Compare Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds vs Edifier NeoBuds Planar Earbuds

ANC is generally usable to good, but it is not the product’s strongest feature; reviewers often note rivals perform better or consistency varies.

ANC is broadly seen as good to impressive for everyday noise, though several reviewers note it is not the strongest at this price or for deep low-frequency rumble.

Android compatibility is conditional: Snapdragon-compatible phones benefit most, while Samsung and Google users cannot access the highest-bitrate features.

Android compatibility is positive, with easy Android pairing and Android-only hi-res codec benefits noted.

The app is feature-rich and important for setup and customization, but reviewers also reported crashing, slow loading, and some mandatory-app friction.

The app is mostly praised as useful, stable, and customizable, although one reviewer found its look ugly and another noted missing device-list convenience.

aptX support is valued, especially aptX Lossless, but reviewers warn that Snapdragon Sound compatibility remains niche.

aptX support is treated as part of the product’s unusually broad high-resolution codec package, including aptX Adaptive and lossless-related support.

Audio-video sync was only directly evaluated by one reviewer, who reported no lag while watching YouTube on an iPhone.

Latency and gaming support are viewed positively, with reviewers noting strong gaming performance and premium audio use beyond music.

Bass is usually described as controlled, deep, and impactful, especially after personalization, but a few reviewers found default or customized bass either light or too boosted.

Bass is the most divisive sound attribute: some reviewers heard deep or strong bass with the right fit or preset, while others found it light, thin, or lacking punch.

Battery life is acceptable to good for ANC earbuds, but reviewers vary from respectable and impressive to merely typical or could be better.

Battery life is average to mediocre overall; some reviewers found it acceptable, but many expected more from a premium-priced earbud.

Bluetooth reliability is mostly positive, including quick connection and smooth switching, though a few reviewers reported stutter, slow app connection, or connectivity issues.

Bluetooth performance has limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer praising range after staying connected across an office.

Build quality was directly praised by one reviewer, who said both the case and earbuds felt great and flagship-like.

Build quality is mostly positive, with reviewers praising finish and construction, though one noted cheap-looking plastic.

Hi-res playback and audiophile-grade sound receive strong praise in the available evidence.

Button/control usability is a standout because reviewers praise extensive customization, many gesture options, and easy control mapping, with only one runner disliking a gesture.

The squeeze or pinch controls are usually considered reliable and customizable, though a few reviewers found them delayed or weaker than top competitors.

Carry case quality is mixed: reviewers praised solid construction and magnet security, while others noted bulk, difficult bud removal, or a weak case feel.

Carry case impressions are mixed: reviewers liked its secure magnets or compact/pocketable feel, but others criticized its size, looks, or chunkiness.

Charging is mixed: reviewers praised fast, wireless, and USB-C charging, but one reported the wireless-charged case getting extremely hot.

Charging is a positive convenience point, especially wireless charging and quick top-ups.

Codec support is a strength for compatible devices, but reviewers also note limitations with AAC, Snapdragon compatibility, and missing LDAC.

Codec support is a major strength, repeatedly praised as exhaustive or unusually complete for high-resolution listening.

Long-use comfort is divisive: some reviewers found the earbuds comfortable, while others reported heat, rubbing, pressure, or discomfort from the large housings.

Long-use comfort is generally strong, with several reviewers wearing them for hours or all day, though one review found comfort only medium over time.

Design splits reviewers: some like the smart, elegant, distinctive look, while others strongly dislike the oversized dinner-plate appearance.

Design is subjective and split, with reviewers admiring its distinctive modern look while others called it unattractive, retro, or an acquired taste.

Eartip fit is highly personal: several reviewers achieved a secure, comfortable seal, while others experienced popping out or poor fit.

Fit is highly important and mostly positive; reviewers found better bass and stability once the right tips or seal were achieved.

Ear tip size options are well received, with praise for multiple tips, foam options, and fit flexibility.

Ear tip size options are praised for helping users find the right fit and bass seal.

EQ customization is useful and often praised, especially ProEQ and immersion controls, though one reviewer wanted more targeted frequency bands.

EQ customization is polarizing: reviewers like the depth and flexibility, but many criticize limited bands, poor bass impact, or weak responsiveness.

Frequency balance is improved by firmware and personalization for some reviewers, but profile differences can make the tonal result uneven for others.

Reviewers describe the frequency balance as generally accurate and controlled, with strong detail and tonality, though the bass region is less consistently weighted.

Included accessories are a positive because reviewers appreciated the supplied fit options, wings, and foam tips.

Included accessories get positive limited evidence, especially the multiple tips and protective pouch/case cover.

Instrument separation is a consistent positive, with reviewers hearing clean layering, distinct elements, and better separation after calibration.

Instrument separation is one of the clearest consensus wins, with reviewers repeatedly praising clean layering, precise reproduction, and strong detail retrieval.

The integrated microphone system is generally clear and usable, with reviewers praising voice clarity and detail for calls.

The integrated microphone setup is adequate in limited evidence, but not a leading strength.

Independent left/right bud use was praised in one review because either earbud could play alone while the other charged.

LDAC is a weakness because multiple reviewers explicitly note that the earbuds do not support it or that LDAC competitors are easier for Android users.

LDAC support is repeatedly included in reviewers’ praise for the broad high-resolution codec package.

Lossless audio support is appreciated and sounds crisp to some reviewers, but its benefit depends on compatible devices and is not always transformative.

Lossless audio support is a strength within the broader codec package, with reviewers treating the support as unusually complete.

