Average score
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.1
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.4
onboard memory
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
1.5
Onboard memory was criticized because profiles, macros, and RGB suites could not be fully carried between PCs.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.8
Onboard memory was praised because saved profiles allow users to keep settings without running iCUE constantly.
switch durability
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.5
Switch durability was supported by one review that tied the 80-million-click rating to expected years of use.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
2.5
Switch durability was only judged through concern rather than failure, with one reviewer worrying about durability despite no misclicks.
tilt gesture controls
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.3
Tilt gesture controls were mixed: some reviewers liked the extra inputs, while others found the wheel too low or hard to use.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
1.5
Tilt-style controls were criticized in the one relevant review, which found the left-clicking wheel input unnatural and not usable.
materials quality
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.3
Materials quality was viewed positively, especially the hard plastic texture, despite one review only moderately praising the ABS feel.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
3.0
Materials quality was mixed: some reviewers liked the control and finish, while others noted slipperiness or concerns about plastic aging.
cable flexibility
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.2
Cable flexibility and charging cable quality were positively mentioned, especially the detachable, fast-charge, and ultraflex cable setup.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
3.0
Cable impressions were mixed: one reviewer found the braided cable stiff, while another described it as a nice long braided cable.
switch feel
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.5
Switch feel was consistently positive, with reviewers calling the clicks sharp, soft-clicky, crispy, tactile, or satisfying.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
3.5
Switch feel was mixed, with some praise for snappy switches but criticism of mushiness or inconsistent sound and feel.
connection stability
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.0
Connection stability was generally positive, but one reviewer reported random disconnects that significantly hurt reliability.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
5.0
Connection stability was praised by reviewers who tried multiple modes, with no lag, dropouts, or mode-specific issues reported.
click latency
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.0
Click latency was mostly praised for quick actuation and minimal travel, with one review criticizing post-travel in the main clicks.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
5.0
Click latency drew strong praise in the one detailed test, where wireless input response was described as having no perceived delay.
click noise
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.0
Click noise was lightly praised in one review where audible clicks helped confirm registered button presses.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
3.0
Click noise was a minor caveat in one review, which found the optical switches somewhat loud.
durability over time
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.0
Durability over time had limited but positive support from expected multi-year click durability.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
3.0
Durability over time was mixed, with early impressions positive but reviewers raising uncertainty about old scroll-wheel issues and plastic wear.
firmware reliability
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
2.0
Firmware reliability was criticized by one reviewer who could not update firmware on an older USB-C-limited desktop setup.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
1.0
Firmware reliability was a notable weakness in the one review that could not complete the final mouse firmware update.
grip texture
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.8
Grip texture was mixed, with some comfort and sweat-control praise offset by a complaint that the plastic could be grippier.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.8
Grip texture was widely praised, especially the rubberized right-side surface and tactile side-button rows that help finger placement.
weight
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.7
Weight was the clearest strength, repeatedly praised as unusually light for a wireless MMO/MOBA mouse with so many buttons.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
3.8
Weight was divisive: several reviewers found it reasonable or well managed for an MMO mouse, while others found it hefty.
profile switching
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.9
Profile switching was mixed: some found setup and switching simple, while one productivity-focused review found switching unresponsive.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.8
Profile switching was praised for onboard profiles, easy game-specific setups, and app or game profile changes.
2.4GHz connectivity
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.1
2.4GHz connectivity was generally viewed as the best gaming connection, though USB-C dongle ergonomics drew some caveats.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
5.0
Reviewers who evaluated 2.4GHz use treated it as the main gaming mode and reported it was reliable or issue-free.
battery life
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.0
Battery life was mixed: reviewers praised long claims and real endurance, but RGB and 2.4GHz use reduced runtime substantially for some.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.8
Battery life was one of the strongest areas overall, with most reviewers praising long runtime; the main caveat was RGB reducing endurance.
long-session comfort
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.3
Long-session comfort was mostly strong due to light weight and palm support, though holes and grip caution hurt some users.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
5.0
Long-session comfort was a strong point for reviewers who fit the shape, with several noting no fatigue or comfortable extended use.
side button quality
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.6
Side button quality was the most divided attribute: some found the grid tactile and easy, while others found it cramped, stiff, or hard to distinguish.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.3
Side button quality was widely praised for tactile actuation, force, placement, and adjustability, with a few concerns about learning curve or jitter.
ecosystem integration
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.0
Ecosystem integration had limited support, mainly from RGB synchronization with other SteelSeries peripherals.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.7
Ecosystem integration was a major highlight, especially around Elgato Stream Deck workflows and Corsair's broader software ecosystem.
value for money
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.2
Value for money was mixed: supporters justified the premium through weight and features, while critics called the price too high.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
3.8
Value was mixed: reviewers saw the price as high for casual users but reasonable when factoring in MMO and Stream Deck-style functionality.
