Compare Glorious GMMK 3 HE vs NuPhy Air60 HE

Acoustics were mixed to weak on the stock board, with comments ranging from merely decent sound to loud clack or nothing special.

Acoustics were generally liked, especially the muted or satisfying low-profile sound, but some reviewers criticized the space bar or found the sound lackluster.

Adjustable actuation was credited with reducing accidental inputs and improving typing accuracy for different typing styles.

Actuation behavior was described as stable and reliable, especially with the dual-rail switches and dependable Hall Effect functions.

Backlighting was viewed positively, with powerful LEDs and transparent caps helping the RGB stand out.

Backlight brightness was praised as bright and usable without being obnoxious.

Build quality split reviewers sharply: custom or higher-spec builds felt solid and premium, but the stock plastic base drew repeated criticism.

Build quality was broadly praised, with reviewers describing the board as sturdy, solid, premium-feeling, or well put together.

Cable quality was only lightly evaluated, with one reviewer calling the included USB-C cable basic but nice enough.

Cable quality was mixed: the included angled cable was praised, while one reviewer found the side-port cable setup limiting for custom cables.

Compatibility was mixed: one reviewer had seamless console use, while another warned about possible north-facing LED keycap compatibility issues.

Compatibility was positive in the reviews that tested or valued laptop use plus Mac, PC, and Linux support.

Connectivity was the most repeated drawback because the board is wired-only and side USB or cable placement bothered several reviewers.

Customization was the strongest consensus attribute, with every review highlighting unusually deep physical, software, or checkout configuration options.

Customization options were strongly praised for remapping, actuation tuning, lighting, layers, and Hall Effect controls.

Design aesthetics varied from dull to stunning, with RGB and custom color/material choices often lifting the visual impression.

Design aesthetics were usually praised as stylish, distinctive, and attractive, though a few reviewers disliked the keycap color mix in person.

Desk space efficiency was supported by praise for the compact yet functional 75% layout.

Desk space efficiency was praised for freeing mouse space in gaming setups.

Durability was viewed positively where reviewers focused on repairability, longevity, and Hall Effect switch lifespan.

Durability was mixed, with PBT legends and solid keycaps praised, but one reviewer strongly criticized scratching during use and travel.

Switch replacement was described as easy or convenient across reviews, helped by included tools and simplified access.

Switch replacement appeared physically easy in the one review that discussed removal directly.

Ergonomics received limited but positive support around comfort adjustments and wrist positioning.

Extra gaming features were appreciated, but some reviewers thought the base board lacked certain competitive features for the price.

Extra gaming features were extensive and often praised, though SOCD/Hyper Tap-style features raised usefulness or fairness concerns for some reviewers.

Frame rigidity was mixed, with one reviewer noting chassis flex while another said the case was generally rigid aside from top-case movement.

Frame rigidity was strongly praised in the PC Gamer review, which reported no flex or creaking.

Gaming performance was generally strong thanks to precise HE inputs, rapid-trigger controls, and advanced actuation, though one review saw the feature set as merely decent.

Gaming performance was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers praising speed, responsiveness, Hall Effect control, and compact competitive use.

Hot-swappability was a standout, especially the unusual ability to use both magnetic HE and mechanical MX-style switches.

Hot-swap support was limited in practical value because compatible low-profile magnetic switch choices were narrow.

Keycap quality was inconsistent: PC Gamer liked the crisp GPBT caps, while several others found stock caps cheap-feeling, tacky, or prone to fingerprints.

Keycap quality split reviewers sharply: some praised PBT feel and solidity, while others disliked slipperiness, light bleed, scratching, or average legends.

Responsiveness was widely praised, with reviewers citing crisp action, precise game movement, and highly responsive inputs.

Responsiveness was a major strength across reviews, with reviewers praising fast keystrokes, snappy switches, and responsive in-game behavior.

Key spacing was criticized by reviewers who felt the flat or wide keys could cause accidental presses or strange typing.

One reviewer noticed slight switch/key wobble, making key stability only average in that review.

Key stability was praised when reviewers focused on dual-rail or low-wobble behavior, with only limited criticism elsewhere.

Latency impressions were mixed: one review downplayed the perceptible benefit of low lag, while another found it slower than some HE competitors.

Latency was consistently praised as very low or imperceptible, with reviewers tying the board’s wired design and 8K capability to fast response.

Layout options were viewed as a strength because reviewers noted 65%, 75%, and 100% choices serving different preferences.

Layout options were a common limitation because the 60% layout omits arrows, function keys, and navigation keys that several reviewers missed.

