Compare Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones vs Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones

Most reviews call the ANC excellent or near top-tier, especially for low-frequency rumble and commuting noise; a few note the Ultra can be a touch stronger or more consistent. ANC is adjustable with app modes and multiple levels; reviewers like the ability to dial it back or add wind-related control, though you generally cannot fully disable processing in the mode system.

The Bose app is typically described as clean and easy, enabling modes, EQ, and updates; one review criticizes the onboarding privacy prompt and the app being required for full control.

aptX family support is cited as missing; several comparisons highlight that more premium or competing models offer advanced Qualcomm codec options.

Most reviewers report acceptable video sync for casual watching, but the limited codec stack means some users may notice lag depending on device and content.

Bass is a defining trait: many describe strong, punchy, even head-shaking low end; critics say it can be overemphasized and may need EQ for balance.

Bass is generally controlled and textured, with some listeners hearing a fuller, pillowy low end and others calling it restrained or dry compared with bassier alternatives. Sub-bass is present but not the main emphasis, so slam-heads may want more weight.

Battery life is usually framed as solid but not class-leading, landing around the mid-20-hour range in claims and tests; competitors can go much longer.

Bluetooth stability is generally described as reliable for everyday use, with no recurring dropout complaints in the provided reviews.

Build quality is usually described as solid but mostly plastic; some reviewers want a more premium feel at the price, while others emphasize durability and dependable hinges.

Build quality is consistently described as excellent, with premium materials, tight assembly, and a refined feel. Several reviews highlight serviceability and long-term durability as part of the value proposition.

Physical buttons are widely praised as tactile, reliable, and easier than touch controls, especially for travel and cold-weather use.

Cable design is a minor gripe in at least one review due to the nonstandard 2.5mm headphone-side connector, even though the cable is included and functional.

Cable impressions are mixed: many find the stock cable sturdy and functional, but some report microphonics or less-than-ideal ergonomics, and several note the lack of a balanced stock option.

The carrying case is commonly described as compact, protective, and well designed for travel; several mention cable storage as a practical bonus.

The included hard/semi-hard case is widely praised as well-made and protective, with room for cables/adapters and a secure zipper. It supports storage and occasional transport effectively.

Charging is generally straightforward via USB-C, with multiple mentions of quick-boost usefulness; full charge times are described as typical for the class.

Clamping force is generally described as secure but not tight, helping maintain a seal without pressure hotspots for most wearers.

Clamp force is generally described as moderate and well-distributed, supporting stability without obvious pain. A handful of impressions mention the clamp feeling a bit tight out of the box, with minor adjustment/break-in helping.

Codec support is a consistent weakness: multiple reviews note only AAC and SBC, which limits future-proofing and high-res playback options.

Comfort is a headline strength, repeatedly described as pillow-like and easy to wear for hours, making them a favorite for travel and desk work.

Comfort is a consistent strength: the self-adjusting suspension design and soft pads enable long listening sessions for most people. A few note fit quirks (small cups for some ears or clamp that starts slightly tight).

Design is generally viewed as understated and unobtrusive, with color options often mentioned; premium styling is sometimes credited more to the Ultra variant.

Design is a standout, with walnut accents and Meze’s mid-century styling repeatedly called premium-looking and distinctive. Even critics of the tuning tend to praise the aesthetics and finish quality.

Detachable cable use is praised for versatility, but one reviewer dislikes the nonstandard 2.5mm end on the included cable.

The detachable dual 3.5mm system is convenient for replacement, yet recessed/narrow connector sizing can limit third-party cable compatibility compared with more universal designs. Connection security itself is generally praised.

The included wired cable with inline mic is highlighted as a useful convenience for calls or laptop use, even when not using Bluetooth.

The included USB-C DAC dongle/adapter is viewed as a nice convenience for modern devices, generally adequate for casual listening. Enthusiast reviewers still expect better performance from dedicated DAC/amps.

Earcup padding is frequently praised as plush and soft, contributing strongly to long-wear comfort.

Velour/suede pads are commonly described as plush, breathable, and comfortable, helping distribute pressure and avoid hotspots. Some users wish for a touch more ear room, but pad comfort is still rated highly.

Cup articulation is generally sufficient for a good seal/fit, with tilt helping the pads conform, though some describe movement as limited compared with more freely articulating designs.

EQ customization is usually described as limited (often a simple multi-band setup), but still helpful for reducing bass or smoothing treble; power users may want more granular control.

Frequency response accuracy is described as consumer-tuned rather than neutral, with boosted bass and some upper-range shaping that not everyone enjoys.

Tonality is often described as balanced or smooth rather than strictly neutral, with a coherent frequency integration that avoids obvious bloat. Some characterize it as tastefully colored (warm-bright/W-shaped) rather than reference-flat.

Headband adjustment range is described as generous and easy to fit across different head sizes, reinforcing the all-day comfort theme.

The auto/self-adjusting headband system is repeatedly singled out as one of the best parts of the design, requiring little to no fiddling while spreading pressure evenly. It also helps with consistent fit and comfort over time.

Build discussions suggest robust hinges and a durable chassis, with spring-steel structures and solid joints expected to hold up well over years of use.

Included accessories are generally good for travel with case and cables; one review notes the absence of an airplane adapter.

Accessories are generally seen as generous for the price: a protective case, cables, and adapters (often including USB-C). The main recurring complaint is the absence of a balanced cable in the box.

Instrument separation is generally described as good for the category, though not always framed as audiophile-grade compared to the best competitors.

