Compare JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds vs Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

P1 JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
P2 Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Comparison Takeaways

JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • Auracast support is 4.7 vs 2.0. Auracast support was treated as a major future-facing strength, though some reviewers noted limited current device compatibility.
  • Included accessories is 4.5 vs 2.5. Included accessories received limited but positive evidence because one reviewer appreciated the useful cable bundle.
  • Carry case quality is 4.6 vs 3.5. The smart charging case was the standout feature across reviews, praised for touchscreen controls, transmitter utility, and overall...
  • Water/sweat resistance rating is 4.5 vs 3.5. Water and sweat resistance was evaluated favorably for workouts, rain, sweat, and daily use confidence.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds

Where It Has the Edge

  • Portability/foldability is 4.5 vs 3.1. Portability is strong because the case is repeatedly described as pocketable, small, and easy to carry.
  • Button control usability is 4.5 vs 3.2. Control remapping is praised as unusually flexible and useful across the app and earbuds.
  • Maximum volume clarity is 5.0 vs 3.8. Maximum-volume clarity is praised for staying clean and distortion-free even at high levels.
  • Find My is 4.3 vs 3.0. Find My support is useful for peace of mind, though one reviewer is disappointed by the location behavior.
Average score
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.2
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2
Active noise cancellation
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.3

ANC was broadly rated good to excellent, though several reviewers said it still trails the very best Bose, Sony, or Apple options.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

ANC is broadly strong and often near flagship level, though several reviewers say it still falls short of the very best Bose-style silence.

Android compatibility
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Android compatibility was praised mainly through LDAC support and Android hi-res advantages.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Android compatibility is praised for LDAC, fast pairing, and strong ANC value with Android phones.

App
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

The JBL app was usually praised for depth, EQ, settings, and control, though one review noted occasional bugs.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.4

The app is mostly praised for useful controls, customization, stability, and EQ access, despite some complaints about layout.

aptX
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.0

aptX support is a weakness because one reviewer specifically wished Qualcomm aptX codecs were included.

Audio-video sync accuracy
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.4

Latency evidence was mixed: one review found low latency for video, while others criticized gaming or LDAC/video-mode latency.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Video sync is mostly strong, with two reviewers reporting zero or no visible lag, while one notes a slight delay with some codecs.

Auracast support
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.7

Auracast support was treated as a major future-facing strength, though some reviewers noted limited current device compatibility.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.0

Auracast support is a concern in one scored review because the reviewer criticizes its absence.

Bass performance
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Bass was consistently described as punchy, deep, textured, and fun, though a few reviewers noted a bass-forward balance.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Bass is widely praised for depth, control, punch, and low distortion, with only one review criticizing the default balance as too boomy.

Battery
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Battery life was widely praised as competitive or impressive, with some long-term evidence of normal capacity decline.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Battery life is consistently a strength, with reviewers praising long ANC runtime and major improvement over the AZ80.

Bluetooth
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.9

Bluetooth connectivity was described as stable and easy, with high marks in reviews that scored or tested pairing and connection behavior.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Bluetooth reliability is consistently praised, with reviewers reporting stable connections and no meaningful dropouts.

Build quality
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Build quality was generally praised as solid, rugged, or well-made, with positive long-term durability evidence.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.6

Build quality is praised as premium, tactile, mature, and a substantial step forward.

Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.6

Hi-res playback was praised through LDAC, LE Audio, and high-quality transmitter-mode listening; DAC-specific evidence was not separately evaluated.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.8

Hi-res playback is praised in the one scored review, where LDAC/FLAC listening brought more detail, solidity, and space.

Button control usability
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.2

Control usability was a recurring compromise because reviewers had to choose among playback, volume, and ANC control groups.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Control remapping is praised as unusually flexible and useful across the app and earbuds.

Carry case quality
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.6

The smart charging case was the standout feature across reviews, praised for touchscreen controls, transmitter utility, and overall usefulness despite size complaints.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Case quality is mixed: it is compact and pocketable, but multiple reviewers criticize weak magnets, rattle, scratches, or bland styling.

Charging
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.6

Charging was praised for quick-charge usefulness, fast charging, USB-C, and wireless charging convenience.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Charging is viewed positively where evaluated, especially wireless charging and case convenience.

Codec support
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.9

Codec support was praised for LDAC and high-resolution wireless options, especially by Android-focused reviewers.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Codec support is praised for LDAC/LC3 breadth, but the absence of aptX is called a mild limitation.

