Compare The Last of Us Part II Remastered vs Dragon Quest I & II HD-2D Remake

Reviewers praise the expanded accessibility suite, especially descriptive audio, speech-to-vibration support, and broader options that make the game easier to experience.

Accessibility and quality-of-life options are a major positive, with reviewers repeatedly citing objective markers, difficulty settings, battle speed, autosave, chest markers, and toggleable assists.

Evidence points to mature-only suitability: reviewers cite an M rating and warn that younger players or those without a strong stomach may not appreciate it.

Enemy behavior is praised for unpredictable patrols, strong aim, and AI that can swarm the player, especially in No Return encounters.

AI behavior receives mixed-to-negative comments, with reviewers noting tactic AI can be unwise or not especially bright.

Aiming is helped by precise PC controls and performance modes, with one technical review emphasizing fast aiming precision and dodging.

Animation remains a major strength, with industry-best combat animation and varied contextual actions supporting the game's brutal presentation.

Animation quality is praised in battles and monster presentation, with reviewers noting spell, strike, and enemy animations.

The art direction is praised through scenic, atmospheric landscapes that reviewers repeatedly stop to admire.

Art direction is highly praised for HD-2D's blend of sprite work, lighting, and 3D spaces.

The game maintains an oppressive, visceral atmosphere, with reviewers calling out its tension, revenge story, and masterclass sense of mood.

Atmosphere is warm, colorful, nostalgic, and sometimes cinematic, supporting the classic fantasy tone.

Boss encounters are supported mainly through No Return and Abby-focused PC coverage, with reviewers highlighting memorable boss fights and final-run showdowns.

Boss design is often praised as tougher, more numerous, and more rewarding, though difficulty can still be demanding.

Bug and stutter reports are limited but present in PC coverage, including texture glitches, foliage pop-in, and stutter entering dense areas.

Camera praise is mostly cinematic rather than mechanical, with reviewers noting strong camera shots rather than camera problems.

Character development is supported by reviews praising Abby's humanization, character arcs, and the emotional impact of the main cast.

Character development is much stronger than in the originals, especially for Dragon Quest II's cousins and expanded party dynamics.

No Return's playable roster is a major positive, bringing Ellie, Abby, Joel, Dina, Lev, Jesse, Tommy, and others into the mode with distinct traits.

The roster is stronger thanks to the Princess of Cannock and a more defined Dragon Quest II party.

The co-op experience is essentially absent; one review explicitly notes that the gameplay bones are there but the online infrastructure is not.

Combat is one of the strongest areas, repeatedly described as dynamic, brutal, satisfying, and mechanically solid in both campaign and No Return.

Combat is broadly praised for preserving old-school turn-based structure while adding more tactical tools, though some solo-hero and encounter-balance issues remain.

Community features are light but present through Daily Run-style shared challenges and leaderboard comparisons.

The remaster is praised for its extras: No Return, Lost Levels, commentary, guitar free play, skins, speedrun tools, and other options.

Content variety improves substantially through new underwater regions, postgame material, endings, expanded areas, and added story content.

Controls are generally praised as responsive, smooth, and especially strong on PC mouse and keyboard.

The core loop is highly praised, especially the tight combat-survival rhythm and No Return's distilled version of the game's mechanics.

The core loop remains a traditional Dragon Quest rhythm of overworld travel, towns, treasures, dungeons, random encounters, leveling, and equipment upgrades.

Crafting remains important, with reviewers tying it to survival, stealth, ammunition scarcity, and No Return upgrades.

Cross-save support is supported by a review noting that PS4 saves and achievements can be carried over.

Dialogue quality is split: one reviewer says no line is wasted, while another says some dialog exchanges stumble and bore.

Dialogue quality gets positive attention through the localized text and additional characterization.

Difficulty is framed as challenging but fair, with selectable difficulty helping players ease into No Return while preserving tension.

Difficulty is one of the most debated points: many reviewers liked the challenge, but spikes, RNG, grinding, and solo-hero fragility frustrated others.

Resource balance is a strength, with reviewers praising scarcity that makes ammo, crafting materials, and every shot feel meaningful.

Emotional impact is one of the strongest consensus areas; reviewers repeatedly describe the story as heavy, upsetting, and memorable.

Emotional impact is surprisingly strong for some reviewers, with late-game or introductory scenes prompting tears or sobbing.

Endgame value comes primarily from No Return's daily and custom runs, ongoing boss attempts, and reasons to return after the campaign.

Endgame content is expanded with postgame dungeons, extra challenges, and additional completion goals.

Enemy variety is supported by No Return's randomized factions and the addition of new enemy types and infected encounters.

Enemy variety expands through enemies from later Erdrick titles appearing in the first game.

Environmental detail is consistently praised, from photorealistic detail to Seattle's scenery, overgrown environments, and accurate city recreation.

Environmental detail is a visual strength, with lighting and detailed spaces giving the world more life.

Exploration is mostly positive because it rewards searching and environmental storytelling, though PC Gamer finds it more constrained than combat.

