Compare Glorious GMMK 2 vs Corsair K70 Core

Acoustics were generally praised as satisfying, full-bodied, or surprisingly good, though one reviewer heard some hollow sound.

Acoustics were a clear strength for most reviewers thanks to a deeper, quieter sound, though one negative review found the sound unpleasant.

Actuation consistency was mixed: reviewers liked the switches after use, but several noted they needed break-in time before feeling consistent.

Evidence is split: one review said actuation behaved as expected, while another reported severe switch chatter on multiple keys.

Backlight brightness was mostly praised as bright and vivid, though one reviewer found the ABS caps slightly subdued the effect.

Backlight brightness earned positive remarks, with reviewers calling the lighting impressively bright or noting strong shine.

Build quality was widely praised; reviewers repeatedly described the board as solid, sturdy, weighty, well-built, or premium for the price.

Build quality was generally solid, especially for the price, but opinions were pulled down by plastic construction and one strongly negative durability critique.

Cable quality was mixed, with praise for decent or compatible cables but criticism of stiffness and packaging kinks.

Cable quality was the most repeated hardware complaint: reviewers disliked the fixed, rubber, non-braided, non-detachable cable.

Compatibility evidence was positive but limited, with one reviewer reporting smooth use across Windows, Mac, consoles, and Android.

Compatibility evidence was positive, with reviewers reporting Windows/Mac support and console testing without issues.

Connectivity was mixed: wired USB connections worked reliably, but one reviewer treated wired-only operation as a downside.

Connectivity was judged positively when discussed, mainly because the wired connection avoided disconnects and wireless-interference concerns.

Customization options were one of the broadest strengths, spanning switches, keycaps, software, RGB, firmware, and modding.

Customization options were broadly strong, covering key remaps, RGB, dial behavior, and iCUE controls, though dial programmability was limited.

Design aesthetics were usually praised for attractive colors, clean styling, and strong RGB presentation, though some disliked exposed switches or specific colors.

Design aesthetics were mixed to positive, with praise for striking or sleek styling offset by comments that it was basic or even unattractive.

Desk space efficiency was a clear strength for the compact 96% and 65% layouts, especially for users who need mouse room.

Desk space opinions depended on layout: the TKL Wireless was efficient, while the full-size Core was called large and space-hungry.

Durability evidence was positive, including drop survival, expected long life, and ease of long-term repair.

Durability evidence was mixed, with positive bend-test comments offset by concerns about the fixed cable and one review calling the keycaps non-durable.

Ease of switch replacement was praised as simple, quick, and accessible with included tools and hot-swap support.

Ease of switch replacement scored poorly because the negative review stressed difficult serviceability without hot-swap or easy disassembly.

Ergonomics were mixed: some liked the angle and long-use comfort, while others found the height, legs, or lack of wrist support uncomfortable.

Ergonomics were mixed, with positive comments on height, palm support, and hand comfort but complaints about tall chassis positioning.

Extra gaming features were present but described as standard rather than exceptional in the tested review evidence.

Extra gaming features were adequate but not standout; reviewers liked useful basics but criticized limited or delayed advanced features.

Frame rigidity scored strongly because reviewers found little to no flex, sturdy aluminum framing, and a case that resisted twisting.

Frame rigidity was usually praised, with reviewers citing low flex, good rigidity, and torsional stiffness.

Gaming performance was broadly positive, with reviewers reporting responsive, enjoyable, and reliable play across casual and competitive use.

Gaming performance was consistently solid to excellent, with reviewers reporting responsive play and no major speed or registration issues in games.

Hot-swappable switches were a standout feature, letting users swap switches without soldering and making the board beginner-friendly.

Hot-swappable switch support was consistently negative because reviewers emphasized that the board is not hot-swappable.

Keycaps drew mixed reactions: reviewers liked the feel, legends, and higher-than-usual ABS quality, but many wanted thicker or PBT caps.

Keycap quality drew mixed reactions: some liked the ABS texture and feel, while others disliked slickness, shine risk, thinness, or durability concerns.

Reviewers who discussed responsiveness found the keys fast and dependable in gaming and typing, with no missed inputs in tested use.

Gaming and general input responsiveness were mostly praised, with reviewers describing presses as snappy, responsive, or quick enough in actual play.

Key spacing was mixed because the compact layouts were usable for some reviewers but caused accidental presses or adjustment for others.

Key stability was generally strong, with comments about stable keys, reduced wobble, and a smoother switch feel.

Key stability was viewed positively overall, with limited wobble noted across keycaps and stabilizer-supported keys.

Latency control was viewed positively, especially when reviewers lowered input latency for more responsive or more competitive gaming.

One reviewer judged latency and speed solid overall, aided by the wired design and mainstream 1,000Hz behavior.

Layout options were mostly appreciated for 65% and 96% choices, although some reviewers wanted a tenkeyless option or noted compressed layouts.

Layout option criticism came from a reviewer who wanted a TKL version of the model they tested.

Legend visibility was praised because shine-through legends and side/front markings made the keyboard easier to use in dim settings.

Legend visibility was mostly usable, but not perfect; one review noted uneven illumination while another found legends clear and easy to see.

Macro customization was a useful strength, with reviewers praising macro creation, layers, shortcuts, and programmable keybinds.

