Compare Cherry M64 Pro vs ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired

P1 Cherry M64 Pro
P2 ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired

Comparison Takeaways

Cherry M64 Pro

Where It Has the Edge

  • weight is 4.7 vs 3.7. Weight is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly measuring or citing roughly 54-55 grams for the Pro model.
  • motion consistency is 4.5 vs 3.9. Motion consistency was a strong theme, with reviewers describing smooth, consistent movement and no obvious tracking irregularities.
  • polling rate is 4.5 vs 3.9. The Pro model's 8K polling rate is widely documented and usually praised, though some reviewers said they could...
  • Accuracy and tracking precision is 4.6 vs 4.2. Tracking precision was a consistent strength: reviewers reported smooth aiming, accurate snapping, and precise response on normal gaming...

ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired

Where It Has the Edge

  • RGB features is 4.2 vs 1.3. RGB features are a consistent strength, including three-zone lighting on the original and reduced but configurable zones on...
  • button customization is 4.5 vs 2.5. Button customization is one of the strongest themes, driven by hot-swappable switches, remapping, macros, and software controls.
  • fingertip grip comfort is 4.1 vs 2.6. Fingertip grip is possible and sometimes listed as supported, but the tall ergonomic body makes it less universally...
  • value for money is 4.4 vs 3.0. Value is favorable overall, with reviewers repeatedly emphasizing affordability, budget fit, or getting a lot for the money.
Average score
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.9
Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.2
2.4GHz connectivity
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Reviewers who discussed the radio link described the 2.4GHz connection as fast, reliable, and tied to the larger high-polling dongle experience.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.1

Reviewers mention 2.4GHz support mainly in the wireless/tri-mode context, with the wired model retaining USB as the core experience.

acceleration control
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.2

Sensor specs list strong acceleration capability, though evidence focuses on maximum acceleration rather than deep acceleration tuning.

Accuracy and tracking precision
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Tracking precision was a consistent strength: reviewers reported smooth aiming, accurate snapping, and precise response on normal gaming surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.2

Tracking precision is generally praised, with one review noting more modest MouseTester behavior while others report accurate gaming performance.

balance and weight distribution
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

Weight balance was praised when mentioned, with reviewers calling the mouse solid, well-balanced, and free of obvious balance issues despite the low mass.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.3

Weight balance is described favorably where tested, especially the centered balance and improved maneuverability on the Core variant.

battery life
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.8

Battery life is mostly good in standard or mixed polling use, but IGN found peak 8K and Pro Gaming settings could drain it far faster than the rated 90 hours.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.1

Battery life appears only in the wireless-oriented review evidence, which reports usable 2.4GHz and Bluetooth runtime figures.

Bluetooth support
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.1

Bluetooth support is consistently mentioned for the wireless or tri-mode versions rather than the wired-only setup.

build quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Build quality is generally solid for an ultralight shell, though one reviewer found M64 side-wall flex and IGN noted only minor flexing and a slightly cheap feel.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.4

Build quality is a clear strength across several reviews, with repeated comments about excellent construction and few creaks or flex issues.

button customization
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.5

Button customization is limited: reviewers found basic mapping or CPI presets, but no software-driven fine control or deeper customization.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.5

Button customization is one of the strongest themes, driven by hot-swappable switches, remapping, macros, and software controls.

button responsiveness
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Main-button responsiveness is strong overall, with reviewers describing snappy travel, good bounce-back, and reliable actuation during gameplay.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.5

Button responsiveness is rated highly overall, with reviewers citing instant registration, tactile feedback, and easy activation.

cable flexibility
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.1

The included cable was usually described as flexible or pliant, helping offset the awkward side-port layout when charging or using wired mode.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.2

Cable impressions are mostly positive: the ROG paracord is flexible and light, though the wired model naturally remains tethered.

charging convenience
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.8

Charging is fast enough and possible while playing, but several reviewers criticized the side USB-C port because the cable can feel awkward or drag against the hand.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
No score yet
claw grip comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.6

Claw comfort depends on hand size: some reviewers liked the low front and relaxed-claw support, while IGN found the small right-handed shell cramped for large hands.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.0

Claw grip support is present but context-dependent; several reviews say the high shape works, while one finds it limited by height.

click latency
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Click latency is supported by adjustable debounce settings, giving users several response-time presets directly on the mouse.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.6

Latency evidence is very positive, especially for wired use, with reviewers reporting instant presses and no significant input lag.

click noise
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.0

Click sound is moderate rather than silent: reviewers described the main clicks as mellow or balanced, though one found them fairly loud.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
3.9

Click noise is generally controlled, but swappable Omron switches can be noticeably louder depending on the chosen switch.

