Compare Marvel Tokon: Fighting Souls vs Kingdom Come: Deliverance II

Simplified inputs and auto-combos are widely seen as beginner-friendly, while later impressions say accessibility improved further.

One reviewer warned that excessive profanity and potentially offensive material make the game unsuitable for some audiences.

CPU battles were considered challenging enough to make practice difficult when no training mode was available.

AI and NPC behavior were praised for believable reactions, routines, crime responses, and increased sophistication over the first game.

Ranged play was viewed as improved by some reviewers, especially archery, but another found ranged combat weightless and weak.

Animation receives positive notes for sketch-to-ink presentation, panel-like motion, and impressive super animations.

Cutscene direction and mocap were praised for selling relationships and emotional scenes convincingly.

The art direction is repeatedly praised for its manga/comic hybrid identity, sharp comic-book look, and Japanese reinterpretation of Marvel.

The visual style of menus, maps, and medieval presentation received praise for matching the game’s historical tone.

Atmosphere is praised through comments about immaculate vibes and personality beyond flashy attacks.

Atmosphere was praised alongside world-building, especially in cities, music, and historically grounded locations.

Bugs were present but usually minor; reviewers ranged from calling glitches common to saying issues rarely disrupted play.

Camera behavior was a noted issue for one reviewer, especially through finicky first-person viewpoint problems.

Team composition is praised for giving players more customization and synergy choices than typical smaller tag teams.

Henry and Hans received strong praise for their evolving relationship and character arcs, with Henry’s trauma and growth adding stakes.

Roster reactions are very positive, with praise for distinct characters, Marvel icon appeal, new additions, and varied playstyles.

The cast was praised for memorable personalities, humor, and a strong sense of history.

Checkpointing was criticized for causing lost progress when autosaves appeared only at limited quest points.

The beta roster was perceived as broadly viable, with no character feeling clearly too strong or weak to one reviewer.

Combat is repeatedly praised for mechanical density, rhythm, speed, and improved assist/tag dynamics, with only beta-era roughness holding it back.

Combat drew broad attention for its realism, skill focus, and improvements, though several reviewers still found it harsh, clunky, or frustrating early on.

The dog companion Mutt was praised as useful and worthwhile, especially for tracking and early side-quest benefits.

Competitive balance is mixed: skill matching was poor, but beta character viability seemed generally healthy aside from strong outliers.

Reviewers praised the breadth of activities, quests, and post-launch additions, with many describing a large and varied set of things to do.

Controls range from praised snappiness and intuitive combos to complaints about clunky switching, odd DP inputs, and auto-combo interference.

Controls were described as noticeably smoother than the first game, especially in camera feel, aiming, and sword fighting responsiveness.

One hands-on review found the basic loop easy to acclimate to, built around openings, combos, and super-move finishers.

One reviewer found the loop rewarding but volatile, with strong highs offset by repeated frustration and setbacks.

Crafting split reviewers: blacksmithing and alchemy could be charming and rewarding, but several found parts clunky, slow, or repetitive.

Crash stability was praised by multiple reviewers who reported no crashes, no soft locks, or no hard crashes.

Dialogue is praised for making characters sound recognizable rather than generic.

Dialogue was mostly praised for impact, humor, and organic choices, though one reviewer found some repeated dialogue drawn out.

Reviewers liked comeback potential and fight engagement, though one wanted clearer defensive options against combo locks.

Difficulty was often called demanding and unforgiving; reviewers generally treated this as part of the appeal, though not always an easy one.

The post-launch expansions were credited with adding a large amount of extra content to the package.

The early economy was described as restrictive, especially when selling damaged or stolen goods with limited vendor money.

Reveal reaction evidence shows unusually strong surprise and excitement around the announcement.

Reviewers described the story as memorable and emotionally powerful, including scenes that brought strong lasting reactions.

Environmental detail was praised for dense, specific objects, puddles, tools, farms, residences, and believable spaces.

Exploration was praised for beautiful spaces, meaningful discoveries, and a strong adventuring feel, though harsh systems made some travel demanding.