Macro customization was praised, especially through iCUE, with reviewers noting useful shortcuts, remapping, and macro recording.

Materials quality was generally strong, with praise for aluminum, weight, and sturdiness, while some reviewers noted the plastic lower case as a tradeoff.

Materials quality was mixed: reviewers liked the metal or aluminum elements but repeatedly noted budget plastic and less premium construction.

Media controls were functional but somewhat limited because control relies on function shortcuts rather than a physical knob or roller.

Media controls were mixed: reviewers liked the multifunction dial, but criticized registration issues, limited programmability, and lack of dedicated media keys.

Noise level was usually considered quiet or controlled, though one reviewer found the board a bit louder than a HyperX board.

Noise level was generally considered low for a mechanical board, with reviewers praising subdued, quiet, or less annoying operation.

Onboard memory was positively mentioned for saving profiles and settings, but evidence was limited to a few reviews.

Onboard memory was mostly valued for portable profiles, though one review wanted stronger onboard behavior and another noted software-profile limitations.

Passthrough features scored low because a reviewer explicitly wanted a USB hub but noted it was absent.

Per-key lighting control was viewed as a strong customization advantage, especially through software and individual-key lighting options.

Per-key lighting control was praised where discussed, with reviewers noting individual key color control and granular lighting customization.

Polling-rate adjustment was treated as a useful performance-tuning feature, though most praise came as part of the broader software/performance controls.

Most reviewers found the 1,000Hz polling rate sufficient or excellent for this class, even if it lacks higher-end AXON-style rates.

Portability was positive for the 65% model and compact weight, although it was not presented as an ultra-light travel board.

Portability was mixed: the board is reasonably light, but full-size dimensions and the fixed cable limit easy travel.

Profile management was praised where tested, especially saving multiple profiles for different uses through software or onboard memory.

Profile management was a weakness in the cited reviews, mainly because software and onboard profiles could be awkward or disconnected.

Reliability evidence was positive but limited, with reviewers noting perfect macOS operation and a reliable, enjoyable overall experience.

Reliability evidence was split between positive long-term/no-issue impressions and one severe switch-chatter complaint.

RGB customization was praised for software effects, presets, layers, and per-key or individual color control, with some platform limitations noted separately.

RGB customization was a major positive, with reviewers highlighting deep iCUE control, effects, per-zone options, and ecosystem integration.

RGB lighting quality was a major highlight, often described as vivid, bright, attractive, or unusually impressive for the class.

RGB lighting quality was widely praised as bright, uniform, crisp, or attractive, though one reviewer noticed inconsistent shine-through on some keys.

Size and form factor were generally praised for compactness and retained functionality, but reviewers mentioned learning curves or compressed key clusters.

The full-size form factor pleased some users but was also criticized for taking up desk space and not fitting every setup.

Software quality was split: reviewers liked Core's ease and flexibility, but criticized Windows-only support, bugs, and cheap-feeling polish.

Software quality was mixed: iCUE was powerful and sometimes easy, but several reviewers called it convoluted, complicated, or difficult for newcomers.

Sound dampening was praised because the foam reduced noise, improved sound, and helped avoid hollow or high-pitched acoustics.

Sound dampening was one of the most consistently praised attributes, with foam layers credited for lower ping, quieter typing, and better acoustics.

Stabilizer quality was mixed: some reviewers praised lubed or rattle-free stabilizers, while others complained about scratchiness, mushiness, or spacebar issues.

Stabilizers and the spacebar were mostly praised for reduced rattle and good tuning, though one reviewer still wanted more lube.

Reviewers consistently liked the Fox linear switches for smooth, soft, quiet, or satisfying feel, though a few noted break-in time or wanted other switch types.

Reviewers generally liked the pre-lubed linear switch feel, often calling it smooth or buttery, though a few criticized gumminess, sluggishness, stiffness, or reliability.

Switch choice was praised through barebones and hot-swap flexibility, but several reviewers criticized the limited prebuilt factory option.

Switch choice is limited: reviewers noted buyers effectively get Corsair Red linear switches, with no tactile or clicky options for different preferences.

Typing comfort was strong, with reviewers citing low fatigue, smoothness, and easy adjustment during long writing or daily use.

Typing comfort was strongly positive where discussed, with reviewers describing the board as comfortable or useful for long work sessions.

Typing feel was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling it sublime, smooth, excellent, or otherwise pleasing.

Typing feel is the strongest consensus win, with most reviewers praising smooth, quiet, satisfying typing despite a few reservations about sluggishness or stiffness.

Value for money was strongly positive, with many reviewers calling the GMMK 2 compelling, budget-friendly, or excellent for its price.

Value for money was widely praised around the $100/£90 class, though a few reviewers felt feature cuts or market competition weakened the deal.

Volume control was usable through function-key commands, though the same review noted no physical volume roller or knob.

Volume control was generally useful through the dial, though some reviewers found the dial resistive or unreliable at fast scrolling.

Wireless performance evidence came from the TKL Wireless review, which noted the wireless mode could exceed wired polling, though the gain was small.

Wrist support drew mixed evidence: one reviewer wanted a wrist rest included, while another liked the separate wrist-rest accessory.

Wrist rest quality was the most divided comfort issue: some found it supportive or comfortable, while many disliked the hard, rough texture.