Average score
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.0
Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.2
acoustics
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.2

When reviewers comment on sound, they describe a quiet, deeper, lightly thocky tone rather than a clicky or sharp one.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.0

The overall sound is generally liked, with reviewers calling it fantastic or delightfully clacky, but one review also notes metallic ping from some keys.

actuation consistency
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.5

PCMag found the actuation feel consistent across the board, with crisp scissor-switch response rather than mushiness.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.0

One review says the linear switches feel consistent and reliable.

backlight brightness
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.1

Brightness can be adjusted and is generally usable, but battery life drops sharply when the lighting is pushed high.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.5

Brightness control is present and usually adequate, but one review finds the side underglow too weak to stand out much.

battery life
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.6

Battery life is heavily mode-dependent: reviewers praise long endurance with lighting off or reduced, but multiple reviews say RGB dramatically cuts runtime.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Several reviews emphasize the dual 4000mAh batteries and say battery life should not be a major worry.

build quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.6

Build quality is a standout, with repeated praise for the premium finish, sturdy aluminum top plate, and minimal flex despite the thin chassis.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.9

Most reviews describe the board as solid or well built for the price, but there are conflicting impressions because some reviewers still report flex or only average refinement.

cable quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.1

The included braided USB-C cable is consistently seen as a nice premium extra, though at least one review notes that it is short.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.8

The included cable is described as braided and reliable in one review, and basic but serviceable in another.

compatibility
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.8

Cross-platform support is one of the Joro's strongest points, with repeated praise for Windows/macOS use and Mac-friendly legends or layout support.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.2

Multiple reviews say the keyboard and software work on both Windows and Mac, though one notes the lack of Mac-specific replacement keys.

connectivity
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.7

Reviews consistently highlight easy tri-device Bluetooth pairing plus wired USB-C use, making switching between devices one of the board's most dependable strengths.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Tri-mode connectivity is a clear strength, and reviewers repeatedly say switching among Bluetooth, 2.4GHz, and wired use is easy.

customization options
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.1

Synapse adds meaningful remapping and feature control, but some reviewers note missing remap coverage or software dependence for advanced functions.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Reviewers say users can remap keys, change lighting, record macros, and otherwise tailor the board with little friction.

desk space efficiency
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.7

The compact 75% design keeps core controls while saving desk space, which reviewers repeatedly frame as a major benefit.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

Reviewers repeatedly say the Cypher96 keeps a numeric keypad without taking too much desk space.

durability
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.5

Reviewers report solid long-term sturdiness, with the slim chassis resisting flex and everyday travel stress well.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Reviewers specifically praise the PBT caps for resisting shine and being more durable than ABS caps.

ease of switch replacement
Product 1: Razer Joro
No score yet
Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
5.0

Switch swapping is described as straightforward and solder-free.

ergonomics
Product 1: Razer Joro
2.8

Ergonomics are the clearest weakness: the fixed low angle helps portability but repeatedly causes fatigue or discomfort for some users.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

One review straightforwardly describes the keyboard as comfortable to use.

extra gaming features
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.1

Gaming extras like Snap Tap, NKRO, and anti-ghosting are present, giving the Joro more gaming utility than most travel keyboards.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

Reviewers mention programmable buttons, FN shortcuts, anti-ghosting, and N-key rollover.

frame rigidity
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.8

Structural rigidity is excellent, with multiple reviewers explicitly calling out the lack of flex even under pressure.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.3

Frame rigidity is mixed: some reviews report no flex, while others describe noticeable flex or twisting.

gaming performance
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.5

Gaming performance is acceptable for casual or secondary use, but reviewers regularly stop short of recommending it as a primary board for serious competitive play.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

One review says the Flamingo switches are well suited to fast-paced games.

hot-swappable switches
Product 1: Razer Joro
No score yet
Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
5.0

Hot-swap support is consistently confirmed, including compatibility with 3- and 5-pin switches.

keycap quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.9

Keycaps get mixed-positive feedback: legends and shine-through are appreciated, but some reviewers mention smoothness or smudge-prone surfaces.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.1

The PBT double-shot caps are usually praised for feel and longevity, but one reviewer criticizes overall cap quality and inconsistent thinner legends.

key responsiveness
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.5

Responsiveness is decent overall, but reviewers disagree more here than elsewhere, with some calling it responsive and others saying the keys rebound too slowly.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Reviewers describe the switches as responsive and say the board supports quicker typing and fast-paced play.

key spacing
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.3

Key spacing is generally praised for preserving full-size arrows and usable spacing, though the compact layout still takes some adjustment.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
2.5

One reviewer dislikes the compressed layout because the arrow keys are harder to find by feel.

key stability
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.5

Where specifically discussed, the keys are described as wobble-free and stable rather than mushy or loose.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Larger stabilized keys are described as free from rattle.

latency
Product 1: Razer Joro
2.7

Bluetooth latency is a recurring caveat: several reviews say it is fine for everyday use and casual play but noticeable in faster competitive gaming.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Wireless 2.4GHz is described as low latency, and wired mode is said to deliver minimal latency.

layout options
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.1

The 75% layout with function row and extra navigation is practical, though not every reviewer loves the specific key choices.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.5

The board is consistently described as a compact 96% or 90% layout, though one reviewer personally prefers a proper full-size layout.