MMO gaming suitability
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.3
MMO gaming suitability was broadly strong but not unanimous because side-button usability and learning curve divided reviewers.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.9
MMO suitability was the clearest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly calling it a top or highly effective MMO/RPG mouse.
build quality
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.4
Build quality was mostly strong, with sturdy shell praise, though one review called the build hit-and-miss around the triggers.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.9
Build quality was generally praised as sturdy, premium, or well made, with only limited concern about long-term plastic wear appearing under materials rather than core construction.
ergonomic design
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Ergonomic design was praised for comfort, hand support, and a relaxed shape, though one reviewer needed adjustment to the length.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.1
Ergonomics were generally positive for the intended MMO/palm audience, though some reviewers found the body clunky or less ergonomic than alternatives.
MOBA gaming suitability
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.5
MOBA gaming suitability was strongly positive overall, with reviewers emphasizing button access and genre-focused customization.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
5.0
MOBA suitability was positive where tested, with reviewers saying the side pad helped MOBA play and ability mapping.
balance and weight distribution
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.3
Balance was described positively, with reviewers noting it avoided pulling to one side and felt stable.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.8
Reviewers who commented on balance said the mouse feels well distributed despite its MMO-mouse weight.
dock compatibility
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
2.0
Dock compatibility was weakly supported by complaints about the dongle/stand situation rather than praise for a dock setup.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
2.5
Dock compatibility was a limitation rather than a strength, with one review noting there is no wireless charging option or dock.
motion consistency
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
5.0
Motion consistency received strong support where tested, with the sensor described as free of unwanted acceleration or hiccups.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.5
Motion consistency was praised in the main detailed mention, where movement feedback stayed smooth and consistent even outside MMO use.
wireless latency
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.5
Wireless latency was mostly praised, especially over 2.4GHz, while Bluetooth was treated as less suitable for serious gaming.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
5.0
Wireless latency was praised in detailed testing, where reviewers reported no noticeable lag or input delay.
left and right click quality
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.2
Left and right click quality was generally praised, though one reviewer found some crunchiness in the primary click movement.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.7
Left and right click quality was mostly praised for crispness, feedback, and satisfying actuation, with one review finding the feel a little mushy.
Bluetooth support
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.8
Bluetooth support was useful for travel and secondary devices, but reviewers also noted latency and configuration limitations.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.3
Bluetooth was viewed as a useful productivity or secondary mode rather than the preferred gaming connection, and reviewers reported it worked well.
DPI range
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.1
DPI/CPI range was viewed as more than enough for most gamers, with some caveats that rivals offer higher maximum specs.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.5
DPI range was seen as technically strong and highly configurable, though reviewers often framed the 33K ceiling as more than most users need.
macro support
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Macro support was a strong positive for games and productivity, though one reviewer complained about limited Windows shortcut handling.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
5.0
Macro support was consistently praised, especially for MMO rotations, productivity shortcuts, and Stream Deck-style workflows.
sensor performance
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Sensor performance was widely praised as fast and reliable, though one review noted the CPI ceiling is not class-leading.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.9
Sensor performance was broadly praised as precise, responsive, and strong, even when reviewers noted the mouse is not designed primarily for FPS play.
FPS gaming suitability
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.4
FPS gaming suitability was mixed: some reviewers liked it in shooters, while others found the MMO grid or grip demands unsuitable.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
3.0
FPS suitability was mixed-to-weak: the sensor can keep up, but the size, weight, and side buttons make it less ideal for fast flicks.
Accuracy and tracking precision
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Reviewers generally found tracking precise, with praise for accurate target selection, Photoshop-style control, and clean cursor placement.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.9
Tracking precision drew broad praise across written and video reviews, with reviewers describing accurate, consistent, and fast movement response.
claw grip comfort
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
2.2
Claw grip comfort was a recurring weakness because the top holes, size, and side-button cluster made claw use awkward for several reviewers.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
2.5
Claw grip comfort was a weak fit in the evidence, with reviewers warning the large, palm-contact shape can feel bulky or awkward for claw users.
scroll wheel quality
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
3.9
Scroll wheel quality was mostly solid, with praise for steps and smoothness, but some criticism of low positioning and tilt access.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.2
Scroll wheel quality was mixed, ranging from precise, tactile, and great to stiff, soft-notched, or lacking side-click features.
