Average score
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.2
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.1
onboard memory
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.4
Onboard memory was useful for profile storage and for reducing dependence on Synapse after setup.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
1.5
Onboard memory was criticized because profiles, macros, and RGB suites could not be fully carried between PCs.
cross-platform compatibility
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
2.2
Cross-platform support was a weakness for Linux users because Synapse is not officially available there.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
5.0
Cross-platform compatibility was praised by one reviewer because the software works on Windows and macOS.
dock compatibility
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.0
Dock support was praised for convenience and higher polling, but reviewers often noted extra cost or availability issues.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
2.0
Dock compatibility was weakly supported by complaints about the dongle/stand situation rather than praise for a dock setup.
weight
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
2.7
Weight was the biggest tradeoff: some liked the controlled heft, but many found it heavy for fast competitive play.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.7
Weight was the clearest strength, repeatedly praised as unusually light for a wireless MMO/MOBA mouse with so many buttons.
software stability
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.4
Software stability was mostly improved or reliable, though Synapse still drew occasional criticism.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
2.4
Software stability was a concern, with battery reporting, sleep behavior, disconnects, and profile switching called unreliable by some.
tilt gesture controls
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7
Tilt controls were useful for horizontal scrolling, extra inputs, lean functions, and productivity workflows.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.3
Tilt gesture controls were mixed: some reviewers liked the extra inputs, while others found the wheel too low or hard to use.
surface compatibility
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.9
Surface compatibility was strong on pads and even glass in some tests, but harder or shiny surfaces created caveats.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
5.0
Surface compatibility was excellent where tested, with strong performance on desks, multiple pads, and varied surfaces.
polling rate
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.8
Polling rate feedback was mixed: high rates were valued, but accessories and battery penalties limited their practical appeal.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.8
The 1000Hz polling-rate implementation was described as flawless or issue-free by the reviewers who discussed it.
claw grip comfort
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.2
Claw grip worked for some reviewers but was less comfortable for others because of the weight and shape.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
2.2
Claw grip comfort was a recurring weakness because the top holes, size, and side-button cluster made claw use awkward for several reviewers.
click latency
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.9
Latency-related feedback was strong, with reviewers praising fast response, low latency, and near-zero debounce delay.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.0
Click latency was mostly praised for quick actuation and minimal travel, with one review criticizing post-travel in the main clicks.
side button quality
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.4
Side buttons were generally praised for placement, tactility, and accessibility without many accidental presses.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.6
Side button quality was the most divided attribute: some found the grid tactile and easy, while others found it cramped, stiff, or hard to distinguish.
cable flexibility
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.3
Cable feedback was mixed: one review found it stiff, another praised it as lightweight and smooth, and another found it slightly stiff.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.2
Cable flexibility and charging cable quality were positively mentioned, especially the detachable, fast-charge, and ultraflex cable setup.
profile switching
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.8
Profile switching was useful where reviewers could store or cycle profiles without constantly returning to Synapse.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.9
Profile switching was mixed: some found setup and switching simple, while one productivity-focused review found switching unresponsive.
handedness options
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
2.3
Handedness was a clear limitation because reviewers repeatedly described it as right-handed only.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
1.5
Handedness options were criticized because the side-button grid makes the mouse poor for left-handers or ambidextrous use.
grip texture
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6
Grip texture was consistently praised for control, fingerprint resistance, and rubberized side support.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.8
Grip texture was mixed, with some comfort and sweat-control praise offset by a complaint that the plastic could be grippier.
Bluetooth support
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5
Bluetooth was valued for work, travel, and multi-device flexibility, though not always ideal for esports latency.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.8
Bluetooth support was useful for travel and secondary devices, but reviewers also noted latency and configuration limitations.
portability
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.0
Portability was acceptable for multi-PC or Bluetooth use, but weight made it less ideal as a travel-first mouse.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.7
Portability was praised through low weight, Bluetooth travel use, and dongle-free convenience.
