Compare Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Resynced vs Kingdom Come: Deliverance II

One reviewer warned that excessive profanity and potentially offensive material make the game unsuitable for some audiences.

AI behavior is mixed-positive: reviewers liked more realistic reactions and aggressive enemy behavior, but one still noticed enemies waiting their turn.

AI and NPC behavior were praised for believable reactions, routines, crime responses, and increased sophistication over the first game.

Ranged play was viewed as improved by some reviewers, especially archery, but another found ranged combat weightless and weak.

Animation quality is positive for more dynamic cinematics, but one reviewer found some motion capture and facial animation uneven.

Cutscene direction and mocap were praised for selling relationships and emotional scenes convincingly.

Art direction is mostly positive for retaining the original style, but one reviewer worried the new presentation could lose some of Black Flag’s soul.

The visual style of menus, maps, and medieval presentation received praise for matching the game’s historical tone.

Atmosphere is highly praised, especially the Caribbean lighting, weather, sea feel, and more alive world presentation.

Atmosphere was praised alongside world-building, especially in cities, music, and historically grounded locations.

Bugs were present but usually minor; reviewers ranged from calling glitches common to saying issues rarely disrupted play.

Camera behavior drew a negative note around assassination camera cuts feeling too harsh.

Camera behavior was a noted issue for one reviewer, especially through finicky first-person viewpoint problems.

Character development is expected to improve because reviewers saw the remake fleshing out Edward’s story and personal relationships.

Henry and Hans received strong praise for their evolving relationship and character arcs, with Henry’s trauma and growth adding stakes.

The character roster expands positively through the addition of three officers, each framed as a meaningful new crew presence.

The cast was praised for memorable personalities, humor, and a strong sense of history.

The checkpoint system appears much improved because detection in tailing missions no longer forces instant desynchronization.

Checkpointing was criticized for causing lost progress when autosaves appeared only at limited quest points.

Combat is one of the most consistently praised areas, with reviewers highlighting faster attacks, parries, chain takedowns, added depth, and a more modern feel.

Combat drew broad attention for its realism, skill focus, and improvements, though several reviewers still found it harsh, clunky, or frustrating early on.

The dog companion Mutt was praised as useful and worthwhile, especially for tracking and early side-quest benefits.

Content variety is praised for new story hours, new crew content, revamped combat, and broader remake additions.

Reviewers praised the breadth of activities, quests, and post-launch additions, with many describing a large and varied set of things to do.

Controls were described as tighter and mostly faithful, with positive notes around ship controls and improved movement control.

Controls were described as noticeably smoother than the first game, especially in camera feel, aiming, and sword fighting responsiveness.

Reviewers strongly liked that the remake preserves a solo action-adventure identity rather than converting Black Flag into an RPG.

One reviewer found the loop rewarding but volatile, with strong highs offset by repeated frustration and setbacks.

Crafting split reviewers: blacksmithing and alchemy could be charming and rewarding, but several found parts clunky, slow, or repetitive.

Crash stability was praised by multiple reviewers who reported no crashes, no soft locks, or no hard crashes.

Dialogue was mostly praised for impact, humor, and organic choices, though one reviewer found some repeated dialogue drawn out.

Difficulty balance is mixed: stricter parry timing adds challenge, but slow-motion dodge and parry cues may make combat easier.

Difficulty was often called demanding and unforgiving; reviewers generally treated this as part of the appeal, though not always an easy one.

DLC value is a recurring concern because Freedom Cry and other DLC are missing, though some reviewers accepted the narrower focus.

The post-launch expansions were credited with adding a large amount of extra content to the package.

Naval handling earned strong praise, especially where storms, waves, and refined ship combat appear to affect how the Jackdaw feels at sea.

The early economy was described as restrictive, especially when selling damaged or stolen goods with limited vendor money.

Emotional impact may improve because more expressive faces are expected to add emotion to story scenes.

Reviewers described the story as memorable and emotionally powerful, including scenes that brought strong lasting reactions.

Environmental detail is consistently praised through denser foliage, livelier towns, more NPCs, improved textures, and richer scenery.

Environmental detail was praised for dense, specific objects, puddles, tools, farms, residences, and believable spaces.

Exploration is expected to feel richer through denser locations, more expansive underwater areas, and a more seamless Caribbean.

Exploration was praised for beautiful spaces, meaningful discoveries, and a strong adventuring feel, though harsh systems made some travel demanding.

Facial animations are broadly praised as much more detailed and expressive, though one hands-off preview still found them somewhat hit or miss.

