Compare Nothing Headphone (1) vs Sony WH-1000XM5 Premium Noise Canceling Headphones

Reviewers liked that wired listening is covered with a 3.5mm jack, often alongside USB-C, making the headphones more flexible for planes and wired sources.

Reviewers valued the retained 3.5mm analog option, especially as a practical fallback for wired playback.

ANC was generally viewed as strong for the price and effective in everyday noise, though several reviewers said Sony, Bose, or AirPods Max still outperform it.

Noise cancellation was one of the strongest points across reviews, with repeated praise for travel, offices, commuting, and loud environments.

Reviewers consistently praised the broad feature set, especially customization, spatial options, ANC controls, and app-driven extras.

Advanced software features were praised for ANC customization and carried-over smart capabilities, though they rely on the app ecosystem.

One reviewer specifically liked the slim profile because the headphones sit close to the head despite their bold styling.

The sleeker, smoother exterior was praised where reviewers focused on styling and discreet modern design.

Background-noise reduction was mixed: lab-style and street testing praised attenuation, while some reviewers noted weaker handling of voices or sudden sounds.

Reviewers noted low hiss or natural-feeling ANC, with several saying the cancellation avoided the invasive artifacts of older products.

One review found ANC changed the sound signature negatively, narrowing and muting more complex tracks.

One review said audio sounded best with ANC off because switching ANC on narrowed and muted the presentation.

ANC was described as preserving clarity better than older implementations rather than dirtying or masking the music.

The six-month review praised the app for working on both iOS and Android, supporting strong Android usability.

Android-related features were viewed positively where reviewers mentioned Fast Pair, LDAC access, or app compatibility.

The app was one of the product’s strongest points, with reviewers praising its layout, speed, settings, and unusually deep EQ tools.

The companion app was widely praised for depth and customization, with a few caveats around privacy or minor annoyances.

Low-latency mode was treated positively as a useful gaming/video feature for reducing delay.

Auracast was a weakness only by absence, with TechRadar saying the lack of LE Audio and Auracast keeps them from feeling fully future-proof.

Wear/on-head detection was praised in early reviews as useful and working well, though related long-term Mac behavior was criticized elsewhere.

Auto power/sleep behavior drew criticism in long-term use, especially when connected to a Mac.

Auto-off behavior was viewed as useful for conserving battery when the headphones are removed and left idle.

Bass impressions were split: some heard controlled punch and texture, while others described muddy bass or weak low-frequency precision before EQ.

Bass drew mixed reactions: often fun, punchy, and energetic, but sometimes too boosted, muddy, or less refined.

Battery life was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly praised for 35+ hours with ANC and exceptional longevity without ANC.

Battery life was usually considered good to excellent for normal use, though some reviewers found it short versus newer or rival models.

Bluetooth reliability was supported by positive connectivity evidence, including Bluetooth 5.3 range and dual-device support.

Bluetooth reliability was generally strong, with reviewers reporting stable connections and few or no dropouts.

Bluetooth 5.3 was described as up to date, giving the headphones a modern wireless baseline.

Bluetooth 5.2 was treated as competent but no longer cutting edge when compared with newer headphones.

Build quality was broadly praised as solid, premium, and better than expected, though one reviewer worried about long-term headband durability.

Build quality was polarizing: some found it flexible and durable, while others worried about plastic and hinge durability.

Wired hi-res and USB-C digital playback were viewed as useful extras, with reviewers noting clearer or lossless wired listening.

Hi-res and enhancement features were useful but mixed: reviewers heard some benefit from DSEE or LDAC-dependent playback, but not always a major change.

Physical controls were a standout strength, widely praised for tactility and usability, although a few reviewers found the layout or paddle/roller behavior finicky.

Cable quality was criticized because the included 3.5mm cable was only three-pole and could not carry microphone audio.

The included factory cable drew a negative comparison against upgraded aftermarket cables.

Case feedback was mixed: some praised protection and compactness, while others found it too large, cheap-feeling, or annoying to zip.

Case impressions were mixed: reviewers liked the quality and compartments but criticized the larger footprint.

Charging was praised, especially the fast-charge claims and real-world usefulness before trips or commutes.

Charging was consistently praised for fast top-ups that provide several hours of playback quickly.

Clamping force was generally secure and comfortable, but PCMag found it tighter than preferred.

Clamp comfort was generally positive for secure, light pressure, though some reviewers felt the fit was tighter than before.

Codec support was treated positively, with SBC/AAC/LDAC and high-res support helping the value proposition.

Codec support was useful thanks to LDAC, AAC, and SBC, but reviewers criticized the limited modern codec set.

Comfort was usually positive over hours of use, but weight, heat, piercings, glasses, and headband pressure made it less universal.

Comfort was often a major strength, especially for long sessions, but fit issues appeared for smaller heads, large ears, or heat-sensitive users.

