Kingdom Come: Deliverance II

Kingdom Come: Deliverance II Review

Brand: Deep Silver
Updated: 2 days ago
4.2
Consolidated expert score
249
Review insights
81
Scored features
20
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for a huge, immersive medieval RPG with superb quests, writing, and systemic freedom. Skip it if harsh saves, steep early friction, or adult content will ruin the fun.

Best for

Best for patient RPG fans who want a dense medieval simulation with reactive quests, historical world-building, meaningful progression, and lots of content. It especially suits players who enjoy solving problems through speech, stealth, crafting, crime, combat, or improvisation.

Not for

Not for players who want quick gratification, forgiving saves, lightweight combat, multiplayer features, or a broad power fantasy. It is also a poor fit for anyone sensitive to heavy profanity, brutality, misogyny, racism, or other mature portrayals noted by reviewers.

Verdict

Reviewers frame Kingdom Come: Deliverance II as a rare, systems-heavy medieval RPG that rewards patience with superb quest design, strong writing, memorable characters, and a reactive world. Its biggest tradeoff is that the same realism powering the immersion also creates friction: restricted saving, demanding combat, dense tutorials, and occasional bugs or camera issues can frustrate new players. The consensus is not that it is easy to love, but that its depth, historical atmosphere, and open-ended problem solving make the long journey unusually rewarding for players willing to meet it on its own terms.

Reviewer Consensus

Strong agreement: Reviewers most consistently agree that the world, quest design, writing, and immersion are exceptional for a modern open-world RPG.

Mixed opinions: Opinions are more split on combat, saving, tutorials, pacing, and how much realism-driven friction improves or harms the experience.

Common concern: The most repeated concern is that early difficulty, stingy saves, dense systems, and occasional technical rough edges can push away impatient players.

Evidence coverage
  • 20 expert reviews
  • 52 of 81 scored features show reviewer agreement
  • 28 scored features have limited or less conclusive evidence
  • 1 scored feature shows reviewer disagreement or mixed evidence
  1. Limited review data
  2. Mixed evidence
  3. Moderate consensus
  4. Strong consensus

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

The Witcher 3

  • Compared: soundtrack impact The music is held up against The Witcher 3's soundtrack as a rare point of comparison.
  • Compared: sequel maturation The sequel is compared to The Witcher 3 as a studio-defining realization of earlier ideas.
  • Compared: quest design The quest craft is framed as strong enough to rival The Witcher 3.

Baldur's Gate 3

  • Better: reactive quest scripting Eurogamer says the reactivity gets close to Baldur's Gate 3, but not quite as far.

Baldur’s Gate 3

  • Compared: script length The script is compared favorably by length to Baldur’s Gate 3.

