Compare Logitech G413 SE vs be quiet! Dark Mount

Acoustics are inconsistent: some reviewers dislike the dull thud or unpleasant sound, while another says the keyboard avoids annoying echo.

Acoustics were exceptional in the reviews that discussed them directly, with reviewers saying the silent operation was nailed.

Actuation consistency is a concern in the Trusted Reviews transcript, which notes different keys feeling uneven in bump strength.

Actuation was described as smooth, consistent, and accurate, though reviewers also noted the board lacks adjustable actuation controls.

Analog input support was criticized as absent, with reviewers noting the switches are not analog, optical, or hall effect.

Backlight brightness is praised where discussed, with reviewers calling it bright, useful in the dark, or easy to see even in a sunlit room.

Backlight brightness feedback was mixed: reviewers liked brightness controls, but one noted the display-key brightness could not be adjusted.

Build quality is consistently strong, with reviewers repeatedly praising the sturdy aluminum-topped construction and premium feel for the price.

Build quality was broadly strong, especially for the core board, with reviewers praising rigidity, premium feel, and robust construction.

The built-in calculator shortcut receives limited positive evidence as part of the useful Fn-layer shortcuts.

Cable quality is generally weak, with reviewers criticizing the standard rubber, non-detachable, non-braided, or dangling cable.

Cable quality received limited but positive-to-mixed feedback, with reviewers noting useful length and toughness but missing older routing or extension conveniences.

Compatibility is scored narrowly around G Hub support, where multiple reviewers call out the keyboard as incompatible or unsupported.

Compatibility was a strength because reviewers praised the web-based software for Mac, Linux, browser use, and situations where installing software is not allowed.

Connectivity is limited by the hard-wired, non-detachable cable, which reviewers disliked for desk setup flexibility.

Connectivity was mixed: wired and modular connections could be sturdy and easy, but reviewers also criticized play, no wireless, or wired-only limitations.

Customization options are broadly weak, with reviewers repeatedly saying there is little or nothing to customize beyond basic shortcuts or lighting presets.

Customization options were a defining strength, with reviewers highlighting modular layouts, remapping, display keys, RGB, macros, and flexible setup choices.

Design aesthetics are a strong point, with reviewers repeatedly praising the clean, black, professional, compact, or sexy appearance.

Design aesthetics were mostly praised for mature, premium, clean, or elegant styling, though some reviewers felt it looked dated or plain.

Desk space efficiency is a strength, especially for TKL users and reviewers who praised the extra mouse room or no-waste footprint.

Desk space efficiency was praised because the detachable or left-mounted numpad frees mouse space without giving up full-size functionality.

Durability evidence is strongly positive but concentrated in one review that emphasizes heat and wear resistance over time.

Durability was supported by praise for PBT keycaps, sturdy construction, long-term feel, and robust materials.

Ease of switch replacement is poor because reviewers say replacing switches requires tools, is not supported, or is a drawback.

Ease of switch replacement was positively supported by the hot-swap design and included tools, making switch and keycap replacement straightforward.

Ergonomics are mixed to positive, with some praise for comfort and adjustable angles but lingering concern about wrist support.

Ergonomics were generally positive thanks to angle adjustment, wrist rests, modular positioning, and reduced reach, though magnetic feet had some robustness caveats.

Extra gaming features are one of the weakest areas, with repeated criticism of missing bells and whistles, although one review liked the anti-ghosting basics.

Extra gaming features were a repeated weakness, with reviewers missing hall effect switches, higher polling, SOCD, analog features, and adjustable actuation.

Frame rigidity is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly noting little to no flex and solid construction.

Frame rigidity was repeatedly praised, with reviewers describing the board as solid, planted, robust, and difficult to flex.

Gaming performance is mixed to moderately positive: some reviewers say it keeps up and registers inputs well, while others criticize basic rollover and missing gaming features.

Gaming performance was judged good for general play, but not exceptional for competitive users because advanced esports features are missing.

Hot-swappable switch support is weak because reviewers point out the switches are not hot-swappable or cannot be swapped.

Hot-swappable switches were consistently praised for making switches and keycaps easy to replace or customize.

Keycap quality is one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for PBT texture and durability, although some reviewers dislike the legends or lack of double-shot clarity.

Keycap quality was mostly praised for PBT durability, texture, and legend longevity, with one reviewer finding the caps slipperier than a competitor.

Responsiveness is generally a bright spot, with reviewers saying the board kept up, felt nippy, gave quick feedback, or registered inputs accurately.

Key response was generally described as sharp, precise, and dependable across typing and gaming, with repeated praise for accurate registration.

Key spacing receives limited positive evidence from one reviewer who found it comfortable for both typing and precision gameplay.

Key stability receives limited positive evidence from one reviewer who found only slight wobble and did not consider it worrying.

Key stability was strong in the main board, with reviewers highlighting little wobble, consistent stabilized keys, and planted feel.

Latency-related evidence is positive but limited, with reviewers describing the keyboard as keeping up and parsing commands quickly.

Latency-related feedback was positive where discussed, with reviewers saying response time felt sharp and quick during fast or complex input.

Layout options are mixed: one reviewer criticizes the TKL layout omissions, while another praises the choice between full-size and TKL versions.

Layout options were a major strength, with praise for the TKL/full-size modular design, ambidextrous numpad, and many possible configurations.

Legend visibility is split: one reviewer found the legends nearly invisible without lighting, while others liked the clean font or noted dark-room limitations for secondary functions.

Legend visibility was mixed: shine-through legends and alternative assignments were praised, while stealth lock icons were criticized as hard to see.

Macro customization is consistently weak because reviewers repeatedly mention the lack of macros, programming, or built-in macro controls.