Comfort during long use
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.1

Comfort was strong for many reviewers over long sessions, but fit problems for smaller ears and foam-tip discomfort created a clear caveat.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Comfort trends positive thanks to smaller, lighter ergonomics, but fit fatigue and bulk remain concerns for some ears.

Design and Aesthetics
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.9

Design opinions were mixed: some liked the premium smart-case look and unique design, while one reviewer felt the buds looked cheap.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Design and aesthetics are generally praised as premium, sleek, compact, or classy, though a few reviewers find the look plain.

Dongle
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.9

The case transmitter/dongle function was repeatedly praised as a major convenience for flights, gyms, wired sources, and low-latency playback.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Eartips fit
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.0

Eartips fit was highly user-dependent, ranging from easy fit and better seals to trouble staying put for smaller ears.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Eartip fit is generally good with the right size, but some reviewers report looseness, bulk, or falling out.

Ear tip size options
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Ear tip options were praised for the generous selection and included foam tips, with some reviewers finding them especially useful.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Ear tip options are considered useful and generous, especially for finding the right fit across ear sizes.

Equalizer customization
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.7

Equalizer customization was one of the most consistently praised features, often described as powerful, robust, or highly configurable.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

EQ customization is a clear strength, with many reviewers praising the eight-band control and meaningful tuning options.

Find My
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.0

Find My evidence was mixed-to-negative because the earbuds had useful locating features but the case could not be pinged in one review.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Find My support is useful for peace of mind, though one reviewer is disappointed by the location behavior.

Frequency response accuracy
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.8

Frequency response was judged generally listenable but somewhat off the reviewer’s preferred target.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Frequency response impressions are mixed: one review calls it strange, while others praise accuracy, balance, and low distortion.

Hinge durability
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Long-term case hinge durability had limited but positive evidence from a 12-month review.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Included accessories
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Included accessories received limited but positive evidence because one reviewer appreciated the useful cable bundle.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.5

Included accessories draw criticism where reviewed because foam tips are missing despite multiple silicone tip sizes.

Instrument separation
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Instrument separation and imaging were frequently praised, especially with comments about clear placement, cohesive mixes, and detailed separation.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.9

Instrument separation is a standout strength, with reviewers hearing layers, voices, and complex arrangements as distinct and clearly placed.

Integrated microphone
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.1

Integrated microphone hardware was viewed positively, with dependable microphones and strong mic clarity when using the case connection.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Interchangeable left/right bud design
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Independent left/right earbud use is praised as convenient and useful when scored.

LDAC
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.7

LDAC was repeatedly treated as a meaningful advantage for compatible Android or hi-res listening setups.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

LDAC is received positively for higher-quality playback and better sound from compatible Android or hi-res sources.

Maximum volume clarity
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.8

Maximum-volume clarity was mixed: one reviewer heard flatness at loud volume, while another found distortion remained low.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Maximum-volume clarity is praised for staying clean and distortion-free even at high levels.

Microphone noise reduction
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Microphone noise reduction was usually praised for suppressing train, traffic, wind, and office noise, though one reviewer found wind-city performance weaker.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.0

Microphone noise reduction is polarized: several reviewers praise wind and background suppression, while one reports failed clarity and cutouts.

Microphone quality for calls
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Call microphone quality was a major strength across reviews, with several reports of clear calls in offices, traffic, or windy settings.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.7

Call quality is mixed, ranging from serviceable or excellent in some reviews to choppy, robotic, or poor in others.

Midrange clarity
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.3

Midrange comments were mostly positive for vocals and clarity, but a few reviewers heard recessed or underpowered mids in some tracks.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Midrange and vocals are generally described as clear, detailed, warm, and more forward than the previous model.

Multi-platform compatibility
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.9

Multi-platform compatibility was praised because the transmitter case and feature blend expand use beyond standard phone pairing.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Multi-platform compatibility is praised because the app and customization work across iOS and Android.

Multipoint connectivity reliability
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.2

Multipoint was useful and often smooth, but one reviewer reported source-switching mistakes that hurt reliability.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.8

Multipoint is a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising reliable switching and three-device connectivity.

Noise isolation (passive)
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.7

Passive isolation was praised, especially with the included tips and foam tips improving the seal.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Passive isolation is viewed positively when the tips seal well, with reviewers noting isolation even before ANC is active.