Feature Scorecards

Pros

  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    value for money: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    Value for money is excellent for players who like this style, with reviewers citing very long playtimes and large amounts of content.
  • 5.0
    based on 2 reviews
    world-building: 5.0, based on 2 reviews
    World-building is a major strength, grounded in medieval Bohemia, historical events, codex material, and dense social systems.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    core gameplay loop: 5.0, based on 1 review
    The loop of making stories, choosing approaches, building Henry, and reacting to consequences is strongly supported by reviewer evidence.
  • 5.0
    based on 1 review
    emotional impact: 5.0, based on 1 review
    The narrative lands real emotional weight for some reviewers, including tears and strong reactions to major story moments.
  • 4.9
    based on 7 reviews
    content variety: 4.9, based on 7 reviews
    Content variety is one of the strongest attributes, spanning quests, dice, crafting, alchemy, hunting, side activities, and large maps.
  • 4.9
    based on 6 reviews
    soundtrack quality: 4.9, based on 6 reviews
    The soundtrack is one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as memorable, orchestral, and emotionally elevating.
  • 4.9
    based on 4 reviews
    faithfulness to franchise: 4.9, based on 4 reviews
    As a sequel, reviewers strongly agree it improves and continues the original's identity without abandoning its core design.
  • 4.9
    based on 4 reviews
    sandbox freedom: 4.9, based on 4 reviews
    Sandbox freedom is highly praised, with multiple ways to solve problems, exploit systems, and tailor Henry's role.
  • 4.9
    based on 2 reviews
    atmosphere: 4.9, based on 2 reviews
    Reviewers consistently describe the medieval atmosphere as immersive, memorable, and central to the game's appeal.
  • 4.9
    based on 2 reviews
    lore depth: 4.9, based on 2 reviews
    Lore depth is excellent, with historical codex material, extensive script detail, and strong cultural grounding.
  • 4.9
    based on 3 reviews
    fun factor: 4.9, based on 3 reviews
    Fun factor is high for patient players, with reviewers describing the game as entertaining, satisfying, and hard to stop playing.
  • 4.9
    based on 3 reviews
    gameplay mechanics: 4.9, based on 3 reviews
    Gameplay mechanics are dense, systemic, and highly improved, with layered simulation and meaningful quality-of-life changes.
  • 4.8
    based on 5 reviews
    world interactivity: 4.8, based on 5 reviews
    World interactivity is exceptional, with NPC memory, crime systems, object reactions, reputation, and reactive scripts repeatedly praised.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    dialogue quality: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Dialogue is consistently praised as abundant, well-written, and well-performed, with skill checks and conversations shaping play.
  • 4.8
    based on 1 review
    frame rate stability: 4.8, based on 1 review
    Frame rate and smoothness are positively supported, including 4K/60 on PS5 Pro and consistent PC frame rate reports.
  • 4.8
    based on 5 reviews
    writing quality: 4.8, based on 5 reviews
    Writing quality is a standout, with reviewers praising humor, quest writing, emotional drama, and historically grounded dialogue.
  • 4.8
    based on 3 reviews
    replay value: 4.8, based on 3 reviews
    Replay value is strong because different playstyles and choices can produce distinct stories and reviewers wanted to continue after long runs.
  • 4.8
    based on 2 reviews
    mission variety: 4.8, based on 2 reviews
    Mission variety is a strength, with reviewers praising diverse main quests, side quests, mysteries, heists, and unique objectives.
  • 4.7
    based on 8 reviews
    narrative quality: 4.7, based on 8 reviews
    Narrative quality is a major strength, with reviewers praising the epic medieval saga, emotional range, political stakes, and strong finale.
  • 4.7
    based on 5 reviews
    graphics quality: 4.7, based on 5 reviews
    Graphics earn strong praise across reviews for landscapes, lighting, painterly visuals, and overall fidelity.
  • 4.7
    based on 4 reviews
    crash stability: 4.7, based on 4 reviews
    Crash stability is strong overall, with several reviewers reporting no crashes or soft locks despite bugs elsewhere.
  • 4.7
    based on 6 reviews
    quest design: 4.7, based on 6 reviews
    Quest design is a core strength, repeatedly praised for depth, reactivity, memorable episodes, and multiple solutions.
  • 4.7
    based on 6 reviews
    voice acting: 4.7, based on 6 reviews
    Voice acting is consistently praised for main performances and many NPCs, with occasional mismatches as a polish caveat.
  • 4.7
    based on 5 reviews
    immersion: 4.7, based on 5 reviews
    Immersion is one of the best-supported attributes, with reviewers repeatedly describing the world as absorbing and believable.
  • 4.7
    based on 7 reviews
    environmental detail: 4.7, based on 7 reviews
    Environmental detail is a standout, from forests, streams, and meadows to detailed medieval cities and weather effects.
  • 4.7
    based on 3 reviews
    AI behavior: 4.7, based on 3 reviews
    NPC and crime behavior are a major strength, with reviewers praising realistic reactions, memory, and consequences, though AI exploits remain possible.
  • 4.7
    based on 5 reviews
    open-world design: 4.7, based on 5 reviews
    Open-world design is a major highlight, with huge maps, dense cities, reactive systems, and immersive spaces.
  • 4.7
    based on 4 reviews
    animation quality: 4.7, based on 4 reviews
    Animation and cinematic presentation are generally strong, especially mocap and facial work, though minor visual oddities remain.
  • 4.7
    based on 2 reviews
    art direction: 4.7, based on 2 reviews
    The art direction leans into medieval authenticity, painterly presentation, stylish maps, and strong cinematic composition.
  • 4.7
    based on 2 reviews
    innovation: 4.7, based on 2 reviews
    Innovation comes from its rare, systems-heavy medieval RPG style and unusually committed simulation design.
  • 4.7
    based on 2 reviews
    visual effects quality: 4.7, based on 2 reviews
    Visual effects and presentation are supported by lighting, weather, moonlight, cutscenes, and environmental visual touches.
  • 4.6
    based on 4 reviews
    skill tree depth: 4.6, based on 4 reviews
    Skill tree depth is strong, with many perks, archetypes, stats, buffs, and meaningful bonuses.
  • 4.5
    based on 6 reviews
    progression system: 4.5, based on 6 reviews
    Progression is meaningful, use-based, and more natural than before, with perks and training making difficult systems easier over time.
  • 4.5
    based on 3 reviews
    controls responsiveness: 4.5, based on 3 reviews
    Controls are generally smoother and more responsive than the first game, especially camera control, aiming, and combat feel.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    character roster: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    The cast is repeatedly described as diverse, complex, and memorable, even though some secondary faces or voices repeat.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    originality: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Originality is high because reviewers emphasize how few modern games offer this specific old-school, simulation-heavy RPG style.
