- Worse: audio quality PCMag says Edifier outdoes Sony WF-1000XM5 and Bose in audio quality.
- Compared: price tier The reviewer places the Edifier at the same price as Sony WF-1000XM5 while arguing the value is poor.
Edifier NeoBuds Planar Earbuds Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Edifier NeoBuds Planar if you want highly detailed, codec-rich earbuds with good ANC and comfort. Skip them if you need big bass, top-tier transparency or calls, longer battery life, or clear value at $299.
Best for
Best for detail-focused listeners who value planar clarity, instrument separation, hi-res codec support, and solid ANC over a heavy bass-first tuning. They also suit users willing to experiment with fit, presets, and EQ.
Not for
Not for budget shoppers, bassheads who want guaranteed low-end slam, or buyers who prioritize class-leading transparency, calls, battery life, or seamless mainstream polish over specialized sound.
Verdict
The Edifier NeoBuds Planar stand out for planar-style detail, strong instrument separation, broad codec support, and generally effective ANC in a comfortable true wireless design. The tradeoff is that reviewers do not agree on the bass: some heard deep, punchy response with the right seal or preset, while others found the low end light, remote, or lacking wallop. Battery life, transparency, call handling, and controls are more mid-pack than premium, and the $299 U.S. price creates pressure against Apple, Bose, Sony, and other established competitors. These earbuds make the most sense as a specialist audio pick rather than an all-round flagship.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Alternative: premium earbud competition AppleInsider treats Bose's QuietComfort Ultra 2nd-gen earbuds as a tough premium competitor.
AirPods Pro 2
- Cheaper: price The reviewer says the Edifier costs $50 more than AirPods Pro 2 and is not worth that premium.
Feature Scorecards
Pros
-
Smudge resistance has limited but positive evidence from one review praising the matte finish for preventing fingerprints.
-
Lossless support is strong, with several reviewers citing aptX Lossless or hi-res lossless transmission.
-
Ear tip options are strong, with multiple reviews noting wide sizing from extra small through extra large or several included pairs.
-
aptX support is a strength, with reviewers repeatedly noting aptX Adaptive or aptX Lossless as part of the codec package.
-
Instrument separation is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising clean track separation, detail retrieval, and precise layering.
-
Codec support is one of the strongest consensus positives, repeatedly described as broad, exhaustive, or covering nearly every major hi-res codec.
-
LDAC support is repeatedly confirmed and is part of the broader hi-res codec strength.
-
Bluetooth 5.4 is repeatedly noted and generally treated as a modern connectivity strength.
-
Reviewers strongly support the hi-res playback side through Hi-Res certification and LDAC, LHDC, and lossless-capable codec support; no review specifically evaluates a DAC.
-
Portability is positive where mentioned, with reviewers calling the package compact or the case pocketable; foldability is not relevant to this earbud form factor.
-
Sound quality is the core strength, with most reviewers praising detail, clarity, and planar character, while some warn that the tuning is specialized or inconsistent.
-
Charging is a clear strength because reviewers repeatedly cite wireless or Qi charging alongside USB-C/wired charging.
-
Android support is strong through Google Fast Pair and Android-accessible hi-res codec advantages, with multiple reviewers calling this out.
-
The Connex app is feature-rich and often praised as usable or intuitive, but one review found it ugly and another found parts of the UX clumsy.
-
Frequency response and tonal accuracy are generally praised for detail and balance through mids and treble, while bass weight remains the main caveat.
-
Multi-platform support is supported by Android/iOS app availability and broad chip/device compatibility, though evidence is narrower than for codecs.
-
Included accessories are solid, with reviewers noting multiple ear tips plus items such as a USB-C cable, pouch, or extra case cover.
-
Case light color customization is repeatedly noted, usually as eight-color or LED customization rather than lighting on the buds themselves.
-
Midrange and vocals are mostly clear and detailed, though one review noted vocals sometimes dipped in the mix.
-
Long-use comfort is generally positive, with several reviewers wearing them for hours or all day; one found comfort only medium.
-
Video and gaming latency are treated positively, with reviewers citing Game Mode, low latency, or fine video latency.
-
Stability is generally good, with several reviewers describing secure fit during running or workouts, though one had to readjust during runs.
-
Soundstage width is usually positive, with reviewers describing expansive, large, open, or better-positioned staging.
-
USB-C charging is clearly supported and repeatedly mentioned for the case or included cable.
-
Treble clarity is a major positive for detail and sparkle, but brightness, sibilance, or restrained treble can become track-dependent issues.
-
Water and sweat resistance is positive, with reviewers consistently citing IP55 or IP54 protection for sweat, rain, dust, or workouts.
-
Fit depends heavily on getting a proper seal; many reviewers achieved secure fits, but some noted seal loss or size sensitivity.
-
Multipoint is widely supported and often works well, but one review reported having to switch devices manually and another noted high-res limitations.
-
Build quality is mostly viewed as solid or well made, though one reviewer criticized the plastic casing as cheap-looking.
-
ANC is consistently described as effective or good, though several reviewers say rivals can block more noise and sub-bass rumble.
-
Weight comfort is mostly positive because the earbuds are described as lightweight, though one reviewer did not find them especially light in the ear.
-
Voice assistant integration is supported through native assistant control or voice-assistant interaction, with limited direct evaluation.
-
The app includes a find-my-earbuds beep feature, but evidence is limited to one review.
-
Passive isolation gets limited but positive support, with one review describing decent isolation with a proper fit.
-
Physical controls are customizable and often reliable, but reviewers also mention a learning curve, weak squeeze feel, or slower response.
