Compare Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 SE Headphones vs SONY WH-1000XM6 Headphones

The 3.5mm input was generally appreciated as a practical wired option, especially because it enables analog listening despite missing USB-C audio.

ANC is generally judged good or improved, though not always elite; reviewers praised effectiveness while noting Sony/Bose-class options can still outperform it.

ANC was the strongest consensus point: reviewers repeatedly called it class-leading, best-in-class, or among the best they had tested.

Advanced software features such as DynamEQ and app changes are useful but taste-dependent, with some reviewers liking the added energy and others preferring simpler original tuning.

Advanced software features were plentiful and often impressive, but reviewers sometimes found them excessive, confusing, or underused.

Aesthetics split reviewers: some liked the clean design and blue color, while another found the wide look silly when worn.

Aesthetic discretion was mixed: one reviewer liked the low-profile street look, while another thought the headphones looked dorkier than competitors.

Background noise reduction is viewed as improved and effective, but not the quietest in the class according to comparison-focused reviewers.

ANC's effect on the sound signature is mixed: one review praised the lack of tonal shift, while another found ANC-on tuning messier on the SE.

ANC sound impact is similarly split, with TechRadar praising tonal consistency and RecordingNow hearing a more problematic change with ANC on.

Android setup worked smoothly in the tested pairing flow, with the reviewer connecting quickly to a Samsung foldable device.

Android compatibility was a strength thanks to LDAC, Android-friendly hi-res support, and cross-device pairing advantages.

The app is widely praised for EQ, controls, and clean layout, though one reviewer wanted clearer EQ frequency labeling.

The app drew mixed-to-negative reactions because it is powerful but crowded, aged, or not especially intuitive.

aptX Lossless support is treated as part of the impressive specification.

aptX was criticized because reviewers specifically noted the lack of aptX HD support.

Gaming/low-latency performance was judged snappy and suitable for videos and fast-paced games.

Latency evidence was limited but positive for wired analog use, where reviewers noted no latency through the headphone cable.

Auracast support was mixed: one reviewer saw it as future-proofing, while another could not get it working in testing.

Wear-detection auto play/pause mostly worked but showed a brief audio cutout in one hands-on test.

Auto-play and wear detection performed very well in the available evidence, pausing and resuming immediately.

RecordingNow gave the product a strong S-Tier expert score, reflecting award-style recognition in that review.

Editorial recognition was strong, with reviewers naming the XM6 a best overall or best new headphone pick.

Bass earns strong praise for impact and EQ potential, but some reviewers found the SE tuning too bass-forward or not fully controlled.

Bass was usually described as punchy, controlled, and customizable, though one reviewer found Sony's low end could overpower mids and highs.

Battery life is one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly called excellent, incredible, extraordinary, or best-in-class.

Battery life was viewed as solid and travel-ready at roughly 30 hours with ANC, though not class-leading against longer-lasting competitors.

Bluetooth-related experiences were largely positive where judged through pairing and multipoint behavior.

Bluetooth performance was discussed positively where reviewed, with connectivity described as a standout area for Sony.

Bluetooth version support was viewed positively in one comparison because the XM6 uses newer Bluetooth with LE benefits.

Build quality is consistently praised as sturdy, premium, or strong for the price, with only minor creaking noted in one review.

Build quality was mixed: one review found it very good, while another said the plastic construction felt underwhelming for the price.

Built-in DAC and hi-res wired playback were criticized because reviewers wanted a true digital lossless USB-C option.

Physical button controls are praised for usability and responsiveness.

Physical button usability improved meaningfully, with reviewers liking the distinct power and ANC buttons and easier blind operation.

Cable quality receives a positive note for the included USB-C and 3.5mm cables.

Cable quality was criticized by one reviewer, who expected better cables for a premium headphone.

The hard case is generally sturdy and solid, but its size hurts compactness.

The carrying case was a standout strength thanks to its compact size, protection, magnetic clasp, and faster access.

Charging was praised for quick-charge performance and the ability to listen while charging.

Clamping force is mostly acceptable or well judged, though one review found the fit snug compared with rivals.

Clamping force was generally comfortable and secure, with tighter fit improving isolation without widespread discomfort.

Codec support is praised through aptX Adaptive and aptX Lossless support, but wireless LDAC absence is a separate limitation.

Codec support was mostly good thanks to LDAC, SBC, LC3, and AAC, but reviewers noted limits such as missing aptX and some LDAC stability concerns.

Comfort is mixed: some reviewers found it comfortable or improved, while others criticized weight, snugness, or headband pressure over time.

Long-use comfort was mostly strong, especially for travel, but several reviewers reported heat, pressure, or fit issues for some heads and ears.

Wired listening options are appreciated as part of the broader connectivity package.

Connectivity options were praised for convenient device switching and multipoint behavior.

Design is usually viewed positively, especially the clean lines and color options, although the look is not universally loved.

Design and aesthetics were mostly praised for a clean, modern, lightweight look, though some reviewers still found the design safe or understated.

Detachable analog cable use was useful for low-latency wired listening, though broader cable quality drew criticism elsewhere.