DPI range
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.5
The 35K DPI ceiling was viewed as technically impressive but often overkill or not worth paying extra for.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.1
DPI/CPI range was viewed as more than enough for most gamers, with some caveats that rivals offer higher maximum specs.
fingertip grip comfort
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.1
Fingertip comfort was mixed to weak because the mouse is heavy and shaped more for palm or claw grips.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
2.5
Fingertip grip comfort was mostly weak except for one palm-or-fingertip-friendly review; larger size and side buttons limited fingertip use.
acceleration control
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
5.0
Evidence was positive where reviewers tested unwanted acceleration or jitter control, with one review reporting clean acceleration behavior.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.5
Acceleration control was praised when tested or configurable, including one review that found no unwanted acceleration.
materials quality
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.8
Materials were viewed as premium, grippy, and visually polished, especially on the Phantom White version.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.3
Materials quality was viewed positively, especially the hard plastic texture, despite one review only moderately praising the ABS feel.
ecosystem integration
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5
Razer ecosystem integration was liked for Chroma synchronization and multi-device setup polish.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.0
Ecosystem integration had limited support, mainly from RGB synchronization with other SteelSeries peripherals.
2.4GHz connectivity
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6
Reviewers liked the included HyperSpeed or 2.4GHz path for low-latency wireless use, with multi-device dongle convenience also mentioned.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.1
2.4GHz connectivity was generally viewed as the best gaming connection, though USB-C dongle ergonomics drew some caveats.
long-session comfort
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7
Long-session comfort was repeatedly praised thanks to the thumb rest, ergonomic shape, and reduced hand strain.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.3
Long-session comfort was mostly strong due to light weight and palm support, though holes and grip caution hurt some users.
build quality
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.8
Build quality was repeatedly praised as solid, tank-like, or nearly flawless.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.4
Build quality was mostly strong, with sturdy shell praise, though one review called the build hit-and-miss around the triggers.
scroll wheel quality
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.3
The scroll wheel was a standout feature, though Smart-Reel behavior and occasional noise or responsiveness quirks created mixed notes.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.9
Scroll wheel quality was mostly solid, with praise for steps and smoothness, but some criticism of low positioning and tilt access.
battery life
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.4
Battery life was a consistent strength, but RGB and high polling rates could reduce endurance substantially.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.0
Battery life was mixed: reviewers praised long claims and real endurance, but RGB and 2.4GHz use reduced runtime substantially for some.
click noise
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.4
Click noise was mixed, with some reviewers calling it quiet and others noting sharper or louder clicks.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.0
Click noise was lightly praised in one review where audible clicks helped confirm registered button presses.
charging convenience
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.2
Charging convenience ranged from excellent with the dock to frustrating when relying on quick wired top-ups.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Charging convenience was a strength, with reviewers praising fast charging, quick top-ups, and easy cable access.
FPS gaming suitability
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.0
FPS suitability was mixed: the sensor could keep up, but the weight reduced flick speed and competitive agility.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.4
FPS gaming suitability was mixed: some reviewers liked it in shooters, while others found the MMO grid or grip demands unsuitable.
programmable buttons
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5
Programmable buttons were a major advantage, providing enough controls for productivity, MMOs, MOBAs, and general gaming.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.8
Programmable-button coverage was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly valuing the 18-button layout.
palm grip comfort
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.9
Palm grip comfort was one of the strongest fit cases, with several reviewers saying the shape felt fantastic or exceptionally comfortable.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Palm grip comfort was a clear strength, with several reviewers calling it comfortable, stable, and well-suited to long use.
macro support
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.9
Macro support was a strength through Synapse, HyperShift, and extra programmable controls.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Macro support was a strong positive for games and productivity, though one reviewer complained about limited Windows shortcut handling.
MOBA gaming suitability
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.8
MOBA suitability was positive where reviewers cited extra buttons, reliable commands, and precise tracking.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.5
MOBA gaming suitability was strongly positive overall, with reviewers emphasizing button access and genre-focused customization.
RGB features
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.3
RGB was usually praised for underglow and zone effects, though some noted hand coverage and battery drain.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.1
RGB was generally praised for brightness, zones, and visual appeal, but several reviewers questioned the battery-life tradeoff.
connection stability
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.2
Connectivity was mostly stable, though one review had temporary dropouts until relocating the dongle.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.0
Connection stability was generally positive, but one reviewer reported random disconnects that significantly hurt reliability.
left and right click quality
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.0
Main click quality was mostly good but mixed by one reviewer who found the clicks somewhat squishy or easy to mispress.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.2
Left and right click quality was generally praised, though one reviewer found some crunchiness in the primary click movement.
