Compare ASUS ROG Chakram X vs ASUS ROG Keris II Ace

Average score
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.0
Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3
2.4GHz connectivity
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.3

2.4GHz connectivity is broadly documented and repeatedly framed as the main gaming wireless mode alongside USB and Bluetooth.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Reviews that discussed wireless modes consistently describe 2.4GHz connectivity as a core option alongside Bluetooth and wired use. The evidence supports strong coverage for 2.4GHz operation, including receiver storage, tri-mode connectivity, and pairing through the main wireless receiver.

acceleration control
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.3

Reviews support strong acceleration-related performance through 50G acceleration specs and angle compensation or angle snapping features that steady movement.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Sensor acceleration specs were consistently described as high-end, with reviewers citing 50G acceleration alongside 750 IPS speed. The evidence supports strong acceleration capability, though it is presented as sensor performance rather than a separate user-facing tuning feature.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.6

The mouse is repeatedly credited with accurate, precise tracking, including high sensitivity, angle-snapping accuracy, and strong aim tracking in games.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Tracking precision was repeatedly praised. Reviewers described near-perfect accuracy, high precision, accurate tracking, and jitter-free performance, with only one review noting high-DPI irregularity at extreme settings.

balance and weight distribution
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.3

Balance and weight distribution are better than the raw weight suggests, with reviews noting a low center of gravity, stable glide, and nicely balanced feel.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Most reviewers who discussed balance found the mouse light and well balanced. One teardown-style review noted a slightly forward balance point, but the broader evidence describes the mouse as comfortable to move without obvious front or rear weight bias.

battery life
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.4

Battery life is a strong point, with multiple reviews citing phenomenal endurance, 150-hour claims, solid real use, or long use between charges.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Battery life is generally strong, with many reviews citing 107 hours at 2.4GHz with lighting off or strong real-world endurance. Higher polling rates and RGB reduce runtime, and one review measured lower Wi-Fi runtime with default lighting.

Bluetooth support
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.0

Bluetooth support is broadly documented as part of the tri-mode connection setup, though reviews often frame it as better for productivity than fast gaming.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Bluetooth support is widely confirmed and treated as a useful convenience feature. Reviews describe Bluetooth pairing, multi-device Bluetooth use, and longer battery life in Bluetooth mode, while noting that it is not the low-latency competitive mode.

build quality
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.2

Build quality is positive overall, with reviewers calling the mouse sturdy, properly built for the price, and solidly constructed.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Build quality is mostly positive, with reviewers describing a sturdy, solid shell and little flex or creaking. A few reviewers found the build merely average or noted minor rattle, so the evidence is strong but not flawless.

button customization
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.6

Button customization is one of the Chakram X's core strengths, covering switch swapping, key binding, button mapping, and broad control customization.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Button customization is well supported through Armoury Crate or onboard controls. Reviewers cite remapping inputs, assigning commands, programmable controls, and hardware-based adjustments for key settings.

button responsiveness
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.1

Basic button response is generally praised, with reviewers calling the clicks responsive, easy, satisfying, or fast, though some note heavier clicks.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Button responsiveness is consistently praised. Reviewers cite snappy registration, lightning-quick actuation, responsive clicks, and short-travel optical buttons that support fast inputs.

cable flexibility
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
3.8

Cable flexibility is mixed: one review found the paracord stiff, while others described the braided or paracord cable as flexible and snag-resistant.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Cable flexibility is a strength overall. Several reviewers praised the paracord as flexible, tangle-free, or drag-reducing, though one reviewer found it long enough but somewhat stiff while charging.

charging convenience
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.4

Charging convenience is strong, with evidence for USB-C charging, quick charging, Qi wireless charging, and charging while playing.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

Charging and setup convenience are mixed. One review says USB-C charging is quick and painless, while another liked the adapter/booster setup but noted the connection stack could feel loose.

claw grip comfort
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
3.9

Claw grip comfort is supported for bigger or medium-to-large hands, though the evidence is less broad than for palm grip.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Claw grip comfort is supported for many hand sizes. Reviews mention all-grip compatibility, relaxed claw comfort, and claw grip usefulness, though one detailed review cautions that fit depends on hand size.