Exploration is usually a strength, especially with secret spots, map options, open-sea travel, and treasure hunting, though underwater and backtracking sections can feel awkward.

Facial animation and capture are repeatedly praised as best-in-class or amazing, preserving the campaign's emotional delivery.

Faithfulness is mixed but positive: reviewers call it a fascinating, bold sequel that recontextualizes the first game rather than repeating it.

Faithfulness to franchise is positive, with reviewers seeing the remake as respectful to classic Dragon Quest while updating it for modern play.

Family friendliness scores very low because reviewers emphasize the game's violence, mature tone, and need for a strong stomach.

Fast travel is convenient but somewhat controversial because it saves time while reducing old-school tension and making Evac less meaningful.

Frame-rate impressions are mostly positive, especially on PS5, though PC coverage notes some scene-dependent or configuration-specific issues.

Frame rate stability is strong in reported platform testing, including consistent 60 FPS and no frame drops.

Fun factor is strongest in No Return, where reviewers repeatedly describe the mode as fun, addictive, and a strong reason to replay.

Fun factor is high overall, with reviewers calling the collection enjoyable, compelling, addictive, or a treat for RPG fans.

Gameplay mechanics are praised for fresh combat, stealth, top-notch play, and improved action systems over the original.

Reviewers describe the remake as adding meaningful new mechanics, including expanded abilities, sigils, scrolls, and tighter gameplay, while keeping the classic JRPG foundation intact.

Graphics remain a major strength, with reviewers praising PS5 and PC visuals even when they call the upgrade modest.

Graphics quality earns consistent praise, with reviewers repeatedly calling the HD-2D presentation gorgeous, brilliant, vibrant, or superb.

Grinding remains part of the experience, but reviewers vary on whether it is rewarding, tolerable, or frustrating when difficulty spikes appear.

Handheld suitability is supported by Steam Deck impressions, which describe playable performance and a fruitful handheld experience.

Handheld play suitability is strong on Steam Deck, where one reviewer completed both games and praised the fit for portable play.

Haptic feedback is widely praised on PS5, especially weapon resistance, bows, subtle vibrations, and DualSense immersion, though one PC review says it feels weaker than PS5.

Horror tension is strong, with reviewers mentioning anxiety from headphones, clicker sounds, and overall atmosphere.

HUD clarity is helped by map and chest icons that make locations easier to read at a glance.

Immersion is helped by DualSense, 3D audio, haptics, and environmental presentation that reinforce the harsh world.

Immersion benefits from the combined effect of visuals, scenery, audio, and presentation upgrades.

Innovation comes from the Lost Levels, developer commentary, and rare behind-the-scenes transparency more than from the unchanged campaign.

Innovation is modest but effective, especially in the sigil system's small changes to classic combat.

Learning curve is helped by selectable difficulty and clear No Return progression, though some automated hinting is described as blunt.

The learning curve is softened by options but still asks players to learn and adapt to old-school RPG challenges.

Level design is mixed: reviewers praise design explanations and training of expectations, but one PC review finds navigation unclear.

Dungeon and level layouts draw some criticism for being overly simple or uninspired compared with the stronger story and combat upgrades.

Live-service support is poor because the planned online or live-service multiplayer project is repeatedly referenced as canceled.

Load times are a clear improvement, with reviewers noting fast or seamless loading compared with older versions.

Load times receive a positive note on Switch 2, with one reviewer calling them quick.

Loot systems matter in No Return through randomized shops, rewards, modifiers, and challenges, though this is not a traditional loot-heavy game.

Loot rewards, especially Mini Medal turn-ins and powerful equipment, make exploration feel more materially rewarding.

Lore depth is supported by environmental storytelling and optional encounters that reveal wider stories without large exposition dumps.

Lore depth is expanded through added Erdrick-trilogy connections and extra story material.

Map and navigation design is mixed: No Return's route board is clear, but some campaign navigation is criticized as hard to read.

Map and navigation design is repeatedly praised for objective markers and minimap support, while still allowing purists to turn guidance off.

Menu usability is supported by the feature-rich extras menu and speedrun recap tools.

Menu usability improves through skill hotkeys that make frequently used spells and abilities easier to access.

Mission design is strongest in No Return, where randomized encounters and changing objectives create short, focused challenges.

Mission design is expanded around the new lore and story additions, giving previously simple objectives more structure and payoff.

Mission variety is a No Return highlight, though a few reviewers say encounter types can eventually become samey.

Mission variety benefits from towns and vignettes that give the journey more localized stories to complete.

Monetization is generally seen as fair because reviewers repeatedly accept or praise the $10 upgrade price.

Movement feel is praised for nimble combat, large arenas, smoother movement, and improved melee animation.

Multiplayer design is effectively absent because the Factions or live-service project was canceled.

Narrative quality remains the most divisive area: many reviewers call it profound or powerful, while others criticize cynicism, pacing, or its framing.

Narrative quality is one of the remake's clearest upgrades, with expanded scenes, stronger trilogy connections, and especially improved Dragon Quest II storytelling.

