycaps, with reviewers describing the board and caps as built to last.
  • 4.7
    based on 1 review
    onboard memory: 4.7, based on 1 review
    Onboard memory is directly supported by one review, which says customizations are stored on the keyboard and persist across devices.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    acoustics: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    Acoustics are a standout, with reviews calling the sound stock, poppy, thocky, and unusually good for the price.
  • 4.7
    based on 4 reviews
    materials quality: 4.7, based on 4 reviews
    Materials quality is a strength, with aluminum construction, high-quality components, and PBT keycaps repeatedly cited.
  • 4.6
    based on 5 reviews
    build quality: 4.6, based on 5 reviews
    Build quality earns broad praise, with reviewers repeatedly describing a solid, dense, exceptional-feeling aluminum keyboard.
  • 4.6
    based on 2 reviews
    noise level: 4.6, based on 2 reviews
    Noise character is favorable: reviews describe muted, thocky sound and stabilizers tuned to be nearly silent, not necessarily a silent board.
  • 4.6
    based on 3 reviews
    switch feel: 4.6, based on 3 reviews
    Reviewers describe the stock linear switches as smooth, poppy, crisp, snappy, and satisfying, though one notes the included choices lean linear rather than tactile.
  • 4.6
    based on 2 reviews
    macro customization: 4.6, based on 2 reviews
    Macro customization is supported through VIA/QMK-style remapping and the ability to create complex macros.
  • 4.5
    based on 3 reviews
    typing comfort: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
    Typing comfort is strong, with reviewers citing soft/bouncy feel, a comfort focus, and a generally pleasant typing experience.
  • 4.5
    based on 4 reviews
    ease of switch replacement: 4.5, based on 4 reviews
    Switch replacement is generally easy due to hot-swap support, although one review says flex cuts can make installation more tedious.
  • 4.3
    based on 4 reviews
    gaming performance: 4.3, based on 4 reviews
    Gaming performance is good for a mechanical productivity/gaming hybrid, with reviewers reporting competent play and responsive behavior rather than elite Hall Effect features.
  • 4.3
    based on 5 reviews
    keycap quality: 4.3, based on 5 reviews
    Keycap quality is mostly positive thanks to double-shot PBT and good thickness, but one review noted a color mismatch on the white unit.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    latency: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    Latency is generally strong for a mechanical board, helped by 1,000Hz polling and an ultra-low latency mode, though it is not framed as a Hall Effect esports board.
  • 4.3
    based on 1 review
    actuation consistency: 4.3, based on 1 review
    Only one review directly addresses actuation consistency, saying the switches feel smooth with a consistent key press.
  • 4.3
    based on 3 reviews
    polling rate: 4.3, based on 3 reviews
    Polling-rate evidence is positive, with multiple reviews calling out 1,000Hz behavior and one video noting very high measured polling/latency behavior.
  • 4.3
    based on 2 reviews
    compatibility: 4.3, based on 2 reviews
    Compatibility evidence is positive but limited, with persistence across multiple devices and software OS/layout changes mentioned.
  • 4.2
    based on 5 reviews
    software quality: 4.2, based on 5 reviews
    Software quality is broadly useful thanks to QMK/VIA and dedicated software mentions, though reviewers note clunky RGB and some uncertainty or wireless limits.
  • 4.2
    based on 3 reviews
    key responsiveness: 4.2, based on 3 reviews
    Responsiveness is praised across typing and gaming, with reviewers describing responsive switches, immediate key presses, and tactile/responsive keys.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    wireless performance: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Wireless performance is promising in the dedicated evidence, especially fast reconnection, but this is supported by one review only.
  • 4.1
    based on 3 reviews
    extra gaming features: 4.1, based on 3 reviews
    Extra gaming features are moderate: 1,000Hz polling and low-latency mode help, but reviews do not show advanced analog or rapid-trigger features.
  • 4.1
    based on 4 reviews
    RGB customization: 4.1, based on 4 reviews
    RGB customization is supported through lighting controls, VIA/QMK-style tools, and software lighting effects, but one review found it clunky.
  • 4.0
    based on 4 reviews
    ergonomics: 4.0, based on 4 reviews
    Ergonomics are generally acceptable, with typing comfort praised, but the fixed angle and firmer feel may not suit everyone.
  • 4.0
    based on 2 reviews
    reliability: 4.0, based on 2 reviews
    Reliability is mixed: one review reports no QC issues, while another notes rare repeated inputs and worries the issue could worsen.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    layout options: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Layout-options evidence is limited to software-side OS/layout changes, not broad physical layout choices.
  • 3.9
    based on 3 reviews
    connectivity: 3.9, based on 3 reviews
    Connectivity is good overall through tri-mode support, but one review flags infrequent minor connectivity issues.
  • 3.9
    based on 3 reviews
    RGB lighting quality: 3.9, based on 3 reviews
    RGB lighting quality is acceptable to good, with south-facing RGB and lighting effects mentioned, though it is not described as best-in-class.
  • 3.9
    based on 2 reviews
    size and form factor: 3.9, based on 2 reviews
    The TKL form factor is familiar and comfortable for many, but one review also calls it chunky and heavy.
  • 3.7
    based on 3 reviews
    stabilizer quality: 3.7, based on 3 reviews
    Stabilizer quality is mixed: some reviewers found them lubed and quiet, while others wanted more lube or noted plate-mounted limitations.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 1 review
    key stability: 3.4, based on 1 review
    Key stability evidence is mixed because the plate-mounted stabilizers are described as less stable and more prone to future rattling.
  • 3.2
    based on 2 reviews
    switch options: 3.2, based on 2 reviews
    Switch choice is a limitation: one review says there are no tactile options, while another notes Vintage White and Matcha Latte choices.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    desk space efficiency: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Desk-space efficiency is a drawback for users who move the board around because one review says the chunky TKL is tricky on the desk.
  • 2.6
    based on 2 reviews
    cable quality: 2.6, based on 2 reviews
    Cable quality is a weak spot because one reviewer calls the cable cheap, while another simply describes it as a standard rubberized cable.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    portability: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Portability is poor because the keyboard is heavy enough that one reviewer says they would not cart it to and from the office.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Gaming Keyboard, this product is above average in hot-swappable switches, value for money, ease of switch replacement, below average in portability, cable quality, desk space efficiency.

