Compare Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds vs Sony WF-C710N Earbuds

P1 Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
P2 Sony WF-C710N Earbuds

Comparison Takeaways

Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • LDAC is 4.5 vs 1.5. LDAC support is frequently highlighted for higher-quality Android streaming, with the usual battery-life tradeoff.
  • Codec support is 4.5 vs 2.5. Codec support is strong (SBC/AAC plus LDAC and LC3/LE Audio features noted), appealing to both iOS users and...
  • Charging is 4.5 vs 3.3. Charging is praised for USB-C plus Qi wireless and quick-charge support; full recharge times are typically a few...
  • Spatial audio is 4.0 vs 3.2. Dolby spatial audio/head tracking is supported and can add immersion, but some reviewers find it subtle or prefer...

Sony WF-C710N Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • Design and Aesthetics is 4.6 vs 3.6. The transparent Glass Blue look stands out and is generally seen as attractive or distinctive in the cited...
  • Smudge resistance is 4.6 vs 3.9. One review specifically says the case is not much of a fingerprint magnet.
  • Comfort during long use is 4.8 vs 4.2. Multiple reviewers say the earbuds stay comfortable for hours, with several calling them all-day or long-session friendly.
  • Preset EQ profile quality is 4.3 vs 3.7. One review specifically praises the Excited preset as a strong option for punchier bass.
Average score
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.0
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

ANC is widely rated top-tier for everyday noise and transit rumble, but several reviews stop short of calling it the absolute best in the category. Noise control is highly adjustable, with adaptive ANC plus granular sliders that let you tune intensity and reduce pressure effects.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.8

ANC is the standout trait in these reviews, with repeated praise for unusually strong noise reduction at this price.

Android compatibility
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.5

Android support works in the cited reviews, including Fast Pair, though Android users miss out on higher-end codec options.

App
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

The Technics Audio Connect app is feature-rich (ANC, EQ, multipoint, spatial settings), but some reviews call the interface clunky or menu-heavy.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.4

The app is feature-rich and easy to navigate for several reviewers, though one reviewer found it a little basic.

aptX
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
1.0

Several reviews explicitly note aptX codecs are not supported.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
1.5

The cited reviews explicitly state that aptX support is missing.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Where tested, audio-video sync is reported as excellent with minimal to no noticeable lag.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
No score yet
Bass performance
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Bass is repeatedly called deep and unusually controlled for true wireless, though one review found it can feel heavy or change with ANC settings.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.5

Bass is repeatedly described as fantastic, powerful, punchy, or clean, though one review says it can overpower the mix.

Battery
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Battery life is commonly reported around 10 hours with ANC on (AAC) plus substantial case recharges, with lower figures when using high-res modes.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.4

Battery life is usually described as strong or all-day, though one review reports closer to 6.5 to 7 hours in mixed use.

Bluetooth
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Bluetooth stability is generally reported as reliable with few dropouts across devices and environments.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.3

Bluetooth 5.3 with AAC/SBC support is clearly documented, and the cited reviews describe connection quality as stable.

Build quality
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.1

The earbuds themselves are often described as solid or premium enough, though some reviewers still notice plasticky elements.

Carry case quality
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

The case is generally pocketable and premium-feeling, but some reviews mention weak magnets, slight rattle, or scratch/scuff issues.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.6

The case is pocketable and sometimes feels sturdy or premium, but several reviewers also call it plasticky or a bit bulky.

Charging
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Charging is praised for USB-C plus Qi wireless and quick-charge support; full recharge times are typically a few hours.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.3

USB-C and quick charging are positives, but wireless charging is repeatedly absent.

Codec support
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Codec support is strong (SBC/AAC plus LDAC and LC3/LE Audio features noted), appealing to both iOS users and Android audiophiles.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
2.5

Codec support is limited to SBC and AAC, and multiple reviews flag the lack of advanced codecs as a downside.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Comfort is widely rated high thanks to a smaller/lighter fit, though some users may still experience fatigue or fit variability over long sessions.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.8

Multiple reviewers say the earbuds stay comfortable for hours, with several calling them all-day or long-session friendly.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Design is viewed as premium and more compact than the prior model, though not everyone finds it the sleekest-looking option.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.6

The transparent Glass Blue look stands out and is generally seen as attractive or distinctive in the cited reviews.

Eartips fit
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.6

The cited reviews describe a snug, comfortable seal when the fit matches the wearer’s ears.

Ear tip size options
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Multiple ear tip sizes are commonly included, helping most users achieve a seal, though tip choice remains key to fit.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.1

The earbuds come with extra tip sizes in the box, but the selection is still fairly limited.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

EQ customization is a strength, often cited as an 8-band EQ plus presets that can significantly change the sound.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.6

Reviews consistently highlight adjustable EQ options, including presets, custom tuning, and guided personalization tools.

Find My
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.4

Find My/location features are present, but feedback varies; some appreciate the feature, while others complain the locating beep or accuracy is limited.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
No score yet
Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.7

Objective-minded reviews say the tuning broadly follows preference targets, but they also note a darker balance and upper-treble dip.

Included accessories
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.0

The cited review mentions a modest accessory pack with extra eartips included in the box.