Connectivity was a major strength, with reviewers praising the mix of USB-C, 3.5mm, multipoint, and app/device support.

Connectivity options were viewed as versatile thanks to Bluetooth, analog cable use, and multipoint support.

Design was one of the most discussed strengths, repeatedly praised as distinctive, premium, and eye-catching, though also polarizing.

Design reactions were mixed: reviewers liked the modern look but criticized the non-folding redesign and less premium feel.

Dolby Atmos/spatial support was mentioned positively as part of the XM5 feature set, though not always as a decisive advantage.

Long-term durability evidence was limited, but one reviewer worried about cosmetic dings from the rectangular cups.

Durability over time raised concerns around padding wear and hinge reports despite some reviewers finding the frame solid.

Ear cup padding was mostly praised for soft memory foam and a good seal, though a few reviewers felt pressure or heat.

Earcup padding was comfortable and plush for some reviewers but criticized for shallow fit, heat, compression, or wear.

Ecosystem perks were useful for Nothing Phone users, but some exclusive features limited broader appeal.

EQ customization was a standout feature, repeatedly described as powerful, granular, and sometimes essential for fixing the stock tuning.

EQ customization was one of the most consistently praised features and often rescued or improved the sound signature.

Launch features were viewed positively because the headphones offered several differentiating features beyond visual design.

Find My support was considered useful but basic, with reviewers noting it mainly plays a sound rather than offering smarter tracking.

Firmware support looked promising because a later Nothing X update added Personal Sound support.

Frequency-response evidence was mixed: some heard balanced tuning, while others found the default curve dark, uneven, or treble-recessed.

Frequency response accuracy was mixed: some praised clarity and balance, while others found stock tuning colored or bass-heavy.

Headband adjustability drew mixed but mostly positive feedback, with smooth adjustment praised and one top-mounted mechanism criticized.

The headband adjustment was functional but less memorable than notched designs because it lacks repeatable settings.

Headband padding was mixed: SoundGuys liked weight distribution, while The Guardian found the padding too thin after hours.

Hinge durability was the most repeated build concern, with multiple reviewers calling it frail, risky, or unreliable.

Immersive audio was weak in TechRadar’s testing, where spatial effects added little and sometimes harmed movie or podcast playback.

Immersive audio quality was positive where reviewers described dimensional or awe-striking presentation.

Included accessories were viewed as simple but adequate, especially the case and included cables.

Instrument separation ranged from crowded and unclear in negative reviews to solid detail and separation in more positive listening impressions.

Instrument separation ranged from excellent and distinct to limited for critical listening, depending on reviewer expectations.

The integrated microphone was repeatedly praised for calls and voice isolation in noisy environments.

LDAC support was consistently treated as a positive, especially for Android/high-res wireless listening.

LDAC was valued for higher-bitrate wireless audio, especially with Android, even though it was not enough for every codec-focused reviewer.

LE Audio readiness was marked down because TechRadar noted the lack of Bluetooth LE Audio and Auracast.

Maximum-volume clarity was positive in CNET’s testing, with almost no distortion even at high volumes.

Maximum volume was praised where reviewers said the headphones play loud without distortion.

Microphone noise reduction was generally strong, with reviewers praising background suppression, though one noted echo/reverb issues.

Microphone noise reduction was a clear strength, with reviewers praising voice isolation and background-noise suppression.

Call mic quality was mixed-to-positive: several reviewers heard clear calls, while others described the mic as merely fine, tinny, or robotic.

Call microphone quality was one of the strongest upgrades, frequently described as clear, impressive, or best-in-class.

Midrange clarity was polarizing, with some praising vocals while others heard too much lower-mid darkness or underemphasized midrange.

Midrange clarity varied from clearer and more expressive after tuning to recessed or muddied by bass in stock sound.

Multi-platform use was praised in long-term testing because the app works across iOS and Android with most features available on both.

Multipoint reliability was treated positively, with reviewers highlighting quick switching and two-device connection.

Multipoint was generally praised as seamless, reliable, or easy to enable.

Passive isolation was a clear strength, with the ear pads and seal repeatedly helping noise reduction even before ANC.

Passive isolation was strong where reviewers noted improved physical blocking and seal-based attenuation.

Overall recommendations were mixed-positive: many reviewers liked the value and debut effort, but sound tuning and comfort kept it from universal praise.

Overall recommendations were mostly positive, but several reviewers added tradeoffs around price, stock tuning, portability, or hinge risk.

Portability was mixed: the headphones lie flat and can pack neatly in some cases, but they do not fold up and remain large.

Portability was one of the biggest weaknesses because the headphones fold flat but not into a smaller shape.

Premium feel was widely praised, with reviewers saying the headphones feel expensive, solid, and better than expected at the price.

Premium feel was mixed: some liked the softness and finish, while others felt older or rival models felt more premium.