click latency
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.2

Click latency evidence is positive where discussed, with reviews connecting high polling, quick response, and reaction-time-focused clicking to fast inputs.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Click latency is a clear strength. Reviews cite latency reduction from high polling, measured low click latency, no latency issues, and low wireless click latency measurements.

click noise
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.2

Click noise evidence is limited but positive, with one review liking the more subtle or dampened switch sound.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Click noise is mixed but generally acceptable. Some reviews described the switches as quiet or quieter than competitors, while another found the optical clicks loud.

connection stability
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.4

Connection stability evidence is positive where discussed, including low lag, reliable switching between systems, precise normal use, responsive movement, and dongle signal support.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Connection stability is strong across the reviews that tested it. Reviewers mention tri-mode connectivity, no delays, no hiccups, no dropouts, and stable Bluetooth or wireless switching.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.3

Cross-platform compatibility is supported through laptop, desktop, iPad, work-computer, and multi-Bluetooth-device usage.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Cross-device use is supported mainly through Bluetooth and multi-device pairing. Reviewers cite simultaneous pairing with multiple devices, multi-device setup versatility, and the ability to pair up to three devices.

debounce customization
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
2.3

Debounce customization is weak. The available evidence says debounce was 0ms and not adjustable, and another review states there was no debounce setting in the software.

dock compatibility
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.0

Dock compatibility evidence is limited to Balteus Qi RGB mouse pad support for wireless charging.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
No score yet
DPI range
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.7

The DPI range is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly citing 100 to 36,000 DPI or a 36,000 DPI peak and fine sensitivity adjustment.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.9

The DPI range is one of the clearest strengths. Reviewers repeatedly cite 42,000 DPI or CPI and describe it as unusually high, although some note that most users will not need the upper end.

durability over time
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.2

Durability over time is supported mainly through 70-million-click switch claims and replaceable switches that can be swapped when worn.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Durability over time is supported mainly through switch behavior. One review specifically links optical switches to consistent long-term performance and reduced double-click risk.

ecosystem integration
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.3

Ecosystem integration is supported by Aura Sync, Armoury Crate, and ASUS/ROG lighting or accessory integration.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Ecosystem integration is present through Aura Sync and the ROG Omni receiver. Reviewers cite lighting sync with compatible devices and using one receiver for multiple ROG peripherals.

ergonomic design
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
3.3

Ergonomics are divisive, with an ergonomic right-handed shape and good general comfort offset by joystick reach, size, and awkward hand movement.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

The design is clearly ergonomic and right-handed. Reviews describe the curved or ergonomic shape, often tying it to right-handed comfort and ultra-light wireless use.

fingertip grip comfort
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
3.3

Fingertip grip comfort is mixed: the grip style is listed, but one review says the right side gives fingertips little to hold.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.4

Fingertip grip comfort is limited and hand-size dependent. One review says the light weight makes fingertip use possible with grip tape, while another does not recommend fingertip gripping the ergonomic shell.

firmware reliability
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
2.5

Firmware reliability is mixed-to-weak: one review had firmware-related troubleshooting, another was forced to update and restart, while another notes update support.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
No score yet
FPS gaming suitability
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
3.4

FPS suitability is mixed: tracking and polling are praised for shooters, but misclicks, joystick awkwardness, and weight reduce competitive confidence.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

FPS and esports suitability are consistently strong. Reviewers repeatedly frame the mouse around hard-core gameplay, competitive esports, FPS use, high polling, and precision aiming.

glide smoothness
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.4

Glide smoothness is a clear strength, with reviews praising PTFE feet, smooth movement, and consistently smooth gliding.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Glide smoothness is broadly praised. Reviewers cite PTFE feet, smooth glide, controlled movement, and good stock skates, including use on glass in some tests.

grip texture
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
3.9

Grip texture receives positive evidence through side texturing, matte finish, and textured plastic that helps the mouse stay in hand.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.7

Grip texture is the most divisive physical trait. Some reviewers liked the non-slip or textured surface and grip tape, while others found the coating slippery or not secure enough without aftermarket grips.

handedness options
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
2.3

Handedness is a limitation: the mouse is repeatedly described as right-handed or not ambidextrous, making it weaker for left-handed users.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.2

Handedness is limited. Evidence shows the mouse is comfortable for right-handers but not suited for lefties or users wanting an ambidextrous shape.

left and right click quality
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
2.3