Durability is judged positively through solid materials and a reviewer description of the headphones as durable overall.

Durability over time had limited evidence, with one reviewer specifically worrying about the folding joint's long-term durability.

Ear cup padding and space are generally praised for plushness, roominess, and comfort.

Ear cup padding was usually praised as soft and well cushioned, though one long-use review found the earpads warm and sweaty.

Ear cup rotation is judged useful and flexible where reviewed.

Ear cup swivel and rotation were praised for neck comfort, easier storage, and restoring convenience missing from the XM5.

One reviewer heard slight creaking during movement, but described it as minor.

Ecosystem integration was criticized where discussed because Sony's own ecosystem and PlayStation support felt incomplete.

EQ customization is a major strength, with reviewers praising the seven-band EQ and how well the headphones respond to tuning.

EQ customization was one of Sony's strongest feature advantages, with repeated praise for the 10-band EQ, guided EQ, and deep tuning control.

Feature coverage is viewed positively, with reviewers noting modern ANC-headphone features and useful app-based controls.

Features at launch were viewed as very complete in the available evidence, with one reviewer saying the XM6 offers essentially everything expected from premium Bluetooth ANC headphones.

Frequency-response impressions are mixed because the SE sounds warmer and less flat than the original, even though the tonal balance can be adjusted.

Frequency response and tuning were generally praised as balanced and well measured, especially compared with earlier Sony tuning.

Headband adjustability was not evaluated directly beyond factual mechanism mentions.

Headband adjustability had limited but positive evidence from a reviewer who found the fully extended fit comfortable.

Headband padding is one of the more divisive comfort points, ranging from improved and comfortable to stiff or not meaningfully changed.

Headband padding and shape were mixed: some reviewers found it comfortable, while others criticized thin padding or long-term pressure.

Head gestures had limited but positive evidence, with a reviewer calling nod/shake call control a nice touch.

Hinge feel and arm construction are praised for tightness, friction, and premium movement.

Hinge durability was mixed: one review praised the more durable hinge, while another flagged fragile-feeling articulating hinges.

Immersion is praised through wide, effortless soundstage comments, even without spatial audio.

Immersive audio quality was mixed: cinema/background modes impressed some reviewers, while others called music upmixing gimmicky or poor.

Included accessories are appreciated, especially the case and cable management touches.

Included accessories were criticized where evaluated because a reviewer expected better and more modern cables for the price.

Detail retrieval and instrument separation are praised in both written and hands-on listening tests.

Instrument separation earned positive but limited evidence, with reviewers hearing better placement and clearer separation in the XM6.

Microphone quality is good in quiet conditions, but noise suppression is less impressive in background noise.

The integrated microphone setup was viewed positively in the available evidence as part of the XM6's strong mic technology.

LDAC is a clear omission for reviewers who expect high-res wireless codec support.

LDAC was a clear plus for Android and hi-res Bluetooth playback, though one reviewer warned the highest transfer rate may be unstable on some phones.

LE Audio readiness was treated as a future-proofing benefit, tied to Auracast and newer Bluetooth features.

Clarity at higher volume is praised, with reviewers noting strong clarity and no distortion at raised levels.

Microphone noise reduction is weaker than some competitors, with one reviewer saying it does not filter as much background noise.

Microphone noise reduction was excellent in the evidence, especially against streets, wind, and ambient noise during calls.

Microphone quality itself is good in quiet conditions, even if background noise filtering is less strong.

Call quality was strongly praised, with reviewers highlighting clearer voice pickup, better mics, and strong performance in noisy settings.

Mids are frequently praised as clear, rounded, and strong with vocals or instruments.

Midrange and vocal clarity were a consistent strength, with reviewers calling voices clear, textured, natural, and fuller than prior models.

Multi-platform compatibility was mixed: Apple and Android playback worked, but PlayStation wireless compatibility drew criticism.

Multipoint generally works, but switching can require pausing and there is no automatic switching in one test.

Multipoint was viewed positively, with reviewers appreciating dual-device pairing across phones, laptops, and mixed Apple/non-Apple setups.

Passive noise isolation is a notable strength, with reviewers praising how much noise is blocked before ANC.

Passive isolation was a major strength in lab and hands-on impressions, helping the headphones block substantial noise even before ANC.

Overall recommendations are very positive, especially for sound-first buyers and value seekers, with caveats around ANC, comfort, and bulk.

Overall recommendations were strongly positive, with reviewers frequently calling the XM6 elite, best-in-class, or worth buying despite caveats.

Portability is a weakness because the headphones and case are not especially compact.

Portability and foldability were major upgrades, with reviewers repeatedly praising the return of folding hinges and a smaller travel footprint.

Premium feel is praised through materials, finish, and comparisons to more expensive headphones.

Premium feel was one of the weaker areas because several reviewers felt the plastic build did not match the high price.

Preset and DynamEQ-style tuning are useful but taste-dependent; some presets are usable while DynamEQ can be divisive.

Preset or guided EQ profiles were received positively where discussed, helping users reach a preferred sound without complex manual tuning.