  • 4.5
    based on 2 reviews
    sound design: 4.5, based on 2 reviews
    Sound design supports stealth and combat awareness, including positional audio and tactile-sounding steel clashes.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    haptic feedback integration: 4.5, based on 1 review
    DualSense haptics are specifically praised for adaptive triggers and steel-clash feedback on PS5.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    level design: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Level design shines when areas are reused or reframed for different objectives and story beats.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    live-service support: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Post-launch support is evidenced through multiple combat patches, fixes, and quality-of-life updates.
  • 4.5
    based on 1 review
    platform-specific feature support: 4.5, based on 1 review
    Platform-specific support is strongest on PS5 Pro and DualSense, with direct evidence for 4K/60 and controller feedback.
  • 4.4
    based on 3 reviews
    aiming precision: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
    Aiming is improved over the first game, with smoother sensitivity and more accurate archery, while still staying relatively HUD-light.
  • 4.4
    based on 3 reviews
    performance optimization: 4.4, based on 3 reviews
    Performance optimization is generally strong on PC and console, though one reviewer calls performance occasionally unpredictable.
  • 4.4
    based on 2 reviews
    character development: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
    Character development is strongest around Henry, Hans, and their relationship, with memorable characterization and humor supporting the journey.
  • 4.4
    based on 2 reviews
    HUD clarity: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
    HUD clarity is praised when it avoids intrusive guidance and later improves through adaptive HUD options.
  • 4.4
    based on 2 reviews
    protagonist appeal: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
    Protagonist appeal is supported through Henry's grounded role, humor, trauma, and ordinary-man framing, though he is not universally central to every review.
  • 4.4
    based on 2 reviews
    user interface design: 4.4, based on 2 reviews
    Interface design improves through outfit slots and loadouts, though broader menu usability remains mixed.
  • 4.3
    based on 4 reviews
    exploration quality: 4.3, based on 4 reviews
    Exploration is consistently rewarding, with huge regions, hidden sites, side quests, and a world that rewards close attention.
  • 4.3
    based on 6 reviews
    crafting system: 4.3, based on 6 reviews
    Crafting is deep and often satisfying, especially blacksmithing and alchemy, though a few reviewers find parts clunky or elaborate.
  • 4.2
    based on 2 reviews
    weapon balance: 4.2, based on 2 reviews
    Weapon balance is mostly positive because weapons have distinct armor interactions, though some reviews note stat dominance or uneven usefulness.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    DLC value: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Later coverage supports DLC value through Royal Edition packaging that includes all content in one bundle.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    map and navigation design: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Map and navigation design are praised for medieval flair, uncluttered structure, and breathable exploration.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    side character depth: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Side character depth is supported by individual praise for characters like Katherine and the Henry-Capon relationship.
  • 4.2
    based on 1 review
    upgrade system: 4.2, based on 1 review
    Upgrade systems are supported through weapon quality tiers and damage scaling tied to crafting and equipment progression.
  • 4.2
    based on 13 reviews
    combat system: 4.2, based on 13 reviews
    Combat is divisive but deeply evidenced: many praise the skill-focused melee system, while some find it slow, awkward, or punishing.
  • 4.1
    based on 3 reviews
    mission design: 4.1, based on 3 reviews
    Mission design is ambitious and often excellent, but a few reviews criticize scripted sequences or required paths that clash with sandbox freedom.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    accessibility options: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Post-launch coverage supports adaptable HUD visibility as the main accessibility-adjacent option, improving immersion and readability rather than offering a broad accessibility suite.
  • 4.0
    based on 1 review
    enemy variety: 4.0, based on 1 review
    Enemy and wildlife variety is supported through wolves, rats, bears, bandits, and varied combat encounters, though it is not a central praise point.
  • 3.9
    based on 6 reviews
    pacing: 3.9, based on 6 reviews
    Pacing is mixed: some reviewers say the game sustains momentum, while others cite rapid climaxes, long cutscenes, or dragging quests.
  • 3.9
    based on 6 reviews
    polish: 3.9, based on 6 reviews
    Polish is improved over the original but still imperfect, with typos, mismatched voice lines, bugs, and small visual oddities.
  • 3.9
    based on 2 reviews
    companion AI: 3.9, based on 2 reviews
    Companion support is mainly represented by Mutt, whose usefulness is praised, while broader companion AI is less central.
  • 3.8
    based on 1 review
    loot system: 3.8, based on 1 review
    Loot handling is intentionally constrained by carry weight and realism, making inventory management part of the challenge rather than a pure reward stream.
  • 3.8
    based on 3 reviews
    economy and resource balance: 3.8, based on 3 reviews
    Resource balance is intentionally stingy and survival-oriented, with money, food, hunger, sleep, and inventory pressure shaping play.
  • 3.7
    based on 4 reviews
    onboarding experience: 3.7, based on 4 reviews
    Onboarding ranges from elegant catch-up material to overwhelming early information, so new-player friendliness is useful but uneven.
  • 3.7
    based on 5 reviews
    bug frequency: 3.7, based on 5 reviews
    Bugs are present across several reviews, mostly graphical or silly rather than game-breaking, with some later coverage noting improvement.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    handheld play suitability: 3.5, based on 1 review
    Handheld suitability has limited support, with transcript evidence only noting handheld performance testing rather than a full evaluation.
  • 3.5
    based on 1 review
    load times: 3.5, based on 1 review
    Load-time evidence is limited but includes one endless loading screen causing a restart.
  • 3.5
    based on 6 reviews
    difficulty balance: 3.5, based on 6 reviews
    Difficulty is intentionally demanding; reviewers often praise the payoff but warn that the early hours and combat can overwhelm players.

