Average score
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.8
Active noise cancellation
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
ANC is widely rated top-tier for everyday noise and transit rumble, but several reviews stop short of calling it the absolute best in the category. Noise control is highly adjustable, with adaptive ANC plus granular sliders that let you tune intensity and reduce pressure effects.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.0
ANC is useful for taking the edge off treadmills, office chatter, and travel noise, but every detailed reviewer said it falls clearly short of premium earbuds. ANC and ambient tuning are adjustable in the app, but reviewers generally felt those sliders and sport-mode tweaks made only modest real-world differences.
Android compatibility
P1Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0
Android support looks solid thanks to Google Fast Pair support and no reported compatibility red flags, though direct Android testing was limited.
App
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2
The Technics Audio Connect app is feature-rich (ANC, EQ, multipoint, spatial settings), but some reviews call the interface clunky or menu-heavy.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0
The JBL app adds meaningful tuning options, sports modes, and control customization, but several reviewers found some mode behavior inconvenient or not especially impactful.
aptX
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
1.0
Several reviews explicitly note aptX codecs are not supported.
P2Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yetAudio-video sync accuracy
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0
Where tested, audio-video sync is reported as excellent with minimal to no noticeable lag.
P2Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yetBass performance
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
Bass is repeatedly called deep and unusually controlled for true wireless, though one review found it can feel heavy or change with ANC settings.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.7
Bass is decent and workout-friendly, but multiple reviews suggest it benefits from EQ boosting rather than sounding especially punchy on the default tuning.
Battery
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
Battery life is commonly reported around 10 hours with ANC on (AAC) plus substantial case recharges, with lower figures when using high-res modes.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.8
Battery life is a standout strength, with reviewers consistently praising the long single-charge runtime and strong total endurance with the case.
Bluetooth
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7
Bluetooth stability is generally reported as reliable with few dropouts across devices and environments.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.7
Connection stability was excellent in testing, with easy room-range use during workouts and no reported dropouts.
Carry case quality
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9
The case is generally pocketable and premium-feeling, but some reviews mention weak magnets, slight rattle, or scratch/scuff issues.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.3
The case is functional but not a highlight: it is on the larger side, only lightly protected against moisture, and can pick up wear in a gym bag.
Charging
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
Charging is praised for USB-C plus Qi wireless and quick-charge support; full recharge times are typically a few hours.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.4
Charging performance is strong, with quick-charge support and reasonable full-charge times repeatedly called out as practical positives.
Codec support
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
Codec support is strong (SBC/AAC plus LDAC and LC3/LE Audio features noted), appealing to both iOS users and Android audiophiles.
P2Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yetComfort during long use
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2
Comfort is widely rated high thanks to a smaller/lighter fit, though some users may still experience fatigue or fit variability over long sessions.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5
Long-session comfort is unusually good for winged sports buds, with reviewers noting they stayed comfortable through runs, workouts, and daily use.
Design and Aesthetics
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6
Design is viewed as premium and more compact than the prior model, though not everyone finds it the sleekest-looking option.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.9
The design is sporty and available in appealing colors, but the buds are still noticeably chunky and protrude more than slimmer everyday earbuds.
Ear tip size options
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1
Multiple ear tip sizes are commonly included, helping most users achieve a seal, though tip choice remains key to fit.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0
The included three ear-tip sizes were a useful fit aid, though one reviewer still felt the overall shell size may be too large for smaller ears.
Equalizer customization
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3
EQ customization is a strength, often cited as an 8-band EQ plus presets that can significantly change the sound.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.1
EQ customization is a real plus, letting users add extra bass or adjust the sound for workouts without needing third-party tools.
Find My
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.4
Find My/location features are present, but feedback varies; some appreciate the feature, while others complain the locating beep or accuracy is limited.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
1.0
One reviewer explicitly noted that there is no Find My-style locating feature, which limits convenience compared with some rivals.
Included accessories
P1Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.1
Accessory support is good for the class, with extra ear tips, wing options or covers, and a charging cable included in the box.
Instrument separation
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6
Instrument separation is frequently praised on busy tracks, helping the AZ100 stay clean and layered.
P2Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yetIntegrated microphone
P1Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.1
The earbuds include an onboard multi-mic setup that works well enough for routine calls and general hands-free use.
LDAC
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
LDAC support is frequently highlighted for higher-quality Android streaming, with the usual battery-life tradeoff.
P2Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yetMaximum volume clarity
P1Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.8
At higher volumes, clarity drops off and upper-range detail compresses, so these do not stay especially clean when pushed hard.
