Glorious GMMK 2

Glorious GMMK 2 Gaming Keyboard Review

Brand: Glorious
Released: February 17, 2022
Updated: 2 months ago
4.3
Overall review score
317
Review evidence points
47
Scored features
19
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Glorious GMMK 2 for customizable RGB, smooth Fox switches, sturdy build, and strong value. Skip it if you need wireless, Mac software parity, tactile prebuilt switches, or a layout with more spacing.

Best for

Best for gamers, typists, and keyboard-curious buyers who want a sturdy wired board with hot-swap switches, strong RGB, compact layouts, and room to customize over time.

Not for

Not for buyers who need wireless use, polished Mac software, factory tactile switch options, a tenkeyless layout, or included wrist support.

Verdict

The Glorious GMMK 2 lands as a strong midrange modular keyboard with unusually broad appeal. Reviewers consistently praised its smooth Fox linear switches, sturdy aluminum-topped build, vivid RGB, compact 65% and 96% layouts, and deep customization through hot-swap sockets, macros, lighting, profiles, and firmware options. The tradeoff is that the board is not equally polished in every area: ABS keycaps drew durability concerns, stabilizers ranged from excellent to mushy or scratchy, and Glorious Core was useful but uneven, especially outside Windows. The compact layouts also save desk space while creating some adjustment issues around key spacing and wrist angle.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

