Compare Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds vs LG xboom Buds by will.i.am

P1 Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
P2 LG xboom Buds by will.i.am

Comparison Takeaways

Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • Volume output is 5.0 vs 2.0. Volume output is praised as top-tier and very loud in the reviews that discuss it.
  • LDAC is 4.5 vs 1.5. LDAC is received positively for higher-quality playback and better sound from compatible Android or hi-res sources.
  • Maximum volume clarity is 5.0 vs 2.3. Maximum-volume clarity is praised for staying clean and distortion-free even at high levels.
  • Bluetooth is 5.0 vs 2.5. Bluetooth reliability is consistently praised, with reviewers reporting stable connections and no meaningful dropouts.

LG xboom Buds by will.i.am

Where It Has the Edge

  • Auracast support is 4.3 vs 2.0. Auracast is repeatedly framed as a useful, uncommon, or unique feature that adds value if nearby broadcasts matter...
  • Software/setup simplicity is 4.5 vs 3.9. Software and setup are helped by the useful fit-test function and simple pairing experience on supported platforms.
  • Transparency mode quality is 4.0 vs 3.6. Transparency mode is praised as useful for letting outside sound through when needed.
  • Integrated microphone is rated 4.5 while the other product has no score yet. The integrated microphone earns praise through whisper-style use, with one reviewer saying it could pick up every word.
Average score
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2
Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

ANC is broadly strong and often near flagship level, though several reviewers say it still falls short of the very best Bose-style silence.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.1

Noise cancellation is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers praising how effectively it dulled or blocked low-frequency and everyday noise for the price.

Android compatibility
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Android compatibility is praised for LDAC, fast pairing, and strong ANC value with Android phones.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
No score yet
App
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.4

The app is mostly praised for useful controls, customization, stability, and EQ access, despite some complaints about layout.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.9

The companion app is mostly praised for customization, fit testing, ANC controls, and clarity, though one short review criticized it.

aptX
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.0

aptX support is a weakness because one reviewer specifically wished Qualcomm aptX codecs were included.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
1.0

aptX support is a weakness because TechRadar specifically called out the absence of aptX Adaptive as a limitation.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Video sync is mostly strong, with two reviewers reporting zero or no visible lag, while one notes a slight delay with some codecs.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
No score yet
Auracast support
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.0

Auracast support is a concern in one scored review because the reviewer criticizes its absence.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.3

Auracast is repeatedly framed as a useful, uncommon, or unique feature that adds value if nearby broadcasts matter to the user.

Bass performance
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Bass is widely praised for depth, control, punch, and low distortion, with only one review criticizing the default balance as too boomy.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.3

Bass is a mixed strength: reviewers heard impact, depth, and fun energy, but several also connected the tuning to muddiness or reduced clarity.

Battery
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Battery life is consistently a strength, with reviewers praising long ANC runtime and major improvement over the AZ80.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.3

Battery life receives broad praise, with reviewers calling the figures strong, competitive, or impressive for the price.

Bluetooth
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Bluetooth reliability is consistently praised, with reviewers reporting stable connections and no meaningful dropouts.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.5

Bluetooth setup is hurt by iOS pairing friction, with one reviewer criticizing the lack of automatic discoverability on iOS.

Build quality
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6

Build quality is praised as premium, tactile, mature, and a substantial step forward.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.5

Build quality is acceptable rather than premium, with the buds described as decently built while the overall feel remains basic.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.8

Hi-res playback is praised in the one scored review, where LDAC/FLAC listening brought more detail, solidity, and space.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
No score yet
Button control usability
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Control remapping is praised as unusually flexible and useful across the app and earbuds.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
No score yet
Carry case quality
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Case quality is mixed: it is compact and pocketable, but multiple reviewers criticize weak magnets, rattle, scratches, or bland styling.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.8

Carry case impressions are modest, with reviewers describing it as basic or cheap rather than premium.

Charging
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Charging is viewed positively where evaluated, especially wireless charging and case convenience.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.5

Charging is a positive in the available review evidence, especially because the buds topped back up quickly.

Codec support
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Codec support is praised for LDAC/LC3 breadth, but the absence of aptX is called a mild limitation.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.0

Codec support is a drawback because reviewers criticized the lack of higher-resolution codec options.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Comfort trends positive thanks to smaller, lighter ergonomics, but fit fatigue and bulk remain concerns for some ears.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2

Comfort is sharply split: multiple reviewers found the rounded, bulky fit poor for long sessions, while others reported a comfortable fit.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Design and aesthetics are generally praised as premium, sleek, compact, or classy, though a few reviewers find the look plain.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.2

Design and aesthetics are consistently weak, with reviewers calling the buds boring, bulky, not sleek, or visually uninteresting.

Eartips fit
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Eartip fit is generally good with the right size, but some reviewers report looseness, bulk, or falling out.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.8

Eartip fit can be secure with a tight seal, but fit remains inconsistent because limited tip options and shape caused issues for some users.

Ear tip size options
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Ear tip options are considered useful and generous, especially for finding the right fit across ear sizes.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.3

Ear tip options are mixed: one reviewer achieved a snug fit, while another considered the number of options disappointingly modest.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

EQ customization is a clear strength, with many reviewers praising the eight-band control and meaningful tuning options.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.9

EQ customization is useful and can improve the sound, though reviewers agreed it does not fully erase the underlying tuning problems.

Find My
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Find My support is useful for peace of mind, though one reviewer is disappointed by the location behavior.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
No score yet
Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Frequency response impressions are mixed: one review calls it strange, while others praise accuracy, balance, and low distortion.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.8

Frequency balance needs adjustment, with TechRadar saying the buds require tuning for a more balanced sound.