Facial animation feedback was mixed: one reviewer noted lifeless dialogue faces, while another praised key character animations.

Faithfulness to franchise is a strength because reviewers felt the remake respects original Black Flag and longtime fans.

Reviewers generally agreed the sequel stays true to the original while improving its systems, scope, and accessibility.

Family friendliness was limited by repeated profanity, sexual content, and depictions of women that one reviewer found objectifying.

Fast travel opinions were mixed: one reviewer praised dynamic events, while another found it cumbersome and interruption-prone.

One reviewer reported a consistent frame rate and treated that as part of the game’s stronger technical state.

Fun factor is very high in the evidence, with reviewers describing excitement, purchase interest, and strong enthusiasm after previews.

Several reviewers found the game highly entertaining, addictive, and rewarding once its demanding systems clicked.

One reviewer saw the remake giving players more direct control during combat, especially through revised tool and weapon handling.

Reviewers repeatedly framed the systems-heavy design as a major strength, praising how mechanics connect to role-playing, dialogue, world simulation, and player expression.

Graphics quality has the strongest agreement: reviewers repeatedly praised the modernized visuals, lighting, water, faces, and environmental fidelity.

Graphics were broadly praised for impressive landscapes, cutscenes, lighting, and major visual improvements over the first game.

The game was not seen as a pure grind, but reviewers still emphasized the effort and repetition needed to gain traction.

Handheld play suitability has a positive early signal because dedicated handheld presets were described as good news.

Handheld suitability was supported by one reviewer who described the game as scalable enough for handheld play.

DualSense haptics and adaptive triggers were praised for reflecting stamina, sword clashes, and sharpening interactions.

A horror-leaning quest was criticized for being too short for its dread to fully develop.

The adaptive HUD was praised for hiding unnecessary elements and improving immersion when information was not relevant.

Immersion impressions are positive where the remake is said to push dynamism, gameplay, and immersion further.

Immersion was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly describing the world, systems, and presentation as absorbing.

One reviewer praised the scale of improvement as something other studios rarely achieve.

The learning curve was repeatedly described as steep, slow, and friction-heavy, rewarding patience but likely turning some players away.

One reviewer praised the way locations were recontextualized into memorable set-pieces that rewarded planning and awareness.

Post-launch support was described positively through free updates, fixes, and eagerly awaited features.

Load-time impressions are very positive because several reviewers noted seamless docking or no loading screens entering cities.

Load times were criticized by one reviewer as long enough to worsen stealth retries and experimentation.

Loot was criticized for early encumbrance pressure and the difficulty of carrying everything a player might want.

The historical codex and contextual detail were praised for offering extensive background on people, events, and society.

Map and navigation design is mixed because replacing the minimap with a compass was framed as a personal-preference change.

Maps were praised for medieval flair and exquisite town art, supporting the game’s historical presentation.

Menu usability was mixed to negative, with some praise for navigation but others calling the menu system dire or frustrating.

Microtransaction impact is concerning where a reviewer disliked the sound of cosmetic pet skins and perk-linked bonuses.

Mission design is mostly praised because tailing and eavesdropping no longer hard-fail instantly, though one reviewer worried the new approach weakens stealth tension.

Main mission design was mixed: reviewers praised varied scenarios, but one criticized a required sequence for lacking an alternate path.

Mission variety was strongly praised, especially for quests that went beyond simple errands or bandit-clearing objectives.

Monetization fairness is a concern where one reviewer interpreted perk-bearing deluxe content as potentially pay-to-win.

Movement and parkour drew broad praise for added flow and modern free-running, though some reviewers noticed slower pacing or momentum loss.

One reviewer felt early traversal was unnecessarily taxing, especially before stronger equipment and better mobility options eased the burden.

Multiplayer design is a weak point because the mode is absent; reviewers ranged from disappointed to not considering it a major loss.

Narrative quality is promising because of Edward-focused additions and new story content, but the changed modern-day structure leaves some story questions.

Narrative quality was a major strength, with reviewers praising the historical saga, main quest, character arcs, and cinematic ambition.

Onboarding divided reviewers: returning and new-player recaps helped, but some found the opening overloaded or blunt.

The open world is praised for preserving the Caribbean map while making it more seamless and easier to move through.

The open world drew strong praise for its scale, density, historically grounded cities, and lived-in regions across multiple maps.

Reviewers repeatedly emphasized how unusual and specific the game feels compared with modern RPGs.

Pacing has a mild caveat because one reviewer thought the parkour footage looked slower than the original.

Pacing opinions varied: some praised the sustained momentum, while others complained about indulgent cutscenes or late-game pacing issues.

