Compare Black+Decker Programmable 12-Cup Coffee Maker, CM1160B vs OXO Brew 9 Cup Coffee Maker

Box contents are described as basic: coffee maker, glass carafe, removable brew basket, and user manual. Multiple sources note missing extras like paper filters and a coffee scoop, though replacement parts like a carafe or lid can be ordered separately.

Included extras are modest but useful: reviewers commonly mention an included measuring scoop, some paper filters, and a manual, with few or no additional accessories.

Core marketed features are broadly supported by reviews (programmable timer, auto shutoff, pause-brew, keep-warm hot plate). Where expectations can diverge is around cup-count conventions and how strong/uneven the first cup can be if you interrupt brewing, which affects perceived consistency versus claims.

Most claims around precision-style brewing, convenience features, and heat retention are supported by hands-on testing, but ultra-strong claims like perfect results for everyone depend heavily on dialing in ratio and taste preference.

Setup is straightforward: add water, insert basket and filter, add grounds, and start. Programming is frequently described as easy, with a minor emphasis on properly seating the basket and snapping the lid closed.

Setup is generally quick: wash removable parts, run a water-only cycle, set the clock, and brew. The main friction point is learning the dial-and-button interface for auto-brew programming the first time.

Commonly praised for automation: 24-hour programmable auto-brew, QuickTouch-style setup, a 2-hour auto shutoff, and a pause-brew or Sneak-a-Cup function that temporarily stops flow when the carafe is removed (typically around 30 seconds).

A standout strength: auto-brew scheduling, automatic bloom or pre-infusion behavior, batch-size logic (2-4 vs 5-9), pause-and-pour with carafe detection, no-water warnings, freshness timer, and descale reminders are repeatedly praised.

Coffee results skew toward strong, classic diner-style brew. Several sources say it is consistent enough for everyday use, but a major taste critique is bitterness/astringency and signs of over-extraction; one outlet also notes finer flavor notes get lost. A few users report occasional grounds ending up in the pot.

Across sources, it produces consistently strong drip coffee with generally even saturation and good temperature management. A common nuance is that top-tier competitors may produce more complexity, and small batches can be less impressive than the best single-serve-focused designs.

Build is repeatedly characterized as mostly plastic with some stainless accents, which is expected at the budget price. The carafe is described as reinforced glass, and one source suggests a practical lifespan of roughly 3–5 years with proper care; the hot plate area may show cosmetic wear over time.

Build quality is often described as premium and well-made, including long-term owner reports of solid performance years later. Some note cosmetic annoyances like fingerprints on stainless surfaces.

At least one review explicitly calls out built-in cord storage on the back, helping keep counters tidier when the machine is not in use.

Cable routing options help placement in different layouts, though at least one owner notes the cord can feel short depending on outlet location.

Marketed and used as a 12-cup class machine with clear water markings. Some testing suggests cup markings can be confusing versus 6-ounce cup conventions and that real-world fills may not match expectations perfectly; user guidance also cautions against brewing very small batches (often not below about 4 cups).

Nominal 9-cup capacity is commonly framed as around 45 ounces of brewed coffee, which aligns more with about 4 to 5 large mugs. Reviews also highlight workable brewing from roughly 2 cups up through a full carafe.

The glass DuraLife-style carafe and handle are generally described as comfortable and pouring is often rated good. The pause-brew/Sneak-a-Cup feature usually prevents major dripping, but reviewers warn you must return the carafe promptly to avoid overflow, and some testing shows minor dribbles.

Thermal carafe heat retention and generally clean pouring are frequent positives. Common drawbacks include a narrow opening that complicates hand-cleaning and mixed experiences with the final pour or occasional splashing depending on technique and lid design.

Often described as compact, lightweight, and counter-friendly with a front-facing water window that helps filling in tight spaces. One consistent ergonomic caveat: it needs enough vertical clearance to open the lid, and at least one reviewer notes it may not fit under standard cabinets when open.

Aesthetics are widely praised as sleek and modern with a simple dial control, but usability is impacted by size: it can feel wide or tall and may require extra headroom to fill the reservoir in tight cabinet setups.

Recurring flaws include a mostly plastic feel, a hot plate that can stain or collect a calcified ring, and exterior nooks/crevices where grounds and splatter accumulate. Some users also note the filter basket is awkward to fill (does not sit flat), plus minor quirks like no brew-finished alert and occasional brew-head warping reports.