connection stability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Connection stability was consistently positive, with reviewers reporting no lag, stutter, hiccups, or wireless dropouts in normal use.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.5

Connection stability is strong for wired use and supported by positive mentions of lag-free tracking and reliable 2.4GHz dongle placement.

cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.3

Cross-PC use is best supported by Gear Link and onboard profiles, which let settings work on another PC after configuration.

debounce customization
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Debounce customization is broad on paper, but one reviewer had ghost clicks at the lowest setting while others praised the selectable 2/4/8/12 ms options.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
No score yet
DPI range
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.4

The DPI/CPI range is wide, reaching 26,000, but preset-only adjustment limits fine-grained sensitivity tuning.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.5

DPI range is a major strength on the original Gladius III, while the Core review notes a lower but still gaming-capable 12,000 DPI sensor.

durability over time
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.0

Durability evidence is limited but positive around the finish, with Tom's Hardware noting the coating is designed for and withstood visible wear.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.5

Durability over time is supported by replaceable switches, spare parts, and high click ratings from 70 million to 100 million clicks.

ecosystem integration
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.1

ASUS ecosystem integration is supported by Aura Sync, AURA Creator, Gear Link, and references to the ROG device ecosystem.

ergonomic design
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

The M64's right-handed ergonomic shape was a major draw for several reviewers, especially those who liked its low front and thumb groove, though large hands may struggle.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.3

Ergonomics are broadly praised for right-handed medium-to-large hands, though the shape can feel tall or narrow to some users.

fingertip grip comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.6

Fingertip grip drew weak support because reviewers found the M64's curvature awkward for fingertip users compared with palm or claw.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.1

Fingertip grip is possible and sometimes listed as supported, but the tall ergonomic body makes it less universally ideal than palm grip.

firmware reliability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.0

Firmware support is present through Armoury Crate, Gear Link, or firmware menus, though the reviews do not deeply test long-term reliability.

FPS gaming suitability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3

FPS suitability is strong when tracking and responsiveness matter, though the shape may favor controlled play more than universal fast-flick comfort.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.0

FPS suitability is good but not perfect: reviewers praise tracking and wired latency, while weight and shape limit elite FPS speed for some.

glide smoothness
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Glide quality was praised, with reviewers citing smooth movement, strong PTFE feet, and good glide across multiple ordinary surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.5

Glide smoothness is a repeated positive, with PTFE/Omni feet producing smooth, effortless movement on tested surfaces.

grip texture
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.7

Grip texture is mixed: the white coating was seen as grippier and durable, while the black coating was criticized as a fingerprint magnet.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
3.9

Grip texture is mixed-to-good, with grippy matte or serrated panels helping control, but one review notes absent rubberized grips.

handedness options
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.5

Handedness is limited because the M64 Pro is explicitly a right-handed ergonomic mouse, not an ambidextrous option.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
2.9

Handedness is a limitation because the evidence repeatedly frames the mouse as right-handed or non-ambidextrous.

left and right click quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3

Left and right click quality was mostly praised for feel and reliability, with several reviewers calling the clicks snappy, satisfying, or trouble-free in gameplay.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.1

Main click quality is mostly strong thanks to tactile switches and good click feel, though one review reports button wobble.

lift-off distance
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Lift-off distance can be adjusted, typically between 1 mm and 2 mm, and one reviewer specifically needed the 2 mm option on hard surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.5

Lift-off distance is supported by Armoury Crate, where high and low lift-off distance options are available.

long-session comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

Long-session comfort is mostly positive from Tom's Hardware, but the side charging cable and large-hand fit concerns limit universal comfort.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.4

Long-session comfort is generally positive, helped by fatigue-free glide and shape, though hand size and grip style matter.

macro support
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.4

Macro support is well covered through Armoury Crate and Gear Link, including macro recording and button-layer functions.

materials quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.4

Materials feel mixed: the shell and UV coating are solid, but IGN felt the ultralight construction made the mouse feel somewhat cheap.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
3.9

Materials quality is solid but not luxurious: reviewers note hard plastic, matte plastic, and occasional oil or grip tradeoffs.

