Compare Razer Joro vs McHose GX87 Keyboard

Reviewers who discussed sound found the Joro's scissor switches pleasant, leaning deeper and subtly satisfying rather than loud or clicky.

Acoustics were a standout strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the thocky, poppy, solid, and very nice sound.

PCMag found the typing feel consistent across the whole board, supporting a strong actuation-consistency score.

One reviewer found the switch actuation consistent, with only a slight scratchiness detectable during very slow presses.

GamesRadar framed the Joro as missing the fancier analog-system actuation features found elsewhere in Razer's lineup.

GamesRadar found the RGB strong enough that half brightness still looked fantastic, though this was discussed alongside battery impact.

Battery impressions were split: several reviewers praised all-day or weeklong use with modest lighting, while others criticized short runtime with RGB enabled.

Battery life was strongly praised, with reviewers emphasizing the large 8,000 mAh capacity and long time between charges.

Build quality was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly praising the rigid, sturdy construction despite the ultra-thin chassis.

Build quality was a major point of agreement, with every review giving positive evidence around the aluminum body, dense feel, assembly, or lack of flex.

The included braided USB-C cable was generally appreciated as premium, though one reviewer noted practical limits from its short USB-C-to-C design.

Cable quality was a weak point in one review, where the included cable was described as cheap and not very good.

Compatibility was a major strength, especially for users switching between Windows, macOS, mobile devices, and multiple paired systems.

Compatibility evidence was positive where reviewers connected QMK and VIA support to deep, flexible keyboard customization.

Connectivity was praised for easy pairing and device switching, but Bluetooth-only wireless and dongle omissions created caveats.

Connectivity was mixed: reviewers liked the wireless and tri-mode feature set, but noted mode-switch delay, visible front controls, and minor connectivity issues.

Customization was often useful through Synapse, remapping, lighting, and profiles, though some reviewers found limits around remappable keys and software dependence.

Customization options were a major strength, especially the magnetic or ball-catch quick-disassembly case, hot-swap design, and easy access for mods.

Design reactions were strongly positive, with reviewers calling the Joro stunning, clean, minimalist, gorgeous, and premium-looking.

Design aesthetics were generally positive for clean, premium, and attractive looks, but some reviewers found the styling mundane or noticed mismatched colors.

Reviewers liked how the compact 75% layout preserved useful controls while saving space and staying productivity-friendly.

Desk space efficiency was positive in one review, which liked that TKL saves space while leaving room for an optional macro pad.

One long-term tester found the Joro held up without visible wear after several weeks, supporting a positive durability score.

Durability evidence centered on the solid aluminum build and PBT keycaps, which reviewers linked to lasting use.

Switch replacement was mostly easy thanks to tool-free access and hot-swap sockets, though one reviewer found reinstalling switches harder because the PCB flexes.

Ergonomics were mixed to negative overall: some liked the flat angle, but many criticized the lack of adjustable feet and fatigue over time.

Ergonomics received limited but positive evidence because the fixed typing angle was expected to be comfortable for most people.

Gaming extras such as Snap Tap, NKRO, and gaming-mode features were appreciated, although they did not fully overcome the keyboard's travel-first limits.

Extra gaming features received positive evidence from one reviewer who highlighted the ultra-low-latency mode as a surprise at this price.

Frame rigidity was consistently praised, with multiple reviewers noting almost no flex or bending from the thin deck.

Frame rigidity was mostly praised for its solid, flex-free construction, though the quick-release design was seen by one reviewer as less sturdy than screws.

Gaming performance was context-dependent: reviewers found it acceptable or speedy for casual use, but weak for serious or PC-focused competitive gaming.

Gaming performance was viewed as more than adequate for casual or hybrid use, with reviewers reporting competent play across first-person and general gaming sessions.

Hot-swappable switches were consistently treated as a benefit because users can replace switches without soldering and personalize the board.

Keycap feedback was mixed: reviewers liked smooth, comfortable caps and etched legends, but several complained about smudges, fingerprints, or clammy feel.

Keycap quality was praised for PBT material, thickness, durability, and a profile that helped typing accuracy.

Responsiveness varied by use case, with some reviewers reporting quick input while others found the keys slow or less responsive than mechanical alternatives.

Key response was consistently praised, with reviewers describing the keys or switches as responsive and accurate enough for both typing and gaming.

Key spacing drew mixed reactions: some reviewers liked the spacing and full-size keys, while others found the compact layout cramped or hard to navigate.

PCMag specifically found no wobble or mush in the keys, supporting a strong key-stability score.

Key stability evidence was mixed: one reviewer disliked the plate-mounted stabilizer tradeoff, while another found the installed stabilizers secure and free of ticking.

Latency was a key concern outside wired mode, with multiple reviewers calling out Bluetooth input delay or the lack of low-latency wireless support.

Latency impressions were positive overall, helped by 1,000 Hz operation and an ultra-low-latency mode, though this is still framed as strong budget performance rather than elite Hall Effect speed.