Preset EQ feedback was mixed, with some finding treble/bass presets useful and others saying presets were not enough or should be skipped.

Replaceable earpad evidence was weak-to-negative, with uncertainty around replacements and a long-term reviewer noting Nothing still did not sell them.

Sensor evidence was positive but limited, with one reviewer identifying proximity sensing as useful hardware.

Smart listening features were positively supported by Personal Sound, which was described as a useful way to personalize tuning.

Smart listening features were generally praised, but Speak-to-Chat and adaptive switching could feel intrusive or overly sensitive.

Smart Pause performance was praised by TechRadar, which said wear detection and multipoint both worked perfectly once enabled.

Smart pause was usually praised for convenience, though one reviewer found related speech detection too sensitive.

Smudge resistance was a weakness because the finish visibly picked up oil even if it wiped off easily.

Smudge resistance was mixed: matte finishes resisted fingerprints, while soft-touch material showed grease and sweat.

Setup and software simplicity were praised through Google Fast Pair, an easy app, and automatic pairing behavior.

Setup was described as straightforward through Sony’s app workflow.

Sound leakage was praised as very low, even at high volume.

Sound quality was the most divisive area: some loved the tuned or EQ-adjusted sound, while many criticized the default tuning as dark, flat, or compressed.

Sound quality was broadly good to excellent, especially with EQ, but reviewers disagreed on stock tuning and technical performance.

Soundstage was often criticized as narrow or compressed, though a few reviewers heard decent width after tuning or in positive listening sessions.

Soundstage ranged from spacious and immersive to narrow or intimate depending on reviewer and comparison set.

Spatial audio was mixed: some found it useful for movies and broad device support, while others called it weak, limp, or harmful to music.

Spatial audio was useful and sometimes immersive, but compatibility and service limitations kept it from being universal.

Fit stability was praised where reviewers described a secure fit without excessive tightness.

Stability was mixed: secure for some movement, but small or narrow heads could experience shifting.

Streaming-service integration was criticized in long-term use because Channel Hop/favorites behavior felt confusing.

Streaming-service integration was limited because 360 Reality Audio did not work with all services.

Repairability evidence was mixed-to-negative: The Guardian noted replacement cushions, but a long-term reviewer criticized the soldered battery.

Sustainability was viewed positively where reviewers mentioned recycled materials and packaging choices.

Sustainability materials were a weakness because The Guardian said the headphones were not made with recycled materials.

Recycled-material construction and packaging were noted positively by reviewers who discussed sustainability.

Touch controls were often intuitive and responsive, but some reviewers found them finicky or easy to misfire.

Transparency mode was generally usable and often natural enough for conversations, but several reviewers found it less natural than Apple, Bose, or Sony.

Transparency/ambient mode was useful and customizable, but reviewers disagreed on how natural it sounded versus Apple or Bose.

Travel friendliness was mixed-to-negative because battery life is good but the case is bulky and the headphones do not fold up.

Travel friendliness benefited from comfort, ANC, battery, and analog fallback, but suffered from the larger non-folding case.

Treble clarity was a common weakness in negative sound reviews, with several reviewers hearing recessed, dull, or less crisp highs.

Treble was praised for clarity and detail in some reviews, but criticized elsewhere as muted, harsh, or masking-prone.

USB-C was praised as a useful wired audio and charging option, especially for modern devices and lossless playback.

USB-C charging was useful, but reviewers criticized the lack of USB-C digital audio playback.

Value was generally positive because the headphones undercut major rivals while offering strong build, controls, battery, ANC, and EQ, though weak default sound hurt value for some.

Value was mixed: reviewers liked discounts and long-term usefulness but criticized the launch price and stronger alternatives.

Voice assistant integration was positively supported through the customizable button and Gemini/assistant access.

Voice assistant support was considered convenient where reviewers noted hands-free or touch-activated assistants.

Voice prompts and feedback split reviewers sharply: one loved the mode sounds, while others found cues uncomfortable, awful, loud, or jarring.

Volume output was criticized by reviewers who wanted more headroom or found the roller caused accidental loud jumps.

Water/sweat resistance was praised as rare for premium over-ears, though PCMag cautioned that IP52 is still limited.

Water and sweat resistance was a weakness because reviewers repeatedly noted the lack of IP rating.

Wear detection auto-pause was criticized in long-term Mac use, where the reviewer said over-ear detection was god-awful.

Wear detection auto-pause was generally praised as fast and convenient.

Wear detection performance was poor in one long-term Mac test, where it reportedly never worked.

Weight comfort was mixed: reviewers often found them wearable, but their 329g weight was repeatedly noticed against lighter Sony/Bose options.

Low weight was a major comfort advantage and helped the XM5 feel lighter than many competitors.

Wind handling was mixed: some mic suppression impressed reviewers, while ANC or voice noise gating struggled in wind.

Wind noise handling was praised in design and call contexts, especially for reducing wind-related disruption.