Recurring pain points: larger or taller footprint, no end-of-brew beep, programming not instantly intuitive, and carafe-lid or mixing-tube drips. A few reports mention dribbling that may resolve with cleaning the stop valve area.

Uses standard basket paper filters and supports a compatible reusable metal filter. Multiple reviews note no included permanent filter, and at least one source reports occasional grounds in the pot, which can depend on filter choice and grind.

It uses #4 cone paper filters and a cone basket. Some reviewers like the cone approach for smaller batches, while comparisons note flat-bed designs can be more consistently bold across batch sizes.

Heating is often described as very hot for the price. Testing cites brew water temperatures in the high 170s to low 190s Fahrenheit range, and the hot plate can keep (or even push) coffee temperature up over time. The downside is that too much hot-plate heat can accelerate oxidation and worsen flavor if coffee sits.

Power and heat performance are generally strong, with multiple measurements indicating hot water delivery in the proper brewing range, though some lab testing reports average brew temperatures that can run slightly below ideal depending on method and batch size.

Overall experience is described as simple and beginner-friendly, helped by large/rubberized buttons and easy programming. Minor usability knocks include a dimmer clock, lack of an end-of-brew beep, and exterior areas that take more effort to keep spotless.

Once dialed in, owners and testers frequently describe a low-effort, high-reward routine: prep the night before, wake to coffee, and rely on clear indicators. The biggest user-experience costs are cleaning, counter-space demands, and the initial learning curve for controls and ratio.

Multiple sources frame it as a bestseller or extremely popular budget coffee maker, including references to high recent sales volume, Amazon best-seller positioning, and Amazon’s Choice-style recognition.

The model is repeatedly featured as a top pick in major buying guides and review roundups, though comparisons sometimes note the 8-cup sibling enjoys broader popularity for consistency and better small-batch or single-cup behavior.

Designed around full-pot drip brewing with a hot plate keep-warm cycle. Reviewers describe it as set-and-forget for morning pots, with the warmer staying on for about two hours before shutting off automatically.

It avoids a hot plate and instead relies on a thermal carafe to keep coffee hot for hours, reducing risk of scorched flavors. A freshness timer is commonly used as the cue for how recently coffee was brewed.

Recognition discussed in reviews centers on marketplace badges and popularity (for example, Amazon’s Choice and best-selling claims). No Specialty Coffee Association certification is indicated, and one lab review notes its brew temperatures average below SCA-recommended ranges.

SCA or Gold Cup-style certification is repeatedly cited as a key credibility signal, alongside mention of meeting standard safety expectations. Reviewers often treat certification as a shorthand for proper temperature and brew-time behavior.

Reviewers explicitly mention there is no included coffee scoop (and no mention of built-in scoop storage). If scoop convenience matters, you will need your own measuring scoop and storage solution.

Speed is generally average-to-good for a budget drip maker. Multiple reviews describe roughly a cup-per-minute pacing; one lab test cites an average brew time around 7:53 for a full pot, and a video walkthrough suggests 4 cups in a little over 4 minutes and 6 cups in about 6 minutes.

Speed is commonly described as fast for a premium brewer: many tests land around 6 to 8 minutes for a full pot, while some real-world demos show closer to about 9 minutes at maximum volume.

Positioned as a low-cost programmable drip machine (often cited around the mid-$20s to mid-$30s). Multiple sources frame it as strong value because you get timer programming and auto shutoff at a budget price, with tradeoffs in build materials and cup refinement.

Pricing is premium for drip, and several reviewers call it expensive. Most still justify the cost when buyers value SCA-style performance plus programmability and a thermal carafe, but it is a tougher sell for budget shoppers or minimal-cleaning priorities.

A two-year limited warranty is cited, with guidance to contact customer service for repair or replacement in the event of defects. Replacement carafes/lids are described as purchasable separately.

Warranty is commonly cited as two years. Some sources highlight a strong service reputation, including responsive help and replacement parts, though it is still shorter than the longest-warranty competitors.

Routine maintenance is presented as simple: removable basket and carafe are often described as dishwasher-safe, and descaling can be done via a dedicated cleaning cycle (reported 45–60 minutes, recommended about every 60 days) or a vinegar-water method. Exterior cleaning can be harder due to hot-plate splatter and tight gaps.

Maintenance is usually considered manageable: removable parts are rinsed regularly, a descale reminder appears around every 90 cycles, and the cycle itself is largely guided. The most consistent complaint is that the thermal carafe often needs a bottle brush and careful lid cleaning.