Layout opinions split sharply: some reviewers found the 75% layout efficient, while others disliked the small Shift, spacebar, or right-side key choices.

Legend visibility was mostly positive thanks to readable fonts and illuminated legends, but one reviewer missed backlighting on secondary functions.

Macro customization was useful where Synapse and onboard tools allowed it, but reviewers criticized the lack of on-the-fly macro recording and limited remap space.

Macro customization was positively supported by reviewers who noted easy macro setup through VIA or QMK-style customization.

Materials quality was mostly strong thanks to the aluminum top plate, though one reviewer found the plastic base comparatively cheap.

Materials quality was praised for the aluminum case, smooth finish, premium feel, and solid components.

Media controls worked through function layers and were reachable for some, but other reviewers found their placement awkward or annoying.

Noise level was a strength, with reviewers describing the Joro as quiet, restrained, and suitable for offices, shared spaces, or travel.

Noise level received limited but positive evidence from a reviewer who described the sound as muted and thocky rather than harsh.

Macworld praised the ability to save function changes directly on the keyboard, supporting onboard memory usefulness.

Onboard memory was positively supported by stored keyboard customizations that persist when moving between devices.

Per-key lighting control was a recurring limitation because reviewers noted single-zone RGB and no individual key effects.

A wired 1,000Hz mode was praised as a useful fallback when battery or wireless gaming performance mattered.

Reviewers treated the 1,000 Hz polling behavior as a strength, linking it to responsive inputs and low-latency use.

Portability was the strongest consensus point: reviewers repeatedly praised the thin, light, bag-friendly body for travel and mobile work.

Portability was a weakness because one reviewer said the heavy aluminum build makes it undesirable to carry to and from an office.

Profile management was helpful through onboard profiles, although one reviewer still found broader customization flexibility limited.

Profile management was supported by the ability to store customizations on the keyboard so settings persist across devices.

PCWorld explicitly tied Snap Tap to rapid-trigger-style support, giving the Joro credit for that gaming feature.

Reliability was generally positive for device switching and daily use, with only isolated connection caveats.

Reliability evidence was mixed to negative in one review due to occasional held-input recognition and rare multiple key registrations.

RGB customization was considered useful through Synapse and onboard controls, though it remained constrained by single-zone behavior.

RGB customization was broadly useful, especially through VIA, QMK, or the MCHOSE software, though one reviewer found the RGB controls clunky.

RGB lighting quality was widely praised as vibrant, beautiful, bright, colorful, and unusually polished for this kind of travel keyboard.

RGB lighting quality was acceptable but not class-leading, with one reviewer saying the lighting options do not match bigger keyboard brands.

The slim, light form factor impressed reviewers, with hands-on comments emphasizing how thin and capable the keyboard felt.

Size and form factor earned positive evidence from one reviewer who found TKL a comfortable step down from full-size keyboards.

Software quality was mixed: reviewers liked Synapse's growing Mac support and clearer layout, but some encountered availability or dependency frustrations.

Software quality was mostly praised for VIA, QMK, and the dedicated MCHOSE software, with caveats around VIA being basic and RGB customization sometimes clunky.

TechRadar specifically criticized the lack of dampening, saying the keys could feel harsh under heavier typing.

Sound dampening was praised for reducing ping, refining the sound, and isolating vibration through the case design and internal layers.

Stabilizer impressions were mixed: some reviewers found them tuned and issue-free, while others noted plate-mount tradeoffs or a need for more lube.

Switch feel was divisive but often positive for scissor switches, with praise for crisp tactility offset by complaints of sluggishness from critics.

Reviewers generally liked the switch feel, calling the Vintage White or stock linear switches smooth, responsive, crisp, and satisfying, with only mild scratchiness or preference-based caveats.

Switch options were a limitation because the Joro is not mechanical, which reviewers said may deter buyers who want that feel.

Switch choice was the clearest limitation: one reviewer wanted tactile options at checkout, while another wanted to try tactiles despite liking the included switches.

Typing comfort ranged from comfortable long writing sessions to fatigue and frustration, mostly depending on angle and layout tolerance.

Typing comfort was praised across reviews for its bouncy gasket feel, smooth typing, and balanced flex, though one reviewer found it slightly firm.

Typing feel was generally pleasant for a slim scissor-switch keyboard, though not all reviewers found it satisfying versus mechanical alternatives.

Typing feel was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers calling it joyful, great, smooth, and close to ideal.

Value for money was one of the weakest areas, with many reviewers calling the Joro expensive unless portability is the buyer's top priority.

Value for money was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly calling the keyboard exceptional for its price and feature set.

Volume control opinions split: Macworld liked one-hand Fn access, while a comparison reviewer disliked the volume placement.

Wireless performance was mixed: Bluetooth was often stable for productivity, but sleep delays, input lag, and competitive-gaming limitations were repeated concerns.

Wireless performance received positive evidence from a reviewer who found the wireless functionality impressive and quick to reconnect.