Microphone noise reduction
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9
Voice noise reduction is often effective at cutting wind and background noise, though aggressive processing can create artifacts.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.9
Call noise handling is respectable rather than exceptional, keeping traffic and background noise fairly controlled without fully erasing it.
Microphone quality for calls
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.8
Call quality is mixed: many find it usable or improved, while others report robotic processing or, in one case, serious call glitches.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0
Call quality is generally clear and usable, though voices can sound slightly hollow instead of especially rich or natural.
Midrange clarity
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9
Midrange is generally clear and natural for vocals, with occasional notes that bass-heavy mixes can push voices slightly back.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.1
Midrange performance is one of the stronger parts of the tuning, with vocals and core musical content coming through clearly for the price.
Multi-platform compatibility
P1Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.4
Compatibility looks broad, with successful use across phones, laptops, watches, and support for both Google and Microsoft quick-pair systems.
Multipoint connectivity reliability
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6
Three-device multipoint is a major differentiator and is often described as seamless; occasional switching lag is mentioned but not common.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5
Multipoint was a meaningful win, with seamless switching between devices highlighted as one of the more premium-feeling features at this price.
Portability/foldability
P1Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.2
Portability is only average because both the buds and especially the case are a bit bulky compared with more pocket-friendly alternatives.
Preset EQ profile quality
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.7
Preset EQ options are generally useful, though some (like extra-bassy modes) may be too much for neutral listeners.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.7
The preset sports profiles are more interesting on paper than in practice, with reviewers often describing them as gimmicky or only mildly different.
Smudge resistance
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9
Case finish durability is mixed, with some noting scratches/scuffs and others calling it relatively scratch-resistant.
P2Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yetSoftware/setup simplicity
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.3
Setup is mostly straightforward, but the lack of a case pairing button and some app UX quirks can add friction.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5
Setup is straightforward, with easy pairing and uncomplicated day-one use standing out as low-friction strengths.
Sound quality
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5
Reviews consistently praise the AZ100 for highly detailed, spacious sound with strong dynamics; a few note the default tuning can be bass-forward or benefit from EQ.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.0
Overall sound quality is good for the money and enjoyable for workouts and casual listening, but it does not deliver premium detail, depth, or polish.
Soundstage width
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6
Soundstage is a standout: multiple outlets describe an immersive, wide presentation that feels larger than typical earbuds.
P2Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yetSpatial audio
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0
Dolby spatial audio/head tracking is supported and can add immersion, but some reviewers find it subtle or prefer it off for music.
P2Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
No score yetStability
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6
Fit stability varies: many report a secure hold, while some reviewers experienced looseness or buds falling out during vigorous movement.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.9
Stability is one of the product's best traits, with the twist-lock wing design keeping the buds secure through running, gym work, and sweaty sessions.
Touch control responsiveness
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1
Touch controls are responsive and highly configurable, with the main complaint being occasional over-sensitivity.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.3
Touch controls are usable but not ideal for exercise, with some lag and reduced reliability versus physical buttons, especially with sweat or gloves.
Transparency mode quality
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0
Transparency/ambient mode is strong and adjustable, but some reviewers note hiss at higher levels, an unnatural voice-focused mode, or not enough outside sound for awareness.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.8
Transparency mode is the most divisive feature: one reviewer found it fairly natural, but the more detailed running-focused reviews said traffic awareness was still lacking.
Treble clarity
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9
Treble is described as airy and detailed without harshness, but a few critics wanted more sparkle or presence.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
3.0
Treble and upper-range clarity are only middling, with repeated comments about limited sparkle, detail, and openness up top.
USB-C
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0
USB-C charging is consistently supported and frequently mentioned as a modern convenience.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.5
USB-C charging is included and treated as an expected but welcome convenience for everyday use.
Value for money
P1Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.8
Value is a major selling point, with every review framing the Endurance Race 2 as a feature-rich, sports-focused bargain that undercuts pricier rivals.
Voice assistant integration
P1Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
1.0
Voice assistant support is absent according to one review, which is a notable feature gap even at a budget price.
Volume output
P1Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
2.8
Maximum loudness is below average for the category, and multiple reviewers had to raise volume more than expected during outdoor runs.
Water/sweat resistance rating
P1
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0
The earbuds are commonly cited as IPX4-rated for sweat and light rain, but not for heavy water exposure.
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.8
The IP68 buds are extremely well-suited to sweaty training and rainy runs, making durability against dust and water one of the clearest strengths.
Weight comfort
P1Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
P2
Product 2: JBL Endurance Race 2 Earbuds
4.2
Even though the shells are fairly large, reviewers still described them as light enough to stay comfortable during movement and longer sessions.