2.4GHz connectivity
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6
Reviewers who discussed the radio link described the 2.4GHz connection as fast, reliable, and tied to the larger high-polling dongle experience.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.8
Reviewers consistently identify the 2.4GHz dongle as the main gaming connection, pairing it with the dock and high polling-rate operation.
Accuracy and tracking precision
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6
Tracking precision was a consistent strength: reviewers reported smooth aiming, accurate snapping, and precise response on normal gaming surfaces.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.8
Tracking accuracy is a clear strength: reviewers describe precise, accurate control with smooth gaming performance and no major aiming complaints.
balance and weight distribution
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5
Weight balance was praised when mentioned, with reviewers calling the mouse solid, well-balanced, and free of obvious balance issues despite the low mass.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.0
Balance is mixed: one review says the battery is barely noticeable, while another feels slight rear weight from the removable pack.
battery life
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.8
Battery life is mostly good in standard or mixed polling use, but IGN found peak 8K and Pro Gaming settings could drain it far faster than the rated 90 hours.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.0
Battery life is useful because of hot swapping, but real-world endurance is mixed, especially when RGB and high polling rates are enabled.
build quality
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2
Build quality is generally solid for an ultralight shell, though one reviewer found M64 side-wall flex and IGN noted only minor flexing and a slightly cheap feel.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.4
Build quality is generally viewed as solid and premium, with one reviewer noting side flex under force testing.
button customization
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.5
Button customization is limited: reviewers found basic mapping or CPI presets, but no software-driven fine control or deeper customization.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.8
Button customization is strong across the mouse and dock, with reviewers praising remapping options in Glorious Core.
button responsiveness
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2
Main-button responsiveness is strong overall, with reviewers describing snappy travel, good bounce-back, and reliable actuation during gameplay.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.6
Button responsiveness is generally positive, with direct input response and no meaningful in-game button issues reported.
charging convenience
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.8
Charging is fast enough and possible while playing, but several reviewers criticized the side USB-C port because the cable can feel awkward or drag against the hand.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.9
Charging convenience is a standout feature because the swappable batteries and dock reduce or eliminate cable charging interruptions.
claw grip comfort
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.6
Claw comfort depends on hand size: some reviewers liked the low front and relaxed-claw support, while IGN found the small right-handed shell cramped for large hands.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.6
Notebookcheck directly supports claw grip use, saying the D3 works with palm, claw, and fingertip styles.
click latency
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2
Click latency is supported by adjustable debounce settings, giving users several response-time presets directly on the mouse.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.6
Click/input latency is treated positively through direct button response and consistent input behavior in testing.
click noise
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.0
Click sound is moderate rather than silent: reviewers described the main clicks as mellow or balanced, though one found them fairly loud.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
3.9
Click noise is mixed: one reviewer calls the D3 very quiet, while another says the optical switches are not particularly quiet.
connection stability
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6
Connection stability was consistently positive, with reviewers reporting no lag, stutter, hiccups, or wireless dropouts in normal use.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.5
Connection stability is mostly strong during battery swaps and gaming, though one review reports occasional Guardian-battery switching issues.
cross-platform compatibility
P1Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
3.8
Cross-platform use is mixed: the mouse can work across Mac and Windows, but Glorious Core is described as Windows-only.
debounce customization
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2
Debounce customization is broad on paper, but one reviewer had ghost clicks at the lowest setting while others praised the selectable 2/4/8/12 ms options.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.9
Debounce customization is clearly supported in software, with reviewers highlighting adjustable debounce time.
dock compatibility
P1Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.8
The dock is central to the product experience, acting as a receiver base, spare-battery charger, indicator panel, and customizable control.
DPI range
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.4
The DPI/CPI range is wide, reaching 26,000, but preset-only adjustment limits fine-grained sensitivity tuning.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.9
The D3 gets very high DPI headroom through its 30,000 DPI sensor and software-configurable sensitivity levels.
durability over time
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.0
Durability evidence is limited but positive around the finish, with Tom's Hardware noting the coating is designed for and withstood visible wear.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
3.8
Long-term durability evidence is limited, but one reviewer reports consistent clicks after about a month while another says battery-mechanism longevity remains to be seen.
ergonomic design
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2
The M64's right-handed ergonomic shape was a major draw for several reviewers, especially those who liked its low front and thumb groove, though large hands may struggle.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.4
Ergonomic comfort is mostly praised, especially for D3 users, although one reviewer disliked the RGB gap under a palm grip.
fingertip grip comfort
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.6
Fingertip grip drew weak support because reviewers found the M64's curvature awkward for fingertip users compared with palm or claw.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.6
Notebookcheck directly supports fingertip grip use, saying the D3 fits palm, claw, and fingertip styles.
FPS gaming suitability
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3
FPS suitability is strong when tracking and responsiveness matter, though the shape may favor controlled play more than universal fast-flick comfort.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.7
Gaming suitability is high, with reviewers describing strong competitive performance, accurate control, and uninterrupted wireless play.
glide smoothness
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6
Glide quality was praised, with reviewers citing smooth movement, strong PTFE feet, and good glide across multiple ordinary surfaces.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.9
Glide is consistently praised thanks to PTFE feet and low-friction movement across desks and mouse pads.
grip texture
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.7
Grip texture is mixed: the white coating was seen as grippier and durable, while the black coating was criticized as a fingerprint magnet.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
3.0
Grip texture is only moderately positive: the plastic coating is usable, but one reviewer notes the lack of included grip tape.
handedness options
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.5
Handedness is limited because the M64 Pro is explicitly a right-handed ergonomic mouse, not an ambidextrous option.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
3.6
Handedness is a limitation for the D3 because it is positioned as the ergonomic right-handed model, with O3 serving ambidextrous users.