47 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    20 (43%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    24 (51%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    3 (6%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.7
    13 reviews strong consensus
    customization options: 4.7, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Customization options were one of the broadest strengths, spanning switches, keycaps, software, RGB, firmware, and modding.
  • 4.8
    7 reviews strong consensus
    frame rigidity: 4.8, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Frame rigidity scored strongly because reviewers found little to no flex, sturdy aluminum framing, and a case that resisted twisting.
  • 4.7
    10 reviews strong consensus
    RGB lighting quality: 4.7, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    RGB lighting quality was a major highlight, often described as vivid, bright, attractive, or unusually impressive for the class.
  • 4.7
    10 reviews strong consensus
    hot-swappable switches: 4.7, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Hot-swappable switches were a standout feature, letting users swap switches without soldering and making the board beginner-friendly.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    ease of switch replacement: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Ease of switch replacement was praised as simple, quick, and accessible with included tools and hot-swap support.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    key responsiveness: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers who discussed responsiveness found the keys fast and dependable in gaming and typing, with no missed inputs in tested use.
  • 4.5
    14 reviews strong consensus
    build quality: 4.5, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality was widely praised; reviewers repeatedly described the board as solid, sturdy, weighty, well-built, or premium for the price.
  • 4.5
    15 reviews strong consensus
    value for money: 4.5, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Value for money was strongly positive, with many reviewers calling the GMMK 2 compelling, budget-friendly, or excellent for its price.
  • 4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    typing comfort: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Typing comfort was strong, with reviewers citing low fatigue, smoothness, and easy adjustment during long writing or daily use.
  • 4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    typing feel: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Typing feel was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling it sublime, smooth, excellent, or otherwise pleasing.
  • 4.5
    11 reviews strong consensus
    gaming performance: 4.5, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Gaming performance was broadly positive, with reviewers reporting responsive, enjoyable, and reliable play across casual and competitive use.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    durability: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Durability evidence was positive, including drop survival, expected long life, and ease of long-term repair.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    backlight brightness: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Backlight brightness was mostly praised as bright and vivid, though one reviewer found the ABS caps slightly subdued the effect.
  • 4.6
    3 reviews strong consensus
    desk space efficiency: 4.6, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Desk space efficiency was a clear strength for the compact 96% and 65% layouts, especially for users who need mouse room.
  • 4.6
    3 reviews strong consensus
    per-key lighting control: 4.6, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Per-key lighting control was viewed as a strong customization advantage, especially through software and individual-key lighting options.
  • 4.5
    10 reviews strong consensus
    RGB customization: 4.5, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    RGB customization was praised for software effects, presets, layers, and per-key or individual color control, with some platform limitations noted separately.
  • 4.4
    18 reviews strong consensus
    switch feel: 4.4, 18 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently liked the Fox linear switches for smooth, soft, quiet, or satisfying feel, though a few noted break-in time or wanted other switch types.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    sound dampening: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Sound dampening was praised because the foam reduced noise, improved sound, and helped avoid hollow or high-pitched acoustics.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    legend visibility: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Legend visibility was praised because shine-through legends and side/front markings made the keyboard easier to use in dim settings.
  • 4.4
    10 reviews strong consensus
    materials quality: 4.4, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Materials quality was generally strong, with praise for aluminum, weight, and sturdiness, while some reviewers noted the plastic lower case as a tradeoff.
  • 4.8
    1 review
    compatibility: 4.8, 1 review
    Compatibility evidence was positive but limited, with one reviewer reporting smooth use across Windows, Mac, consoles, and Android.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    key stability: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Key stability was generally strong, with comments about stable keys, reduced wobble, and a smoother switch feel.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    noise level: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Noise level was usually considered quiet or controlled, though one reviewer found the board a bit louder than a HyperX board.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    profile management: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Profile management was praised where tested, especially saving multiple profiles for different uses through software or onboard memory.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    latency: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Latency control was viewed positively, especially when reviewers lowered input latency for more responsive or more competitive gaming.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    reliability: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Reliability evidence was positive but limited, with reviewers noting perfect macOS operation and a reliable, enjoyable overall experience.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    macro customization: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Macro customization was a useful strength, with reviewers praising macro creation, layers, shortcuts, and programmable keybinds.
  • 4.3
    9 reviews strong consensus
    acoustics: 4.3, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Acoustics were generally praised as satisfying, full-bodied, or surprisingly good, though one reviewer heard some hollow sound.
  • 4.3
    10 reviews strong consensus
    design aesthetics: 4.3, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Design aesthetics were usually praised for attractive colors, clean styling, and strong RGB presentation, though some disliked exposed switches or specific colors.
  • 4.2
    2 reviews limited evidence
    onboard memory: 4.2, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Onboard memory was positively mentioned for saving profiles and settings, but evidence was limited to a few reviews.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    volume control: 4.0, 1 review
    Volume control was usable through function-key commands, though the same review noted no physical volume roller or knob.
  • 4.2
    7 reviews strong consensus
    polling rate: 4.2, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Polling-rate adjustment was treated as a useful performance-tuning feature, though most praise came as part of the broader software/performance controls.
  • 4.1
    3 reviews strong consensus
    portability: 4.1, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Portability was positive for the 65% model and compact weight, although it was not presented as an ultra-light travel board.
  • 4.2
    8 reviews strong consensus
    layout options: 4.2, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Layout options were mostly appreciated for 65% and 96% choices, although some reviewers wanted a tenkeyless option or noted compressed layouts.
  • 4.2
    10 reviews strong consensus
    size and form factor: 4.2, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Size and form factor were generally praised for compactness and retained functionality, but reviewers mentioned learning curves or compressed key clusters.
  • 3.8
    1 review
    media controls: 3.8, 1 review
    Media controls were functional but somewhat limited because control relies on function shortcuts rather than a physical knob or roller.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    connectivity: 4.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Connectivity was mixed: wired USB connections worked reliably, but one reviewer treated wired-only operation as a downside.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    extra gaming features: 3.5, 1 review
    Extra gaming features were present but described as standard rather than exceptional in the tested review evidence.
  • 4.1
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    software quality: 4.1, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Software quality was split: reviewers liked Core's ease and flexibility, but criticized Windows-only support, bugs, and cheap-feeling polish.
  • 3.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    cable quality: 3.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Cable quality was mixed, with praise for decent or compatible cables but criticism of stiffness and packaging kinks.
  • 3.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    switch options: 3.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Switch choice was praised through barebones and hot-swap flexibility, but several reviewers criticized the limited prebuilt factory option.
  • 3.6
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    ergonomics: 3.6, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Ergonomics were mixed: some liked the angle and long-use comfort, while others found the height, legs, or lack of wrist support uncomfortable.
  • 3.7
    13 reviews strong consensus
    keycap quality: 3.7, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Keycaps drew mixed reactions: reviewers liked the feel, legends, and higher-than-usual ABS quality, but many wanted thicker or PBT caps.
  • 3.6
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    stabilizer quality: 3.6, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    Stabilizer quality was mixed: some reviewers praised lubed or rattle-free stabilizers, while others complained about scratchiness, mushiness, or spacebar issues.