Attribute This product Category average Difference
hot-swappable switches 5.0 3.2 +1.7
portability 2.0 3.4 -1.4
value for money 4.9 3.6 +1.3
cable quality 2.6 3.8 -1.2
ease of switch replacement 4.5 3.4 +1.1
desk space efficiency 3.0 4.0 -1.0
wireless performance 4.2 3.3 +0.9
battery life 4.7 3.9 +0.8

FAQ

Is the McHose GX87 good for gaming?

Yes for casual and mainstream gaming, since reviewers praise its responsiveness, 1,000Hz polling, and low-latency options. It is not presented as a true Hall Effect esports board with analog or rapid-trigger features.

How does the McHose GX87 sound?

Sound is one of the strongest points. Reviewers describe it as thocky, poppy, clean, and unusually good in stock form, helped by foam, PET layers, and the aluminum case.

Can I replace the switches?

Yes. Reviews repeatedly confirm hot-swap support, so switches can be replaced without soldering, though one reviewer says the flex-cut PCB can make installation a little more tedious.

Is the McHose GX87 portable?

Not really. The TKL layout is familiar, but reviewers call the keyboard heavy and chunky, with one specifically saying it is not something they would cart to and from the office.

How good is the software customization?

The software story is mostly positive because reviewers mention QMK, VIA, key remapping, macros, and lighting control. The caveats are clunky RGB customization in one review and wireless customization limits in another.

How is the battery life?

Battery life is strongly praised. Multiple reviews point to the 8,000mAh capacity, and one reviewer says they had not run out of charge during testing.

What are the main downsides?

The main downsides in the reviews are heavy weight, limited stock switch options, a cheap cable in one review, plate-mounted stabilizer caveats, and occasional connectivity or repeated-input quirks.

Consider This Instead

If you want better portability

Choose Epomaker G84 HE. It scores 4.5 vs 2.0 for portability, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better cable quality

Choose Keychron Q5 HE. It scores 4.6 vs 2.6 for cable quality, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

If you want better desk space efficiency

Choose Lemokey P1 HE. It scores 4.8 vs 3.0 for desk space efficiency, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better switch options

Choose MonsGeek M1 V5 HE. It scores 4.9 vs 3.2 for switch options, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Gaming Keyboard Alternatives

#1 Keychron Q3 HE 8K
4.5
5 reviews

Best for 8K polling, magnetic-switch gaming control, premium build, and deep web customization. Skip it if you need broad switch compatibility, USB passthrough, a wrist rest, or a portable keyboard.

Pros: latency, polling rate

Cons: portability, switch options

#2 Keychron Q6 HE
4.4
6 reviews

Good if you want a premium full-size Hall Effect keyboard with smooth switches, strong gaming controls, and quiet acoustics. Skip it if you need a portable, budget, or broadly switch-compatible...

Pros: key stability, frame rigidity

Cons: portability, switch options

#3 Keychron Q3 HE
4.4
8 reviews

Best for a premium, quiet Hall Effect TKL with strong wireless, software, and gaming features. Skip it if price, switch flexibility, USB passthrough, or an included wrist rest matter most.

Pros: rapid trigger support, typing feel

Cons: switch options, portability

#4 Keychron Q5 HE
4.4
10 reviews

Best for a premium 96% metal keyboard with Hall Effect tuning, strong wireless, and excellent typing feel. Skip it for travel, bargain pricing, or maximum esports specs.

Pros: build quality, frame rigidity

Cons: portability, switch options