Left and right click quality is mixed: the click feel can be crisp, but multiple reviews flag accidental or overly sensitive main-click activation.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Left and right click quality is generally strong, with snappy, tactile, consistent, or solid click feedback across many reviews. Some detailed reviewers still criticized slipperiness or travel on the main buttons.

lift-off distance
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.1

Lift-off distance receives limited but direct support through Armoury Crate settings and adjustable LOD options.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.2

Lift-off distance support is present through software or onboard controls, but not universally flexible. Reviews mention lift-off adjustment, low/high LOD options, and 1mm/2mm LOD limits.

long-session comfort
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
3.7

Long-session comfort is divided: ergonomics can support long gaming sessions, but joystick use and heavier clicks caused discomfort in some reviews.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Long-session comfort is strong where discussed. Reviewers cite no hand pain, low fatigue, and zero strain over prolonged play, helped by the low weight.

macro support
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.5

Macro support is directly supported in reviews that mention assigning keys and macros or remapping macros through software.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Macro support is available through Armoury Crate. Reviews cite macro recording and saved macros in the software workflow.

materials quality
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.2

Materials quality is positive, especially the matte finish and semi-transparent plastic that resists fingerprints or oil buildup.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

Materials quality is generally positive, with evidence for PBT buttons, bio-based nylon, rigid shell feel, and textured surfaces. Some reviewers still found the shell feel less premium than rubberized coatings.

MMO gaming suitability
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.2

MMO suitability is supported mainly by the product's listed MMO game type and many programmable controls.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

MMO suitability is only lightly supported. One review used the mouse in Final Fantasy XIV raids and inventory management, but the review evidence does not present it as a dedicated MMO mouse.

motion consistency
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.4

Motion consistency is supported by angle snapping, angle compensation, and sensor calibration evidence that reviewers said helped steady or tune movement.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.6

Motion consistency is strong in gameplay, with reviewers citing smooth tracking, granular accuracy, and micro-adjustment precision. MotionSync is present but not configurable in one technical review.

onboard memory
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.8

Onboard memory evidence is limited to one review, which says the mouse can store five custom profiles.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Onboard memory/profile support is present, with reviews citing hardware-based profiles, onboard controls, and profile switching without needing to keep the software open.

palm grip comfort
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
3.9

Palm grip comfort is generally supported, especially for smaller hands in one review and bigger-hand palm users in another.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Palm grip comfort is positive but not universal. Reviews describe comfortable palm or relaxed palm use, while hand size and the smaller ergonomic shape affect fit.

polling rate
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.6

Polling-rate coverage is strong, especially wired 8,000 Hz operation, while some reviews also note lower but usable wireless polling rates.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Polling rate is a headline strength across nearly every review. Evidence repeatedly confirms 4,000Hz wireless polling and 8,000Hz wired polling through the included booster.

portability
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.2

Portability is helped by dongle storage, an included pouch or travel bag, and evidence that the mouse can be brought between locations.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Portability is supported through bundled accessories, dongle storage, and multi-device use. Reviewers mention grip tape, extra feet, and using one mouse across multiple devices or on the go.

premium feel
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.4

Premium feel is positive, with reviewers describing a dream-like feel, handsome look, dense feature set, good-looking design, and premium presentation.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Premium feel is present but not unanimous. Some reviewers found the chassis premium and the mouse solid, while others criticized coating and click feel as less premium for the price.

profile switching
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.5

Profile switching is supported by reviews that mention saved profiles, game-to-game navigation, and setting up different profiles.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.1

Profile switching is supported but placement is sometimes criticized. Reviewers cite scenario profiles, saved profiles, and button-combination profile switching, while some dislike the underside DPI/profile control.

programmable buttons
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.6

Programmable controls are a clear strength, with reviews citing 11 programmable buttons, side controls, and software-programmed button assignments.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Programmable button coverage is solid for an esports mouse. Reviews cite five or six programmable buttons and programmable controls including scroll functions.

