Compare Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)

P1 Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
P2 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)

Comparison Takeaways

Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra

Where It Has the Edge

  • charging convenience is 4.1 vs 2.0. Charging convenience is mostly positive, with secure magnetic charging and useful top-up behavior, though one magnet felt only...
  • recovery insights is 4.0 vs 2.0. Recovery guidance was described as broadly sensible after testing, with no major complaint about the recovery-time behavior.
  • menu navigation is 4.5 vs 3.2. Menu navigation benefits from responsive menus, workout screens, and map display performance.
  • size options is 3.4 vs 2.5. Size is a tradeoff: the larger case improves screen experience, but very slim wrists may not be ideal.

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)

Where It Has the Edge

  • LTE connectivity is 5.0 vs 2.0. LTE is a meaningful advantage for users who want to run or stay reachable without carrying a phone.
  • ECG functionality is 4.5 vs 2.0. ECG is treated positively as part of Samsung Health Monitor’s useful health-tool set rather than as a deeply...
  • water resistance is 4.8 vs 3.2. Water resistance is treated positively for pool, rain, snow, and diving-oriented use.
  • onboard music storage is 4.5 vs 3.0. Onboard music and storage are valuable for Spotify, podcasts, media, and offline use, especially now that storage is...
Average score
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.9
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9
activity auto-detection
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.3

Auto-detection is useful because detected walks and activities can contribute to training load and improve recovery estimates.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Auto-detection works very well for walking and running, but one reviewer found it less reliable for cycling and strength training.

antioxidant index
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
1.6

The antioxidant index is consistently weak, with several reviewers calling it low-value, inaccurate, gimmicky, or only marginally responsive.

app ecosystem
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.3

The app ecosystem is split: one reviewer calls Zepp credible, while another says the wider ecosystem is a weak point.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

The app ecosystem is strong, with reviewers citing many apps and plenty of smartwatch functionality.

band quality
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.6

Band quality is mixed: some reviewers like the included bands, while another calls the strap the build’s weakest part.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Band quality is mixed to positive, with easy swaps and a robust strap system offset by dirt buildup and a hit-or-miss release mechanism.

battery life
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.6

Battery life is one of the strongest areas, with multiple reviewers praising long GPS and everyday endurance despite one short-of-claim test.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Battery life is a strength relative to other Galaxy Watches, but real-world results vary widely with always-on display, GPS, and travel use.

blood oxygen tracking
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.0

Blood oxygen tracking drew a clear caveat, with one reviewer repeatedly seeing lower SPO2 results than expected from other sensors.

brightness
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.3

Brightness is usually praised as top tier, though one reviewer found Apple and Garmin screens punchier outdoors.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

Brightness is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly noting bright output and easy readability.

build quality
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.5

Build quality is consistently praised, with reviewers describing a premium, robust, well-built watch.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Build quality is a major strength thanks to the rugged titanium case, robust design, and adventure-ready construction.

button controls
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.8

Button controls are polarized: reviewers like the programmable/quick button, but one long-term reviewer had repeated accidental presses and wanted better workout shortcuts.

call handling
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.2

Call handling works well for one reviewer, with loudness comparable to an Apple Watch in ordinary environments.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
charging convenience
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.1

Charging convenience is mostly positive, with secure magnetic charging and useful top-up behavior, though one magnet felt only decent.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.0

Charging convenience is hurt by Samsung omitting the wall charger, which one reviewer called stingy.

charging speed
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.3

Charging speed is serviceable but not impressive compared with faster rivals.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
coaching features
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.4

Coaching and training analysis are well regarded, especially for runners, though reviewers still place Garmin ahead in depth.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Coaching features are a standout, especially Running Coach, which reviewers found useful, personalized, or exceptionally effective.

comfort
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.3

Comfort is generally good despite the large case, helped by low weight and comfortable strap options.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.7

Comfort varies by reviewer: some found it comfortable, including for sleep, while others felt the weight and bulk.

companion app quality
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.3

The companion app is mixed: credible and workable, but route creation and map downloads can feel hidden or clunky.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.0

Companion app quality is mixed because Samsung still splits settings and health data across separate apps.

contactless payments
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.0

Contactless payment works quickly after setup, but enrollment and PIN friction make the implementation less convenient.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
cross-platform compatibility
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.0