Instrument separation
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6

Instrument separation is frequently praised on busy tracks, helping the AZ100 stay clean and layered.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.3

The cited reviews note audible instrument separation and stereo layering on well-recorded tracks.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.2

One review explicitly confirms onboard microphones are built into the earbuds for calls.

Interchangeable left/right bud design
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.4

One review explicitly says either earbud can be used on its own while the other charges.

LDAC
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

LDAC support is frequently highlighted for higher-quality Android streaming, with the usual battery-life tradeoff.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
1.5

The cited reviews explicitly state that LDAC support is missing.

Lossless audio support
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
1.5

One review explicitly notes the lack of aptX Lossless or LDAC, so lossless-grade wireless support is not present here.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Voice noise reduction is often effective at cutting wind and background noise, though aggressive processing can create artifacts.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.0

Noise reduction on calls is generally effective, especially against wind and street noise, though it is not flawless in every scenario.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.8

Call quality is mixed: many find it usable or improved, while others report robotic processing or, in one case, serious call glitches.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.8

Call quality is usually clear in calmer settings, but some reviews report less natural or choppier results in noisy environments.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Midrange is generally clear and natural for vocals, with occasional notes that bass-heavy mixes can push voices slightly back.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.9

Midrange performance is often described as clear or warm, but some reviews say mids can get muddy or constrained.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.5

The cited reviews describe smooth use across iPhone, Android, and laptop setups.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6

Three-device multipoint is a major differentiator and is often described as seamless; occasional switching lag is mentioned but not common.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.1

Multipoint connection to two devices works smoothly for several reviewers, though one review reports buzzing and dual-device issues.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.7

The passive seal is strong in the cited reviews, helping block outside noise even before ANC is engaged.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.6

The case is described as compact and easy to carry in a pocket.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.7

Preset EQ options are generally useful, though some (like extra-bassy modes) may be too much for neutral listeners.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.3

One review specifically praises the Excited preset as a strong option for punchier bass.

Sensors
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.4

Wear or in-ear detection is a recurring feature callout, and reviewers say the auto pause/resume behavior works well.

Smudge resistance
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Case finish durability is mixed, with some noting scratches/scuffs and others calling it relatively scratch-resistant.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.6

One review specifically says the case is not much of a fingerprint magnet.

Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.3

Setup is mostly straightforward, but the lack of a case pairing button and some app UX quirks can add friction.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.5

Some reviewers find the software easy to use, but one review reports annoying re-pairing and reconnection steps.

Sound quality
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Reviews consistently praise the AZ100 for highly detailed, spacious sound with strong dynamics; a few note the default tuning can be bass-forward or benefit from EQ.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.4

Sound quality is broadly praised as very good for the money, though some reviews stop short of calling it flagship-level.

Soundstage depth
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.5

Reviewers note a three-dimensional presentation and useful depth cues, especially for the price category.

Soundstage width
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6

Soundstage is a standout: multiple outlets describe an immersive, wide presentation that feels larger than typical earbuds.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.5

The cited reviews describe the presentation as wide with clearly defined stereo placement for the price.

Spatial audio
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0

Dolby spatial audio/head tracking is supported and can add immersion, but some reviewers find it subtle or prefer it off for music.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
3.2

Sony 360 Reality Audio support is present, but enthusiasm is mixed and some reviewers do not see it as a major draw.

Stability
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Fit stability varies: many report a secure hold, while some reviewers experienced looseness or buds falling out during vigorous movement.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.2

For everyday use the fit is steady for several reviewers, but one review says the buds can slip during running or workouts.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Touch controls are responsive and highly configurable, with the main complaint being occasional over-sensitivity.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.0

Touch controls usually respond well, but repeated-tap volume changes and accidental triggers come up repeatedly as annoyances.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0

Transparency/ambient mode is strong and adjustable, but some reviewers note hiss at higher levels, an unnatural voice-focused mode, or not enough outside sound for awareness.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.0

Ambient and transparency modes are useful for conversations and awareness, but some reviewers mention hiss, white noise, or activation delay.

Treble clarity
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Treble is described as airy and detailed without harshness, but a few critics wanted more sparkle or presence.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.1

Treble is usually described as clear or crisp, though some reviews mention upper-treble softness or occasional distortion.

USB-C
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

USB-C charging is consistently supported and frequently mentioned as a modern convenience.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.5

USB-C charging is explicitly present in the cited reviews.

Value for money
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.8

These reviews consistently frame the earbuds as excellent value around the $100 to $120 range, especially for ANC and comfort.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.2

The controls can trigger a phone voice assistant, with Siri and Google Assistant support explicitly referenced.

Volume output
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.2

One review describes the earbuds as loud and proud, suggesting strong output.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0

The earbuds are commonly cited as IPX4-rated for sweat and light rain, but not for heavy water exposure.

Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.0

The cited reviews consistently mention IPX4 splash and sweat resistance suited to light workouts and daily use.

Weight comfort
Product 1: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Sony WF-C710N Earbuds
4.9

One review specifically highlights the very light 0.18oz-per-bud weight as a comfort benefit.