Included accessories
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.5

Included accessories draw criticism where reviewed because foam tips are missing despite multiple silicone tip sizes.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
No score yet
Instrument separation
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.9

Instrument separation is a standout strength, with reviewers hearing layers, voices, and complex arrangements as distinct and clearly placed.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.5

Instrument separation is a limitation, with TechRadar noting that vocals, synths, and other elements were not layered enough.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.5

The integrated microphone earns praise through whisper-style use, with one reviewer saying it could pick up every word.

Interchangeable left/right bud design
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Independent left/right earbud use is praised as convenient and useful when scored.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
No score yet
LDAC
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

LDAC is received positively for higher-quality playback and better sound from compatible Android or hi-res sources.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
1.5

LDAC support is absent, and reviewers treated that lack of higher-end codec support as a sonic limitation.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Maximum-volume clarity is praised for staying clean and distortion-free even at high levels.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.3

Maximum-volume clarity is weak, with reviewers hearing distortion, fuzziness, or quality loss at high volumes.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0

Microphone noise reduction is polarized: several reviewers praise wind and background suppression, while one reports failed clarity and cutouts.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2

Microphone noise reduction is serviceable but imperfect, since higher-frequency background sounds could still get through.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.7

Call quality is mixed, ranging from serviceable or excellent in some reviews to choppy, robotic, or poor in others.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.9

Call microphone quality ranges from usable to excellent, with one reviewer reporting exceptionally clear call sound and others noting some tinniness.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Midrange and vocals are generally described as clear, detailed, warm, and more forward than the previous model.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2

Midrange clarity improves with tuning but can become muddy when bass dominates.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Multi-platform compatibility is praised because the app and customization work across iOS and Android.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.3

Multi-platform compatibility is mixed: Google and Microsoft pairing was praised, while iOS pairing was criticized.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.8

Multipoint is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising reliable switching and three-device connectivity.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.0

Multipoint is viewed as a useful perk, though the evidence is more about convenience than stress-tested reliability.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Passive isolation is viewed positively when the tips seal well, with reviewers noting isolation even before ANC is active.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
No score yet
Portability/foldability
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Portability is strong because the case is repeatedly described as pocketable, small, and easy to carry.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.5

Portability is strong because the case is compact and light enough to pocket easily.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Preset EQ quality is mostly positive, especially Direct, Dynamic, and Treble+ modes, though SuperBass+ is too heavy for one reviewer.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2

Preset EQ quality is uneven, with some presets improving individual tracks while treble-heavy tuning could sound harsh or tinny.

Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Setup and software simplicity are mostly positive, but the lack of a physical pairing button adds friction for one reviewer.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.5

Software and setup are helped by the useful fit-test function and simple pairing experience on supported platforms.

Sound leakage
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.5

Sound leakage is a weakness in the one scored review, which says loud music can be heard in a quiet room.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.0

Sound leakage is a clear weakness in one review, especially above roughly 40% volume.

Sound quality
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Reviewers overwhelmingly praise the AZ100's sound as clear, detailed, musical, and high-end, though one review found the stock tuning odd.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2

Sound quality is the most divisive area: some reviewers heard enjoyable or even stellar audio, while others found it muddy, unclear, or below rivals.

Soundstage depth
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Soundstage depth is usually strong, with reviewers praising depth, immersion, and layering, though one long-term reviewer wanted more depth.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.2

Soundstage depth is limited, with What Hi-Fi? describing the presentation as claustrophobic.

Soundstage width
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Soundstage width receives strong praise, with reviewers describing the presentation as spacious, broad, expansive, and room-like.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.4

Soundstage width is limited, with reviewers wanting greater spaciousness and more expansive layering.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Spatial audio is mixed: reviewers appreciate Dolby/head-tracking support, but several find it merely decent, distracting, or less clear than stereo.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.0

Spatial audio is a weakness because the product lacks the more immersive, three-dimensional focus found in pricier LG earbuds.

Stability
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Stability is mixed: several reviewers found the fit secure, while others would not trust it for vigorous movement.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.7

Stability is generally good thanks to hooks, seal, and secure fit, but it can fall apart when the eartips do not suit the wearer.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Touch controls are generally responsive and customizable, though sensitivity and personal preference create some mixed reactions.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.3

Touch controls are mixed: they can be fast and responsive, but other reviewers reported accidental or phantom taps.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Transparency mode is mixed: some find it natural or useful, while others hear hiss, over-processing, or weaker situational awareness.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
4.0

Transparency mode is praised as useful for letting outside sound through when needed.

Treble clarity
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Treble is usually considered clear, airy, detailed, and non-harsh, though one review says the default tuning lacks high-end content.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.8

Treble clarity is inconsistent, sounding crisp in places but harsh or tinny without tuning.

Value for money
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Value is mixed-to-positive: reviewers like the premium feature set and sound, but several note the high price and strong competition.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.2

Value for money is highly split: the buds bring ANC, battery, and features at a moderate price, but several reviewers preferred cheaper or clearer-sounding rivals.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Voice assistant integration is limited in coverage but works reliably where tested or described.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
No score yet
Volume output
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Volume output is praised as top-tier and very loud in the reviews that discuss it.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
2.0

Volume output is a weakness because one reviewer found the buds quiet enough to push volume into leakage-prone levels.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Water and sweat resistance is adequate for workouts or rain, but one reviewer cautions against heavier rain exposure.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
3.8

Water and sweat resistance is adequate for light rain and workouts, but review evidence does not frame it as a standout durability feature.

Weight comfort
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Weight comfort is praised because the earbuds feel better distributed, light, and easier to forget during use.

Product 2: LG xboom Buds by will.i.am
No score yet