Legend visibility drew a qualified note because one reviewer observed imperfections in the key fonts.

Legend visibility drew criticism because several reviewers found the legends, translucent keys, or light bleed distracting or unclear.

Macro customization was useful in principle, but evidence was mixed because one reviewer said macros were forgotten during testing.

Macro customization was mixed because one review praised available macros and custom delays while another said macro creation was missing.

Materials quality depended heavily on configuration: metal/custom builds felt premium, while the stock plastic and keycaps were often criticized for the price.

Materials quality was mixed: aluminum and PBT elements earned praise, while one reviewer criticized scratch-prone plastic and coatings.

Noise level varied by configuration, from muted and late-night-friendly to a louder clack on some switch/keycap combinations.

Noise level was considered office-friendly or pleasantly controlled rather than truly silent.

Onboard memory was positively tied to saving and switching up to three keyboard profiles from the board.

Per-key lighting control was supported by multiple reviews that liked individual-key or per-key RGB adjustment.

The 8K polling rate impressed some reviewers, but others called its real-world value limited or had trouble accessing it in software.

Polling rate was viewed as a strong spec, though reviewers also cautioned that 8K may be imperceptible or cause jitter for some setups.

Portability was helped by a lightweight or non-cumbersome feel despite the board's substantial construction.

Portability was mixed: reviewers liked the small, light body but repeatedly noted that wired-only operation undercuts travel appeal.

Profile management was praised for handy physical switching and game-specific profile support.

Profile management was mixed: the physical switch was appreciated, but the three-profile limit was a possible deal-breaker.

Rapid Trigger earned positive comments for quick successive inputs and snappy response, especially for fast gaming movement.

Rapid Trigger support was repeatedly praised as responsive and useful, with reviewers noting near-instant reset and practical gaming benefits.

Reliability was mostly positive from reviewers discussing long-term use and repairability, but one software-related macro issue reduced confidence.

Reliability drew concerns from firmware-update problems and feet that did not lock securely in one critical review.

RGB customization was praised for Core-based control, individual-key color options, and layered per-key lighting effects.

RGB customization was viewed positively, with reviewers liking the available effects, side lighting, and web-based lighting controls.

RGB lighting quality was a clear strength, with reviewers calling it pretty, eye-popping, and effective through transparent keycaps.

RGB lighting quality was usually praised for brightness and visual effect, but keycap light bleed made it look odd to some reviewers.

Size and form factor split by preference: compact layouts pleased small-form-factor users, but one 75% reviewer missed a numpad and mistyped initially.

Size and form factor were usually praised for compactness and novelty, though one reviewer questioned the low-profile value because travel distance felt full-size.

Software quality was highly mixed: some found Core easy or lightweight, while others reported unintuitive controls, bugs, or polling/profile issues.

Software quality was one of the most consistently praised attributes, with reviewers liking the web app, stability, clean UI, and broad controls.

Sound dampening received polarized feedback: one reviewer disliked the thin foam, while others praised internal damping and quiet typing setups.

Sound dampening was praised when reviewers mentioned the foam and silicone layers, which helped make the thin board sound more refined.

Stabilizer quality was a recurring weak spot, mostly because multiple reviewers singled out the space bar for wobble, rattle, or clanky sound.

Switch feel ranged from smooth and satisfying to transformative with upgraded Panda switches, though one reviewer was less convinced by the stock Fox HE feel.

Reviewers generally liked the low-profile magnetic Jade switches for smoothness, snappiness, and comfort, though one reviewer found the light force required adjustment.

Reviewers liked the variety of HE switch choices, including tactile/clicky options and samples, with several calling the switch ecosystem unusually flexible.

Switch choice was criticized as narrow, with reviewers noting the current low-profile magnetic ecosystem leaves only the two Gateron LP Jade variants.

Typing comfort was generally favorable, helped by accurate typing, cushioning, and satisfying feedback, especially with preferred switches.

Typing comfort was praised by some reviewers as excellent, but others reported accuracy issues from the flat/light low-profile feel.

Typing feel was one of the most split areas: several reviewers loved the smooth or upgraded experience, while one called the stock setup mixed.

Typing feel was the most divided core attribute: several reviewers loved it, while others found the keycaps, low-profile shape, or light actuation less satisfying.

Value for money was the most common concern: reviewers praised the platform but repeatedly criticized the base price and costly upgrades.

Value for money was usually praised, especially versus other Hall Effect boards, but one negative review argued the price made little sense.

The optional wrist rest was liked in the one review that evaluated it, where it was described as comfortable and stable.