acceleration control
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.5
Acceleration control was praised when tested or configurable, including one review that found no unwanted acceleration.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.8
Acceleration was discussed positively where evaluated, with reviewers tying the 50G capability to strong gaming responsiveness.
polling rate
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.8
The 1000Hz polling-rate implementation was described as flawless or issue-free by the reviewers who discussed it.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.5
Polling rate was treated as sufficient for the product category, with reviewers saying 1000Hz is enough for MMO-focused use.
software usability
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.1
Software usability was polarized but leaned positive: many praised customization ease, while several disliked bloat or dongle-only limitations.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
3.9
Software usability was mixed, with reviewers praising Stream Deck or productivity setup while criticizing iCUE clarity and intuitiveness.
wireless performance
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Wireless performance was usually praised as reliable, responsive, or excellent, with only scattered software-related caveats.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.8
Wireless performance was consistently praised for responsiveness, reliability, and gaming-ready behavior.
button responsiveness
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Button responsiveness was usually strong across main and side inputs, though some reviews focused more on accidental-click prevention than speed.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.4
Button responsiveness was mostly positive, with reviewers praising clicky, fast, or mush-free activation; one reviewer criticized the DPI button as sticky.
shape comfort
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.2
Shape comfort was mostly positive for larger or palm-oriented hands, with reservations about fatigue, size, or mixed grip support.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.0
Shape comfort depended heavily on grip style and hand fit, with palm users often positive and some reviewers finding other grips awkward.
portability
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.7
Portability was praised through low weight, Bluetooth travel use, and dongle-free convenience.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.5
Portability was helped by dongle storage and travel-friendly wireless design, with one reviewer also valuing the all-in-one control setup.
programmable buttons
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.8
Programmable-button coverage was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly valuing the 18-button layout.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.9
Programmable buttons were one of the mouse's defining strengths, repeatedly praised for productivity, gaming control, and flexible command access.
software stability
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
2.4
Software stability was a concern, with battery reporting, sleep behavior, disconnects, and profile switching called unreliable by some.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
2.5
Software stability was sharply split: one review called iCUE terrible, while another found the configured Stream Deck system reliable.
charging convenience
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Charging convenience was a strength, with reviewers praising fast charging, quick top-ups, and easy cable access.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.7
Charging convenience was viewed positively through quick practical recharge outcomes, a usable charging cable, and comfortable use while charging.
palm grip comfort
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.6
Palm grip comfort was a clear strength, with several reviewers calling it comfortable, stable, and well-suited to long use.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.7
Palm grip comfort was a clear strength for reviewers with compatible hands, who found the shape supportive and comfortable.
premium feel
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.8
Premium feel was repeatedly positive, with reviewers describing the mouse as premium, unique, and satisfying overall.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.8
Reviewers described the mouse as premium-feeling or a great piece of kit, especially when discussing overall control quality and finish.
RGB features
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.1
RGB was generally praised for brightness, zones, and visual appeal, but several reviewers questioned the battery-life tradeoff.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.2
RGB impressions were mixed-positive: reviewers liked useful or customizable lighting, though it remained secondary to controls and battery life.
glide smoothness
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.7
Glide smoothness was strongly praised across reviews, with PTFE skates repeatedly described as smooth, low-drag, or dreamlike.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.7
Glide was generally praised as smooth or effortless across mousepads and desks, though one review described the stock feet as slower.
button customization
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.8
Button customization was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers praising remapping, flexible profiles, and broad control options.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.8
The adjustable side keypad and button mapping were repeatedly praised as practical, comfort-improving, and easy to tailor, though one reviewer found the adjustability less impactful.
cross-platform compatibility
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
5.0
Cross-platform compatibility was praised by one reviewer because the software works on Windows and macOS.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
5.0
Cross-platform support appeared strongest for creator workflows, with one review praising full Mac support alongside Windows software.
surface compatibility
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
5.0
Surface compatibility was excellent where tested, with strong performance on desks, multiple pads, and varied surfaces.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
5.0
Surface compatibility was praised where evaluated, with reviewers reporting reliable tracking or useful calibration across varied surfaces.
fingertip grip comfort
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
2.5
Fingertip grip comfort was mostly weak except for one palm-or-fingertip-friendly review; larger size and side buttons limited fingertip use.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SENo score yet
handedness options
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
1.5
Handedness options were criticized because the side-button grid makes the mouse poor for left-handers or ambidextrous use.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SENo score yet
water and dust resistance
SteelSeries Aerox 9 Wireless
4.1
Water and dust resistance was mostly reassuring, though one owner still worried the open casing would attract dust.
Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SENo score yet