Portability/foldability
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.1

Portability was mixed to negative because the smart case adds useful features but is often bulkier than average.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Portability is strong because the case is repeatedly described as pocketable, small, and easy to carry.

Preset EQ profile quality
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Preset EQ evidence was limited but positive, especially for the Studio preset’s bass adjustment.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Preset EQ quality is mostly positive, especially Direct, Dynamic, and Treble+ modes, though SuperBass+ is too heavy for one reviewer.

Sensors
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Sensors were praised for reliable wear detection and auto-pause behavior.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Sidetone adjustment quality
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.5

Sidetone/Voice Aware adjustment had limited mixed evidence because one reviewer found it fiddly despite liking transparency overall.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Smudge resistance
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.3

Smudge resistance was mixed: one review liked the case’s fingerprint resistance, while another said a glossy case picked up fingerprints.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
No score yet
Software/setup simplicity
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.8

Setup and software stability were usually positive, with quick pairing and later app stability, though one review flagged app moodiness.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.9

Setup and software simplicity are mostly positive, but the lack of a physical pairing button adds friction for one reviewer.

Sound leakage
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
2.5

Sound leakage had limited negative evidence tied to one reviewer’s poor seal and passive-isolation issue.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
2.5

Sound leakage is a weakness in the one scored review, which says loud music can be heard in a quiet room.

Sound quality
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.6

Reviewers widely praised the overall sound as clear, exciting, and flagship-level, with only a few caveats about tuning preferences.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Reviewers overwhelmingly praise the AZ100's sound as clear, detailed, musical, and high-end, though one review found the stock tuning odd.

Soundstage depth
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Soundstage depth evidence was positive but limited, with comments about full engagement and an immersive concert-like effect.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.5

Soundstage depth is usually strong, with reviewers praising depth, immersion, and layering, though one long-term reviewer wanted more depth.

Soundstage width
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Soundstage width earned positive comments for left-right separation and a clear sense of space.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Soundstage width receives strong praise, with reviewers describing the presentation as spacious, broad, expansive, and room-like.

Spatial audio
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.1

Spatial audio drew mixed-to-positive reactions, with several reviewers loving head tracking while others found it inconsistent or track-dependent.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Spatial audio is mixed: reviewers appreciate Dolby/head-tracking support, but several find it merely decent, distracting, or less clear than stereo.

Stability
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.9

Fit stability was split: some reviewers found a secure workout-ready seal, while others struggled with looseness or smaller-ear fit.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Stability is mixed: several reviewers found the fit secure, while others would not trust it for vigorous movement.

Touch control responsiveness
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.9

Touch responsiveness was mixed, ranging from reliable sensors and useful controls to laggy or temperamental case/touch behavior.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.2

Touch controls are generally responsive and customizable, though sensitivity and personal preference create some mixed reactions.

Transparency mode quality
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
3.9

Transparency mode was generally usable to good, but reviewers varied from strong praise to merely acceptable or digitally recreated impressions.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.6

Transparency mode is mixed: some find it natural or useful, while others hear hiss, over-processing, or weaker situational awareness.

Treble clarity
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Treble was usually praised for clarity, crispness, and control, with only limited concern about brightness or EQ tweaking.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Treble is usually considered clear, airy, detailed, and non-harsh, though one review says the default tuning lacks high-end content.

Value for money
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.1

Value was highly context-dependent: many reviewers liked the feature set or sale pricing, while others criticized the premium price and cheaper JBL alternatives.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.1

Value is mixed-to-positive: reviewers like the premium feature set and sound, but several note the high price and strong competition.

Voice assistant integration
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
No score yet
Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.3

Voice assistant integration is limited in coverage but works reliably where tested or described.

Volume output
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.7

Volume output was considered strong, with reviewers noting headroom and loud playback even around moderate settings.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
5.0

Volume output is praised as top-tier and very loud in the reviews that discuss it.

Water/sweat resistance rating
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Water and sweat resistance was evaluated favorably for workouts, rain, sweat, and daily use confidence.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
3.5

Water and sweat resistance is adequate for workouts or rain, but one reviewer cautions against heavier rain exposure.

Weight comfort
Product 1: JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.5

Weight comfort was positive in the reviews that discussed it, with light-feeling buds and minimal suction.

Product 2: Technics EAH-AZ100 Earbuds
4.7

Weight comfort is praised because the earbuds feel better distributed, light, and easier to forget during use.