Cons

  • 3.4
    based on 3 reviews
    stealth mechanics: 3.4, based on 3 reviews
    Stealth is useful and sometimes satisfying, but reviewers often call it finicky, exploitable, or the weakest gameplay element.
  • 3.4
    based on 2 reviews
    fast travel convenience: 3.4, based on 2 reviews
    Fast travel is mixed: one review praises dynamic events, while another finds it cumbersome and slow.
  • 3.3
    based on 4 reviews
    menu usability: 3.3, based on 4 reviews
    Menu usability is mixed: some find menus easy to navigate, while others criticize controller-oriented paneling and dense UI.
  • 3.2
    based on 4 reviews
    tutorial quality: 3.2, based on 4 reviews
    Tutorial quality is mixed: the game explains a lot but leans heavily on dense text and can overwhelm new players.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    camera behavior: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Camera issues are a repeated but limited complaint, especially around the finicky first-person perspective and in-engine scenes.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    facial animations: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Facial animation evidence is mixed: one reviewer found some characters lifeless during dialogue scenes.
  • 3.0
    based on 1 review
    horror tension: 3.0, based on 1 review
    Horror tension appears in at least one memorable quest, but the reviewer says the sequence ends too quickly to fully build dread.
  • 2.9
    based on 5 reviews
    save system reliability: 2.9, based on 5 reviews
    The save system is a common concern, with restricted manual saves and stingy checkpoints frustrating some reviewers.
  • 2.9
    based on 4 reviews
    learning curve: 2.9, based on 4 reviews
    The learning curve is steep and often frustrating at first, but multiple reviewers say the payoff improves once systems click.
  • 2.8
    based on 1 review
    grind level: 2.8, based on 1 review
    Grind and friction are real concerns, especially early, where persistence and repeated failure can wear players down.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    age appropriateness: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Review evidence points to adult suitability: violence, misogyny, racism, and heavy profanity are repeatedly flagged as caveats.
  • 2.5
    based on 1 review
    checkpoint system: 2.5, based on 1 review
    Checkpointing is a weak spot because autosaves are limited and can force replay after failed encounters.
  • 2.0
    based on 1 review
    family friendliness: 2.0, based on 1 review
    Family friendliness is low because reviewers cite objectification of women, profanity, brutality, and potentially offensive portrayals.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in AI behavior, quest design, writing quality, below average in family friendliness, horror tension, checkpoint system.