Performance optimization looks promising because reviewers noted a benchmark tool and PC requirements that may compare favorably to Shadows, but no launch benchmarks exist yet.

Performance was generally praised across PC and console contexts, with reviewers noting strong optimization and technical improvements.

Platform-specific feature support is viewed positively on PC because the preview highlighted modern upscalers and broad technical support.

The PS5 Pro version was praised as a graphical treat, with platform-specific technical strengths noted.

Platforming precision is promising because of freer movement, but one reviewer flagged beam-to-beam delay and sluggishness as a concern.

Polish is viewed positively overall, with several reviewers saying the remake looks refined, while still noting minor flaws and pre-release uncertainty.

Reviewers saw the sequel as much more polished than the first game, with rough edges reduced and systems better realized.

Progression appears improved through weapon perks, trinket-style choices, and returning fleet management that adds light progression outside core missions.

Progression was widely praised for turning early friction into rewarding growth through skills, perks, equipment, and player learning.

One reviewer strongly disliked Hans as a long-term companion presence, creating strain on their desire to continue.

Quest design impressions are positive, centered on new officer quests and added side content that reviewers found exciting.

Quest design was one of the strongest points, with reviewers praising memorable side stories, branching approaches, and strong writing, despite a few disappointing payoffs.

Remake quality is broadly praised as ambitious, faithful, and more than a simple remaster, though integration questions remain before release.

Replay value looks strong for players who enjoy roaming the Caribbean and engaging with the sailing fantasy beyond missions.

Replay value looked strong thanks to hardcore mode, major content additions, and reviewers wanting to return for more playthroughs.

Sandbox freedom benefits from stealth and tool changes that let players approach encounters with more creativity.

Reviewers admired the freedom to solve problems, exploit systems, and role-play, though the sandbox sometimes clashed with scripted story demands.

The save system was one of the most divisive topics, praised by one reviewer but criticized by many as stingy or punishing.

Side character depth is strongly praised through new officers, personal questlines, expanded arcs, and more character connection.

The sequel was credited with giving supporting women and other groups somewhat more agency than before.

Reviewers liked the depth and usefulness of perks, weapon techniques, and skill trees, especially when they enabled meaningful playstyle specialization.

Sound design was praised for supporting immersion and helping players identify attacks or stealth-relevant cues.

Soundtrack quality is praised because classic sea shanties return alongside new shanties and new music.

The soundtrack was one of the most consistently praised elements, with several reviewers calling it orchestral, phenomenal, or legendary.

Stealth is widely viewed as improved thanks to free crouching, better detection behavior, and less punishing tailing, though social-stealth and penalty changes remain debated.

Stealth was useful and sometimes satisfying, yet reviewers also called it finicky, weak, or frustrating in specific forced sections.

Tutorial quality was mixed, with one reviewer calling it decent while others criticized dense text screens and poor explanations.

Upgrade systems are praised for Jackdaw alternate-fire options, new ship upgrades, and more tactical flexibility.

The revised perk and upgrade system was praised for offering meaningful upside-focused choices rather than weak side-grades.

User interface design has a mixed note because one reviewer found the on-screen combat UI somewhat messy despite being understandable.

UI feedback was positive when reviewers discussed improved, adaptable, or visually polished interface presentation.

Value for money is mixed: one reviewer liked the $60 price, while another advised waiting for reviews rather than pre-ordering.

Value was praised because the game is both strong and very long, with some reviewers reporting enormous playtime.

Visual effects are highly praised, especially lighting, ray-traced effects, refreshed underwater visuals, rain, wind, and water presentation.

Visual set pieces and in-engine scenes were praised for creating striking emotional moments.

Voice acting impressions are positive where the original cast and new recorded lines are described as fitting the remake well.

Voice acting was broadly praised, especially the main cast, though some reviewers noted repeated or uneven minor NPC voices.

Weapon balance looks improved through varied weapon perks and chain-kill limits that help avoid button-mashing.

Weapon balance was mixed: one reviewer liked weapon choice, while another found some ranged options hard to use effectively.

World-building was repeatedly praised as immersive, historically grounded, and central to the game’s appeal.

World interactivity is viewed positively through breakable environments, more consequential ship damage, and dynamic environmental effects.

Reviewers consistently praised the reactive crime, reputation, NPC, and quest systems that made the world feel alive and responsive.

Writing quality is praised for potential added depth and returning writer involvement, with a caveat about whether new additions integrate smoothly.

Writing was described as excellent, engaging, humorous, and consistently strong across main and side content.