Compare Glorious Model D3 vs Cherry M64 Pro

2.4GHz connectivity was positively supported by performance on Windows and a reviewer preference for 2.4 GHz.

The 2.4GHz connection was praised in one review as both fast and reliable.

Reviewers consistently found tracking accurate and precise, with only minor wireless consistency caveats elsewhere.

Reviewers praised tracking precision for smooth response, aim adjustments, and accurate shots, with one M64 user calling the experience very good.

Balance drew mixed feedback: one review barely noticed any difference, while another felt rear battery weight.

Balance and weight distribution drew positive comments, with reviewers describing the build as well balanced or having good weight balance.

Battery life was mixed: some praised runtime, while others found high-polling or feature-heavy use below expectations.

Battery life was mixed: several reviews found it strong or good, while IGN said peak-performance use drained it unpredictably.

Bluetooth support was positively supported by one reviewer using Bluetooth on Mac for work.

Build quality was mostly praised as high quality, though one review found some side flex.

Build quality was generally solid, with many reviewers reporting sturdy shells and no creaking, though some found flexing or minor creaks.

Button customization was a clear strength, with reviewers praising flexible keybinds and dock controls.

Button customization was limited in the one scored review, which said the mouse restricts customization.

Button responsiveness was praised for direct, accurate inputs and consistent main clicks.

Button responsiveness was mostly reliable, with reviewers saying buttons were fine in game, avoided misclicks, and never misbehaved.

Cable flexibility itself was generally liked, but flexible cables did not fully solve the awkward side-charging experience.

Charging convenience was a standout because the hot-swap battery system reduced cable interruptions, with minor one-handed and clutter caveats.

Charging convenience was the most common drawback, with quick charging and flexible cables offset by an awkward side port.

Claw grip comfort was supported by one review that found the D3 suitable for claw-style use.

Claw grip comfort was generally strong thanks to the low button height, but large-hand users may still feel cramped.

Click noise was split, with one reviewer calling the mouse very quiet and another saying the switches were not especially quiet.

Click noise was acceptable to mixed, ranging from loud in one review to balanced or mellow in others.

Connection stability was mostly strong, especially during battery swaps, though one review reported occasional switching failure.

Connection stability was strong in the scored reviews, with no hiccups, no stuttering, and no reliability problems called out.

Cross-platform compatibility was mixed: hardware use across Mac and Windows was positive, but software was Windows-only.

Debounce customization was praised as a useful tuning option for competitive players.

Debounce customization received negative evidence from one reviewer, who found the lowest debounce setting caused ghost or slam-click behavior.

Dock compatibility was viewed positively because the Guardian/dock system added controls, charging, and integration benefits.

DPI control was viewed positively because reviewers could make fine adjustments and quick in-game changes.

DPI range was mixed: one reviewer found enough presets to settle in, while another criticized the lack of fine granularity.

Durability over time remained uncertain because one reviewer said the repeated battery mechanism would need time to prove itself.

Durability over time was mixed, with one review praising finish wear resistance and another treating click wobble as concerning.

Ergonomics were usually praised as comfortable or top-notch, with one notable complaint about the D3 cut-through gap.

The ergonomic design was usually praised for the thumb groove, low profile, and locked-in feel, but it was less successful for larger hands.

Fingertip grip comfort was supported by one review that found the D3 suitable for fingertip-style use.

Fingertip grip comfort was weak in the available evidence because reviewers found the curvature or wider dimensions awkward for fingertip use.

Firmware reliability had a caveat because one review saw the battery failover problem awaiting a firmware fix.

Firmware reliability had limited positive evidence, with one reviewer calling the dongle and mouse firmware update super easy.

FPS gaming suitability was supported by competitive precision and a reviewer calling it brilliant for gaming.

FPS suitability was generally positive for responsiveness and precision, although one reviewer viewed the M64 shape as better for slower-paced play.

Glide smoothness was consistently praised as effortless, low-friction, and smooth across pads or surfaces.

Glide smoothness was praised, with reviewers describing the M64 as butter smooth and noting excellent glide across surfaces.

Grip texture drew a negative note because the mouse lacked included grips.

Grip texture was mixed: reviewers liked the grippy or smooth finish, while one criticized the black coating as a fingerprint magnet.

Left and right click quality was viewed as consistent and quality-feeling.