Maximum-volume clarity is a strong point, with reviewers praising clean output, crystal clarity, and low distortion even at high volume.

Microphone noise reduction is solid overall, with reviewers noting wind and background-noise handling that keeps voice usable.

Microphone noise reduction is mixed: some reviewers heard good wind or background reduction, while others found ambient noise pickup and noisy conditions problematic.

Call microphone quality is generally good, with reviewers hearing clear calls and intelligible voice pickup, though not always perfect.

Call quality ranges from excellent to merely okay, with most reviewers finding voices intelligible but not always natural, loud, or class-leading.

Midrange performance is generally strong, with reviewers praising clear vocals, layered mids, and presence; one reviewer found the default tuning too mid-forward and radio-like.

Midrange and vocals are usually praised as clear, detailed, and natural, with one reviewer noting vocal volume could dip in the mix.

Multi-platform compatibility was positively tested in one review through automatic switching between a tablet and phone.

Multi-platform compatibility is positive in limited evidence, with codec support framed as useful across Qualcomm, MediaTek, and Google Tensor phones.

Multipoint connectivity is one of the most consistently praised usability features, with reviewers describing seamless or perfect switching between devices.

Multipoint is useful and sometimes seamless, but not consistently reliable; one reviewer had to switch manually while others reported smooth pause-and-play behavior.

Passive isolation benefits from the seal, foam tips, and fit options, with reviewers describing a solid seal and better noise isolation.

Passive isolation was described as decent with a proper fit, but the review evidence mainly focuses on ANC rather than unpowered isolation.

Portability is mixed because some reviewers found the case pocketable, while others called the case bulky and the earbuds themselves large.

Portability has limited positive evidence, with one reviewer calling the charging case compact.

Personalized profile quality is a defining strength: most reviewers found AAT or personalized sound dramatically better, though one reviewer disliked the profile result.

Preset EQ profiles are generally useful, especially Dynamic, which reviewers said improved balance or impact.

RGB/light customization has limited but positive evidence, with the case light colors treated as fun customization.

Sensors are mixed: one reviewer found wear detection unreliable, while another said it worked well.

Smudge resistance was only directly assessed once, with the reviewer noting minimal fingerprints on the case.

Smudge resistance has limited positive evidence, with the matte case finish praised for helping prevent fingerprints.

Setup and software are mixed: the hearing test can impress and work well, but some reviewers found tinkering slow or less polished than rivals.

Setup and software simplicity are mixed: pairing can be simple, but mode switching and Edifier-style configuration can feel sluggish or finicky.

Sound quality is the clearest strength overall: most reviewers praised clean, spacious, detailed audio, though one lab-focused review was sharply negative before firmware/tuning changes.

Reviewers strongly agree the NeoBuds Planar are detail-first earbuds with unusually precise, clean sound, though a few found the tuning inconsistent or easier to admire than love.

Soundstage depth and immersion are generally strong, with reviewers describing holographic space, a bubble of music, and studio-like presence.

Soundstage depth is mixed: one reviewer heard no depth, another praised immersion, and another felt the presentation was pushed forward.

Soundstage width earns broad praise, with multiple reviewers describing wide, open, spacious, or expansive presentation from earbuds.

Several reviewers heard an open, airy, expansive soundstage, with soundstage width treated as one of the planar driver strengths.

Spatial audio is polarized, ranging from underwhelming in one review to immersive, excellent, and wide in several others.

Spatial audio is a clear missing-feature complaint from the available evidence.

Stability is generally good when the right tips or wings are used, with reviewers praising secure fit and reduced fall-out risk.

Stability is mostly good for regular use and exercise, though some reviewers experienced shifting during runs or workouts.

Touch responsiveness is strongly rated, with reviewers describing responsive taps, reliable touchpads, and working commands.

Touch/tap responsiveness is mixed: one reviewer found the controls pretty good, while others said the tap system needs adjustment or works only most of the time.

Transparency or social mode is mixed: some reviewers found it gentle, useful, or convenient, while others called it basic, artificial, or ineffective.

Transparency mode is functional but not a standout; reviewers praised voice-focused tools in one case but often found it muffled, unnatural, or merely adequate.

Treble is mostly clear and energetic, with praise for sparkle and highs, but some reviewers noted brightness, tame extension, tinny highs, or slight grain depending on profile.

Treble detail is a major strength, often described as crisp, clean, or precise, but some reviewers found the highs bright, toasty, or potentially fatiguing.

Value depends heavily on price: reviewers criticized the original premium cost, but sale pricing and sound quality made it compelling for several.

Value for money is heavily split by region and priorities: sound-focused reviewers can justify it, but many think the price is too high versus competitors.

Voice assistant use has limited but positive evidence, with voice commands described as swift.

Volume output is strong, with reviewers calling the earbuds louder than most, not shy about volume, and clear across lower and higher volumes.

Volume output drew mild criticism: reviewers generally found it usable, but noted it was on the lower side and not ideal for listeners who want maximum loudness.

Water and sweat resistance is viewed as adequate for light workouts, sweat, and light rain, but no reviewer treated it as rugged waterproofing.

The water and dust rating is viewed as practical for rain, sweat, dust, and realistic everyday conditions.

Weight and size comfort is a recurring concern because reviewers repeatedly describe the earbuds as large, awkward, or uncomfortable for smaller ears.

Weight comfort is positive in the limited evidence, with reviewers describing the buds as lightweight or far from heavy.