Compare De’Longhi Rivelia Automatic Espresso Machine vs OXO Brew 9 Cup Coffee Maker

Reviews highlight a generous box: the second bean hopper for swapping beans/decaf is a standout, and several sources mention a milk container, water filter, and descaler being included.

Included extras are modest but useful: reviewers commonly mention an included measuring scoop, some paper filters, and a manual, with few or no additional accessories.

Most claims around precision-style brewing, convenience features, and heat retention are supported by hands-on testing, but ultra-strong claims like perfect results for everyone depend heavily on dialing in ratio and taste preference.

Several reviews note there is no finicky app required and everything runs from the touchscreen. That is great for simplicity, but it also means phone-based control is not the focus.

Setup is repeatedly described as guided and quick, with the touchscreen walking through basics like language and water hardness. Physical ergonomics (weight, no handles, screen angle) are the main setup-related gripes.

Setup is generally quick: wash removable parts, run a water-only cycle, set the clock, and brew. The main friction point is learning the dial-and-button interface for auto-brew programming the first time.

Automation is a core strength: Bean Adapt-style guidance, user profiles, and prompts that steer grind/temperature and maintenance. Some reviews also mention the machine surfacing different drink options by time of day or remembering prior tweaks (like extra shots).

A standout strength: auto-brew scheduling, automatic bloom or pre-infusion behavior, batch-size logic (2-4 vs 5-9), pause-and-pour with carafe detection, no-water warnings, freshness timer, and descale reminders are repeatedly praised.

Across reviews, drinks come out consistently smooth with dependable crema, and the guided dialing-in helps repeatability. A few reviewers note you can still over-extract or need a couple of tries to land the ideal grind for a specific bean.

Across sources, it produces consistently strong drip coffee with generally even saturation and good temperature management. A common nuance is that top-tier competitors may produce more complexity, and small batches can be less impressive than the best single-serve-focused designs.

Build impressions are mixed: multiple reviewers call out a lot of plastic and at least one found parts (like the carafe) flimsy. On the upside, long-term use reports describe steady, reliable output over months.

Build quality is often described as premium and well-made, including long-term owner reports of solid performance years later. Some note cosmetic annoyances like fingerprints on stainless surfaces.

Cable routing options help placement in different layouts, though at least one owner notes the cord can feel short depending on outlet location.

Capacity is compact-friendly but not huge: multiple sources cite a 1.4L water tank, two 250g/8.8oz bean hoppers, and a grounds bin that fills around every 10 coffees. Heavy black-coffee households may refill the tank more often.

Nominal 9-cup capacity is commonly framed as around 45 ounces of brewed coffee, which aligns more with about 4 to 5 large mugs. Reviews also highlight workable brewing from roughly 2 cups up through a full carafe.

Cup and tray handling is generally practical, with adjustable outlets and cited cup clearance around 13.5-14 cm. Some reviewers want a deeper drip tray or note you need to be mindful of the grounds container to avoid spills.

Thermal carafe heat retention and generally clean pouring are frequent positives. Common drawbacks include a narrow opening that complicates hand-cleaning and mixed experiences with the final pour or occasional splashing depending on technique and lid design.

Design is widely praised as slim, modern, and space-aware (and it is associated with design awards). The side-mounted tank and clean layout help usability, but it can still feel deep/heavy on the counter and the top-mounted screen angle is not ideal for everyone.

Aesthetics are widely praised as sleek and modern with a simple dial control, but usability is impacted by size: it can feel wide or tall and may require extra headroom to fill the reservoir in tight cabinet setups.

Common annoyances include a small purge/waste when switching hoppers, occasional extra water purges into the tray, and design quirks like screen angle or fiddly milk parts. A few reviews also call out grinder noise and the not-quite-cold-brew style cool drinks.

Recurring pain points: larger or taller footprint, no end-of-brew beep, programming not instantly intuitive, and carafe-lid or mixing-tube drips. A few reports mention dribbling that may resolve with cleaning the stop valve area.

Espresso and milk drinks are broadly rated as rich and satisfying, with repeated praise for crema and chocolatey notes. The main caveat is nuance: some reviewers say it cannot match the depth of a manual portafilter shot, and default strength can lean mild unless adjusted.

Water filtration is supported and discussed in reviews, including setting water hardness and replacing filters on a regular schedule (often every 2-3 months) to reduce scale and keep taste consistent.

It uses #4 cone paper filters and a cone basket. Some reviewers like the cone approach for smaller batches, while comparisons note flat-bed designs can be more consistently bold across batch sizes.