Onboarding is decent through difficulty settings and hint prompts, though some guidance can feel artificial.

Onboarding is helped by immediate quality-of-life guidance that makes the old structure easier to approach.

Originality is mixed: the core game remains singular, but No Return is described as fun without being a unique roguelike structure.

Originality comes from making Dragon Quest I feel meaningfully new rather than merely resurfaced.

Pacing is the most repeated story concern, with reviewers citing excessive length, elongated sections, and short lost levels cut for pacing.

Pacing is mixed: several reviewers praised the flow or Dragon Quest II's expansion, while others found padding, bloat, or uneven sections.

Performance optimization is generally good on PS5 and PC, but PC impressions vary with some stutter and texture-glitch caveats.

Performance optimization is viewed positively across platforms, with reviewers mentioning strong Switch 2/Steam Deck performance and stable modes.

Platform-specific feature support is strong, spanning DualSense, 3D audio, VRR, FOV, ultrawide, HDR, PC options, and save carryover.

Platform-specific support is noted on Switch 2 through performance and graphics modes.

Polish is generally high, with reviewers citing Naughty Dog polish, top-notch PS5 optimization, and a strong PC definitive version.

Polish is reflected in the sense of care, respect, and overall quality given to the remakes.

Progression is praised in No Return through unlockable characters, cosmetics, bosses, modifiers, and an overarching progression track.

Progression is improved by scrolls, sigils, leveling, and character customization that give players more ways to build strength without abandoning the classic structure.

Protagonist appeal is mixed: Ellie is praised as carrying the sequel, but one reviewer says the character became harder to relate to.

The protagonist gains appeal through small personality cues despite remaining silent.

Puzzle design appears mostly in Lost Levels and optional environmental sections, with reviewers calling out light or water-based puzzle elements.

Quest design benefits from added lore and scenario changes that make the remakes feel more deliberate than the originals.

Remaster quality is strong as a special edition, not a remake: reviewers praise the package while noting visual changes are modest.

Remake quality is the consensus highlight: reviewers repeatedly call these thoughtful, definitive, or gold-standard updates rather than simple ports.

Replay value improves through No Return, daily/custom runs, unlocks, and extras, though a few reviewers question long-term staying power.

Replay value is limited for at least one reviewer because the longer, more bloated versions are less inviting to revisit than shorter originals.

Sandbox freedom is strongest in No Return, where custom runs, modifiers, and route choices let players tune combat scenarios.

Save reliability is a strength thanks to generous autosave and expanded save options that reduce frustration.

Side character depth is supported by praise for supporting performances and scenes involving characters beyond Ellie and Abby.

Side characters gain depth from new and returning figures receiving their own storylines.

Skill depth appears in No Return through supplements, upgrade trees, skills, and temporary build decisions rather than a deep RPG system.

Social features are limited but include friend comparisons on leaderboards for Daily Runs.

Sound design is a major strength, especially stealth audio, clicker/stalker cues, and anxiety-enhancing headphone play.

Sound design supports atmosphere, especially through musical instrumentation that makes caves and locations feel more distinct.

Soundtrack quality remains strong, with reviewers praising the score and music's emotional impact.

The soundtrack is widely praised for orchestral arrangements and classic themes that enhance exploration and mood.

Stealth mechanics are praised as improved, tense, and central to both campaign and No Return.

Tutorial and guidance are present but mixed, with hints and commentary explaining scenes but some prompts feeling artificial.

Upgrade systems are praised within No Return through weapon upgrades, skills, recipes, and character unlocks.

The sigil system gives upgrades and conditional combat enhancements that add a light but meaningful layer to battles.

UI is mixed: the Extras menu is feature-rich, but one PC review notes a mouse/UI frame-rate issue and guitar free play clunkiness.

Value for money is usually positive, especially at $10, though one review argues the package may not be worth every player's time.

Value for money is supported by the two-game package, expanded runtime, and strong companion value within the trilogy.

Visual effects remain strong, with praise for lighting, scenery, pop-in improvements, and environmental effects.

Visual effects stand out in combat, especially spell and attack effects that make battles more spectacular.

Voice acting is consistently praised, with reviewers calling the cast superb and the performances central to the story.

Voice acting is generally well received, adding presence and emotion, though some reviewers wanted more or found it uneven.

Weapon balance is supported by scarcity and weapon tradeoffs, where having ammo for one weapon often means lacking it for another.

World-building is praised through Seattle's detail, environmental storytelling, and the expanded world of the sequel.

World-building is strengthened by deeper setting detail, a more cohesive Erdrick trilogy, and added context for Alefgard and its people.

World interactivity appears in optional encounters, environmental clues, and small interactive moments that deepen the setting.

World interactivity is supported through environmental searching, Mini Medals, barrels, rocks, secret spots, and rewards that encourage checking every nook.

Writing quality is mixed but high-impact, with praise for intentional storytelling alongside criticism of some script choices.

Writing quality is praised for improved character writing, localization, and personality, with some reviewers calling the added dialogue a highlight.