Facial animation feedback was mixed: one reviewer noted lifeless dialogue faces, while another praised key character animations.

Marvel faithfulness is praised through character essence, recognizable identity, and personality that feels true to the comics.

Reviewers generally agreed the sequel stays true to the original while improving its systems, scope, and accessibility.

Family friendliness was limited by repeated profanity, sexual content, and depictions of women that one reviewer found objectifying.

Fast travel opinions were mixed: one reviewer praised dynamic events, while another found it cumbersome and interruption-prone.

Frame rate stability is specifically praised during chaotic matches with assists and specials on screen.

One reviewer reported a consistent frame rate and treated that as part of the game’s stronger technical state.

Fun factor is one of the strongest areas, with many reviewers saying they had a blast, wanted more, or became newly excited after hands-on time.

Several reviewers found the game highly entertaining, addictive, and rewarding once its demanding systems clicked.

Reviewers describe the mechanics as deep and increasingly rewarding, with later build impressions saying the system became much more dynamic, though auto-combos and complexity remain tradeoffs.

Reviewers repeatedly framed the systems-heavy design as a major strength, praising how mechanics connect to role-playing, dialogue, world simulation, and player expression.

Visual quality is a major point of agreement, with reviewers calling the game gorgeous, flawless, stunning, awesome, and comic-like.

Graphics were broadly praised for impressive landscapes, cutscenes, lighting, and major visual improvements over the first game.

The game was not seen as a pure grind, but reviewers still emphasized the effort and repetition needed to gain traction.

Handheld suitability was supported by one reviewer who described the game as scalable enough for handheld play.

DualSense haptics and adaptive triggers were praised for reflecting stamina, sword clashes, and sharpening interactions.

A horror-leaning quest was criticized for being too short for its dread to fully develop.

HUD clarity is flagged in later build impressions because the stylish combo gauge lacked visual feedback.

The adaptive HUD was praised for hiding unnecessary elements and improving immersion when information was not relevant.

One reviewer found the combined sights and sounds made fights feel alive and engaging.

Immersion was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly describing the world, systems, and presentation as absorbing.

The reveal was received as bold and surprising, emphasizing the game's unusual 4v4 Marvel fighter concept.

One reviewer praised the scale of improvement as something other studios rarely achieve.

The game is described as easy to enter but hard to fully understand, with a steep depth curve beneath the accessible surface.

The learning curve was repeatedly described as steep, slow, and friction-heavy, rewarding patience but likely turning some players away.

Stage transitions are praised for being fast and not interrupting match flow.

One reviewer praised the way locations were recontextualized into memorable set-pieces that rewarded planning and awareness.

Post-launch support was described positively through free updates, fixes, and eagerly awaited features.

Load times were criticized by one reviewer as long enough to worsen stealth retries and experimentation.

Loot was criticized for early encumbrance pressure and the difficulty of carrying everything a player might want.

The historical codex and contextual detail were praised for offering extensive background on people, events, and society.

Maps were praised for medieval flair and exquisite town art, supporting the game’s historical presentation.

Matchmaking is a beta weakness, with reviewers reporting trouble finding matches and uneven skill ranges.

Lobby/menu usability is a repeated weakness, with reviewers disliking the arcade-cabinet system and its added friction.

Menu usability was mixed to negative, with some praise for navigation but others calling the menu system dire or frustrating.

Main mission design was mixed: reviewers praised varied scenarios, but one criticized a required sequence for lacking an alternate path.

Mission variety was strongly praised, especially for quests that went beyond simple errands or bandit-clearing objectives.

Movement and tagging feel more energetic in later impressions, with reviewers praising faster play, better mobility, and more satisfying swaps.

One reviewer felt early traversal was unnecessarily taxing, especially before stronger equipment and better mobility options eased the burden.

The 4v4/tag structure is the most debated design point: some praise all-out team play, while others question tagging incentives and clunky swaps.

Narrative quality was a major strength, with reviewers praising the historical saga, main quest, character arcs, and cinematic ambition.

The basic tutorial is credited for explaining controls and mechanics, but the broader beta onboarding lacked practice depth.

