Average score
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.0
Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.3
acoustics
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.2

When reviewers comment on sound, they describe a quiet, deeper, lightly thocky tone rather than a clicky or sharp one.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.8

Reviewers praise the GX87’s stock sound as a standout, describing it as refined, lively, and unusually satisfying for a prebuilt board.

actuation consistency
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.5

PCMag found the actuation feel consistent across the board, with crisp scissor-switch response rather than mushiness.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

One review specifically says the switches deliver a consistent key press.

backlight brightness
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.1

Brightness can be adjusted and is generally usable, but battery life drops sharply when the lighting is pushed high.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
battery life
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.6

Battery life is heavily mode-dependent: reviewers praise long endurance with lighting off or reduced, but multiple reviews say RGB dramatically cuts runtime.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.9

Battery life is a clear strength, with multiple reviews calling out the large 8,000mAh capacity and very long runtime.

build quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.6

Build quality is a standout, with repeated praise for the premium finish, sturdy aluminum top plate, and minimal flex despite the thin chassis.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.6

Multiple reviewers describe the GX87 as very well built, with strong assembly, solid casework, and no obvious quality-control issues.

cable quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.1

The included braided USB-C cable is consistently seen as a nice premium extra, though at least one review notes that it is short.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
2.8

One video calls the included cable cheap and unimpressive.

compatibility
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.8

Cross-platform support is one of the Joro's strongest points, with repeated praise for Windows/macOS use and Mac-friendly legends or layout support.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Key mappings are described as persisting across multiple devices, which supports multi-device use.

connectivity
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.7

Reviews consistently highlight easy tri-device Bluetooth pairing plus wired USB-C use, making switching between devices one of the board's most dependable strengths.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.0

The board offers Bluetooth and 2.4GHz wireless modes, but one review also reports minor connectivity issues.

customization options
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.1

Synapse adds meaningful remapping and feature control, but some reviewers note missing remap coverage or software dependence for advanced functions.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.8

Reviewers consistently say the GX87 is easy to customize, thanks to straightforward disassembly and mod-friendly design, with one video also mentioning swappable top colors.

desk space efficiency
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.7

The compact 75% design keeps core controls while saving desk space, which reviewers repeatedly frame as a major benefit.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2

The TKL layout is described as saving desk space versus full-size boards while keeping a familiar key set.

durability
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.5

Reviewers report solid long-term sturdiness, with the slim chassis resisting flex and everyday travel stress well.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
5.0

One review explicitly says the GX87 feels built to last.

ease of switch replacement
Product 1: Razer Joro
No score yet
Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
5.0

Switch replacement is described as very easy because switches can be removed and replaced without soldering.

ergonomics
Product 1: Razer Joro
2.8

Ergonomics are the clearest weakness: the fixed low angle helps portability but repeatedly causes fatigue or discomfort for some users.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.0

The fixed typing angle is presented as standard enough that it should not bother most users.

extra gaming features
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.1

Gaming extras like Snap Tap, NKRO, and anti-ghosting are present, giving the Joro more gaming utility than most travel keyboards.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2

A dedicated ultra low latency mode is explicitly mentioned in the software.

frame rigidity
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.8

Structural rigidity is excellent, with multiple reviewers explicitly calling out the lack of flex even under pressure.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.3

The chassis is praised for having no flex or rattles, though one video notes the quick-release design may feel less rigid than a screwed-in case.

gaming performance
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.5

Gaming performance is acceptable for casual or secondary use, but reviewers regularly stop short of recommending it as a primary board for serious competitive play.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.4

Reviewers say the GX87 handles gaming well, especially for hybrid work-and-play use, even if it is not framed as a specialist Hall Effect board.

hot-swappable switches
Product 1: Razer Joro
No score yet
Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
5.0

Hot-swap support is clearly confirmed across reviews, making switch swaps part of the board’s appeal.

keycap quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.9

Keycaps get mixed-positive feedback: legends and shine-through are appreciated, but some reviewers mention smoothness or smudge-prone surfaces.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

One review specifically praises the included PBT keycaps as high quality.

key responsiveness
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.5

Responsiveness is decent overall, but reviewers disagree more here than elsewhere, with some calling it responsive and others saying the keys rebound too slowly.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.0

One review says the switches feel fairly responsive in play.

key spacing
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.3

Key spacing is generally praised for preserving full-size arrows and usable spacing, though the compact layout still takes some adjustment.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
key stability
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.5

Where specifically discussed, the keys are described as wobble-free and stable rather than mushy or loose.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
latency
Product 1: Razer Joro
2.7

Bluetooth latency is a recurring caveat: several reviews say it is fine for everyday use and casual play but noticeable in faster competitive gaming.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.4

Latency is framed positively for normal gaming use, with reviewers noting reduced latency concerns and immediate-feeling keypresses.

layout options
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.1

The 75% layout with function row and extra navigation is practical, though not every reviewer loves the specific key choices.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
legend visibility
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.9

Main legends are usually praised as crisp and durable, but some reviews note that secondary functions are harder to see because they are not backlit.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
macro customization
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.7

