Cherry M64 Pro

Cherry M64 Pro Gaming Mouse Review

Brand: Cherry
Released: August 2, 2024
Updated: 2 months ago
4.0
Overall review score
175
Review evidence points
41
Scored features
9
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Cherry M64 Pro if you want a light, plug-and-play wireless mouse with a distinctive ergonomic shape. Skip it if you need software control, granular DPI, easy wired charging, or the best value at $139.

Best for

Best for gamers who want a very light, plug-and-play wireless mouse with a distinctive ergonomic M64 shape and strong tracking. It suits palm or claw users who value fast wireless performance over deep software control.

Not for

Not ideal for users who need granular DPI/software customization, frequently play while charging, prefer fingertip grip, or have large hands that are easily cramped. Value-focused buyers may prefer the cheaper standard version.

Verdict

The Cherry M64 Pro lands as a lightweight, performance-first wireless mouse with a shape reviewers found distinctive and often comfortable. Its best evidence centers on low weight, strong sensor tracking, stable wireless performance, smooth glide, and an ergonomic feel that can lock the hand in well for palm or claw styles. The tradeoff is that Cherry’s no-software approach keeps setup simple but makes detailed adjustments tedious, while the side-mounted charging port repeatedly drew complaints. Value is also contested: some reviewers considered the performance worth it, but others saw the 8K upcharge and $139 price as difficult against strong competitors.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

41 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    13 (32%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    18 (44%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    9 (22%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)

Pros

  • 4.6
    8 reviews strong consensus
    weight: 4.6, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Weight was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling the mouse very light, impressively lightweight, or easy to maneuver.
  • 4.5
    7 reviews strong consensus
    sensor performance: 4.5, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Sensor performance was consistently positive, with reviewers reporting good tracking, no hiccups, and reliable behavior even on less-than-ideal surfaces.
  • 4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    wireless performance: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Wireless performance was a major strength, with reviewers reporting top-notch, smooth, responsive, and issue-free wireless use.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Accuracy and tracking precision: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers praised tracking precision for smooth response, aim adjustments, and accurate shots, with one M64 user calling the experience very good.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    shape comfort: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Shape comfort was mostly praised for a natural, distinctive M64 feel, though reviewers also framed it as a less-safe shape for some users.
  • 4.3
    9 reviews strong consensus
    build quality: 4.3, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality was generally solid, with many reviewers reporting sturdy shells and no creaking, though some found flexing or minor creaks.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    FPS gaming suitability: 4.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    FPS suitability was generally positive for responsiveness and precision, although one reviewer viewed the M64 shape as better for slower-paced play.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    switch feel: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Switch feel was mostly praised as amazing, fast, snappy, and satisfying, though one early hands-on impression was more reserved.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    motion consistency: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Motion consistency was a strength, with reviewers describing smooth response, consistent tracking, and no wireless tracking problems.
  • 4.1
    7 reviews strong consensus
    ergonomic design: 4.1, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The ergonomic design was usually praised for the thumb groove, low profile, and locked-in feel, but it was less successful for larger hands.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    button responsiveness: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Button responsiveness was mostly reliable, with reviewers saying buttons were fine in game, avoided misclicks, and never misbehaved.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    connection stability: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Connection stability was strong in the scored reviews, with no hiccups, no stuttering, and no reliability problems called out.

Cons

  • 2.0
    1 review
    debounce customization: 2.0, 1 review
    Debounce customization received negative evidence from one reviewer, who found the lowest debounce setting caused ghost or slam-click behavior.
  • 2.7
    7 reviews low consensus
    charging convenience: 2.7, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Charging convenience was the most common drawback, with quick charging and flexible cables offset by an awkward side port.
  • 2.7
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    profile switching: 2.7, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Profile and setting switching was divisive: on-device presets can be quick, but bottom controls and indicator-light workflows were tedious or problematic.
  • 2.7
    2 reviews limited evidence
    fingertip grip comfort: 2.7, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Fingertip grip comfort was weak in the available evidence because reviewers found the curvature or wider dimensions awkward for fingertip use.
  • 2.9
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    software usability: 2.9, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Software usability was polarizing: no-software plug-and-play appealed to some, while others found manual button combinations annoying or tedious.
  • 2.8
    1 review
    button customization: 2.8, 1 review
    Button customization was limited in the one scored review, which said the mouse restricts customization.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Gaming Mice, this product is above average in firmware reliability, weight, balance and weight distribution, near average in shape comfort, palm grip comfort, below average in debounce customization, button customization, charging convenience.