The grinder and hopper system is a headline feature: interchangeable dual hoppers make regular/decaf switching simple, and reviewers mention 13-14 grind settings plus on-screen guidance. Tradeoffs include residual beans in the grinder (sometimes requiring a purge) and occasional complaints about grinder noise.

Heating is strong for coffee, with multiple sources praising drink temperatures in general. The recurring limitation is milk (often around 60C) and hot water for tea (one review cites about 80C), so people who want extra-hot beverages may prefer a manual steam wand.

Power and heat performance are generally strong, with multiple measurements indicating hot water delivery in the proper brewing range, though some lab testing reports average brew temperatures that can run slightly below ideal depending on method and batch size.

Iced and cool options get mixed reviews: some are impressed by the cold/iced modes when poured over ice, while others say it is not true cold brew and tastes best with added ice. Several sources point to an optional cold-foam accessory that upgrades iced milk drinks.

Used-ground handling is generally easy and tidy, with multiple sources citing a grounds bin capacity around 10 drinks and straightforward emptying. One reviewer warns the grounds container can drop if you do not support it during removal.

Milk performance is a highlight: reviewers frequently describe plush, adjustable foam (sometimes latte-art capable) and like that the milk container stores in the fridge. The main downsides are extra cleaning steps and milk temperature that some find too lukewarm.

Overall, reviews describe a very approachable, one-touch experience with a responsive touchscreen, profiles, and lots of recipes. Satisfaction dips mainly around maintenance for milk drinks, occasional quirks with hopper switching, and price.

Once dialed in, owners and testers frequently describe a low-effort, high-reward routine: prep the night before, wake to coffee, and rely on clear indicators. The biggest user-experience costs are cleaning, counter-space demands, and the initial learning curve for controls and ratio.

Multiple sources frame the Rivelia as a popular, in-demand super-automatic, especially for people who want a compact all-in-one with bean switching.

The model is repeatedly featured as a top pick in major buying guides and review roundups, though comparisons sometimes note the 8-cup sibling enjoys broader popularity for consistency and better small-batch or single-cup behavior.

It avoids a hot plate and instead relies on a thermal carafe to keep coffee hot for hours, reducing risk of scorched flavors. A freshness timer is commonly used as the cue for how recently coffee was brewed.

Only limited evidence appears, but where pressure is mentioned it is framed as a high-pressure, stable super-automatic platform (often quoted at 19 bars), with no widespread complaints about pressure-related inconsistency.

Design recognition comes up repeatedly, with reviewers mentioning major design awards (such as iF and Red Dot) tied to the machine's look and user experience.

SCA or Gold Cup-style certification is repeatedly cited as a key credibility signal, alongside mention of meeting standard safety expectations. Reviewers often treat certification as a shorthand for proper temperature and brew-time behavior.

At least one hands-on review calls out practical storage for the measuring scoop, which helps keep the counter setup tidy.

Speed is repeatedly praised: the machine heats quickly, produces drinks in well under a minute in several accounts, and generally delivers one-touch beverages faster than manual workflows.

Speed is commonly described as fast for a premium brewer: many tests land around 6 to 8 minutes for a full pot, while some real-world demos show closer to about 9 minutes at maximum volume.

Value is debated: some reviewers call it a strong deal for the feature set (especially where pricing is closer to the midrange), while others highlight the premium MSRP (around $1500) and extra-cost add-ons for enhanced cold drinks. Most agree the dual-hopper convenience and milk quality are the key justification.

Pricing is premium for drip, and several reviewers call it expensive. Most still justify the cost when buyers value SCA-style performance plus programmability and a thermal carafe, but it is a tougher sell for budget shoppers or minimal-cleaning priorities.

Warranty details are rarely discussed in depth, but at least one review notes a 1-year warranty, which is standard for the category rather than best-in-class.

Warranty is commonly cited as two years. Some sources highlight a strong service reputation, including responsive help and replacement parts, though it is still shorter than the longest-warranty competitors.

Maintenance is mostly well-supported by on-screen prompts: water hardness testing, periodic descaling, and simple access for routine brew-group rinsing. The recurring negatives are milk-system cleaning (more parts and frequent rinses) and occasional reports of extra rinse water ending up in the drip tray.

Maintenance is usually considered manageable: removable parts are rinsed regularly, a descale reminder appears around every 90 cycles, and the cycle itself is largely guided. The most consistent complaint is that the thermal carafe often needs a bottle brush and careful lid cleaning.