Attribute This product Category average Difference
AI behavior 4.7 3.1 +1.6
quest design 4.7 3.4 +1.3
writing quality 4.8 3.5 +1.3
dialogue quality 4.8 3.5 +1.3
narrative quality 4.7 3.6 +1.1
family friendliness 2.0 3.3 -1.3
horror tension 3.0 4.3 -1.3
checkpoint system 2.5 3.6 -1.1

FAQ

Do you need to play the first Kingdom Come: Deliverance first?

No. Several reviewers say the sequel catches new players up with recaps, dream sequences, and early context, though familiarity with Henry and Hans makes the story land better.

Is Kingdom Come: Deliverance II hard to get into?

Yes. Reviews repeatedly describe the opening hours as demanding, text-heavy, and sometimes frustrating, but many also say the systems become rewarding once they click.

How good are the quests?

Quest design is one of the clearest strengths. Reviewers praise memorable side quests, multiple solutions, reactive scripting, and objectives that feel more handcrafted than filler.

Is the combat better than the first game?

Most reviewers say combat is smoother, clearer, or more refined, but it remains deliberate and punishing. Some loved the skill-focused swordplay, while others still found it slow or awkward.

Does the game have many bugs?

Bugs are mentioned often, but usually as graphical glitches, typos, mismatched lines, or odd behavior rather than constant crashes. Multiple reviewers specifically reported no crashes.

Is it worth the money?

For the right player, yes. Reviewers cite dozens to well over 100 hours of content, huge maps, many quests, and strong replay potential, but the value depends on enjoying its slower simulation style.

Consider This Instead

If you want better family friendliness

Choose Donkey Kong Bananza. It scores 4.8 vs 2.0 for family friendliness, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better save system reliability

Choose Saros. It scores 4.6 vs 2.9 for save system reliability, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

Overall Top Video Games Alternatives

#1 Hades II
4.6
25 reviews

Good if you want deeper Hades-style roguelite combat, huge build variety, polished art, and rewarding progression. Skip it if repetition, resource tracking, or a less intimate story than the original...

Pros: world interactivity, side character depth

Cons: grind level

#2 Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
4.3
21 reviews

Best for a stylish, emotional RPG with deep timed combat and exceptional music. Skip it if tight parry timing, weak maps, or awkward platforming would frustrate you.

Pros: world-building, crash stability

Cons: platforming precision, map and navigation design

#3 Donkey Kong Bananza
4.3
30 reviews

Good if you want joyful 3D exploration, fluid DK movement, dense collectibles, and playful destruction. Skip it if frame drops, camera hiccups, easy or repeated bosses, or a $70 price...

Pros: load times, movement feel

Cons: enemy variety, platforming precision

#4 Lego Batman: Legacy of the Dark Knight
4.3
12 reviews

Good if you want Arkham-style Lego combat, lively Gotham exploration, collectibles, and couch co-op. Skip it if seven launch heroes, no online co-op, or deluxe-locked content bothers you.

Pros: voice acting, performance optimization

Cons: multiplayer design, monetization fairness