legend visibility
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.9

Main legends are usually praised as crisp and durable, but some reviews note that secondary functions are harder to see because they are not backlit.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.3

One review praises the legends as sharp and visible, while another says thinner legends look inconsistent.

macro customization
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.7

Macro support exists and can be powerful, but some reviewers note that advanced macro-style features rely on Synapse being active.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Reviews say macro recording is supported and simple to set up.

materials quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.6

Material quality is repeatedly described as premium for the category, especially the aluminum top and overall finish.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.6

The ABS construction is usually framed as decent and better than cheap-feeling plastic, but not truly premium.

media controls
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.7

Media controls are available through function layers rather than dedicated keys, which makes them useful but not especially elegant.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
No score yet
noise level
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.7

Noise levels are consistently low, making the Joro one of the quieter boards in its class and easy to use in shared spaces.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

Most reviews say the keyboard stays controlled and not overly loud, though one review mentions metallic ping from some keys.

onboard memory
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.5

The keyboard supports saving changes on the board itself, which helps retain profiles and custom behavior without constant software reliance.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
No score yet
per-key lighting control
Product 1: Razer Joro
2.0

Per-key lighting control is a clear limitation: multiple reviews explicitly describe the lighting as single-zone or one-color rather than individually addressable.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.0

One review explicitly mentions per key RGB underglow.

polling rate
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.6

Wired mode's 1,000Hz polling is a meaningful plus for gaming-minded users, even if the wireless story is less impressive.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

One review explicitly calls out an impressive 1000Hz polling rate.

portability
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.8

Portability is the Joro's defining strength, with nearly every reviewer praising how slim, light, and bag-friendly it is.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.0

One review explicitly calls the board lightweight and portable.

profile management
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.3

Profile handling is solid, with reviewers noting multiple savable profiles and the ability to switch between them later.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.0

One review highlights preset sharing and downloading other users’ configurations.

reliability
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.9

Day-to-day reliability is generally good once connected, but sleep behavior and the occasional reconnect hiccup keep it from being flawless.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

One reviewer says the wired connection never lets them down.

RGB customization
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.5

RGB customization is flexible enough for effects and color changes, especially through Synapse, but it is not as granular as Razer's full gaming boards.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

Multiple reviews say the software lets users change colors, effects, brightness, and related lighting behavior with little fuss.

RGB lighting quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.3

The RGB itself is widely praised as bright, vibrant, and attractive, especially considering the keyboard's travel-focused design.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.0

RGB is mostly described as vibrant, bright, or attractive without being overpowering, though one review says the side underglow is weak.

size and form factor
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.5

The ultra-low-profile 75% form factor balances compactness with more usable keys than many travel boards.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

Several reviews praise the board for staying compact while still fitting a numpad.

software quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.9

Synapse is usually seen as useful and capable, especially with Mac support added, but some reviews flag setup gaps or dependence for advanced features.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.4

The companion software is repeatedly described as easy to use and good enough for common remaps, macros, and lighting changes.

sound dampening
Product 1: Razer Joro
2.4

Sound dampening is not a strength; at least one review specifically calls out a harsher landing and missing dampening.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Multiple reviews credit the multilayer dampening and gasket construction for reducing vibration, hollowness, and harshness.

stabilizer quality
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.3

When key wobble is discussed, reviewers describe the typing action as controlled and free of mush, suggesting solid stabilization for the format.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.8

Stabilizers are mostly praised for keeping larger keys controlled, though a few reviewers mention looseness or a need for extra tuning.

switch feel
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.6

Switch feel gets mixed-positive marks: the scissor switches are often called crisp, tactile, or satisfying for the type, but they do not replace a good mechanical board.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

Reviews generally describe the stock switches as smooth, light, pre-lubed, and pleasant to use, though one reviewer calls the Wisterias fairly generic.

switch options
Product 1: Razer Joro
2.6

Reviews only discuss a single low-profile scissor-switch implementation, so switch variety appears limited.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
3.5

Stock choice is limited in one review, while others note two out-of-box switch options and hot-swap flexibility for changing them later.

typing comfort
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.0

Typing comfort is good for many users once acclimated, but comfort over very long sessions is less consistent because of the flat angle.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Typing comfort is a recurring strength, with reviewers calling the board pleasurable, cloud-like, or well suited to long sessions.

typing feel
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.4

Typing feel is one of the more successful parts of the Joro, with several reviews comparing it favorably to premium laptop keyboards or the Magic Keyboard.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Typing is repeatedly described as lovely, soft, and thocky rather than harsh.

value for money
Product 1: Razer Joro
2.7

Value is the biggest sticking point: reviewers often like the design and portability but still argue the asking price is hard to justify.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.3

The keyboard is regularly framed as affordable, competitive, or good value despite some compromises.

volume control
Product 1: Razer Joro
3.5

Volume control exists on the function layer, but the lack of dedicated controls makes it less convenient than on larger boards.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
No score yet
wireless performance
Product 1: Razer Joro
4.0

Wireless performance is good enough for productivity and casual use, with generally reliable Bluetooth pairing, but sleep wake delays and gaming limits show its ceiling.

Product 2: Epomaker Cypher96 Keyboard
4.5

Wireless use is described as fast, responsive, and low-lag in everyday use.