RGB features
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.2

RGB features are widely covered, including nine-zone lighting, Aura Sync, visible lighting zones, effects, and custom logo or lighting options.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.3

RGB features are modest but useful. Reviews focus on the single scroll-wheel RGB zone, customization, battery notifications, and keeping RGB without losing the low weight.

scroll wheel quality
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.3

The scroll wheel is usually praised for its rubberized coating, grip, satisfying scroll feel, easy click, and useful tactile steps.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.7

Scroll wheel quality is mixed. Some reviewers praised tactile, quiet, or excellent scrolling, while others wanted clearer steps, adjustable resistance, or a more controlled encoder.

sensor performance
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.6

The ROG AimPoint sensor is described as fast, precise, and accurate, with several reviews tying it to strong in-game tracking and overall performance.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Sensor performance is excellent overall. Reviewers cite an accurate high-end sensor, no tracking issue, top-tier performance, glass tracking, and no spinouts or jitter in normal testing.

shape comfort
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
3.9

Shape comfort is mixed but often positive for larger or right-handed users; smaller hands and joystick reach create some comfort complaints.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.4

Shape comfort is a major strength for many reviewers, especially for relaxed claw, palm, and small-to-medium ergonomic preferences. A few reviewers reported hand-size mismatch or cramps.

side button quality
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
2.4

Side button quality is one of the weaker areas, with repeated complaints about tiny, crowded, awkward, far-apart, or accidentally activated side controls.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.1

Side button quality is mixed. Some reviewers loved their placement and crispness, while others found them small, stiff, high, heavy, or less accessible for larger hands.

skate durability
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.1

Skate durability is only moderately supported. One review points to replaceable feet if they wear out, and another describes the stock skates as standard PTFE rather than emphasizing long-term durability.

software stability
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
1.5

Software stability is a major weakness in the negative reviews, including failed device settings, slow loading, and never-ending loading screens.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
2.9

Software stability is a weakness. Reviews describe Armoury Crate as bloated, resource-heavy, and unwieldy, even though some settings can be handled without keeping it open.

software usability
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
3.5

Software usability is mixed: some reviews found Armoury Crate easy or powerful, while others had difficulty accessing settings or disliked the app.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.6

Software usability is mixed. Some reviewers found configuration simple or the lighter Armoury Crate Gear easier, while others called the software slow, terrible, bloated, or in need of improvement.

surface compatibility
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.3

Surface compatibility is supported through manual calibration, preset surfaces, and mouse-pad-specific sensor tuning.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Surface compatibility is very strong. Reviews describe calibration for surfaces, tracking on glass, and reliable tracking across many surfaces or mouse pads.

switch durability
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.5

Switch durability is well supported through hot-swappable switch sockets, 3-pin and 5-pin support, spare switches, and 70-million-click claims.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Switch durability is a clear strength. Multiple reviews cite the ROG Optical Micro Switches and their 100-million-click rating.

switch feel
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.1

Switch feel is mostly positive, with comments about crisp tactility, tailored operating force, muted or dampened sound, and satisfying click feedback.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.0

Switch feel is divisive. Some reviewers praised crisp, consistent, punchy switches, while others described dull, mushy, hollow, or travel-heavy click feel.

value for money
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
2.7

Value for money is mixed-to-negative overall: some call the price high or hard to excuse, while others say the feature set can justify it for the right user.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
3.7

Value is mixed because the performance is high but the price is premium. Several reviewers called it expensive or pricey, while others still found the package justified or worth the money.

weight
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
2.5

Weight is a recurring drawback: reviewers repeatedly cite the 126-127 g range and describe the mouse as heavy, hefty, or middle-of-the-road for weight.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.8

Weight is a standout strength. Reviewers repeatedly cite 54g or about 1.9 ounces and praise the control and low fatigue that come from the ultra-light build.

weight tuning
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
2.8

Weight tuning is mixed and limited: one review wanted interchangeable weights, while another notes the joystick can be removed or changed, but not true weight adjustment.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
No score yet
wireless latency
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.8

Wireless latency evidence is limited but positive, with one review describing higher-DPI and polling-rate use as lightning-fast with very little noticeable lag.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.5

Wireless latency is strong in the 2.4GHz mode. Reviewers cite low-latency wireless, low measured wireless click latency, high-polling responsiveness, and no obvious latency problems.

wireless performance
Product 1: ASUS ROG Chakram X
4.3

Wireless performance is generally strong, with multiple reviews highlighting 2.4GHz wireless, responsive gaming movement, and tri-mode wireless flexibility.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Keris II Ace
4.7

Wireless performance is consistently strong. Reviewers report good wireless connectivity, no drop in tracking, no hiccups, no stutters, and no dropouts during use.