Left and right click quality was mixed because reviewers noted wobble or a stiff right button despite otherwise usable performance.

Lift-off distance earned positive mention as part of the useful competitive tuning options.

Lift-off distance had limited mixed evidence, with one reviewer needing to switch to 2 mm when using hard surfaces.

Long-session comfort was praised through longer-session ergonomics and fatigue reduction from the lightweight body.

Long-session comfort had limited but strong evidence, with one reviewer reporting no hand fatigue after long gaming sessions.

Macro support was positively noted through the dock’s ability to execute macros.

Materials quality was mixed: reviewers liked the matte modern surface but one described it as standard plastic.

Materials quality was mixed, balancing praise for a non-hollow shell and durable finish against complaints about cheap feel and fingerprint-prone coating.

Motion consistency was mostly strong, but one review noted slight fluctuations under certain wireless conditions.

Motion consistency was a strength, with reviewers describing smooth response, consistent tracking, and no wireless tracking problems.

Onboard memory was supported by saved programmable profiles that could be quickly loaded by game or preference.

Palm grip comfort was split, with one reviewer calling the gap annoying and another finding the grip styles suitable.

Palm grip comfort depended on hand size, with some reviewers able to palm it comfortably while IGN found it cramped for large hands.

Polling-rate support was useful and flexible, though 8K polling was criticized for draining battery quickly.

The polling rate was generally seen as responsive and smooth, though IGN found the jump beyond 1000Hz hard to notice and tied it to battery drain.

Premium feel was supported by high-end presentation and modern, high-quality finish comments.

Premium feel was mixed: some impressions found it solid and distinctive, while IGN said the ultralight design felt a little cheap.

Profile switching was treated as useful because saved profiles could be quickly loaded for different games or preferences.

Profile and setting switching was divisive: on-device presets can be quick, but bottom controls and indicator-light workflows were tedious or problematic.

Programmable button support was seen as useful across the mouse and dock, with freely assignable controls.

RGB opinions were mixed to negative: customization was broad, but color quality, styling, and hand-feel tradeoffs drew criticism.

Scroll wheel feedback was mixed: some praised it as quiet or nice, while others found resistance, softness, or tactility lacking.

Scroll wheel quality was well received for tactile steps, satisfying use, granular control, and easy movement.

Sensor performance was praised for precision, speed, and dependable tracking in practical gaming use.

Sensor performance was consistently positive, with reviewers reporting good tracking, no hiccups, and reliable behavior even on less-than-ideal surfaces.

Shape comfort was polarizing: several reviewers found the D3 very comfortable, while one strongly disliked the palm-gap feel.

Shape comfort was mostly praised for a natural, distinctive M64 feel, though reviewers also framed it as a less-safe shape for some users.

Side buttons were generally accessible and comfortable, though one reviewer wanted larger D3 side buttons.

Side button quality split reviewers: some complained about reach, mushiness, or pre-travel, while others praised the thumb buttons as dependable or exceptional.

Software usability was broadly praised for being clean, intuitive, simple, and informative, with one battery-percentage criticism.

Software usability was polarizing: no-software plug-and-play appealed to some, while others found manual button combinations annoying or tedious.

Surface compatibility was praised through smooth movement on varied mouse pads and desk surfaces.

Surface compatibility was positive in the scored review, which found the sensor performed well on plastic and wood surfaces.

Switch durability was supported by the reviewer’s positive durability wording around the optical switch design.

Switch feel was described as making a decent quality impression.

Switch feel was mostly praised as amazing, fast, snappy, and satisfying, though one early hands-on impression was more reserved.

Value for money was mixed: reviewers liked the innovation and performance but repeatedly noted the high price or buyer-specific appeal.

Value for money was highly mixed, with praise from some reviewers but repeated concerns about the 8K upcharge and $139 competition.

Weight was mostly praised as light or a sweet spot, though one reviewer felt it was not exceptionally light.

Weight was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling the mouse very light, impressively lightweight, or easy to maneuver.

Wireless latency was praised, with reviewers reporting no lag, no hiccups, or no detectable wired-versus-wireless difference.

Wireless latency was praised, with reviewers reporting no lag, no delays, and no wireless-experience issues.

Wireless performance was strongly positive overall, with reviewers reporting smooth everyday and gaming use.

Wireless performance was a major strength, with reviewers reporting top-notch, smooth, responsive, and issue-free wireless use.