Onboarding divided reviewers: returning and new-player recaps helped, but some found the opening overloaded or blunt.

Netcode and online match feel are strongly praised, with smooth matches and little lag even in demanding beta conditions.

The open world drew strong praise for its scale, density, historically grounded cities, and lived-in regions across multiple maps.

Originality is supported by the unusual manga-Western look and a tag system that reviewers say works differently from traditional tag fighters.

Reviewers repeatedly emphasized how unusual and specific the game feels compared with modern RPGs.

Pacing earns praise when fights build tension and stage transitions flow well, but one reviewer found the speed initially too slow.

Pacing opinions varied: some praised the sustained momentum, while others complained about indulgent cutscenes or late-game pacing issues.

Performance is praised in beta play for staying consistent without stutters or drops.

Performance was generally praised across PC and console contexts, with reviewers noting strong optimization and technical improvements.

The PS5 Pro version was praised as a graphical treat, with platform-specific technical strengths noted.

Polish is mixed: the game is highly promising, but beta systems, lobbies, and remaining refinement needs are repeatedly noted.

Reviewers saw the sequel as much more polished than the first game, with rough edges reduced and systems better realized.

Progression was widely praised for turning early friction into rewarding growth through skills, perks, equipment, and player learning.

One reviewer strongly disliked Hans as a long-term companion presence, creating strain on their desire to continue.

Quest design was one of the strongest points, with reviewers praising memorable side stories, branching approaches, and strong writing, despite a few disappointing payoffs.

Hands-on reviewers repeatedly wanted more time with the game, citing anticipation, continued experimentation, and post-session excitement.

Replay value looked strong thanks to hardcore mode, major content additions, and reviewers wanting to return for more playthroughs.

Reviewers admired the freedom to solve problems, exploit systems, and role-play, though the sandbox sometimes clashed with scripted story demands.

The save system was one of the most divisive topics, praised by one reviewer but criticized by many as stingy or punishing.

Server reliability is mixed negatively in one beta review because friend/cabinet connections could randomly disconnect.

The sequel was credited with giving supporting women and other groups somewhat more agency than before.

Reviewers liked the depth and usefulness of perks, weapon techniques, and skill trees, especially when they enabled meaningful playstyle specialization.

Sound design is praised for impactful hits that add energy without overwhelming the match.

Sound design was praised for supporting immersion and helping players identify attacks or stealth-relevant cues.

Music is consistently liked, with reviewers calling it energetic, good, and close to Arc System Works' fighting-game style.

The soundtrack was one of the most consistently praised elements, with several reviewers calling it orchestral, phenomenal, or legendary.

Stealth was useful and sometimes satisfying, yet reviewers also called it finicky, weak, or frustrating in specific forced sections.

Multiple reviewers criticize the beta for lacking a proper training mode or practice space despite useful basic tutorial material.

Tutorial quality was mixed, with one reviewer calling it decent while others criticized dense text screens and poor explanations.

The revised perk and upgrade system was praised for offering meaningful upside-focused choices rather than weak side-grades.

The UI is praised for matching the comic-book aesthetic alongside backgrounds and character models.

UI feedback was positive when reviewers discussed improved, adaptable, or visually polished interface presentation.

Value was praised because the game is both strong and very long, with some reviewers reporting enormous playtime.

Visual effects are praised for readable motion, flashy Marvel attacks, aesthetic impact, and later-build spectacle.

Visual set pieces and in-engine scenes were praised for creating striking emotional moments.

Voice presentation is praised because characters sound like themselves rather than generic versions.

Voice acting was broadly praised, especially the main cast, though some reviewers noted repeated or uneven minor NPC voices.

Weapon balance was mixed: one reviewer liked weapon choice, while another found some ranged options hard to use effectively.

World-building was repeatedly praised as immersive, historically grounded, and central to the game’s appeal.

Reviewers consistently praised the reactive crime, reputation, NPC, and quest systems that made the world feel alive and responsive.

Character lines are praised for matching comic tone, especially Spider-Man-style banter.

Writing was described as excellent, engaging, humorous, and consistently strong across main and side content.