Replaceable earpads and battery-related serviceability are repeatedly praised as longevity-friendly.

Replaceable earpads were mixed: one source praised easier pad removal, another called replacement difficult, and another simply noted replaceable pads.

Replaceable components receive praise where reviewers focus on the user-replaceable battery as a long-term ownership benefit.

Replaceable pads or headband evidence was limited but positive for earpads, with easier pad removal described as a change for the better.

Sensor performance is mostly positive through wear-detection testing, though resume behavior had a minor glitch in one review.

Sensors were praised in the available evidence because the wear sensors performed reliably.

Sidetone/voice passthrough needs improvement according to one reviewer who wanted clearer, louder self-voice feedback.

Sidetone adjustment was a weakness for one reviewer because voice amplification sounded unnatural and could not be toned down enough.

Smart listening features such as DynamEQ are useful for low-volume listening but not universally preferred.

Smart listening features such as Speak-to-Chat, Quick Attention, and adaptive modes were generally useful, though not universally essential.

Smart Pause works quickly in hands-on testing, though one reviewer observed a brief audio glitch when resuming.

Smart Pause worked very well in the available evidence, immediately pausing and resuming playback.

The off-white finish receives a small positive note for resisting a dirty-looking appearance over time.

Smudge resistance was weak, with reviewers complaining that the darker finishes show finger grease and smudge badly.

Setup and software are generally smooth, clean, and intuitive, with fast firmware and app interactions noted.

Setup and software simplicity were mixed-to-negative because spatial setup, app navigation, and feature layout could feel involved or unintuitive.

Sound quality is the strongest repeated praise, described as detailed, clear, engaging, and high value for the price.

Reviewers broadly praised the XM6 for rich, clear, dynamic sound, with only a few noting rivals can sound wider or more refined.

Soundstage is generally wide and spacious, though one reviewer heard it as more intimate than wide.

Soundstage was mixed: some reviewers heard nice width, while others found it restricted or weak for competitive gaming.

Spatial audio is absent, which some reviewers list as a limitation, though others say the natural soundstage reduces the sting.

Spatial audio was one of the most mixed areas: cinema use sometimes impressed reviewers, but music support, setup, and service availability drew criticism.

Fit stability was positive where evaluated, with reviewers noting snug, secure fit and consistent seal behavior.

Streaming service integration for spatial audio was weak, with reviewers noting limited or lost service support despite 360 Reality Audio capability.

Sustainability and repairability are praised thanks to recyclable packaging, recycled materials, user-replaceable batteries, and removable pads.

Repairability was criticized, especially around maintenance options and difficulty replacing parts compared with expectations for a premium product.

Sustainability materials earn praise from TechRadar, especially the recycled plastic and driver material claims.

Touch controls divided reviewers: some found them accurate or intuitive, while others called them finicky, easy to nudge, or terrible.

Transparency mode ranges from natural and useful to merely acceptable and less airy than competitors.

Transparency mode improved substantially and often sounded natural, though some reviewers still found AirPods Max more realistic or Sony slightly unnatural.

Travel friendliness is mixed: battery life is excellent for long trips, but the large case and limited folding hurt portability.

Travel friendliness was a major strength, supported by strong ANC, comfort, battery life, folding design, and the improved case.

Treble is often praised for detail, shine, and sparkle, but DynamEQ can make the sound more aggressive for some listeners.

Treble drew mostly positive comments for detail and sparkle, but lab-focused criticism noted some peaks that could need EQ.

USB-C connectivity is positively mentioned as part of the wired-listening and cable package.

USB-C was the most repeated technical complaint because reviewers wanted USB-C audio or lossless digital playback, not charging-only behavior.

Value is one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly calling the P100 SE well priced or exceptional for sound quality per dollar.

Value was mixed: reviewers often said performance justified the price, but the $450 tier, discounts, and missing features were recurring caveats.

Voice assistant access worked cleanly in hands-on testing.

Voice assistant and voice-command features were mixed, with one reviewer saying they worked well and another finding them inconsistent.

Voice prompts stand out positively, especially the Matt Berry/Southwark option.

Volume output is mixed: some found it loud enough or very loud, while another wanted more Bluetooth/3.5mm loudness.

Water resistance is a weakness because one reviewer warns users to be careful due to no rating.

Water and sweat resistance were a weakness because reviewers cautioned there is no IP rating.

Wear-detection auto-pause is fast, though the broader wear-detection behavior was not flawless.

Wear detection auto-pause was excellent in the available review, immediately pausing and resuming playback.

Wear detection performed quickly but had a resume-side glitch that the reviewer wanted fixed.

Wear detection performance was excellent in the available review, with sensors described as as good as ever.

Weight comfort is mixed to negative, with one reviewer calling it among the heaviest in class while another found it substantial but acceptable.

Weight comfort was praised where mentioned, with reviewers highlighting the XM6 as very light for premium over-ear ANC headphones.

Wind handling is mixed: one review criticized wind noise in transparency mode, while another found ANC outdoor wind handling very good.

Wind handling was praised in microphone testing, where the XM6 rejected unwanted wind noise very well.