Average score
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.1
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.8
Active noise cancellation
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.6
ANC is the most divided area: several reviewers call it strong or impressive for the price, while others say it is average, weak, or below competitors.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.7
ANC is available, but reviewers consistently treat it as limited by the open-fit design; one comparison piece expects improvement over Buds 3, while hands-on reviews still call it modest or not serious noise blocking.
Android compatibility
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.7
Android compatibility is strong because reviewers emphasize that a OnePlus phone is not necessary to access core features.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.1
Android support is strong for everyday use, especially on Galaxy phones, and non-Samsung Android users can still use the Wearables app, though some Galaxy-only features remain locked down.
App
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.3
The app is a major strength, with reviewers praising easy setup, strong feature access, stability, and broad control options.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.1
The app and settings experience is broad on Samsung and Android, with Wearables support for non-Samsung Android phones and Galaxy settings integration for Samsung users.
Audio-video sync accuracy
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.3
Audio-video sync is generally strong for video and casual gaming, with occasional gaming delay noted in demanding cases.
P2Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yetAuracast support
P1Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.5
Auracast is explicitly included among the shared features across the Buds 4 lineup.
Bass performance
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2
Bass is one of the strongest themes: many reviewers praise its punch, depth, and fun energy, while a few find it too much or underwhelming out of the box.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.2
Bass earns positive notes across reviews, ranging from punchy and crunchy to loud, wide, fuller and more refined.
Battery
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.9
Battery life is viewed as good enough by most reviewers, but not universally impressive and vulnerable to feature drain.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.5
Battery life is serviceable rather than standout, with reviewers citing 6 hours without ANC, 5 hours with ANC and 30 hours via the case.
Bluetooth
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.6
Bluetooth reliability is positive where tested, with strong range and stable everyday connectivity noted by reviewers.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.5
Bluetooth support is a strength because the Buds 4 include Bluetooth 6.1, which reviewers connect to range, stability and future-proofing.
Build quality
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.4
Build quality is generally positive, with reviewers noting durable finishes and solid construction after use.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.1
Build impressions are positive: reviewers describe a premium feel, refined stems and a cleaner physical design.
Built-in DAC and hi-res playback
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.0
Hi-res playback brings some benefits, such as lower distortion or slightly better quality, but reviewers describe the improvement as limited.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3
Hi-res playback is a Galaxy-centered strength, with UHQ and 24-bit Hi-Fi audio noted when paired with compatible devices.
Button control usability
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.4
Control usability is strong where volume swipes are discussed, although one review criticized the default omission of play/pause.
P2Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yetCable quality
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
2.8
The included cable drew a mild negative note because PCMag called it short despite recognizing the signature USB-C cable.
P2Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yetCarry case quality
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.7
Carry case quality is mixed: reviewers like the compact pocketable case, but one questioned the plastic case’s toughness.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.1
The case is viewed positively for its translucent lid, updated flat-bud layout and physical pairing button.
Charging
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.0
Charging is mixed: fast charging helps, but the repeated lack of wireless charging is one of the most common drawbacks.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.7
Charging evidence centers on the case reserve, with reviews citing up to 30 hours of total listening time through the charging case.
Codec support
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.3
Codec support is useful but imperfect: LHDC support earns interest, yet limited device support and unstable high bitrates reduce its practical value.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.0
Codec and high-quality audio support is represented by UHQ and 24-bit Hi-Fi playback on compatible Galaxy devices, not by aptX or LDAC.
Comfort during long use
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5
Comfort is widely praised, with many reviewers saying the earbuds are comfortable for long sessions, though one found fit only moderately comfortable.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.7
Comfort is a clear strength in the Tom's Guide review, including for small ears.
Design and Aesthetics
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5
Design is broadly praised for looking stylish, premium, sleek, and attractive, with only smudging treated separately as a drawback.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.0
Design feedback is broadly positive, describing the Buds 4 as polished, premium and more refined, even while acknowledging the AirPods-like stem style.
Eartips fit
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.0
Eartip fit is mostly positive for comfort and seal, though one review notes the looser fit can let a bud slip out.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.7
Fit evidence is mixed to weak: the open design can require adjustments and lacks a seal, though one review still found the earbuds comfortable.
Ear tip size options
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.0
Ear tip sizing receives one mild complaint that extra-large tips would have been useful.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
1.4
Ear tip options are effectively absent because the Buds 4 use an open-fit, no-silicone-tip design.
Equalizer customization
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.1
EQ customization is useful and often effective, though one review found it too light-touch to correct the bass-heavy sound.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.6
EQ customization is strong, with access to a 9-band equalizer in the app/settings experience.
Frequency response accuracy
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.4
Frequency balance is often considered improved or well tuned, but reviewers frame it as consumer-friendly rather than strictly neutral.
P2Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yetHead gestures
P1Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.2
Head gestures are a supported modern control feature, with reviewers noting nods or shakes for calls, Bixby prompts and notifications.
Hinge durability
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.6
Hinge durability is positive in the reviews that mention it, with both describing the case hinge as sturdy and not flimsy.
P2Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yetInstrument separation
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5
Instrument separation and imaging are frequently praised, with reviewers noting above-average placement, exceptional separation, and clear directional cues.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3
Instrument separation is supported by a detailed listening note about synth effects layered between bassline and percussion.