ergonomic design
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.8
Ergonomics were one of the strongest themes, especially for right-handed users and palm-focused comfort.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Ergonomic design was praised for comfort, hand support, and a relaxed shape, though one reviewer needed adjustment to the length.
wireless performance
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5
Wireless performance was generally strong, with rock-solid HyperSpeed and reliable 2.4GHz performance in most reviews.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Wireless performance was usually praised as reliable, responsive, or excellent, with only scattered software-related caveats.
button responsiveness
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5
Button responsiveness was consistently positive, with clean actuation, clear pressure points, and minimal response delay.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Button responsiveness was usually strong across main and side inputs, though some reviews focused more on accidental-click prevention than speed.
sensor performance
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7
Sensor performance was one of the highest-scoring areas, with reviewers praising accuracy, flawless tracking, and high-end specs.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Sensor performance was widely praised as fast and reliable, though one review noted the CPI ceiling is not class-leading.
button customization
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6
Customization was a major strength, with extensive remapping, HyperShift, and button control through Synapse.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.8
Button customization was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers praising remapping, flexible profiles, and broad control options.
premium feel
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6
Premium feel was strong, with reviewers praising the look, hardware polish, and feature-packed construction.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.8
Premium feel was repeatedly positive, with reviewers describing the mouse as premium, unique, and satisfying overall.
value for money
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
3.1
Value was the most common concern because the mouse is expensive and often only a modest upgrade over cheaper predecessors.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.2
Value for money was mixed: supporters justified the premium through weight and features, while critics called the price too high.
glide smoothness
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.7
Glide was usually praised as smooth or buttery, though surface choice affected the feel.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.7
Glide smoothness was strongly praised across reviews, with PTFE skates repeatedly described as smooth, low-drag, or dreamlike.
Accuracy and tracking precision
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.6
Most reviewers praised precision and tracking, though one noted slight jitter at very high DPI settings.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Reviewers generally found tracking precise, with praise for accurate target selection, Photoshop-style control, and clean cursor placement.
MMO gaming suitability
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.2
MMO suitability was generally positive because of extra buttons and macros, but it was not seen as a full dedicated MMO mouse.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.3
MMO gaming suitability was broadly strong but not unanimous because side-button usability and learning curve divided reviewers.
balance and weight distribution
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.2
Balance was generally viewed as controlled and stable, though one reviewer found the mouse somewhat front-heavy.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.3
Balance was described positively, with reviewers noting it avoided pulling to one side and felt stable.
software usability
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.1
Software usability was powerful but mixed: reviewers liked the depth of controls, while some found Synapse annoying or overwhelming.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.1
Software usability was polarized but leaned positive: many praised customization ease, while several disliked bloat or dongle-only limitations.
switch feel
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5
Switch feel was broadly positive, described as snappy, tactile, clean, or satisfying.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.5
Switch feel was consistently positive, with reviewers calling the clicks sharp, soft-clicky, crispy, tactile, or satisfying.
shape comfort
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.2
Shape comfort was mostly positive for ergonomic use, though some reviewers found it too thin or grip-specific.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.2
Shape comfort was mostly positive for larger or palm-oriented hands, with reservations about fatigue, size, or mixed grip support.
wireless latency
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
4.5
Wireless latency was praised as effectively indistinguishable from wired by one reviewer and low-latency through HyperSpeed by another.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.5
Wireless latency was mostly praised, especially over 2.4GHz, while Bluetooth was treated as less suitable for serious gaming.
motion consistency
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
5.0
Motion consistency was highly praised, with reviewers describing consistent tracking and precise input translation.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
5.0
Motion consistency received strong support where tested, with the sensor described as free of unwanted acceleration or hiccups.
durability over time
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35KNo score yet
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.0
Durability over time had limited but positive support from expected multi-year click durability.
firmware reliability
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35KNo score yet
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
2.0
Firmware reliability was criticized by one reviewer who could not update firmware on an older USB-C-limited desktop setup.
lift-off distance
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35K
5.0
Lift-off distance control received strong marks where reviewers evaluated its adjustability and consistency across surfaces.
SteelSeries Aerox 9 WirelessNo score yet
switch durability
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35KNo score yet
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.5
Switch durability was supported by one review that tied the 80-million-click rating to expected years of use.
water and dust resistance
Razer Basilisk V3 Pro 35KNo score yet
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.1
Water and dust resistance was mostly reassuring, though one owner still worried the open casing would attract dust.