Instrument separation and imaging are widely regarded as excellent for the price, helping complex mixes stay organized and making positional cues easy to track. Even reviewers who nitpick tuning tend to credit the Silva’s placement and delineation.

LDAC support is repeatedly cited as missing, especially in comparisons to Sony models that offer it.

Maximum volume behavior is described as loud and largely clean, with at least one reviewer noting no obvious distortion at very high levels.

When pushed louder, reviewers who mention it report the presentation staying composed, with bass and treble control holding together without obvious strain.

Noise reduction for calls is mixed: some reviews report effective background handling and wind improvements, while another notes noise rejection can be an issue in certain environments.

Call quality is generally described as good to decent, with clear voice pickup in many scenarios; expectations should be moderate compared with dedicated boom-mic headsets.

Midrange is often described as generally clear, but a few reviews say it can feel recessed or masked by the heavy bass until EQ is adjusted.

Midrange is a highlight for many, with clear, forward vocals/instruments and an overall transparent character. A few note that certain vocal ranges can sound a bit thin, scooped, or pushed depending on recording and pairing.

Reviewers frequently describe good compatibility across sources (phones with dongles, laptops, DAPs, and desktop amps), helped by easy drivability. Some note it scales with source quality and can reveal harshness from poor gear.

Multipoint is supported and often praised for smooth device switching, though at least one review notes it may be toggled or managed in the app.

Passive isolation benefits from a strong seal and well-sized earcups; multiple reviews mention minimal leakage and good baseline isolation even before ANC.

As open-backs, passive isolation is low and sound leakage is expected; a couple of reviewers note mild attenuation compared to very open designs, but these are still best for quiet rooms.

Foldability and rotation are repeatedly called travel-friendly, especially compared with bulkier non-folding competitors and cases.

Portability is mixed: they’re easy to drive and include a protective case, but the open-back design and size make them better suited to home or quiet environments than true travel/commute use.

Preset EQ profiles are described as helpful and functional, though the overall EQ system is still viewed as less flexible than some competitors.

Earpads are commonly treated as replaceable in practice, with at least one long-term owner discussing swapping to aftermarket pads and noting minor ANC impact.

Where discussed, earpads are replaceable and intended for long-term ownership, with guides or documentation supporting pad swaps and maintenance.

Wear-detection sensors are repeatedly called out as missing, leading to no auto-pause when removing the headphones.

Setup and daily use are frequently described as fuss-free, with simple pairing, clear controls, and an app that is easy to navigate.

Overall sound quality is rated enjoyable by most, especially for modern genres, but a subset of reviewers strongly dislike the default tuning and point to limited EQ as the constraint. Wired listening is supported and commonly cited as useful for travel and low-latency needs; at least one reviewer notes passive operation when the battery is dead.

Across reviews, the 105 Silva is described as an engaging open-back with a premium “Meze” presentation: natural timbre, strong technicalities for the price, and a tuning that favors musical enjoyment over strict neutrality. A minority find the voicing less competitive on pure sound-per-dollar versus cheaper rivals without EQ.

Soundstage is described as fairly spacious for ANC Bluetooth headphones, with some reviews crediting design choices for a wider presentation.

Soundstage impressions vary: some describe it as expansive, airy, and three-dimensional, while others find it only moderately wide or a touch narrow with limited depth/layering. Imaging is commonly cited as more consistent than sheer stage size.

Spatial audio or immersive modes are consistently described as not included on this standard model, positioned as a key differentiator for the Ultra.

Fit stability is usually strong thanks to moderate clamp and the suspension design, with reports of little slippage and secure positioning. One review flags potential fit issues for smaller heads due to the frame geometry.

Sustainability is repeatedly tied to Meze’s serviceable approach: parts can be replaced rather than discarding the headphone, supporting longevity and repairability over time.

Touch controls are not a focus on this model; multiple comparisons frame the absence of touch gestures as intentional in favor of buttons.

Transparency or Aware mode is widely described as very natural and effective, with at least one reviewer calling it best-in-class; some note limited fine control of awareness without blending with ANC.

Treble is polarizing: some praise crisp detail, while others mention a peaky or harsh region that can affect busy mixes and benefits from EQ.

Treble is typically praised for clarity and refinement, but several reviews note peaks/extra air that can sound a little spicy, sizzly, or less forgiving on bright or compressed tracks. Others hear it as smooth and well-balanced for long sessions.

USB-C is present for charging; at least one review highlights the lack of USB-C audio passthrough as a limitation despite the port.

USB-C support comes via an included adapter/dongle, enabling plug-and-play use with phones and computers lacking a headphone jack. It’s positioned as convenience rather than a high-end solution.

Voice assistant access via button press is noted as convenient and works as expected for common assistants on paired devices.

Volume output is repeatedly described as very high, with listeners often using lower volume than usual because the headphones get loud quickly.

Multiple reviews call the 105 Silva very easy to drive (high sensitivity, modest impedance) and capable of reaching loud listening levels from phones, dongles, laptops, and DAPs. Higher-quality sources can still improve refinement and control.

Several reviews caution against workouts because there is no official water or sweat resistance rating.

Reviewers consistently highlight the light weight as a major comfort advantage, helping reduce fatigue during long sessions.

At roughly mid-300g, the Silva isn’t ultra-light, but reviewers frequently say it feels lighter on-head due to excellent weight distribution. Most report minimal fatigue from weight during extended sessions.