Cross-platform support is uneven because Android replies are supported while iOS notification replies are limited.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.3

Cross-platform compatibility is limited: reviewers note Android support but no current iPhone compatibility.

customization options
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.2

Customization has limitations, especially on fixed elevation overview metrics that cannot yet be configured.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Customization is strong for widgets, dashboards, watch faces, and tiles, but workout data-screen customization drew a complaint.

display quality
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.5

Display quality is widely praised for size, responsiveness, AMOLED sharpness, and improved bezel proportions.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Display quality is consistently praised as vibrant, large, detailed, scratch-resistant, and excellent overall.

durability
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.5

Durability impressions are strong, with tough off-road suitability and robust high-quality construction highlighted.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

Durability is excellent across reviews, from chassis feel to military-standard claims and real-world wear with little damage.

ECG functionality
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
2.0

ECG is a clear missing health feature; one reviewer called its absence one of the few serious criticisms.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

ECG is treated positively as part of Samsung Health Monitor’s useful health-tool set rather than as a deeply tested medical feature.

fit
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.8

Fit is acceptable for larger watches but slightly thicker on wrist, though one reviewer did not find the thickness notable.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.5

Fit is context-dependent: one reviewer liked the big watch on their wrist, while another found it too large.

fitness tracking accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.2

General activity performance was positive across runs, swims, and gym workouts in one review.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

Fitness tracking is broadly positive for running and general activity, though scientific testing framed performance as good enough rather than best-in-class.

flashlight usefulness
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.7

The flashlight is strongly praised as useful, bright, and convenient, especially for nighttime runs and everyday situations.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
GPS accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.4

GPS accuracy is generally strong and often close to top competitors, though some tests judged it competitive rather than exceptional in harder conditions.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

GPS accuracy is praised by several mainstream reviewers, but scientific testing found visible deviations and placed it behind stronger sports watches.

health tracking accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.7

Health-tracking accuracy is mixed: reviewers praised some running-related readings, but questioned HRV, blood oxygen, antioxidant-style metrics, and scientific testing placed Samsung below top-tier rivals.

heart rate accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.0

Heart-rate evidence is mostly positive, with excellent road, trail, gym, and cycling results, though reviewers noted occasional interval or anomaly problems.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Heart-rate accuracy is generally good for running and daily fitness, though scientific testing still found better wrist options and exercise-dependent limits.

Hill Splitter hill tracking
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.4

Hill and elevation tracking is praised as genuinely useful for reading climbs, descents, and route difficulty.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
LTE connectivity
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
2.0

LTE is a clear weakness because reviewers note there is no cellular option or independent internet connection.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
5.0

LTE is a meaningful advantage for users who want to run or stay reachable without carrying a phone.

mapping and navigation
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.9

Mapping and navigation are powerful and fast overall, but visual rerouting and return routing remain important weaknesses.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Mapping and navigation benefit from larger storage for offline maps and route-related use, especially for outdoor users.

materials quality
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.6

Materials quality is a major strength thanks to titanium and sapphire construction that reviewers repeatedly call premium.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

Materials quality is excellent, with praise for titanium, ruggedness, and corrosion-resistant construction.

menu navigation
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.5

Menu navigation benefits from responsive menus, workout screens, and map display performance.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.2

Menu navigation is mixed: the digital bezel and haptics help, but reviewers miss a rotating bezel/crown and find usability reduced.

music controls
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
2.8

Music controls are limited by the lack of streaming-service support.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
onboard music storage
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.0

Onboard music is usable for manually loaded files, but streaming-service absence is a repeated limitation.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Onboard music and storage are valuable for Spotify, podcasts, media, and offline use, especially now that storage is doubled.

operating system experience
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.8

Zepp OS feels smoother and more mature than before, but still trails Apple and Garmin polish in some reviewer opinions.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.3

The operating system experience is improved by One UI 8, with more functional UI elements and praised new software features.

outdoor visibility
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.0

Outdoor visibility is generally good, with strong readability praise, but one review found rivals punchier in bright sun.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.9

Outdoor visibility is excellent, with multiple reviewers saying the display remains readable in direct sunlight.

pairing reliability
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.4

Pairing was quick and painless in the unboxing evidence.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
5.0

Pairing reliability is excellent in the Notebookcheck test, where the watch was recognized and set up without issues.

