Compare Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 vs Logitech G502 X Plus

The 2.4GHz connection was praised through an instant, fast connection experience with the included dongle.

2.4GHz connectivity was mixed: setup through the dongle was easy, but one review disliked the rattly dongle storage.

Acceleration feel received direct praise in one review, where the reviewer enjoyed its smoothness in Diablo IV.

One review praised the lack of smoothing or acceleration, tying it directly to accurate, predictable tracking.

Reviewers consistently described the mouse as accurate in games, with especially strong praise for tracking, pointer accuracy, and shot control.

Reviewers consistently praised tracking accuracy, saying the mouse stayed precise, true, and hiccup-free across gaming and everyday use.

Weight distribution received positive evidence from a reviewer who specifically praised the balance.

Weight balance evidence was limited and mixed-positive, with one reviewer noting back-heaviness and another saying balance improved.

Battery life was generally praised as long-lasting, though reviewers noted it drops with higher polling rates.

Battery life was mostly positive and often praised as long, but RGB drain and one poor real-world result kept opinions from being unanimous.

Bluetooth support was a repeated weakness because reviewers noted the mouse lacks Bluetooth and is less versatile for multi-device use.

Build quality was repeatedly praised as solid, squeak-free, well put together, and elite despite the light shell.

Build quality was rated highly, with reviewers calling it solid, sturdy, durable, and well-built.

Customization drew positive comments for granular controls and strong software-hardware integration, though it still depends heavily on G Hub.

Button customization was a clear strength, with reviewers praising remapping, physical DPI-shift adjustability, and flexible control setups.

Button responsiveness was mostly praised for tactile, responsive clicks, though one reviewer disliked the heavier actuation for spam clicking.

Button responsiveness was consistently strong, with tactile, well-built, satisfying clicks and quick in-game response.

Cable quality was a recurring complaint, with reviewers criticizing drag, resistance, and the dated rubber cable.

Cable flexibility was criticized in one review because the included cable felt basic compared with flexible braided alternatives.

Charging convenience was praised for USB-C, faster charging, and fewer desk cables.

Charging convenience was generally positive thanks to USB-C and charge-while-playing, though one reviewer found the USB-C port fiddly.

Claw grip comfort was broadly positive, with reviewers calling the mouse comfortable or easy to use for claw grip.

Claw grip comfort was mixed, with one review saying it suits claw or hybrid grips and another saying claw users may want a smaller mouse.

Click latency was praised as very low by some reviewers, though one technical reviewer found it merely good rather than flagship-leading.

Click latency and response were viewed positively overall, with reviewers praising snappier timing, low-latency response, and instant-feeling switches.

Click noise was mixed: some liked the satisfying click sound, while others found it loud or high-pitched.

Click noise had limited negative evidence, with one review saying the primary keys and especially the wheel were relatively loud.

Connection stability was praised in one review for not faltering even in a difficult RF environment.

Connection stability was excellent in the scored evidence, with reviewers reporting no hiccups or meaningful slip-ups.

Cross-platform compatibility was praised through G Hub support for both Windows and macOS.

Cross-platform compatibility had limited positive evidence through onboard memory helping when using the mouse on multiple systems.

PowerPlay compatibility was viewed positively, though one reviewer called the accessory expensive.

Dock compatibility was useful when paired with Powerplay, but reviewers criticized the extra cost or missing included puck.

DPI coverage was seen as technically strong and granular, but one reviewer felt the extreme ceiling is more marketing than everyday value.

DPI control was generally praised for its wide range and fine increments, though one reviewer questioned the practical value of ultra-high DPI.

Drag click support had limited positive evidence from one reviewer who called drag clicking pretty awesome.

Durability over time had limited but positive evidence from a longer-use reviewer whose unit remained rock solid.

Durability over time had limited but positive long-term evidence from an 18-month owner who remained satisfied.

Ecosystem integration was praised for Logitech presets, backward compatibility, and community/profile support.

Ecosystem integration was a strength, with praise for shared receivers, G Hub device management, Lightsync, and Logitech peripheral syncing.

Ergonomics were generally positive for comfort and contouring, but one review noted large hands may find the shape less ergonomic.

Ergonomic design was praised for refined comfort, natural hand fit, and better extended-use ergonomics.

Fingertip grip comfort was praised by reviewers who found the shape comfortable for fingertip use.

Fingertip comfort was generally positive but size-dependent, with one reviewer warning fingertip users may prefer a less substantial mouse.

FPS suitability was one of the strongest areas, with repeated praise for speed, responsiveness, and competitive first-person shooter use.

FPS suitability was mixed: accuracy, buttons, and DPI helped some reviewers, while weight made others reject it for serious competitive FPS.

Glide smoothness was highly mixed: some reviewers praised effortless glide, while others disliked stock-skate drag or control-heavy movement.

Glide smoothness was one of the strongest traits, with reviewers praising PTFE feet, low drag, and smooth movement on desks and pads.

Grip texture was well received, with reviewers praising the grippy surface, recessed sides, or usefulness for clammy hands.

Grip texture was mostly praised for comfort, reliable hold, and premium-feeling rubber, though one reviewer disliked the sticky rubber sides.

Handedness support was mixed because the symmetrical shape helps lefties, but the side buttons remain left-side only.

Handedness options were poor in the available evidence because the mouse is designed for right-handed users only.

Left and right clicks were praised for satisfying tactility, light rapid tapping, and improved main-button feel.

Left and right click quality was positive overall, with praise for satisfying primary clicks and pleasant pressure points.

Lift-off distance control was viewed as useful and noticeably adjustable, especially for players who fine-tune mouse behavior.

Lift-off distance tuning was a weakness in one review because adjustable lift-off distance was missing.