-
The integrated mic array is well documented, usually as three mics per bud or six total, though call performance varies by environment.
-
Soundstage depth is mixed, with one reviewer finding no depth while others heard a firm foundation, space, or an immersive stage.
-
Bass impressions are split: several reviewers found bass light or lacking punch, while others reported strong, deep, or punchy bass with the right fit or tuning.
-
Preset EQ quality is generally usable, especially Dynamic or Electrostatic, but reviewers do not treat the presets as universally ideal.
-
Sensors are present and useful, especially wear detection, but performance ranges from working well to laggy or unreliable.
-
Call quality ranges from clear and coherent to quiet, processed, or merely decent depending on conditions.
-
Design opinions are divided between modern, futuristic, or individual styling and comments that the look is unattractive or an acquired taste.
-
Case feedback is mixed: some reviewers liked its robust, compact, or pocketable feel, while others called it ugly or chunky.
-
EQ customization is powerful on paper, but reviewers are split because some liked the adjustable bands while others found the EQ limited or not very responsive.
Cons
-
Microphone noise reduction is mixed: some reviewers heard good background or wind handling, while others called reduction spotty or said it struggled in a cafe simulation.
-
Control responsiveness is mixed, ranging from reliable pressure controls to accidental activation, delay, and sluggish mode changes.
-
Battery life is generally average to mediocre for the price, despite some reviewers noting acceptable totals or better-than-claimed playback.
-
Setup and software simplicity are mixed: pairing can be easy, but reviewers also cite sluggish mode switching, finicky setup, or UX rough edges.
-
Transparency mode is serviceable but not top-tier; reviewers mention useful voice or awareness modes but also muffled highs and unnatural sound.
-
Value is strongly divided by region and price: some reviewers justify the price for sound, but many call $299 expensive or a hard sell.
-
Volume output is a concern in the two reviews that discuss it, with both saying the earbuds are on the lower side or not very loud.
-
Spatial audio is a weakness because one review explicitly says this feature is absent.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Earbud Headphones, this product is above average in aptX, LDAC, Lossless audio support, below average in Spatial audio, Value for money.
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| aptX | 4.8 | 2.0 | +2.8 |
| LDAC | 4.7 | 2.5 | +2.2 |
| Spatial audio | 1.0 | 3.3 | -2.3 |
| Lossless audio support | 4.9 | 3.1 | +1.7 |
| Smudge resistance | 5.0 | 3.3 | +1.7 |
| Value for money | 3.0 | 4.1 | -1.1 |
| Codec support | 4.8 | 3.7 | +1.1 |
| Built-in DAC and hi-res playback | 4.7 | 3.6 | +1.1 |
FAQ
Do the Edifier NeoBuds Planar sound good?
Yes, most reviewers praised their detail, clarity, and instrument separation. The main caveat is that the tuning is specialized, and not every reviewer found the bass satisfying.
Are they good for bass?
Bass is the most divided area. Some reviewers heard deep or punchy bass after getting the right seal or using Dynamic EQ, while others found the low end light or lacking body.
How good is the noise cancellation?
Reviewers generally found ANC effective for everyday noise, cafes, public transport, and wind. Several still said Apple, Bose, Sony, or other rivals can cancel more noise, especially low rumble.
Is the battery life strong?
Battery life is mostly described as average or mediocre for the price. Reviews commonly cite about five hours with ANC on and around 20 to 30 hours total with the case.
Do they support high-resolution audio?
Yes. Reviewers repeatedly mention LDAC, LHDC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, Snapdragon Sound, and Hi-Res certification, making codec support one of the strongest positives.
Are the controls and app easy to use?
The app offers deep customization and many reviewers liked it, but some found the EQ or UX complex. Controls are customizable, though responsiveness and squeeze feel drew mixed reactions.
Are they worth $299?
That depends on how much you value their detailed sound and codec support. Several reviewers found $299 hard to justify because competitors offer stronger all-round features.
Consider This Instead
If you want better Spatial audio
Choose Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 Earbuds. It scores 4.5 vs 1.0 for Spatial audio, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better Value for money
Choose Sennheiser CX 80U Wired Earbuds. It scores 4.9 vs 3.0 for Value for money, with a 3.7 overall score.
If you want better Battery
Choose Audio-Technica ATH-CKS50TW Earbuds. It scores 5.0 vs 3.4 for Battery, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better Transparency mode quality
Choose Apple AirPods Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds. It scores 4.7 vs 3.2 for Transparency mode quality, with a 4.0 overall score.
Overall Top Earbud Headphones Alternatives
Choose JBL Tour Pro 3 for feature-hungry listeners who want a smart-case transmitter and lively sound. Skip if you need the smallest, most secure fit or demand best-in-class ANC and...
Pros: Dongle, Codec support
Cons: None
Choose for top-tier sound and a feature-rich, future-proof codec stack; Skip if you prioritize the very best ANC or consistently clean calls in wind/noise (especially on iPhone).
Pros: Codec support, aptX
Cons: Spatial audio, Find My
Choose the Status Pro X if sound quality, LDAC, strong ANC, and secure comfort matter most. Skip them if you need all-day battery, best wind handling, or more premium smart...
Pros: LDAC, Android compatibility
Cons: Spatial audio, Noise isolation (passive)
Choose the Sony WF-1000XM6 for elite ANC, detailed sound, strong calls, and deep EQ. Skip them if stiff foam tips, a dense app, or the premium price bother you.
Pros: Sound quality, Midrange clarity
Cons: Cable quality, Voice assistant integration