left and right click quality
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3
Left and right click quality was mostly praised for feel and reliability, with several reviewers calling the clicks snappy, satisfying, or trouble-free in gameplay.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.4
Left and right click quality is generally solid, with consistent main clicks and robust button feel.
lift-off distance
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2
Lift-off distance can be adjusted, typically between 1 mm and 2 mm, and one reviewer specifically needed the 2 mm option on hard surfaces.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.9
Lift-off distance customization is well supported in software and appears alongside other competitive tuning settings.
long-session comfort
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5
Long-session comfort is mostly positive from Tom's Hardware, but the side charging cable and large-hand fit concerns limit universal comfort.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.7
Long-session comfort is one of the D3’s stronger points, especially for longer gaming sessions and reduced fatigue.
materials quality
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.4
Materials feel mixed: the shell and UV coating are solid, but IGN felt the ultralight construction made the mouse feel somewhat cheap.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.1
Materials are mostly viewed as high-quality matte plastic, though one reviewer describes the coating as basic rather than soft-touch.
motion consistency
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5
Motion consistency was a strong theme, with reviewers describing smooth, consistent movement and no obvious tracking irregularities.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.5
Motion consistency is mostly good, but one review notes slight wireless tracking consistency fluctuation under some conditions.
onboard memory
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3
On-device settings are a strength for plug-and-play users because key controls can be adjusted directly on the mouse without software.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.6
Onboard memory is supported by evidence that settings can be saved directly to the mouse.
palm grip comfort
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.5
Palm grip comfort is decent for smaller to medium hands, but several reviewers warned the shape or size can be awkward for fingertip users or large hands.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
3.5
Palm grip comfort is mixed: some evidence supports palm-style use, while one reviewer strongly disliked the D3’s gap under palm contact.
polling rate
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5
The Pro model's 8K polling rate is widely documented and usually praised, though some reviewers said they could not always feel a meaningful difference.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.9
Polling-rate support is a major spec strength, with up to 8,000Hz wireless polling repeatedly cited, though it can reduce battery life.
premium feel
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.0
Premium feel is mixed: some praised the non-hollow feel, while others felt the quality and finish were not quite top-tier for the price.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.6
Premium feel is generally strong due to high-end positioning, quality impressions, and the distinctive dock-and-battery system.
profile switching
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.0
Profile or sensor-mode switching is available directly on the mouse, with Pro Gaming, Standard, and Low Power modes mentioned.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.6
Profile switching is supported through Glorious Core profiles and dock/software controls.
programmable buttons
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.0
Programmable-button support is basic, mostly limited to standard game or Windows button mapping rather than rich software macros.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.7
Programmable buttons are a strength, with six assignable buttons and broad remapping options reported.
RGB features
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
1.3
RGB is essentially absent, with reviewers repeatedly noting no flashy lighting or special lighting beyond an indicator LED.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.1
RGB is mixed: software control is broad, but reviewers criticize blotchy or inaccurate colors and some prefer disabling it.
scroll wheel quality
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2
Scroll wheel quality is generally solid, with tactile notches, consistent scrolling, and easy movement, though one reviewer described the wheel feel as merely okay.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
3.9
Scroll wheel quality is mixed: some reviewers like its quiet smoothness, while others want stronger tactility or lower resistance.
sensor performance
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6
Sensor performance is consistently strong thanks to the Pixart/Pixart 3395-class sensor, accurate tracking, and stable performance on common surfaces.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.8
Sensor performance is rated highly, with repeated praise for the BAMF 3.0 optical sensor and precise tracking.
shape comfort
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.9
Shape comfort is the most divisive area: some reviewers loved the locked-in ergonomic shape, while IGN found it cramped for large hands.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.3
Shape comfort is mostly strong for the ergonomic D3 shape, but reviewer fit varies because one palm gripper disliked the shell gap.
side button quality
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.9
Side-button quality is split: some reviewers praised their size and crispness, while others found the M64's side buttons mushy.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.2
Side button quality is generally good for access and placement, though one reviewer wanted larger, more distinct D3 side buttons.
software usability
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.8
Software usability is polarizing because there is no software; plug-and-play users may like it, but many reviewers found on-device controls tedious or limiting.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.5
Software usability is generally strong after Glorious Core updates, but missing battery percentage reporting is a notable complaint.
surface compatibility
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.6
Surface compatibility is acceptable on normal plastic and wood surfaces, but glass was reported unusable.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.6
Surface compatibility is positive, with smooth tracking and glide reported across mouse pads, desk surfaces, and desk mats.
switch feel
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2
Switch feel is generally good, with reviewers praising snappy, balanced main clicks, though one early impression found the implementation merely okay.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.5
Switch feel is generally good, with robust or quality-feeling optical switches, though noise and tactile preferences vary.
value for money
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.0
Value is mixed to weak: the $139 Pro version performs well, but reviewers questioned the 8K surcharge and compared it against strong software-supported competitors.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
3.5
Value is mixed because reviewers like the innovation but repeatedly flag the high price and question whether every user needs the battery system.
weight
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.7
Weight is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly measuring or citing roughly 54-55 grams for the Pro model.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.5
Weight is widely praised as light for a wireless ergonomic mouse, though one reviewer does not consider it ultra-light.
wireless latency
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3
Wireless latency was mostly praised as lag-free, though IGN questioned whether 8K gains are noticeable to average users.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.8
Wireless latency is viewed positively, with reviewers reporting low latency, no lag, and no perceptible wired-versus-wireless response gap.
wireless performance
P1
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5
Wireless performance was a strength, with reviewers reporting reliable 2.4GHz operation and no obvious wireless tracking issues.
P2
Product 2: Glorious Model D3
4.8
Wireless performance is a major strength, with stable gaming, smooth operation, and uninterrupted battery-swap behavior in most tests.