recovery insights
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.0

Recovery guidance was described as broadly sensible after testing, with no major complaint about the recovery-time behavior.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.0

Recovery-style guidance is a weak spot in one long-term review, where the energy score felt redundant and unhelpful.

reliability
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.2

Reliability is mixed: endurance and GPS are taken seriously, but automatic rerouting was criticized for not working reliably.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.0

Reliability is mostly good, but Notebookcheck reported brief display interruptions during always-on display use.

running power support
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.3

Running power support is treated positively as part of the advanced running metrics available without extra sensors.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
safety features
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.2

Safety usefulness is supported mainly by the bright flashlight and SOS-style illumination for night trails.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Safety features are helped by LTE, which one reviewer valued for safer phone-free running.

score tracking
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.2

Score tracking is useful through BioCharge-style internal battery scoring, though the evidence centers on wellness scores rather than sport scoring.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
size options
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.4

Size is a tradeoff: the larger case improves screen experience, but very slim wrists may not be ideal.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.5

Size options are limited by the single large case, and multiple reviewers describe the Ultra as very big.

sleep tracking accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
2.0

Sleep tracking drew a poor personal accuracy assessment from one reviewer, who said watches generally reported good sleep despite feeling bad.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.2

Sleep tracking earns mixed marks: reviewers liked the score and some stage consistency, but noted low awake detection and second-tier sleep-stage performance.

smartphone notifications
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.2

Notifications are usable, but iOS reply limitations make the experience less complete.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Notification handling is positive, with one reviewer noting detailed, useful notifications from the watch.

smartwatch features
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.2

Smartwatch features are considered broad and useful, with packed hardware and everyday tools, but not always best-in-class.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.2

Core smartwatch features are strong, but some reviews temper praise by noting the 2025 model adds few meaningful upgrades.

software smoothness
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.7

Software smoothness is strong where maps and navigation screens load quickly.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Software smoothness is strong in direct testing, with smooth operation and quick app launches.

step counting accuracy
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

Step counting is strong during normal arm-swinging walks, with a caveat that carts or strollers reduce accuracy.

stress tracking
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.0

Stress-related scoring is viewed positively through Hybrid Charge, which combines physical data with psychological stress inputs for more personalized feedback.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
style and design
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.5

Style and design are a major strength, with repeated praise for its premium, streamlined, elegant look.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.8

Style is subjective: one reviewer loved the stylish look, while another disliked the rugged, masculine aesthetic.

third-party app support
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.4

Third-party app support is mixed, with useful athlete integrations offset by a storefront lacking major apps.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.5

Third-party app support benefits from extra storage and useful fitness/media apps, giving users more room for services beyond Samsung’s own tools.

touchscreen responsiveness
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.9

Touch response is praised on the display, but one reviewer disliked the double-tap unlock behavior during activity.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
No score yet
user interface
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.4

The on-watch interface makes good use of the larger screen and feels natural in the tested UI.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.0

The user interface is functional and approachable, though at least one reviewer found parts of the visual design odd.

value for money
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.7

Value is divided: reviewers praise the Garmin undercut and premium feature set, but some question the high Amazfit price and overlap with cheaper models.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
2.9

Value for money is the most contested attribute: reviewers like the watch itself but often question the 2025 refresh and launch price.

voice assistant quality
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.4

Voice assistant feedback is positive overall: one reviewer found it works well enough, while another called it fast and responsive.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

Gemini makes the voice assistant experience notably useful and convenient, especially because the watch screen is small.

watch face quality
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
No score yet
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

Watch faces are a major strength, with reviewers praising Samsung’s selection, visual quality, and customization.

water resistance
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
3.2

Water resistance is acceptable for swimming but limited by the lack of diving suitability.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.8

Water resistance is treated positively for pool, rain, snow, and diving-oriented use.

wellness insights
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.3

Wellness insights are praised through BioCharge and Hybrid Charge-style feedback that personalizes readiness and energy signals.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
3.9

Wellness insights are useful when they explain metrics or provide coaching, though some newer metrics remain questionable.

workout tracking variety
Product 1: Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
4.6

Workout variety is a strength, with reviewers emphasizing extensive training modes and broad activity coverage.

Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025)
4.7

Workout variety is a strength, with reviewers praising broad activity support, multisport-style capabilities, and Samsung’s wide exercise list.