Integrated microphone
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.6
The integrated mic array is praised in the scored review for supporting clear speech recognition.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.0
The mic hardware is described as upgraded, with multiple microphones and voice pickup units.
Maximum volume clarity
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.1
Maximum-volume clarity is mixed: PCMag praised distortion-free bass at top volumes, while Scarbir warned treble can become overwhelming.
P2Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yetMicrophone noise reduction
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.4
Microphone noise reduction is often praised for suppressing background noise and wind, though Android Central was less convinced outdoors.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.2
Microphone noise reduction is a strength, with reviewers saying background roar, white noise and wind/background noise are reduced or blocked.
Microphone quality for calls
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2
Call microphone quality is usually good to excellent, with praise for loud, clear voices, though a few reviewers consider it merely adequate.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.9
Call quality is generally good and intelligible, though one review says the voice can sound muffled and another notes processing in noisy places.
Midrange clarity
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.6
Midrange impressions vary: some hear clear vocals and mids, while others find the mids veiled or recessed behind the stronger bass and treble.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.1
Midrange clarity is praised through adequate mids, clean vocals and strong mids/treble performance.
Multi-platform compatibility
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5
Multi-platform compatibility is positive in the scored review, which found audio quality consistent across several phones.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.8
Multi-platform compatibility is limited: basics work outside Galaxy, but advanced features and seamless switching are restricted by ecosystem.
Multipoint connectivity reliability
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5
Multipoint is a consistent strength, with reviewers calling it brilliant, flawless, convenient, and useful across phones, laptops, and other devices.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.4
Multipoint is context-dependent, working best in the Galaxy ecosystem and improving in Samsung contexts while remaining limited for non-ecosystem devices.
Noise isolation (passive)
P1Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
1.8
Passive isolation is weak because the open-fit, no-seal design lets external noise seep in.
Portability/foldability
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5
Portability is positive in the scored review, which highlights the compact, lightweight design of the buds and case.
P2Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yetPreset EQ profile quality
P1Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3
Preset EQ support is good, with six presets including speech and instrumental options.
Smudge resistance
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
2.4
Smudge resistance is weak because reviewers repeatedly describe the glossy earbuds as fingerprint-prone.
P2Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yetSoftware/setup simplicity
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.6
Setup and software simplicity are mixed: several reviewers call setup or the app easy, while others report slow pairing or calibration/connectivity friction.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.1
Setup is simplest on Galaxy devices through Bluetooth/settings integration and remains available through Wearables on non-Samsung Android.
Sound quality
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.3
Reviewers generally like the sound for the price, often calling it good, rich, or entertaining, though some note bass-heavy tuning and imperfect balance.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3
Sound quality is the product's strongest theme, with reviewers calling it richer, cleaner, clear, balanced and better than expected.
Soundstage depth
P1Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
No score yet
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.0
Soundstage depth is supported by listening impressions of deeper low-end and expansive playback.
Soundstage width
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2
Soundstage is viewed as respectable to impressive for the price, though one reviewer felt pricier Pro buds opened up audio more.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.1
Soundstage width is supported by the UHQ soundscape and wide bass impressions.
Spatial audio
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.6
Spatial audio divides reviewers: some call it immersive and unusually good at this price, while others find it underwhelming, fake, or unnatural.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.9
Spatial audio is present as 360 Audio/360° sound, though one reviewer does not personally use it.
Stability
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2
Fit stability is mostly good for exercise and daily use, though some reviewers see it as better for lighter activity or dependent on eartip fit.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
2.3
Fit stability is a concern because one review calls out constant fit adjustments from the open design.
Touch control responsiveness
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.1
Touch controls are mostly praised for responsiveness and customization, but some reviewers report missed taps, accidental presses, or awkward use while moving.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.3
Controls are well regarded, with swipe, press and pinch gestures described as straightforward, precise and easy to locate.
Transparency mode quality
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.7
Transparency mode ranges from natural and useful to confusingly ineffective, with reviewer experiences varying more than for most other features.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.0
Transparency is improved by the addition of a proper Ambient Sound mode.
Treble clarity
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
3.7
Treble receives split feedback, from clear and detailed to blown out, spicy, harsh, or insufficiently crisp depending on reviewer and volume.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.2
Treble clarity is praised alongside mids, with reviewers noting crunchy highs and strong mids/treble performance.
Value for money
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5
Value for money is one of the clearest strengths, with most reviewers praising the $100 feature set despite some tradeoffs.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
4.4
Value is positive for Galaxy or Android users because reviewers frame the $179 Buds 4 as compelling and able to challenge bigger rivals.
Voice assistant integration
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5
Voice assistant integration is positive in the one scored review, which says assistant commands worked well hands-free.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.9
Voice assistant support is clear, with Bixby and Gemini assistance plus head-gesture responses to Bixby prompts.
Volume output
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.6
Volume output is a strength for reviewers who like loud earbuds, with both scored reviews describing the Buds 3 as louder than average.
P2Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yetWater/sweat resistance rating
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.2
Water and sweat protection is treated positively for rain and sweat use, though reviewers do not frame it as suitable for submersion.
P2
Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
3.1
Water and sweat protection is adequate but not rugged, with IP54 covering sweat and splashes while dropping below Buds 3's IP57 rating.
Weight comfort
P1
Product 1: OnePlus Buds 3
4.5
Weight comfort is a strength: reviewers describe the buds as lightweight enough to barely register or be easy to forget in the ear.
P2Product 2: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4
No score yet