Long-session comfort was strongly positive in one review that reported almost no hand fatigue after long sessions.

Long-session comfort was strongly positive where mentioned, with reviewers praising multi-hour and extended-use comfort.

Macro support was praised for an easy-to-use macro tool that guides users through setup.

Macro support was positively received, with reviewers finding macro setup and assignment options useful despite broader software complaints.

Materials quality was praised for a cool, soft matte plastic feel.

Materials quality was mixed: one review praised the plastics and rubber linings, while another disliked the slicker scroll-wheel material.

MMO suitability was mixed, with enough controls for some MMO/RPG use but not enough buttons for dedicated MMO players.

MOBA suitability was weaker because one reviewer found the heavier clicks worse for spam-click games.

MOBA suitability was positive in limited evidence, with reviewers saying the controls worked well for MOBA play.

Motion consistency was described positively, with reviewers calling motion smooth, sharp, and accurate.

Motion consistency drew strong praise where tested, with reviewers reporting no stutter and true tracking during long use.

Onboard memory was supported by the ability to save multiple profiles, though evidence was more about usefulness than enthusiasm.

Onboard memory was useful for carrying profiles or avoiding software after setup, but one review criticized Logitech's implementation.

Palm grip comfort was limited by one review saying palm-grip players may be better served elsewhere.

Palm grip comfort was favorable, with reviewers saying the shape supports palm grip well.

Polling-rate opinions were mixed: several reviewers felt clear responsiveness gains, while others saw 2,000Hz as fine but not industry-leading.

Polling rate was a limitation in one review because the mouse is capped at 1kHz with no higher-rate dongle option.

Portability was supported by the dongle-storage cover, which one reviewer framed as essential for esports travel.

Portability was positive in limited evidence, with reviewers liking receiver storage and easy bag carry.

Premium feel was positive overall, with reviewers saying the mouse feels sturdy, premium, and high quality.

Premium feel was mostly positive, with reviewers describing premium, stylish, polished qualities, though one said it could feel cheap.

Profile behavior was mixed: app-linked settings were useful, but onboard-profile handling was described as confusing in G Hub.

Profile switching had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer appreciating quick profile cycling in loading screens.

Programmable side buttons were useful to one reviewer for DPI adjustment, especially because the mouse lacks a dedicated DPI button.

Programmable buttons were widely valued for genre flexibility, productivity, and accessible control layouts.

The lack of RGB was generally accepted as a worthwhile tradeoff for battery life, weight, and the mouse’s clean look.

RGB was praised for style, customization, and vivid lighting, but several reviewers noted battery drain or questioned whether the Plus model is worth it for RGB alone.

Scroll wheel feedback was mixed, with some praise for tactility but repeated criticism that it felt stiff, mushy, vague, or less precise.

Scroll wheel quality was the most divisive feature, with some praising versatility and improved stability while others criticized stiffness, noise, wobble, backlash, or cheap feel.

The HERO 2 sensor was widely praised as crisp, precise, fast, and close to flawless, though some reviewers framed the higher specs as incremental.

Sensor feedback was strongly positive; reviewers described the HERO sensor as snappy, smooth, precise, and still among the best they had used.

Shape comfort was broadly praised as safe, familiar, and very comfortable, though a few reviewers disliked the rounded shape personally.

Shape comfort was broadly positive, especially for larger hands and G502 fans, though a few reviewers found it cramped or size-dependent.

Side button quality was the most contested control area, ranging from well-placed and improved to repeatedly described as mushy.

Side button feedback was mixed: some reviewers liked the improved shapes and placement, while many complained about accidental presses or squeaks.

Skate durability was a repeated concern, with reviewers calling the PTFE feet thin, meh, or unlikely to last long.

Software stability had limited but positive evidence from one review calling the G Hub interface stable.

Software stability had one negative report involving an apparent DPI-setting loop.

Software usability was split sharply: some reviewers found G Hub easy and powerful, while others called it unintuitive or frustrating.

Software usability split reviewers: some found G Hub easy or intuitive, while others called button programming complicated or the software poor.

Surface compatibility was mixed, with good results across many surfaces but complaints on softer pads and warnings to tune surface modes.

Surface compatibility evidence was positive, with reviewers noting smooth glide or hiccup-free performance across surfaces and environments.

Switch durability evidence centered on optical-switch reliability and reduced double-click concerns, with reviewers treating it as a meaningful benefit.

Switch durability had limited evidence, but one reviewer reported no double-click issues during their testing period.

Switch feel split reviewers: many loved the crisp, tactile Lightforce feel, while others found the clicks heavier or too tactile.

Switch feel was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly praising crisp, tactile, clicky, premium-feeling hybrid switches.

Tilt controls were criticized because side-scrolling could require extra force or cause accidental scroll-wheel side inputs.

Value was mixed: reviewers praised the performance tier but often questioned the price and upgrade value from the original Superlight.

Value for money was the biggest broad concern, with many reviewers calling the mouse expensive or questioning the Plus price premium.

Reviewers strongly praised the low weight, calling it excellent, effortless, and well balanced for the mouse size.

Weight opinions were mixed: some appreciated the lighter G502 refresh or balanced heft, while competitive-focused reviewers still found it heavy.

Weight tuning was weakly received because the swappable cover options were seen as features most people would not find useful.

Weight tuning was consistently viewed as a downgrade because the older adjustable weight system is gone.

Wireless latency was praised directly, with reviewers reporting no latency issues or seemingly no latency at all.

Wireless latency was strongly praised overall, though one review noted the 1kHz limit can feel subtly behind higher-polling mice in elite play.

Wireless performance was praised as seamless and flawless, with no cable-related compromise in use.

Wireless performance was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly describing it as excellent, stable, responsive, or effectively wired-like.