Macro support exists and can be powerful, but some reviewers note that advanced macro-style features rely on Synapse being active.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Macro support is explicitly mentioned as part of the board’s deeper customization toolkit.

materials quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.6

Material quality is repeatedly described as premium for the category, especially the aluminum top and overall finish.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.7

The materials are consistently praised, especially the aluminum chassis and PBT keycaps, with one reviewer also highlighting the smooth finish.

media controls
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.7

Media controls are available through function layers rather than dedicated keys, which makes them useful but not especially elegant.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
noise level
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.7

Noise levels are consistently low, making the Joro one of the quieter boards in its class and easy to use in shared spaces.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

The sound profile is described as muted rather than sharply loud, keeping the board’s thock controlled.

onboard memory
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.5

The keyboard supports saving changes on the board itself, which helps retain profiles and custom behavior without constant software reliance.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.8

Customizations are explicitly described as being stored on the keyboard itself.

per-key lighting control
Product 1: Razer Joro
2.0

Per-key lighting control is a clear limitation: multiple reviews explicitly describe the lighting as single-zone or one-color rather than individually addressable.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
polling rate
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.6

Wired mode's 1,000Hz polling is a meaningful plus for gaming-minded users, even if the wireless story is less impressive.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2

The keyboard is repeatedly described as running at 1,000Hz, with one video also discussing a low-latency mode.

portability
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.8

Portability is the Joro's defining strength, with nearly every reviewer praising how slim, light, and bag-friendly it is.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
2.5

Its heavy all-metal build makes it less convenient to carry around or reposition frequently.

profile management
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.3

Profile handling is solid, with reviewers noting multiple savable profiles and the ability to switch between them later.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
reliability
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.9

Day-to-day reliability is generally good once connected, but sleep behavior and the occasional reconnect hiccup keep it from being flawless.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.2

One review reports rare duplicate key registrations and a fringe long-hold input issue, so reliability is good but not flawless.

RGB customization
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.5

RGB customization is flexible enough for effects and color changes, especially through Synapse, but it is not as granular as Razer's full gaming boards.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.9

Lighting customization exists and can be adjusted, but the experience is not unanimously polished, with one review calling it clunky.

RGB lighting quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.3

The RGB itself is widely praised as bright, vibrant, and attractive, especially considering the keyboard's travel-focused design.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
size and form factor
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.5

The ultra-low-profile 75% form factor balances compactness with more usable keys than many travel boards.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.0

The GX87 is explicitly described as an 80% TKL, giving it a compact-but-not-tiny footprint.

software quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.9

Synapse is usually seen as useful and capable, especially with Mac support added, but some reviews flag setup gaps or dependence for advanced features.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.2

Software support is generally seen as good for the category, with QMK/VIA support and dedicated software, though one reviewer still found VIA basic.

sound dampening
Product 1: Razer Joro
2.4

Sound dampening is not a strength; at least one review specifically calls out a harsher landing and missing dampening.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.7

Internal foam and damping layers are specifically credited with reducing ping and cleaning up the typing sound.

stabilizer quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.3

When key wobble is discussed, reviewers describe the typing action as controlled and free of mush, suggesting solid stabilization for the format.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
3.8

Stabilizers are mixed but acceptable overall: one review says they are nearly silent, while another wanted a bit more lube.

switch feel
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.6

Switch feel gets mixed-positive marks: the scissor switches are often called crisp, tactile, or satisfying for the type, but they do not replace a good mechanical board.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

The stock linear switches are described as satisfying, bouncy, crisp, and snappy in everyday use.

switch options
Product 1: Razer Joro
2.6

Reviews only discuss a single low-profile scissor-switch implementation, so switch variety appears limited.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
2.8

Switch choice at purchase is limited, with one review explicitly noting only two similar linear options and no tactile choice.

typing comfort
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.0

Typing comfort is good for many users once acclimated, but comfort over very long sessions is less consistent because of the flat angle.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.5

Typing comfort is positively described, with reviewers calling out a soft, bouncy, comfort-focused feel.

typing feel
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.4

Typing feel is one of the more successful parts of the Joro, with several reviews comparing it favorably to premium laptop keyboards or the Magic Keyboard.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.7

Typing feel is strongly positive, with reviewers describing the GX87 as joyful, smooth, and satisfying to type on.

value for money
Product 1: Razer Joro
2.7

Value is the biggest sticking point: reviewers often like the design and portability but still argue the asking price is hard to justify.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.9

Reviews repeatedly frame the GX87 as unusually strong value, pairing premium-feeling features with a budget-friendly price.

volume control
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.5

Volume control exists on the function layer, but the lack of dedicated controls makes it less convenient than on larger boards.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
No score yet
wireless performance
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.0

Wireless performance is good enough for productivity and casual use, with generally reliable Bluetooth pairing, but sleep wake delays and gaming limits show its ceiling.

Product 2: McHose GX87 Keyboard
4.8

Wireless behavior is praised for reconnecting quickly after idle and feeling responsive in use.