Comparison summary

41 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    8 (20%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    20 (49%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    13 (32%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
debounce customization 2.0 3.8 -1.8
firmware reliability 4.5 2.7 +1.8
button customization 2.8 4.3 -1.5
charging convenience 2.7 4.0 -1.3
DPI range 3.0 4.2 -1.2
profile switching 2.7 3.8 -1.1
software usability 2.9 3.9 -1.0
fingertip grip comfort 2.7 3.7 -1.1

Consider This Instead

If you want better debounce customization

Choose Glorious Model D3. It scores 4.8 vs 2.0 for debounce customization, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

If you want better build quality

Choose Endgame Gear OP1we. It scores 4.6 vs 4.3 for build quality, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

If you want better claw grip comfort

Choose Endgame Gear XM2we. It scores 4.9 vs 3.8 for claw grip comfort, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

M4

  • Worse: thumb curvature The reviewer preferred the M64's less aggressive curve over the older M4 shape.
  • Worse: shape and grip comfort The reviewer preferred the M64 over the M4 because the updated shape felt better to grip.

FAQ

Is the Cherry M64 Pro comfortable?

Most reviewers found the M64 Pro comfortable, especially because of its low-profile ergonomic shape and thumb groove. Large-hand users may find palm and claw grips cramped.

Does the M64 Pro have noticeable wireless lag?

The review evidence is strongly positive on wireless feel. Reviewers reported no lag, no latency, no hiccups, and generally smooth wireless performance.

Is the 8K polling rate worth it?

Opinions are mixed. One reviewer found the 8K polling rate noticeably responsive, while IGN said higher-than-1000Hz polling was hard to perceive and mainly affected battery drain.

How is the charging setup?

Charging is quick in the positive reviews, but the side-mounted USB-C port is a recurring complaint. Several reviewers found it awkward or unpleasant when using the mouse wired.

Does the M64 Pro use software?

No. Reviewers described it as plug-and-play with on-mouse controls, which some liked for simplicity, but others found the manual button combinations tedious.

How are the side buttons?

Side button feedback is mixed. Some reviewers praised the large, crisp thumb buttons, while others found the M64 side buttons mushy, pre-traveled, or harder to reach.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Gaming Mice to Consider

#1 ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Choose the ROG Harpe II Ace for ultralight FPS play, precise tracking, smooth glide, and web-based tuning. Skip it if you need palm-grip support, MMO buttons, onboard profiles, or long...

Pros: acceleration control, wireless latency

Cons: onboard memory, MMO gaming suitability

#2 Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.4

Choose it if you want a premium MMO/productivity mouse with 12 adjustable side buttons, strong battery life, and Stream Deck integration. Skip it if you need an ultralight FPS mouse,...

Pros: click latency, macro support

Cons: firmware reliability, tilt gesture controls

#3 Razer Viper V4 Pro
4.4

Best for ultra-light, competition-focused speed, precise tracking, stable wireless, and long battery life. Skip it if you need quieter clicks, left-handed support, Bluetooth, more buttons, or better value for casual...

Pros: balance and weight distribution, build quality

Cons: dock compatibility, Bluetooth support

#4 MSI Versa 300 Wireless 8K
4.4

Best for precise wireless tracking, smooth glide, strong battery life, and unusually good 8K value. Skip it if you need polished software, quiet snappy clicks, true left-handed controls, or gentle...

Pros: Accuracy and tracking precision, click latency

Cons: software stability, profile switching