Macro customization was broadly praised for display keys, programmable functions, and Windows macro features, though some reviewers found the scope less advanced or less useful than expected.

Materials quality is mixed: one review praises PBT and aluminum, while another criticizes cheap-feeling materials despite those components.

Materials quality was mixed: reviewers liked aluminum, PBT, and premium materials, but several criticized plastic or ABS elements at this price.

Media controls are mixed: some reviewers appreciate function-layer controls, while others criticize the lack of dedicated media keys.

Media controls were mixed: reviewers liked the dock concept and utility, but many criticized shallow buttons, mushy feel, confusing navigation, or limited flexibility.

Noise level trends negative to mixed: several reviewers say the board is loud or clicky enough to disturb others, though one says it is not very loud.

Noise level was the strongest consensus point: reviewers repeatedly called the board extremely quiet, whisper-like, or among the quietest mechanical keyboards they had used.

Onboard memory is criticized by one reviewer because lighting settings reset without built-in memory.

Onboard memory was praised where discussed, especially for saving settings or using board-level controls without constant software dependence.

Passthrough features are a repeated omission, with several reviewers criticizing the loss or lack of USB passthrough.

Passthrough features were a weakness, with reviewers criticizing the lack of USB passthrough or the wired-only connection limitations.

Per-key lighting control is criticized because one review specifically says players cannot color important keys such as WASD.

Per-key lighting control was positively noted where discussed, especially for custom areas, individual keys, and multi-layer lighting control.

The 1,000Hz polling rate was considered fine or a reasonable tradeoff, but reviewers noted it does not compete with faster 8,000Hz gaming boards.

Portability is mixed: reviewers like the compact, light TKL body, but one reviewer dislikes the attached cable for packing.

Portability was limited but not wholly negative: one reviewer found it more portable than a daily driver, though the broader design remains a modular desk keyboard.

Profile management receives negative evidence from one reviewer who says there is no way to create profiles.

Profile management was useful but imperfect, with onboard/browser profile handling praised and profile switching or web limitations criticized.

Rapid trigger support was a repeated weakness: several reviewers explicitly missed Rapid Trigger, adjustable actuation, SOCD, or similar modern gaming functions.

Reliability has limited positive evidence from one reviewer who says the new keys avoid the double-typing issue.

Reliability was mixed, with several reviewers reporting bugs, wake issues, profile resets, media desync, loose feet, or port-cover issues.

RGB customization is weak overall because reviewers repeatedly note the lack of RGB, configurable colors, or programmable lighting.

RGB customization was widely praised for deep software control, per-key effects, layers, presets, and web or app configuration.

Lighting quality is mixed: reviewers often like the clean white lighting, but several criticize limited white-only modes, distracting patterns, or lack of richer lighting behavior.

RGB lighting quality was generally strong, with praise for vivid, uniform, attractive light bars and ambiance; minor complaints included distracting edge lighting or weak purple tones.

Size and form factor are broadly praised, with reviewers emphasizing compactness, low wasted space, and lightweight designs.

Size and form factor drew mixed reactions: one reviewer found the look dated, while another called it big with all modules attached.

Software quality is a repeated weakness because the board lacks G Hub support or meaningful software-based customization.

Software quality was good overall but inconsistent: reviewers praised the interface and web option, while others reported bugs, missing refinements, or basic functionality.

Sound dampening receives positive limited evidence from reviewers who note little reverberation or no echoing from the chassis.

Sound dampening was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers praising the multi-layer foam/silicone system for reducing echo, vibration, and typing noise.

Stabilizer quality is split, with one reviewer complaining about ticking stabilizers and another saying the spacebar had no wobble.

Stabilizer quality was a standout, with reviewers repeatedly praising lubrication, reduced rattle, and quiet large keys.

Switch feel is the most divisive core trait: several reviewers called the switches stiff, clunky, mushy, or terrible, while a smaller set found them smooth, tactile, or enjoyable.

Reviewers consistently praised the Dark Mount switches as smooth, quiet, and pleasing to type on, with only minor caveats about personal preference or lack of a thocky feel.

Switch options are very limited, with one reviewer criticizing the board for effectively offering only brown-style switches.

Switch choice was seen as adequate but somewhat limited: reviewers liked the silent linear and tactile options, while one wanted a wider default selection.

Typing comfort is highly split: some reviewers find the keyboard satisfying or comfortable, while others report fatigue, stiffness, or poor typing comfort.

Typing comfort was strongly positive, with reviewers calling the board soft, cushioned, comfortable, and suitable for long writing sessions.

Typing feel is mixed: positive reviews describe a satisfying, responsive feel, but several reviewers describe mushiness, friction, or dull feedback.

Typing feel was one of the strongest areas, repeatedly described as excellent, smooth, cushioned, fast, and satisfying.

Value for money is sharply split but leans negative overall: several reviewers say it is overpriced or hard to recommend, while others call it reasonable or affordable.

Value for money split reviewers: some saw strong value in the modules and quiet design, while others felt the high price was hard to justify.

Volume control is mildly positive where mentioned, because reviewers note Fn-layer volume controls, but not dedicated hardware controls.

Volume control was mixed, with praise for feel and grip offset by criticism that the roller was imprecise or awkward.

Wireless performance was a weakness because reviewers explicitly noted the lack of 2.4GHz or Bluetooth as a drawback for cable-free users.

Wrist rest quality scores low because reviewers repeatedly describe the missing wrist rest as disappointing or uncomfortable.

Wrist rest quality was mixed but mostly positive: many reviewers found the rests comfortable and secure, while a few criticized alignment, height, or security.