MMO gaming suitability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.5

MMO suitability received only indirect support through a standard gaming sensor mode described for lower-precision MMO-style play.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.8

MMO suitability is explicitly supported by the Core review, which calls SpeedShift useful for MMO players.

motion consistency
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

Motion consistency was a strong theme, with reviewers describing smooth, consistent movement and no obvious tracking irregularities.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
3.9

Motion consistency is mostly good, but testing varies: one review reports smooth tracking while another records jitter at flick peaks.

onboard memory
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3

On-device settings are a strength for plug-and-play users because key controls can be adjusted directly on the mouse without software.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.4

Onboard memory is a strength, with multiple reviews citing five profiles or built-in memory.

palm grip comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.5

Palm grip comfort is decent for smaller to medium hands, but several reviewers warned the shape or size can be awkward for fingertip users or large hands.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.3

Palm grip is the best-supported grip style because reviewers repeatedly say the tall ergonomic body suits palm users.

polling rate
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

The Pro model's 8K polling rate is widely documented and usually praised, though some reviewers said they could not always feel a meaningful difference.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
3.9

Polling rate support reaches 1000Hz across the reviews, though one test calls polling performance average with jitter.

premium feel
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.0

Premium feel is mixed: some praised the non-hollow feel, while others felt the quality and finish were not quite top-tier for the price.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.2

Premium feel is tied more to ROG branding, construction, and presentation than to ultralight materials or understated styling.

profile switching
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.0

Profile or sensor-mode switching is available directly on the mouse, with Pro Gaming, Standard, and Low Power modes mentioned.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.1

Profile switching is supported through onboard profiles and profile buttons, although one reviewer wishes the control were more conveniently placed.

programmable buttons
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.0

Programmable-button support is basic, mostly limited to standard game or Windows button mapping rather than rich software macros.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.3

Programmable buttons are well supported, with reviews describing six or seven configurable buttons and software remapping.

RGB features
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
1.3

RGB is essentially absent, with reviewers repeatedly noting no flashy lighting or special lighting beyond an indicator LED.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.2

RGB features are a consistent strength, including three-zone lighting on the original and reduced but configurable zones on the Core.

scroll wheel quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Scroll wheel quality is generally solid, with tactile notches, consistent scrolling, and easy movement, though one reviewer described the wheel feel as merely okay.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
3.9

Scroll wheel quality is mostly positive for tactile detents and rubberized feel, but one review reports side-to-side wobble.

sensor performance
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.6

Sensor performance is consistently strong thanks to the Pixart/Pixart 3395-class sensor, accurate tracking, and stable performance on common surfaces.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.1

Sensor performance is generally strong and gaming-capable, though one wired review finds lower test performance than expected.

shape comfort
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.9

Shape comfort is the most divisive area: some reviewers loved the locked-in ergonomic shape, while IGN found it cramped for large hands.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.0

Shape comfort is divisive: many like the ergonomic Gladius shape, while others find it tall, chunky, or narrow.

side button quality
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.9

Side-button quality is split: some reviewers praised their size and crispness, while others found the M64's side buttons mushy.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.2

Side buttons are generally usable and tactile, with convenient placement in one review but right-side/left-hand limitations in another.

skate durability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
3.8

Skate durability is only lightly supported through included replacement PTFE gliders, not long-term wear testing.

software stability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.7

Software stability is strongest in the Gear Link review, where the tool is described as quick, reliable, and smooth.

software usability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
2.8

Software usability is polarizing because there is no software; plug-and-play users may like it, but many reviewers found on-device controls tedious or limiting.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.0

Software usability is mixed-to-positive, with Gear Link praised, Armoury Crate usable, and one reviewer expressing mixed feelings.

surface compatibility
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.6

Surface compatibility is acceptable on normal plastic and wood surfaces, but glass was reported unusable.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.3

Surface compatibility is well supported through calibration options for preset mousepads, new surfaces, and manual deskmat calibration.

switch durability
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
No score yet
Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.4

Switch durability is a core strength, with high click ratings and replaceable switches across several reviews.

switch feel
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.2

Switch feel is generally good, with reviewers praising snappy, balanced main clicks, though one early impression found the implementation merely okay.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.4

Switch feel is a major positive, with tactile, responsive, snappy, and clicky descriptions recurring across reviews.

value for money
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
3.0

Value is mixed to weak: the $139 Pro version performs well, but reviewers questioned the 8K surcharge and compared it against strong software-supported competitors.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.4

Value is favorable overall, with reviewers repeatedly emphasizing affordability, budget fit, or getting a lot for the money.

weight
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.7

Weight is a clear strength, with reviewers repeatedly measuring or citing roughly 54-55 grams for the Pro model.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
3.7

Weight is mixed: lighter than predecessors or wireless variants, but still heavier than ultralight FPS mice.

wireless latency
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.3

Wireless latency was mostly praised as lag-free, though IGN questioned whether 8K gains are noticeable to average users.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
No score yet
wireless performance
Product 1: Cherry M64 Pro
4.5

Wireless performance was a strength, with reviewers reporting reliable 2.4GHz operation and no obvious wireless tracking issues.

Product 2: ASUS ROG Gladius III Wired
4.2

Wireless performance is only supported in wireless-oriented evidence, mainly around dongle placement for reception and reliability.