If you want better Spatial audio
Choose Denon Perl Pro True Wireless Earbuds. It scores 4.2 vs 1.0 for Spatial audio, with a 4.2 overall score.
Edifier NeoBuds Planar Earbuds Review
Bottom Line
Choose these for detailed, airy sound, broad codec support, comfort, and solid ANC. Skip them if you need heavy bass, top-tier battery life, natural transparency, or obvious value at $300.
Best for
Best for detail-focused listeners who value separation, treble clarity, high-resolution codec support, and a planar-style presentation over mainstream bass impact. They also suit users who want comfort, app customization, and solid everyday ANC.
Not for
Not for bassheads, bargain hunters, or shoppers who want the strongest battery life, most natural transparency, or simplest all-round flagship experience. They are also a risky pick if low-end punch matters more than detail.
Verdict
The Edifier NeoBuds Planar earn their strongest praise for precision, separation, treble detail, codec support, comfort, and a capable app. Reviewers often describe them as unusually revealing and audiophile-leaning for true wireless earbuds, with ANC that is good enough for daily use and sometimes genuinely impressive. The tradeoff is that the same planar character can feel light in bass weight or unforgiving with some tracks, and the EQ does not always fix that. Battery life, transparency, call noise reduction, and price also keep them from being an easy all-round recommendation.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
50 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.017 (34%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.422 (44%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.410 (20%)
-
Very negative below 1.51 (2%)
Pros
-
Codec support is a major strength, repeatedly praised as exhaustive or unusually complete for high-resolution listening.
-
Instrument separation is one of the clearest consensus wins, with reviewers repeatedly praising clean layering, precise reproduction, and strong detail retrieval.
-
Reviewers strongly agree the NeoBuds Planar are detail-first earbuds with unusually precise, clean sound, though a few found the tuning inconsistent or easier to admire than love.
-
Midrange and vocals are usually praised as clear, detailed, and natural, with one reviewer noting vocal volume could dip in the mix.
-
Treble detail is a major strength, often described as crisp, clean, or precise, but some reviewers found the highs bright, toasty, or potentially fatiguing.
-
Fit is highly important and mostly positive; reviewers found better bass and stability once the right tips or seal were achieved.
Cons
-
Spatial audio is a clear missing-feature complaint from the available evidence.
-
Volume output drew mild criticism: reviewers generally found it usable, but noted it was on the lower side and not ideal for listeners who want maximum loudness.
-
Sensors are mixed: one reviewer found wear detection unreliable, while another said it worked well.
-
The integrated microphone setup is adequate in limited evidence, but not a leading strength.
-
Microphone noise reduction is mixed: some reviewers heard good wind or background reduction, while others found ambient noise pickup and noisy conditions problematic.
-
Transparency mode is functional but not a standout; reviewers praised voice-focused tools in one case but often found it muffled, unnatural, or merely adequate.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Earbuds, this product is above average in aptX, LDAC, Lossless audio support, near average in Sound quality, Bass performance, below average in Spatial audio, Volume output, Value for money.
Comparison summary
49 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher18 (37%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts19 (39%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower12 (24%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| aptX | 5.0 | 2.3 | +2.7 |
| Spatial audio | 1.0 | 3.2 | -2.2 |
| LDAC | 5.0 | 3.1 | +1.9 |
| Lossless audio support | 5.0 | 3.4 | +1.6 |
| Codec support | 5.0 | 3.5 | +1.5 |
| Smudge resistance | 4.5 | 3.1 | +1.4 |
| Volume output | 2.7 | 3.9 | -1.3 |
| Value for money | 3.1 | 4.0 | -0.9 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Value for money
Choose Sony WF-C510 Earbuds. It scores 4.7 vs 3.1 for Value for money, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better Volume output
Choose Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE Earbuds. It scores 5.0 vs 2.7 for Volume output, with a 3.9 overall score.
If you want better Sensors
Choose Sony WF-C710N Earbuds. It scores 4.8 vs 2.8 for Sensors, with a 3.9 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Similar: microphone quality The reviewer rates mic pickup in the same class as Sony WF-1000XM5.
- Compared: market competition The reviewer cites Sony’s WF-1000XM5 as tough competition for the NeoBuds Planar.
- Better: active noise cancellation PCMag says the NeoBuds Planar ANC trails the Sony WF-1000XM5.
AirPods Pro 2
- Better: transparency mode The reviewer says the best transparency benchmark is AirPods Pro 2, not the NeoBuds Planar.
- Similar: active noise cancellation The reviewer felt the ANC was about as capable as AirPods Pro 2.
- Cheaper: price The reviewer says the NeoBuds Planar cost more than AirPods Pro 2 in the U.S.
Denon PERL Pro
- Similar: microphone quality The reviewer rates mic pickup in the same class as Denon PERL Pro.
- Similar: microphone quality The reviewer ranked the mic quality alongside Denon PERL Pro.
FAQ
Do the Edifier NeoBuds Planar sound good?
Yes, reviewers mostly praise their detailed, precise, and spacious sound. The main caveat is bass: some heard strong bass with the right fit, while others found the low end lacking punch.
Are they good for bass-heavy music?
They are not the safest choice for bass-first listeners. Several reviewers liked the bass after adjusting fit or using Dynamic EQ, but many said the planar drivers lack low-end weight or wallop.
How good is the noise cancellation?
ANC is generally good to impressive for everyday environments such as cafes, commuting, and office noise. It is less consistently praised for airplane-style low-frequency rumble or versus Bose, Apple, and Sony flagships.
Is the battery life a weakness?
Battery life is one of the more common complaints. Reviewers often described it as average, mediocre, or disappointing for the price, even though a few found it acceptable.
Are the controls and app easy to use?
The app is usually praised for customization, but the EQ and mode switching can feel more complicated than necessary. Squeeze controls are often reliable, though some reviewers noticed delay or weaker responsiveness.
Who are these earbuds best for?
They fit listeners who care most about detail retrieval, instrument separation, high-resolution codec support, and an uncommon planar sound. They are less suited to casual shoppers who want a simple all-rounder.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Picky Audio
- Review score
- 3.6
YouTube - Aaron X Loud and Wireless
- Review score
- 3.5
Article Reviews
howtogeek.com
- Review score
- 4.0
forums.appleinsider.com
- Review score
- 3.9
hometheaterreview.com
- Review score
- 4.6
Top Earbuds to Consider
Best for detailed, natural wired sound, three connector options, and standout value around $99. Skip it if you need wireless features, stronger bass, softer treble, or a compact fit for...
Pros: Sound quality, Midrange clarity
Cons: Software/setup simplicity, Portability/foldability
Choose the JBL Tour Pro 3 if you want feature-packed earbuds with strong sound, ANC, LDAC and a genuinely useful smart case. Skip them if you have smaller ears, want...
Pros: Codec support, Dongle
Cons: Sound leakage, Find My
Choose these for excellent sound, deep app control, strong codec support, and a premium true-wireless package. Skip them if call quality, best-in-class ANC, iPhone integration, or a compact case matters...
Pros: Maximum volume clarity, Stability
Cons: Spatial audio, Microphone noise reduction
Choose the Technics EAH-AZ100 if sound quality, bass, ANC, battery life, and multipoint matter most. Skip them if you need flawless calls, Bose-level ANC, the most natural transparency, or a...
Pros: Volume output, Maximum volume clarity
Cons: aptX, Auracast support