Cons

Sort
  • 3.4
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    key spacing: 3.4, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Key spacing was mixed because the compact layouts were usable for some reviewers but caused accidental presses or adjustment for others.
  • 3.4
    3 reviews strong consensus
    actuation consistency: 3.4, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Actuation consistency was mixed: reviewers liked the switches after use, but several noted they needed break-in time before feeling consistent.
  • 3.4
    2 reviews limited evidence
    wrist rest quality: 3.4, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Wrist support drew mixed evidence: one reviewer wanted a wrist rest included, while another liked the separate wrist-rest accessory.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Gaming Keyboards, this product is above average in hot-swappable switches, value for money, ease of switch replacement, near average in software quality, customization options, below average in actuation consistency, keycap quality, key spacing.

Summary

47 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    14 (30%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    29 (62%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    4 (9%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
hot-swappable switches 4.7 3.4 +1.2
value for money 4.5 3.7 +0.8
ease of switch replacement 4.7 3.7 +1.0
legend visibility 4.5 3.5 +1.0
reliability 4.5 3.5 +1.0
compatibility 4.8 3.8 +1.0
actuation consistency 3.4 4.2 -0.7
keycap quality 3.7 4.2 -0.5

Consider This Instead

If you want better layout options

Choose Razer Huntsman V2 TKL. It scores 5.0 vs 4.2 for layout options, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better build quality

Choose HyperX Alloy Origins. It scores 4.9 vs 4.5 for build quality, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better design aesthetics

Choose ASUS ROG Falchion RX. It scores 4.9 vs 4.3 for design aesthetics, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Worse: gaming and typing comfort The reviewer says they would rather use the GMMK 2 than the HyperX Alloy Origins.
  • Better: switch durability The reviewer says the GMMK 2's switch rating is lower than the HyperX Alloy Origins 65.
  • Compared: overall value and feature set The reviewer says the GMMK 2's feature set and price compare well against the Keychron Q5.

FAQ

Is the Glorious GMMK 2 good for gaming?

Yes. Reviewers repeatedly found it responsive in games, and several praised the low-latency settings, smooth Fox switches, and compact layouts for gaming use.

How does it feel for typing?

Typing feedback was very positive overall, with reviewers calling the feel smooth, sublime, comfortable, or excellent. The main caveats were key height, compact spacing, and occasional stabilizer inconsistency.

Are the switches good?

Most reviewers liked the Glorious Fox linear switches for their smooth, soft, and quiet feel. A few noted break-in time or wished Glorious offered tactile switches in the prebuilt version.

Is the RGB lighting strong?

Yes. RGB was one of the most praised areas, with reviewers highlighting bright shine-through legends, vivid side lighting, and useful customization through software or onboard controls.

What are the biggest drawbacks?

The main drawbacks in the reviews were ABS keycaps, uneven stabilizer impressions, Windows-focused software, no wireless option, and compact layouts that can require adjustment.

Is it worth the money?

Reviewers generally considered it a strong value, especially because it combines sturdy construction, hot-swap support, RGB, software customization, and enthusiast-friendly modding at a midrange price.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Gaming Keyboards to Consider

#1 Keychron Q5 HE
4.5

Good if you want a premium 96% Hall Effect keyboard for work and gaming with excellent build, sound, and customization. Skip it if you need cheaper esports-first speed, 8,000Hz polling,...

Pros: cable quality, typing comfort

Cons: portability, switch options

#2 Keychron Q3 HE
4.4

Good if you want a premium, quiet TKL Hall Effect keyboard for typing and gaming. Skip it if price, portability, 8,000Hz polling, or broad switch choice matters most.

Pros: build quality, extra gaming features

Cons: switch options, hot-swappable switches

#3 Keychron Q6 HE
4.4

Good if you want a premium full-size Hall Effect keyboard with smooth switches, quiet sound, and deep customization. Skip it if you need a portable, budget-friendly board or broad switch...

Pros: key stability, frame rigidity

Cons: portability, switch options

#4 Razer Huntsman V3 TKL
4.4

Good if you want esports speed, analog tuning, and deep customization. Skip it if typing comfort, quiet office use, or included extras matter more.

Pros: polling rate, RGB customization

Cons: key stability, typing comfort